Oregon’s Liberal Dem Governor Kate Brown Accepted Large Soros Donation Three Days Before She Refused to Send National Guard to Protect US Border

It sounds like a good prosecutor could make a case that Kate accepted a bribe to influence commision of a subversive act. Who does she think she is, Hillary Clinton?

This is Soros’ “first direct involvement” in Oregon.

Soros is becoming the shadow president of this nation, piece by piece.

Gov. Kate Brown’s appeal crosses state line to attract national donors

Here is a link to the Eugene Register story:

registerguard.com/rg/news.../gov.-kate-browns-appeal- crosses-state-line-to-attract-national-donors.csp

Money = Free speech, right?

Money = Free speech, right?

Is there no end to your moral relativism?

So you're on record as to $upporting bribing US gummint official$ to $ell out the US Constitution, Liberty AND Justice?

You have an extremely warped sense of ethics. Were you raised by wolves?

So you're on record as to $upporting bribing US gummint official$ to $ell out the US Constitution, Liberty AND Justice?

You're inferring what I did not imply........

On the contrary, I am in favor of challenging the SCOTUS decisions that give credibility to the practice of bribery in the name of political speech.

We could start by supporting a challenge to the Citizens United ruling....

We could support putting and end to the "legislation-for-pay" advocated by the PACs funded by the likes of: Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, Foster Friess, Paul Singer, Robert Mercer, and George Soros.

You'd agree with me on this, right?

You're inferring what I did not imply........

UNLESS you consider adding 2+2 = 4 "implying".

I am in favor of challenging the SCOTUS decisions that give credibility to the practice of bribery in the name of political speech.

We could start by supporting a challenge to the Citizens United ruling....

We could support putting and end to the "legislation-for-pay" advocated by the PACs funded by the likes of: Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, Foster Friess, Paul Singer, Robert Mercer, and George Soros.

You'd agree with me on this, right?

Well?

On the contrary, I am in favor of challenging the SCOTUS decisions that give credibility to the practice of bribery in the name of political speech.

The problem is you fail to understand the definition of "Constitutional" and subscribeto an alternative universe definition of "Free Speech"; I'm not being facetious. Your side truly dismisses reality and truth nearly all the time. Probably because you dwell in an echo chamber of consensus where logic and common sense are discarded.

We could start by supporting a challenge to the Citizens United ruling....

Chyeah -- THAT'S a good place to start. IF you're that anxious to dig up the skeleton of Stalin. And want to start CW2.

We could support putting and end to the "legislation-for-pay" advocated by the PACs funded by the likes of: Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, Foster Friess, Paul Singer, Robert Mercer, and George Soros.

I'm glad you tossed in George Soros. Finally we agree on SOMETHING.

So you're on record as to $upporting bribing US gummint official$ to $ell out the US Constitution, Liberty AND Justice?

If you fail to understand that this is exactly what is being done to you by the billionaire-funded political action committees, you are indeed part of the problem.

If you think there is any difference in Soros sending $35,000 to Wolfe in Oregon, or the Koch brothers bankrolling ryan....you're simply choosing to be ignorant.

If you fail to understand that this is exactly what is being done to you by the billionaire-funded political action committees, you are indeed part of the problem.

*I* understand totally; But what YOU fail to note or concede is that 95% of these same billionaire-funded political action committees are a Leftist-Liberal-Dem alliance.

This Leftist billionaire PAC funds the MSM message, a "Resistance" meme festooned by Leftist opinion and narratives upon The Pods. THE Target: Censorship. AND embedded indoctrination of hatred and violence toward conservative-pro-National and masculine Christian-Men.

By continuing to support this status quo, you are not only THE problem, you may not even realize it.

If you think there is any difference in Soros sending $35,000 to Wolfe in Oregon, or the Koch brothers bankrolling ryan....you're simply choosing to be ignorant.

I don't believe there's a warrant for others' arrest in any countries as there is for SOROS...IS THERE?

Look -- Soros is in eyeball deep in attempting to manipulate international currencies and governments. He admits his goal is to subvert or take over entire governments.

That you would compare ANYONE to George Soros is simply...madness.

And btw -- Paul Ryan is...A GLOBALIST. Not an American nationalist, FYI.

If you think there is any difference in Soros sending $35,000 to Wolfe in Oregon, or the Koch brothers bankrolling ryan....you're simply choosing to be ignorant.

So, you are in favor of corruption and the bribing of the elected leaders of our nation, as long as you agree with the agenda....is this true?

attempting to manipulate international currencies and governments. He admits his goal is to subvert or take over entire governments.

And the goals of those on the right who promote endless war, continuing interference in the affairs of sovereign nations, manipulating worldwide energy resources, and profiteering at any cost, is different how?

95% of these same billionaire-funded political action committees are a Leftist-Liberal-Dem alliance.

I challenge you to produce evidence to support this claim.

What you fail to grasp is the fact that this corrupt system is wrong.

But what YOU fail to note or concede is that 95% of these same billionaire-funded political action committees are a Leftist-Liberal-Dem alliance.

Here, I'll help you out....

As of April 09, 2018, 1,867 groups organized as super PACs have reported total receipts of $296,026,301 and total independent expenditures of $61,473,012 in the 2018 cycle. See more on Outside Spending.

Of the top 42 Listed (based on at least $100,000 spent) 31 self identify as conservative.

So, because math is hard for you, lets just use round numbers... about 74% are right- wing

https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/superpacs.php

He clearly wants to harm our Nation. That's what he did to England and after causing all the problems there shorted the pound to make a killing.

Of the top 42 Listed (based on at least $100,000 spent) 31 self identify as conservative.

I guess that is what you define conservative? W claimed to be conservative and he is a liberal.

BTW I really doubt the stats. Regressives skirt the law at all cost.

I guess that is what you define conservative?

Not my definition, but point taken.

I was simply refuting another poster's claim that 95% of PACs were "liberal"

BTW I really doubt the stats.

It is my understanding that the site "opensecrets" is reasonably fair.