Army vet with AR-15 stands guard outside high school

Source: WND
Published: Feb 26, 2018
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2018-02-27 07:26:16 by Gatlin
Views: 17833

Enough is enough, says an armed U.S. Army veteran in Indiana who has decided to take student and teacher protection into his own hands after the horrifying Florida school shooting and threats of school violence rocked his own town.

Mark Cowan says he is keeping watch outside North Side High School in Fort Wayne with his AR-15 and a handgun – at least until added security is in place. Cown told WANE-TV 15 that he’s standing guard to protect students and defend them against anyone who might threaten their safety while they’re in school. He has been in contact with local police and the school resource officer.

“I [decided] to get my butt off the couch and come out here and keep an eye on these kids and teachers. They deserve it,” Cowan told the news station. “They all deserve a right to go home every night without fear of what’s going to happen during the day.”

In addition to being an Army veteran, Cowan is a member of Oath Keepers, an organization of former police officers, first responders and veterans.

“These kids mean a lot to me,” Cowan told WANE-TV 15. “These teachers mean a lot to me … this is my community, and they need protecting. And our law enforcement, as good as it is, can’t be everywhere. So it’s people like myself and the other Oath Keepers that say, ‘I’m gonna take up that slack.'”

However, the school district doesn’t appear to be thrilled by Cowan’s efforts to provide more security.

“We take the security of our schools very seriously,” Fort Wayne Community Schools spokeswoman Krista Stockman told WANE-TV 15. “We understand he has a right to be out there, but we do not believe it adds to the safety of our students. At North Side, as at all of our schools, we have security procedures in place. In addition. at North Side, we have armed police officers in the building every day.”

As WND has reported, the idea of having armed military veterans and law-enforcement officers act as guards to improve school safety is not new. Action star Chuck Norris, an Air Force veteran, has promoted the idea for several years in his exclusive weekly column.

“Which one of our fine law enforcement or military personnel (in any branch) wouldn’t consider it their greatest duty and honor to take a paid or volunteer shift as a guard infront of our schools protecting those precious souls?” Norris asked in his Feb. 19 column.

And in 2013, Norris pointed to Israel, arguing that it’s a “beacon of light for how to protect our children in public places.”

“Israel mandated armed guards at the entrances to all schools in 1995, and those guards are backed up by special police forces,” he wrote. “Despite that school defenses are primarily intended to thwart terrorists, they also deter any would-be psychos who would cause harm to their children.”

Norris continued: “Back at the home of the brave, the U.S. faces multiple mass shootings on academic campuses and the majority still refuses to post any type of armed guard or even unarmed security at schools to protect our children. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, 70 percent of public schools do not have a police officer, and more than half (57 percent) have no security staff. There is an old-fashioned term for that lack of security response in these times: stupid.”

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Deckard    To: Gatlin (#0)

In addition to being an Army veteran, Cowan is a member of Oath Keepers, an organization of former police officers, first responders and veterans.

Good job Oathkeepers. Parsons loathes you because you defend the Constitution.

Oath Keepers National Call to Action: Help Us Protect the Future by Standing Guard Outside Schools Nationwide

Deckard posted on 2018-02-27 07:53:02   Reply   Private Reply

#2: paraclete    To: Gatlin (#0)

Ok we can applaud this fellows action now if a hundred thousand veterans would step up and fill the gap there would be some point to all those assault weapons in the community, the meaning of militia might have emerged

paraclete posted on 2018-02-27 07:56:06   Reply   Private Reply

#3: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#1)

Good job Oathkeepers
Is it?

I find there is no psychological check run on Oath Keepers members to determine their mental condition and no criminal background check either. If they are ex- military, there is no determination made to see if they suffer from severe PTSD.

Shockingly, someone doesn’t’ even need to have any current of prior service in the military, police or first responder to join. Any John Doe can receive “huge discount on Oath Keepers memberships.”

