West Windsor, NJ (Rutherford Institute) Two street preachers are targeted, confronted and eventually arrested by transit officers who insist that they stop talking about their Christian beliefs without getting the agencys permission first, and the courts say thats all right.
But the Rutherford Institute thinks otherwise, and thats why its seeking a rehearing before the entire 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in a First Amendment case involving preachers Don Karns and Robert Parker.
A panel of the appeals court previously ruled that the two transit officers, Kathleen Shanahan and Sandra McKeon Crowe, were justified in ordering the preachers to be quiet, grilling them over their activities, and then arresting and charging them all because they were sharing their beliefs in a public location.
This case sheds light on a disconcerting bureaucratic mindset that wants us to believe that the government has the power to both bestow rights on the citizenry and withdraw those rights when it becomes necessary, whether its the right to proselytize on a train platform, the right to address ones representatives at a city council meeting, or the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, said constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of the Rutherford Institute.
Yet those who founded this country believed that our rights are unalienable, meaning that no man or government can take them away from us. Thus, the problem in this case is not the absence of any specific law allowing free speech on the train platform. Rather, the problem is government officials who have forgotten that they work for us and their primary purpose is to safeguard our rights.
Rutherford is seeking a rehearing in the case that erupted when Karns and Parker were preaching at a Princeton, New Jersey, train station.
They were charged with trespass and obstruction of justice but eventually cleared of the charges.
They then sued the New Jersey Transit Corp. and the officers over the demand that they obtain a permit to talk, non-commercially, with others at the public station.
The appeals court panel said the officers were immune from claims that they violated the preachers constitutional rights under the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.
It was on June 26, 2012, when Karns and Parker began sharing their Christian beliefs with members of the public at the Princeton Junction Station of the NJTC.
No notices were posted at the station prohibiting or restricting First Amendment activities, Rutherford explained.
But they quickly were confronted by Shanahan and Crowe, who first demanded identification, then told them they could not speak without the agencys permission.
When Karns and Parker asserted the train station was a public area, they were arrested.
After they were cleared of those counts, the Rutherford Institute filed a civil rights case against the officers for discriminating against them on the basis of the religious content of their speech.
#1: Hondo68 To: Deckard, Liberator (#0)
Governor Chris Christie's 501c3 church has a monopoly on God in NJ? You gots to pay and pay!
Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-17 11:43:19 Reply Private Reply
#2: Liberator To: hondo68 (#1)
("They quickly were confronted by Shanahan and Crowe, who first demanded identification, then told them they could not speak without the agencys permission.")
WHO are "Shanahan and Crowe"?? Who do they represent?
Get the villains right.
Liberator posted on 2018-02-17 11:54:46 Reply Private Reply
#3: Hondo68 To: Liberator (#2)
NJTC run by the State of New Jersey and Gov Crisco until recently? Am I right?
Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-17 12:08:32 Reply Private Reply
#4: Liberator To: hondo68 (#3)
That order came from local Princeton authoritahs -- "Shanahan and Crowe". The town and area is a Prog hotbed.
And it's not as though they first called Krispy for permission.
Liberator posted on 2018-02-17 12:11:57 Reply Private Reply
#5: sneakypete To: hondo68 (#1)
Proving that the right is as guilty of lying and spreading propaganda as the left is when it is THEIR oxen being gored.
The TRUTH is EVERYBODY has to have a permit demonstrate on the public streets. These laws were created by normal citizens who were tired of not being able to take a dozen steps without some SOB pushing a sign in their face and demanding they give money to them or some political cause. People have a right to not be harassed as they walk down the public streets.
This whole report is slanted to do nothing but get the fundies foaming at the mouth mad.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-17 12:31:35 Reply Private Reply
#6: sneakypete To: Liberator (#2)
They represent the majority of the public,who don't want people shouting in their face as they walk down the sidewalk,minding their own business.
They are also transit officers who were hired and paid to do this job.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-17 12:33:32 Reply Private Reply
#7: Liberator To: sneakypete (#6)
BUZZZZZZ. WRONG.
The majority of people SUPPORT Free Speech.
who don't want people shouting in their face as they walk down the sidewalk,minding their own business.
BUZZZZZ. Wrong.
They spoke to people. Did NOT "shout in their faces."
