'Embarrassed' mom goes viral for accidentally sending son to school in lewd McDonald's parody shirt

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2018/04/08/embarrassed-mom-goes-viral-for-accidentally-sending-son-to-school-in-lewd-mcdonalds-parody-shirt.html
Published: Apr 9, 2018
Author: Alexandra Deabler
Post Date: 2018-04-09 12:15:01 by Justified
Views: 4497

A Texas mom is apologizing for not monitoring her son’s clothing close enough.

Shelly McCullar sent her son, Anthony, to school at Travis Elementary on Wednesday in what she thought was a McDonald’s-logo t-shirt. But the mom was in for a surprise when Anthony got home and she took a closer look at what he was wearing – an X-rated McDonald's parody featuring a pair of parted women's legs wearing heals with the tagline, “I’m lovin it” written underneath.

“I promise from now on to monitor what my kids are wearing!” McCullar wrote in a now-viral Facebook post. “I had no idea Anthony wore this to school.”

According to the Facebook post, which has been shared over 100,000 times, McCullar had received a box of hand-me-down clothes for Anthony from a friend, but she hadn’t yet gone through the bins to see what was in it. Anthony said in a posted video that he just grabbed the shirt thinking it was "like McDonald's" and went to school.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Tooconservative    To: Justified (#0)

That is a pretty racy stuff to wear at an elementary school.

And here is the tyke wearing the aforementioned T-shirt. Apparently Mom was so horrified that she took a picture of him wearing it. Maybe this is just their 15 minutes of fame or something.

Tooconservative posted on 2018-04-09 12:25:43   Reply   Private Reply

#2: Justified    To: Tooconservative (#1)

I suppose she never saw the shirt?

Omg that is so funny!

Justified posted on 2018-04-09 12:27:13   Reply   Private Reply

#3: Fred Mertz    To: Tooconservative (#1)

Fur burger special.

Fred Mertz posted on 2018-04-09 12:33:08   Reply   Private Reply

#4: Tooconservative    To: Justified (#2)

It is funny but I'm not so sure they aren't just seeking a little fame. Why is that picture released to the public. She either took the photo before he wore it to school and posted on Facebook where it could be found (in which case her claim to have never seen the shirt is false). Or she took the photo after discovering to her horror what the shirt was and then, to express her horror and shame, she offered it up to the press to publish worldwide. All ashamed and stuff.

I'm not so sure they aren't just looking for their 15 minutes of fame. Not that I care deeply or want to cause them trouble. But the explanations don't exactly jibe with the evidence and that should raise questions.

Your image isn't exactly the one on the T-shirt though it is similar. Notice the shadowing in the illustration's outline and the lack of trademark on the actual T-shirt the boy wore in the photo I included from DailyMail (via anonymized DuckDuckGo image cache which I use to prevent pictures posted at LF from being traced from their source websites who may or may not be litigious about other people posting their photos).

The shadowing makes it much more apparent visually that those are high heels and thighs than your shadowless version does. Making Mom's and Sonny's claims of not recognizing that it was racy even more suspect. C'mon, most 10yo boys would love to try to get away with wearing something like that to school for a laugh. What's the worst that would happen, a principal would order him to turn it inside out to finish the school day? Big deal.

Tooconservative posted on 2018-04-09 12:36:23   Reply   Private Reply

#5: Justified    To: Tooconservative (#4)

Yes I believe you are correct.

Why she put her son in the picture is odd to say the least and what mother does not look at their child's clothes? Did she buy it or did the son buy it or what.

Justified posted on 2018-04-09 12:45:08   Reply   Private Reply

#6: Fred Mertz    To: Justified (#5)

Did she buy it or did the son buy it or what. [?]

Read the article, retardo.

Fred Mertz posted on 2018-04-09 14:14:02   Reply   Private Reply

#7: Justified    To: Fred Mertz (#6)

Talking to yourself?

Truth is I really don't care. Thought it was just funny and that's why I posted it under humor! 8)

Justified posted on 2018-04-09 14:15:51   Reply   Private Reply

#8: Fred Mertz    To: Justified (#7)

According to the Facebook post, which has been shared over 100,000 times, McCullar had received a box of hand-me-down clothes for Anthony from a friend, but she hadn’t yet gone through the bins to see what was in it.

You're welcome, turtle.

Fred Mertz posted on 2018-04-09 14:24:36   Reply   Private Reply

#9: Justified    To: Fred Mertz (#8)

LOL

Thanks. I'm basically working 3 jobs and playing on the computer.

Justified posted on 2018-04-09 14:39:28   Reply   Private Reply

#10: Fred Mertz    To: Justified (#9)

You sound like one of my former employees.

You're fired! /Trump mode

Fred Mertz posted on 2018-04-09 14:43:11   Reply   Private Reply

#11: Liberator    To: Tooconservative (#4)

It is funny but I'm not so sure they aren't just seeking a little fame. Why is that picture released to the public...

I'm not so sure they aren't just looking for their 15 minutes of fame...

BINGO.

Liberator posted on 2018-04-09 15:44:25   Reply   Private Reply

#12: Stoner    To: Liberator (#11)

Maybe it was the mothers shirt ??

Stoner posted on 2018-04-09 20:58:16   Reply   Private Reply

#13: Liberator    To: Stoner (#12)

Maybe it was the mothers shirt ??

THAT is a possibility too.

How could she buy the shirts, LOOK them over, and then NOT wash them??

One look at an interview would be all I need to make that determination. (Maybe a former lap-dancer?)

Liberator posted on 2018-04-10 12:23:04   Reply   Private Reply