Instead of paying $40.00, for just $29.95 per year....you get:

  • Official Associate Member status
  • Membership certificate suitable for framing
  • Laminated membership card with sequential member number
  • Access to our members-only national forum
  • 2 Oath Keepers bumper stickers and 1 back window sticker
  • Color Oath Keepers brochures and Oath Keepers “push” cards (size of business cards) as an outreach “start up kit.”
  • Oath Keepers DVD
  • Pocket Constitution.

And the right to stand across the street from a school with an Oath Keepers patch on your cap while armed with an AR-15 and a pistol.

Reading their membership application, the best I can determine that even the school shooter Nikolas Cruz could have joined and stood across the street from the school with an “Oath Keepers” patch and his AR-15.

A quick search of 82 shootings on the internet shows that at least 28 of the shooters had been in the U.S. military.

Military veterans are more than twice as likely to be mass shooters.

Mass Shooters are Disproportionately US Veterans.

So what we have here now is an individual sporting his “Oath Keepers” patch who has not been vetted in any manner dressed in civilian clothes and wearing sun glasses with a pull-down cap standing across the street from a school with an AR-15 and pistol.

Is this what you REALLY want….is this what we REALLY need?

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 08:52:28   Reply   Private Reply

#4: Hondo68    To: Gatlin, *Politics and Politicians* (#0)

Somebody needs to protect America's schools from corrupt government officials, their DACA Dream Students, other illegal aliens, and Gatlin's peer group psychos.

The Oathkeepers are doing the job that Sheriff Scott Israel and Gatlin won't, protecting America's kids against enemies foreign and domestic.

Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-27 08:57:05   Reply   Private Reply

#5: Deckard    To: Gatlin (#3)

Reading their membership application, the best I can determine that even the school shooter Nikolas Cruz could have joined and stood across the street.

What a colossal load of steaming bullshit! It's unbelievable what your fevered delusional mind comes up with.

Deckard posted on 2018-02-27 08:57:54   Reply   Private Reply

#6: Hondo68    To: Gatlin (#3)

  • Pocket Constitution.

    Military veterans are more than twice as likely to be mass shooters.

I hope that the Oathkeepers take you out before any children are harmed.

Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-27 09:04:34   Reply   Private Reply

#7: Tooconservative    To: Gatlin (#0)

As WND has reported, the idea of having armed military veterans and law-enforcement officers act as guards to improve school safety is not new. Action star Chuck Norris, an Air Force veteran, has promoted the idea for several years in his exclusive weekly column.

More Chuck Norris!

“We take the security of our schools very seriously,” Fort Wayne Community Schools spokeswoman Krista Stockman told WANE-TV 15. “We understand he has a right to be out there, but we do not believe it adds to the safety of our students. At North Side, as at all of our schools, we have security procedures in place. In addition. at North Side, we have armed police officers in the building every day.”

Wouldn't any mass shooter just shoot this guy first?

He would also be breaking the law if he actually did enter the school due to the federal gun-free zoning of schools.

The law applies to public, private, and parochial elementary schools and high schools, and to non-private property within 1000 feet of them. It provides that the states and their political subdivisions may issue licenses that exempt the licensed individuals from the prohibition.

I assume this guy is on private property where he is standing watch.

Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-27 09:13:33   Reply   Private Reply

#8: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#5)

Reading their membership application, the best I can determine that even the school shooter Nikolas Cruz could have joined and stood across the street. What a colossal load of steaming bullshit! It's unbelievable what your fevered delusional mind comes up with.
Is it?

I would be extremely grateful to be proven wrong. See if you can do that by going right now and use a pseudo-name with all other false information to join. You will find that you can join the Oath Keepers as a “John Doe.” I have shown you their membership application….NOW, you PROVE me wrong.

I have shown you how Nikolas Cruz could have joined Oath Keepers and become an Associate Member. Stop with the insults and show me where I am wrong.

PLEASE….show me how Oath Keepers members are vetted with background checks in any form or fashion….PLEASE.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 09:16:03   Reply   Private Reply

#9: Deckard    To: Gatlin (#8)

I have shown you how Nikolas Cruz could have joined Oath Keepers and become an Associate Member.

You've shown NOTHING you arrogant ass.

