hen the DNA results came back, even Lukis Anderson thought he might have committed the murder.
I drink a lot, he remembers telling public defender Kelley Kulick as they sat in a plain interview room at the Santa Clara County, California, jail. Sometimes he blacked out, so it was possible he did something he didnt remember. Maybe I did do it.
Kulick shushed him. If she was going to keep her new client off death row, he couldnt go around saying things like that. But she agreed. It looked bad.
Before he was charged with murder, Anderson was a 26-year-old homeless alcoholic with a long rap sheet who spent his days hustling for change in downtown San Jose. The murder victim, Raveesh Kumra, was a 66-year-old investor who lived in Monte Sereno, a Silicon Valley enclave 10 miles and many socioeconomic rungs away.
Around midnight on November 29, 2012, a group of men had broken into Kumras 7,000-square-foot mansion. They found him watching CNN in the living room, tied him, blindfolded him and gagged him with mustache-print duct tape. They found his companion, Harinder, asleep in an upstairs bedroom, hit her on the mouth and tied her up next to Raveesh. Then they plundered the house for cash and jewelry.
After the men left, Harinder, still blindfolded, felt her way to a kitchen phone and called 911. Police arrived, then an ambulance. One of the paramedics declared Raveesh dead. The coroner would later conclude that he had been suffocated by the mustache tape.
Three-and-a-half weeks later, the police arrested Anderson. His DNA had been found on Raveeshs fingernails. They believed the men struggled as Anderson tied up his victim. They charged him with murder. Kulick was appointed to his case.
As they looked at the DNA results, Anderson tried to make sense of a crime he had no memory of committing.
Nah, nah, nah. I dont do things like that, he recalls telling her. But maybe I did.
Lukis, shut up, Kulick says she told him. Lets just hit the pause button till we work through the evidence to really see what happened.
What happened, although months would pass before anyone figured it out, was that Lukis Andersons DNA had found its way onto the fingernails of a dead man he had never even met.
[url]https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/framed-for-murder-by-his-own-dna/[/url]
Continued at link
Poster Comment:
Pretty interesting,and scary,article that should be read in full to understand it.
#1: Vicomte13 To: sneakypete (#0)
Vicomte13 posted on 2018-04-19 09:45:12 Reply Private Reply
#2: Pinguinite To: sneakypete (#0)
Pinguinite posted on 2018-04-19 11:03:27 Reply Private Reply
#3: Fred Mertz To: sneakypete (#0)
Fred Mertz posted on 2018-04-19 11:54:41 Reply Private Reply
#4: Hank Rearden To: sneakypete (#0)
So he missed out on six months of lying unconscious in the gutter and pestering people for free money.
Well, at least the drunken loser had a warm bed for six months, so look at the bright side!
Hank Rearden posted on 2018-04-19 12:58:32 Reply Private Reply
#5: Tooconservative To: sneakypete (#0)
DNA migrates. It's always been a major problem with its reliability. This case is a perfect example of it.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-04-19 14:47:15 Reply Private Reply
#6: sneakypete To: Hank Rearden (#4)
I do see the ironically funny point you are making,but the part that ain't funny at all is these are the very people who are so confused they can't help mount a defense. Like the guy said,"Maybe I did do it when I was blacked out?"
And yeah,I HAVE "been there and done that" when it comes to blackouts. I can see where it would be SOOO easy for a trained investigator to trick somebody in the condition I was in back then to not only confess to stuff I didn't do,but to come to believe I did do it.
Ain't nothing even the TINIEST big funny about someone serving time for a crime someone else committed. Especially not murder or rape.
sneakypete posted on 2018-04-19 19:15:23 Reply Private Reply
#7: Fred Mertz To: sneakypete (#0)
This statistic has been bothering me since I read this earlier today.
I don't believe it, the football field thing, but I pretty much believe the rest of the article.
Fred Mertz posted on 2018-04-19 23:02:19 Reply Private Reply
#8: sneakypete To: Fred Mertz (#7)
I suspect they just failed to define the statement. If they had said something like "One microscopic fleck per square yard" or something similar,it sounds a little more reasonable. As it is,it sounds like they are describing a snowfall.
The litle word "cover" can sometimes be a very big word if put out there all by itself.
sneakypete posted on 2018-04-20 08:45:30 Reply Private Reply