Poster Comment:
Ramping up for Congressional second amendment infringement bills.
"Time for a change" - F' off for a change!
| Source: | Fox News Sunday/INFODAILY TV |
| Published: | Feb 18, 2018 |
| Author: | Chris Wallace |
| Post Date: | 2018-02-18 23:34:33 by Hondo68 |
| Views: | 19786 |
Poster Comment:
Ramping up for Congressional second amendment infringement bills.
"Time for a change" - F' off for a change!
#1: Tooconservative To: hondo68 (#0)
And the republic has failed entirely, the representatives elected by the people across the nation are corrupt or indifferent, and so all we need is to institute some sort of mob rule where laws get passed depending on how many angry demonstrators show up in the Beltway to demand some change.
I loathe the idea of giving in to these whiny Millennials and their attempt at mob rule. Let them run for office, let them vote. But don't give in to the mob howling at Congress's door.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 09:21:05 Reply Private Reply
#2: A K A Stone To: hondo68 (#0)
If we had listened to hondfag we would have voted for Gary Johnson. Who is for gun control!.
No thanks hondfag Trump is right to stand firm.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 09:25:35 Reply Private Reply
#3: Deckard To: Tooconservative, hondo68 (#1)
"Fourteen Or Fight!"
Deckard posted on 2018-02-19 09:28:56 Reply Private Reply
#4: Deckard To: A K A Stone, hondo68 (#2)
No - his VP running mate William Weld was the gun-grabber.
Johnson is pro-gun.
Get your facts straight.
Deckard posted on 2018-02-19 09:33:04 Reply Private Reply
#5: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#4)
Never trust a faggot lover. They all lie to themselves.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 09:41:07 Reply Private Reply
#6: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#2)
This thread isn't about you or hondo or Gary Johnson.
You didn't even address a single post to the article. You just saw the word 'hondo' and charged at him blindly.
I know it's a sruprise to hear but some people actually do come here to read an article and then comment on that article. Shocking, huh?
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 09:56:24 Reply Private Reply
#7: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#6)
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 10:13:35 Reply Private Reply
#8: Deckard To: A K A Stone (#5)
Page Not Found
Here's some facts for you: Gary Johnson on Gun Control
Banning assault weapons just criminalizes the owners Q: You said there might be a role in restricting guns from terrorists or the mentally ill; but there have been specific proposals debated in the Senate, which it sounds like you reject-
JOHNSON: Well, nothing has come through Congress.
Q: So, do you have a view on what might work?
JOHNSON: No, I don't.
Q: What about assault-style weapons? Is there a constitutional right to that?
JOHNSON: Well, assault-style weapons, meaning semi-automatic-style rifles, you are talking about 30 million weapons, and if you do that, I daresay half the owners of those weapons are not going to turn them in, and now you're going to criminalize the ownership of those weapons.
Q: So, it sounds to me like you're saying, in theory, 'Sure,' but in fact there's no proposal that would meet your test. If there was something that would work.
JOHNSON: I don't want to for a second say that there might not be that proposal tomorrow.
Deckard posted on 2018-02-19 10:40:00 Reply Private Reply
#9: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#8)
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 10:43:42 Reply Private Reply
#10: Deckard To: A K A Stone (#9)
No different than any other politician, including Trump.
Deckard posted on 2018-02-19 10:46:04 Reply Private Reply
#11: Hondo68 To: Deckard, A K A Stone, TooConservative (#8)
Take out the space preceding trashes, and it comes us as the story of Gary Johnson throwing the cap & ball pistol that Austin Peterson gave him after his nomination at the Libertarian convention, into a trash can.
That just means that Gary didn't want that particular gun, NOT that he's anti-2a. It shows that Stone loves to jump to false conclusions and drama queen it up with his favorite topic GAY Johnsons.
Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-19 11:17:58 Reply Private Reply
#12: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone, hondo68 (#7)
The "article" is the posted content that began the thread, whether a text article, photos, video or podcast content. When you do a Post Article at LF, the TEXTAREA box labelled "Article" is the article of a thread. I really shouldn't have to explain this to you. If you have a problem with your forum software, you can ask Neil to explain what an "article" is to you. It's very obvious from the mysql database that drives your website.
As for your constant accusations that hondo voted for Gary Johnson, can you even prove that?
Following the 2016 election, the party announced that it had achieved automatic ballot status in 37 or 38 states plus the District of Columbia.
The only conclusion is that hondo only had a ~60% chance of living in a state where he could vote for LP's Johnson.
Maybe hondo can tell us if Johnson was even available on his ballot or if he even voted in the 2016 election. As opposed to the usual sodomy innuendo you spew at him on thread after thread which has gotten quite dull and shop-worn.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 11:27:23 Reply Private Reply
#13: Deckard To: hondo68, A K A Stone, GrandIsland (#11)
Stone's obsession with gays may indicate that, like GrandIsland, he's a self-loathing queer who hasn't yet come out of the closet.