Deckard posted on 2018-02-27 09:19:05   Reply   Private Reply

#10: Gatlin    To: Tooconservative, Deckard (#7)

Wouldn't any mass shooter just shoot this guy first?
Or more so, wouldn’t some police officer from some outside district this Oath Keeper had not introduced himself to arriving first shoot him assuming he was the mass shooter?

Or, would that police officer say: “May I see your Oath Keepers Identification Card, please?”

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 09:19:52   Reply   Private Reply

#11: Deckard    To: Gatlin, Liberator (#8)

PLEASE….show me how Oath Keepers members are vetted with background checks in any form or fashion…

You have no fricking clue what their vetting process is Parsons.

Your only agenda here is to defame Oathkeepers - just like it has always been, even at Liberty Post.

Your badged "brave heroes" sure fucked up last time around - now here's a group of Patriots who have come up with a possible solution.

You won't see any of these guys cowering behind a car during the next school shooting.

Deckard posted on 2018-02-27 09:24:46   Reply   Private Reply

#12: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#11)

You have no fricking clue what their vetting process is Parsons.
And you have no fricking way of showing that they even have a vetting process.

Some crazy nut doesn’t even need to pay to join Oath Keepers, he can go on eBay and buy a Oath Keepers’ patch and declare himself to be a member.

You really do support some insane and unrealistic positions.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 09:33:50   Reply   Private Reply

#13: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#11)

You won't see any of these guys cowering behind a car during the next school shooting.
So YOU say, and of course you would. Oath Keepers are like Gods to you.

Of course you will chose to ignore the fact that one of your Gods, Matthew Fairfield, while as president of a Oath Keepers chapter was jailed on 54 criminal counts related to his alleged storing of a live napalm bomb at his home, along with other explosives kept at a friend's home. And that he had already had been sentenced to two years' probation for carrying concealed weapons.

Then in Tennessee, thre was an armed man driving a pickup truck emblazoned with an Oath Keepers logo arrested in a bizarre scheme to place two dozen officials in a town under arrest.

Oh, there was another Oath Keeper, Charles Dyer, was arrested in Oklahoma for the alleged rape and forcible sodomy of a 7-year-old child; he was also charged with possessing a grenade launcher that had been stolen from a California military base in 2006.

There are MANY other cases, I could go on and on…but you should get the message and understand it.

Yet YOU don’t seem to and you show that you completely satisfied without any reservations whatsoever that these types of individuals are eminently qualified to stand across the street from schools armed with an AR-15 and a pistol….proudly displaying their Oath Keepers patch.

Give me a fuckin’ break….you stupid asshole.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 10:18:18   Reply   Private Reply

#14: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#9)

I have shown you how Nikolas Cruz could have joined Oath Keepers and become an Associate Member.

You've shown NOTHING you arrogant ass.

Oh, but I did and you never showed where I was wrong.

That is still hope for you some day and …

Then the eyes of the blind will be opened And the ears of the deaf will be unstopped. Isaiah 35:5

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 10:24:37   Reply   Private Reply

#15: Deckard    To: Gatlin (#13)

Yet YOU don’t seem to and you show that you completely satisfied without any reservations whatsoever that these types of individuals are eminently qualified to stand across the street from schools armed with an AR-15 and a pistol…

Fricking liar - properly vettted Oathkeepers standing guard at schools is a workable approach.

Yet you still think the cops will "save the children" even after you've seen that they will cower in fear when innocent lives are on the line.

The only "oath" a cop swears to is that he makes it home alive at the end of his shift.

Deckard posted on 2018-02-27 10:27:32   Reply   Private Reply

#16: Hondo68    To: Gatlin (#13)

If you expect the OathKeepers to give Nikolas Cruz a HappyMeal, you can forget it!

Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-27 10:28:19   Reply   Private Reply

#17: Deckard    To: Gatlin (#14)

Hypocritically quoting scripture again Parsons? What a pretentious, arrogant and pompous, utterly clueless ass clown!

Deckard posted on 2018-02-27 10:31:57   Reply   Private Reply

#18: Deckard    To: hondo68 (#16)

If you expect the OathKeepers to give Nikolas Cruz a HappyMeal, you can forget it!

Gatlin/Parsons would rather watch cops wet their panties in fear rather than have dedicated veterans stand watch at schools.

Deckard posted on 2018-02-27 10:33:30   Reply   Private Reply

#19: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#15)

Fricking liar - properly vettted Oathkeepers standing guard at schools is a workable approach.
You can take your “properly vetted” and jam it up your biased ass.

They are not “properly vetted.” They never have been and probably never will be.

All Rhodes wants in the monthly memberships dues coming in each month.

Wow….look at what we have here:

And now you want to let domestic terrorists stand across the street from schools armed withAR-15s and pistols....wearing their Oath Keepers’ patches?

Come, on....please say it ain’t so.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 10:43:36   Reply   Private Reply

#20: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#17)

Hypocritically quoting scripture again Parsons? What a pretentious, arrogant and pompous, utterly clueless ass clown!

Truth is where you find it"....those are your words.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 10:47:27   Reply   Private Reply

#21: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#18)

If you expect the OathKeepers to give Nikolas Cruz a HappyMeal, you can forget it!
I said noting about giving Nikolas Cruz a Happy Meal. I said that the day before the school shooting, the Oath Keeprs would have made Nikolas Cruz an Associate member simply for the payment of $29.99. Check their membership site and prove that to be untrue.
Gatlin/Parsons would rather watch cops wet their panties in fear rather than have dedicated veterans stand watch at schools.
I would dearly love to have a group responsible veterans stand watch at our schools. But I don’t want a bunch of show boating clowns that has members who were charged with rape and forcible sodomy on a 7-year-old child or someone arrested as a domestic terrorist to be in that group.

I hope I have made myself perfectly clear and trust that I adequately describe the Oath Keepers membership to you.

How many more slaps against the side of your head will it take for you to wake up to reality?

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 11:04:19   Reply   Private Reply

#22: Deckard    To: Gatlin (#19)

They are not “properly vetted.” They never have been and probably never will be.

So your absurd claim is that Oathkeepers will allow just anyone to stand guard in front of schools? Maybe some of the members in the past have been unsavory characters, but as you say about cops - "it's just a few bad apples". That certainly applies here.

Your agenda here is to denigrate a group of veterans and COPS who refuse to follow UNCONSTITUTIONAL orders and have a plan to offer protection to schools.

Would you be on-board with this if the group worked together with the local police departments who could run background checks on any of the volunteers and weed out those who do not pass muster?

Deckard posted on 2018-02-27 11:07:17   Reply   Private Reply

#23: Jameson    To: Gatlin (#0)

stands guard outside high school

So....I doubt this could be done by volunteers.....

Funding is the problem.

about 98,000 public schools in the US....

Average school year is about 1,000 hours over 180 days

That's 98,000,000 man-hours.

What do "armed guards" make? $15 an hour?

That's $1.5 Billion

That's for (1) armed guard per school, - that doesn't cover any after-school activities, and it doesn't cover liability insurance, benefits, employer taxes...

Jameson posted on 2018-02-27 11:17:33   Reply   Private Reply

#24: Liberator    To: Deckard, Stoner (#11)

Your only agenda here is to defame Oathkeepers - just like it has always been, even at Liberty Post.

Of course. We know what Gilligan is and has always been.

He's here to promote and advance his Goosestepping Fascist ideal. There's more to him and his occultist agenda, but that'll do.

Dismiss, Bozo and starve the Troll once and for all.

Liberator posted on 2018-02-27 11:43:14   Reply   Private Reply

#25: Gatlin    To: Jameson (#23)

Armed guards will never be the answer. If there were enough manpower and money to place armed guards at every school, a mass shooter would then head to (or back to) churches. If armed guards were placed at churches, a mass shooter would look to other places. There will never be enough armed guards and there will always be too many places to protect to look for armed guards being the solution.