I wonder if Stonie shares GI's obsession with jacking off while watching MMA fights?
Deckard posted on 2018-02-19 11:29:14 Reply Private Reply
#14: Tooconservative To: Deckard (#13)
I'm really trying not to picture that.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 11:36:18 Reply Private Reply
#15: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#12)
I don't think I ever said he voted for him. He did tell everyone to vote for him though. Over a period of years.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 11:51:42 Reply Private Reply
#16: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#12)
That was is a response to his posting for years that everyone who supported Romney was a faggot supporter. I'm just judging him by his own standards that he put in place.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 11:54:54 Reply Private Reply
#17: no gnu taxes To: A K A Stone (#15)
no gnu taxes posted on 2018-02-19 11:56:57 Reply Private Reply
#18: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#12)
I know what an article is silly. But you said read. You don't read video articles you watch them. In the video I saw them blaming Trump. So I made the relevant comment considering Hondo's post.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 11:57:02 Reply Private Reply
#19: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#13)
Bye have a good day.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 11:59:27 Reply Private Reply
#20: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#16)
I recall some trolling he did with the usual Mitt-is-gay kind of graphics.
Like this one (in the first 30 DDR-searched images for "mitt-is-gay").
But it is true. He did say that and ran that campaign and his later ones for governor the same way with the same kind of rhetoric.
It may be trollish to post these things but that doesn't make it untrue. Romney is very much a pro-gay candidate, even more than Trump. And when he gets elected to the Senate, you'll probably hear some reminders from hondo about who and what Romney always was.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 12:03:34 Reply Private Reply
#21: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#19)
Anyway, the article is still about the upcoming Million Moron Millennials march (slated to go down in history as about as meaningful as the Million Homie March, the Million Moron Mommies March, etc.).
It's not about how you feel about hondo. That's no secret to any of us. Nothing on this thread was about Gary Johnson until you decided to make it about Johnson. And now you've managed to trash the entire thread in your anti-hondo rampage.
And you still haven't bothered to make a single comment about the thread's article. All you saw was that it was posted by hondo and nothing else.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 12:16:13 Reply Private Reply
#22: Jameson To: Tooconservative (#1)
"...mob rule..."
Marginalize "loopy 16yo Millennials" at your own risk.....
This mob could become a reliable and motivated voting block by the 2020 election cycle..........
Jameson posted on 2018-02-19 12:26:24 Reply Private Reply
#23: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#19)
Or are we allowed to actually post about the content of this thread's article?
That's now three posts I've made, relevant to this thread's topic. You have yet to post even one.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 12:27:05 Reply Private Reply
#24: Tooconservative To: Jameson (#22)
In the coastal hard-Blue states, they will. No doubt. But they already were anyway so it's no loss.
I don't see any mass movement of youth voters turning out to vote for anything less than a pretty charismatic leader like 0bama. They did vote for him. But they didn't show up to vote for Dems not named '0bama' in 2016 or in the 2010 or 2014 midterms.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 12:29:27 Reply Private Reply
#25: Tooconservative To: hondo68 (#0)
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 12:31:09 Reply Private Reply
#26: Jameson To: Tooconservative (#24)
It is possible, maybe probable, that this issue is just the catalyst that will do the trick.
How many more mass shootings, especially at schools will there be this year?
Jameson posted on 2018-02-19 12:40:14 Reply Private Reply
#27: Tooconservative To: Jameson (#26)
The various Million Moron Marches seldom succeed.
People just don't like mob rule, hordes of people descending on the Capitol to try to force Congress to enact major legislation or else. It wasn't even very successful during its heyday during the civil rights fights and demonstrations in the Sixties over racial issues and the Vietnam war.
We've had a lot of Million Moron Marches, going back a century now. Their track record is dismal as a way to enact public policy.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 12:51:11 Reply Private Reply
#28: no gnu taxes To: Jameson (#26)
I think the correct question is how many lives will be saved by prohibiting law abiding decent people from carrying guns. If I were there and allowed to have a gun, i would have taken this punk out in 10 seconds.
no gnu taxes posted on 2018-02-19 12:52:11 Reply Private Reply
#29: Jameson To: Tooconservative (#27)
Ok, I understand your position.
Do you think mass shootings will be an issue in the 2018 midterms?
Jameson posted on 2018-02-19 12:59:37 Reply Private Reply
#30: Jameson To: no gnu taxes (#28)
Sure you would.
"...prohibiting prohibiting law abiding decent people from carrying guns...."
So was this kid in Florida "law abiding decent people"?
Jameson posted on 2018-02-19 13:03:18 Reply Private Reply
#31: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#21)
If we had listened to hondope Hillary would be Presidentt. That is the topic.
The second amendment would be infringed if not for Trump in the White House.