The only solution will be to go to the root source of the problem, identifying potential a mass shooter before s/he is too far gone and takes action. Some of that is being done already, but as in the case oc Cruz....the warnings were ignored. How that can be improved on....I will leave to the experts.

Obviously some people are already thinking along these lines as evidenced by other sources and this:
Trying To Better Detect Potential Mass Shooters After Las Vegas

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 12:05:58   Reply   Private Reply

#26: Jameson    To: Gatlin (#25)

If there were enough manpower and money to place armed guards at every school, a mass shooter would then head to (or back to) churches.

No disagreement.

Jameson posted on 2018-02-27 12:12:47   Reply   Private Reply

#27: Hondo68    To: Liberator, Deckard, Stoner (#24)

He's here to promote and advance his Goosestepping Fascist ideal. There's more to him and his occultist agenda, but that'll do.

Gatlin, Illinois Nazi

Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-27 12:25:20   Reply   Private Reply

#28: Gatlin    To: Deckard, GrandIsland, A K A Stone, misterwhite, Tooconservative, hondo58, buckeroo, Liberator, and Everyone (#22)

Maybe some of the members in the past have been unsavory characters, but as you say about cops – "it's just a few bad apples". That certainly applies here.

Listen, Grasshopper....a rooster crows only when he sees the light. Put him in the dark and he will never crow. You have seen the light and you’re crowing.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 12:42:54   Reply   Private Reply

#29: misterwhite    To: Gatlin (#28)

misterwhite posted on 2018-02-27 12:50:40   Reply   Private Reply

#30: Deckard    To: Gatlin, Liberator (#25)

as in the case oc Cruz....the warnings were ignored.

The warnings were deliberately ignored by the Sheriff department AND the Feebs in order to create the opportunity for this massacre to happen.

The Sheriff's ultimate agenda includes gun bans followed by eventual confiscation - that should be obvious to even you Parsons.

Deckard posted on 2018-02-27 12:55:51   Reply   Private Reply

#31: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#22)

Would you be on-board with this if the group worked together with the local police departments who could run background checks on any of the volunteers and weed out those who do not pass muster?
I would give serious consideration to that if I felt armed guards at schools would work. Many, to most all, schools already have an armed guard. Human nature is unpredictable and there is no assurance an Oath Keeper will not react the same as the same as Scot Peterson did at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting.

People react in variously different ways for many reasons. I could never automatically blanket label it fear, although that may sometimes be the final determined reason. Until I had a thorough understanding to the situation... I would just say they “freeze” for some unknown reason. Remember the story about the Army Master Sergeant, a veteran of WWII in Euorpe, I posted where he froze when it was time to throw the WP grenade and the instructor had to grab it out of his hand and throw it down range.

If you are wanting me to endorse the Oath Keepers under a special qualification you have established....I simply cannot do that. Take the money factor out of it, remove Rhodes from the picture, establish extreme vetting procedures and I would still have problems....because the Oath Keepers would remain an independently formed civilian armed militia responsible to a single person in command with no oversight by any independent civil authority.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 13:18:28   Reply   Private Reply

#32: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#30)

as in the case oc Cruz....the warnings were ignored.

The warnings were deliberately ignored by the Sheriff department AND the Feebs in order to create the opportunity for this massacre to happen.

According to media reports, they were ignored by BCSD. It as an agreement first started in an adjacent county between the police and school and then adopted by the Broward Country Sheriff Department and School Board. If ou are interested, look it up. I ill not take time to cover the agreement here.
The Sheriff's ultimate agenda includes gun bans followed by eventual confiscation - that should be obvious to even you Parsons.
It is unfortunate that you live with that conspiracy theory every moment of your life. Gun confiscation will never happen in America. Oh, there no doubt will be political compromises and further restrictions place on some guns, but ending in total confiscations? Nah....never gonna happen. Rest easy on that point ...

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 13:38:05   Reply   Private Reply

#33: Gatlin    To: misterwhite (#29)

That made me laugh, aand I desperately needed the humor after dealing so much with troubled Deckard.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 13:40:28   Reply   Private Reply

#34: sneakypete    To: Gatlin (#0)

Poor guy. He means well,but sooner or later the professional LEO's are going to get tired of him eating their cookies,and he is going to get a beatdown and conviction to keep him from ever legally owning another firearm,or he is just going to be killed.

sneakypete posted on 2018-02-27 14:05:52   Reply   Private Reply

#35: sneakypete    To: Deckard (#5)

What a colossal load of steaming bullshit! It's unbelievable what your fevered delusional mind comes up with.

Ok,if he is wrong,post evidence proving he is wrong. He sure seemed right based on what he posted.

sneakypete posted on 2018-02-27 14:08:38   Reply   Private Reply

#36: sneakypete    To: Deckard (#11)

PLEASE….show me how Oath Keepers members are vetted with background checks in any form or fashion…

You have no fricking clue what their vetting process is Parsons.

I admit freely that I have no clue about the vetting.

If you do,why not tell us all?

sneakypete posted on 2018-02-27 14:11:27   Reply   Private Reply

#37: sneakypete    To: Deckard (#15)

Yet YOU don’t seem to and you show that you completely satisfied without any reservations whatsoever that these types of individuals are eminently qualified to stand across the street from schools armed with an AR-15 and a pistol…

Fricking liar -

Looks to me like it's up to YOU to prove he is lying.

sneakypete posted on 2018-02-27 14:13:15   Reply   Private Reply

#38: Hank Rearden    To: Gatlin (#0)

"And our law enforcement, as good as it is, can’t be everywhere."

Even when it is there, it quite often just cowers and hides.

Hank Rearden posted on 2018-02-27 16:28:41   Reply   Private Reply

#39: Gatlin    To: sneakypete (#34)

... or he is just going to be killed.

I figure the poor fellow will be killed. It was stated that he introduced himself to the local cops patrolling the area and the school resource officer.

But some off-duty cop that doesn’t know who he is or what he doing is not going to just drive by and think: Oh look there’s a guy standing across the street with an AR- 15 and just wave to him while yelling have a nice day. The off-duty cop will draw down on the guy and order him to drop his weapons. If the guy makes any indication of a wrong move, then....BAM, BAM.

Yes, his intentions are good....but his actions are stupidly death threatening to him.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 17:05:37   Reply   Private Reply

#40: tpaine    To: Gatlin, , Tooconservative, Y'ALL (#10)

: Tooconservative, ---- Wouldn't any mass shooter just shoot this guy first?

Military veterans are more than twice as likely to be mass shooters. --- gatlin

TC -- Good point. --- The solution might be to have one child's parent in every class (a volunteer parent with a cc permit). Such parents could volunteer to attend one of their children's classes every month (given a class size of 30 kids), The schools Parent Teacher Association could work out the details and scheduling.. Comments?

As to our supposed major knocking Vets... Whatta Creep..

tpaine posted on 2018-02-27 17:15:29   Reply   Private Reply

#41: Gatlin    To: Hank Rearden (#38)

"And our law enforcement, as good as it is, can’t be everywhere."

Even when it is there, it quite often just cowers and hides.

That is rather an extreme gross generalization that really doesn’t say anything and definitely proves nothing.

Would it be possible for you to specifically characterize “quite often” in both frequency of occurrence and number of LEOs involved....then cite specific incidents, other than the most recent school shooting?

I will understand if you cannot.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 17:17:51   Reply   Private Reply

#42: Tooconservative    To: Gatlin (#39)

But some off-duty cop that doesn’t know who he is or what he doing is not going to just drive by and think: Oh look there’s a guy standing across the street with an AR- 15 and just wave to him while yelling have a nice day. The off-duty cop will draw down on the guy and order him to drop his weapons. If the guy makes any indication of a wrong move, then....BAM, BAM.

I'm not sure how they can stop him or do anything else. Obviously, he is on private property and the school and the local cops have no power to prevent a legal gun owner from creeping out the kids and teachers by hanging out across the street with an AR-15 and pistol.

Of course, you never know, maybe there are kids or teachers in that school who do feel more secure, seeing a heavily armed guy standing watch quietly across the street.