So it is on topic when a douche pretends to support the second amendment.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 13:04:17 Reply Private Reply
#32: Tooconservative To: Jameson (#29)
I would bet against it. But if Republicans in Congress fall for some loopy gungrabbing plan, it could hurt them.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 13:11:08 Reply Private Reply
#33: no gnu taxes To: Jameson (#30)
no gnu taxes posted on 2018-02-19 13:11:29 Reply Private Reply
#34: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#31)
No, it isn't. It's about this massive online-organized Million Teenybopper March.
You just want to make it about hondo.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 13:12:13 Reply Private Reply
#35: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#34)
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 13:18:19 Reply Private Reply
#36: A K A Stone To: Jameson (#29)
I sure hope it is. It needs to be made clear that Democrats promote immoral behavior. The parents don't teach their kids right from wrong.
The Democrats teach a calice disregard for human life. They teach if you have a problem that murder is ok. When they teach kids that murder is the solution. Don't be surprised when the craps have really stinky fruit from their actions.
If only the babies had guns to blow the abortionist away before being murdered. It all comes back to teaching morality and right vs wrong. Not the liberal puke agenda of moral relativity.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 13:24:13 Reply Private Reply
#37: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#35)
Do you ever wonder why people who got banned from FR or left on their own no longer make a beeline for LF the way they all used to when they left FR and joined LP? How do you explain that?
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 13:40:21 Reply Private Reply
#38: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#36)
The biological parents of Cruz and his brother are unknown. His adoptive parents are dead (the father some years back from heart attack, the mother died last fall). The mother did call the police a number of times to come by personally and try to get the killer to listen to reason and obey the laws.
You can't blame the parents, either natural or adoptive. At least not without some evidence.
Are you picturing some fetus leaning out of his mother's vagina to shoot an abortionist dead as an act of self-defense? LOL
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 13:43:08 Reply Private Reply
#39: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#37)
LP was known and even Robinson posted there at least once. LF isn't known so not as many people can take that path.
Then tthere is the decline of sites like this.
Then there is the Stone is an asshole factor.
But how is this on topic?
Honestly I have thought about just closing this place down.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 13:45:33 Reply Private Reply
#40: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#38)
I don't know the family history. Mine is a general statement that many parents don't do their jobs. In my opinion that is the biggest factor that leads to violence and just bad behavior in general.
No matter what we do there will always be bad people doing bad things. As you know.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 13:49:14 Reply Private Reply
#41: Jameson To: A K A Stone (#36)
yeah.....
Just to clarify - do you think "Gun Control" "Gun Banning" "Taxing of Assault Weapons" or the like will be an issue in the 2018 midterms?
Jameson posted on 2018-02-19 13:54:29 Reply Private Reply
#42: A K A Stone To: Jameson (#41)
If the baby murder party you belong to think they can amend the constitution to eliminate the second amendment they should go that route so they don't commit treason
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 14:00:08 Reply Private Reply
#43: Jameson To: A K A Stone (#42)
Ok.... I'm guessing your answer is "YES"
It's quite likely, really.
"...the baby murder party you belong to..."
The only party I belong to is the Block Party!
Jameson posted on 2018-02-19 14:04:13 Reply Private Reply
#44: A K A Stone To: Jameson (#43)
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 14:07:40 Reply Private Reply
#45: A K A Stone To: Jameson (#43)
You might get Mike Savage to agree with you.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 14:08:56 Reply Private Reply
#46: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone, Pinguinite (#39)
You do post threads with some regularity, attacking your own posters by name. Goldi never did that. Whether you later delete that thread doesn't count for much. People following this forum know that that could happen to them if they start posting here.
I think your hands-off moderation contributes. You let some comments stand that probably shouldn't.
I think that LP, back when it had a true Biker Bar where threads could be moved so they didn't show up in the sidebar or comments was the best version of Pinguinite overall. I know it cost something in CPU/database response time but it was a worthy feature, comparable to FR's Smokey Backroom.
Goldi also took a dim view of endless seminar posting. For instance, one after another Ron Paul thread. Or seminar postings against the cops like Deckard does. Those don't represent you or the majority of posters on this forum but, to an outsider, it seems from the sidebar that that is what this forum is all about.
I liked Biker Bar and light moderation.
Tooconservative posted on 2018-02-19 14:12:31 Reply Private Reply
#47: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#46)
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 14:18:43 Reply Private Reply
#48: Jameson To: A K A Stone (#44)
Again, with the exception of the Block Party I don't support or vote for "party"
For the foreseeable future however, I will be voting for the most likely candidate to win who is NOT a member of the republican party.
****update****
upon further review I'd like to correct my previous statement -
I also support the Pizza Party.
Thanks
Jameson posted on 2018-02-19 14:18:55 Reply Private Reply
#49: Jameson To: A K A Stone (#45)
??? No idea who this is
Jameson posted on 2018-02-19 14:19:32 Reply Private Reply
#50: A K A Stone To: Jameson (#49)
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-19 14:21:35 Reply Private Reply