Even so, I can see how this is problematic, a heavily-armed neighborhood watch kind of thing. I don't think the idea will be popular. People don't want self-appointed armed guards at their schools.

Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-27 17:26:57   Reply   Private Reply

#43: Hondo68    To: Gatlin, Hank Rearden (#41)

cite specific incidents, other than the most recent school shooting?

Charlottesville Va. when hundreds of LEO's in full protective gear, cowered in fear of Antifa & BLM.

Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-27 17:33:50   Reply   Private Reply

#44: Tooconservative    To: tpaine (#40)

TC -- Good point. --- The solution might be to have one child's parent in every class (a volunteer parent with a cc permit). Such parents could volunteer to attend one of their children's classes every month (given a class size of 30 kids), The schools Parent Teacher Association could work out the details and scheduling.. Comments?

Have you even met any of today's parents? LOL

The glory days of the swaggering Harper Valley PTA are long gone.

You may recall they actually made a movie based on this song back in the Seventies, starring Barbara Eden.

Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-27 17:34:59   Reply   Private Reply

#45: Gatlin    To: Tooconservative (#42)

I'm not sure how they can stop him or do anything else.
I did not say and neither did I mean to imply they would stop him. I am assuming that he is on private property with permission on fhe owner. If not, then I am assuming he is more than 100 feet from the school on public property.

I am merely pointing out the possibility of some cop driving by and not know what he is doing there and challenges him and he could possible be shot.

Of course, you never know, maybe there are kids or teachers in that school who do feel more secure, seeing a heavily armed guy standing watch quietly across the street.

I believe I read the school does not want him there.

Even so, I can see how this is problematic, a heavily-armed neighborhood watch kind of thing.

Again, I say it could be problematic for him and for the reason I stated.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 18:10:18   Reply   Private Reply

#46: Tooconservative    To: Gatlin (#45)

If not, then I am assuming he is more than 100 feet from the school on public property.

Within 1000 feet on any public property. That's the law.

I always thought it was excessive. And it criminalizes anyone driving down the street with a gun in their vehicle.

Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-27 18:15:23   Reply   Private Reply

#47: Gatlin    To: Tooconservative (#46)

Within 1000 feet on any public property. That's the law.
Sorry, typo....I knew that. I read it in your earlier post.

Good point on cars driving by.

Gatlin posted on 2018-02-27 18:28:30   Reply   Private Reply

#48: tpaine    To: Tooconservative, Y'ALL (#44)

Have you even met any of today's parents? LOL

The glory days of the swaggering Harper Valley PTA are long gone.

I doubt those days ever existed, except in the sit com mind.

--- The solution might be to have one child's parent in every class (a volunteer parent with a cc permit). Such parents could volunteer to attend one of their children's classes every month (given a class size of 30).

Individual School Boards would have to work out the details and scheduling, of course,_and vet the parent volunteers..

A plan of this type could very well work in rural areas, where both parents and school authorities are likely to be normal, conservative people..

Comments anyone?

tpaine posted on 2018-02-27 18:34:50   Reply   Private Reply

#49: Tooconservative    To: Gatlin (#47)

Actually, it will usually be breaking the law if you drive with a firearm within 2-3 blocks of a school. Average length of a block is supposedly ~350 feet. But that includes a lot of very big cities with small block sizes. Most of the country has bigger blocks. A lot of bigger towns not on the east coast have blocks more like 1/10 of a mile, sometimes more.

Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-27 18:36:36   Reply   Private Reply

#50: tpaine    To: Tooconservative (#46)

Within 1000 feet on any public property. That's the law.

I always thought it was excessive. And it criminalizes anyone driving down the street with a gun in their vehicle.

Tooconservative

More than excessive, it's unconstitutional, --- and if my memory serves, that 1000 ft 'rule' has been successfully challenged several times in lower courts..

Eventually, the SCOTUS will have to shoot down this type of infringement, or else. ---

--- The republic will cease to exist..

tpaine posted on 2018-02-27 18:56:49   Reply   Private Reply