They are also transit officers who were hired and paid to do this job.
BUZZZZ. Wrong.
Transit Officers' "job" is a matter of maintaining safety and security. NEITHER of which applied in THIS CASE.
You do have a bit of old-school Soviet Stalinist in you, dontcha?
Liberator posted on 2018-02-17 13:09:54 Reply Private Reply
#8: paraclete To: Deckard (#0)
paraclete posted on 2018-02-17 17:20:27 Reply Private Reply
#9: sneakypete To: Liberator (#7)
No,but like Stalin,you want everyone to be a slave to your religion.
People have a right to walk down the street without being bothered by these yahoos.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-17 19:16:40 Reply Private Reply
#10: sneakypete To: paraclete (#8)
Your freedom ends where others begins,and you have all the freedom of religion yuo want in your church.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-17 19:17:52 Reply Private Reply
#11: Hondo68 To: sneakypete, Liberator (#6)
You have a "permit" to shout in our faces?
"If you see something, say something".
I'm not a ratfink, so I'm not going to report this horrendous violation of PC. /s
It's not any kind of a crime to talk to people, even about religion.
Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-17 19:34:25 Reply Private Reply
#12: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#10)
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-17 19:38:54 Reply Private Reply
#13: sneakypete To: hondo68 (#11)
It is if they don't want to hear it and tell you to leave them alone.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-17 19:51:45 Reply Private Reply
#14: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#12)
You do if you are preaching,and nobody has a right to harass anyone who tells them "Leave me alone".
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-17 19:53:07 Reply Private Reply
#15: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#14)
To not harm you of course.
But your faggot lovining snowflake ears don't have a right to not be offended. Snowflake Peter believes you have more free speech on the internet then you do on the streets.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-17 20:20:51 Reply Private Reply
#16: Deckard To: A K A Stone, sneakypete, hondo68 (#12)
Maybe pete thinks that Christians are only allowed to practice their First Amendment rights here:
Deckard posted on 2018-02-17 21:35:06 Reply Private Reply
#17: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#15)
I can't wait to see what you have to say with "The Church of Homosexual Jesus" comes up to you on the street and shouts in your face stuff like "Jesus said to love your fellow man! If you do not have sex with other men you are going against GAWDS will!"
Or someone comes up ranting about how the age of consent for girls to have sex with men should be 8,Mary Magdalene was a whore so legalize prostitution,etc,etc,etc.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 05:46:06 Reply Private Reply
#18: sneakypete To: Deckard (#16)
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 05:50:16 Reply Private Reply
#19: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#17)
Yawn. Fools will be fools.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-18 07:35:23 Reply Private Reply
#20: Liberator To: sneakypete, A K A Stone (#17)
You mean you haven't noticed this ALREADY happening? Except that in your analogy, Man replaces "GAWD'S" will or "Jesus'".
Society is ALREADY being shouted at by people, orgs, and institutions who are indeed making the SAME demands on behalf of "The Church of Homosexual." Where you ask?
EVERYWHERE.
On TV. Movies. MANDATED at Public schools. College Campuses. The Social Media as well as MSM. Corporations. Even at so-called, "Christian Churches." ENFORCED BY GUBMINT INSTITUTIONS AND LAWS.
Ever hear of "HATE CRIMES"? Or "HATE SPEECH"? Sure you have. They are Special Protections and laws enacted EXCLUSIVELY for "The Church of Homosexual."
Liberator posted on 2018-02-18 10:40:59 Reply Private Reply
#21: Liberator To: sneakypete, Deckard (#18)
You mean like the hysterical Liberals, Antifa, Homofascists, Mad-Pussyhatters and various other insane Church of Progressivism groups?
Yeah, I agree.
OTOH, Christians are NOT "screaming" at anyone. So why are you exaggerating??
Liberator posted on 2018-02-18 10:44:32 Reply Private Reply
#22: Hondo68 To: sneakypete, Deckard, A K A Stone, Liberator (#18)
It seems like you want to drive Christians off of the streets and underground into the catacombs to watch Pope Francis Vatican Mass on TV? Imagine what the streets would be like then, nothing but weirdos and pervs!
The Catacombs: A Place of hiding and Worship For the Early Church
The catacombs were underground rooms and passageways that served as mausoleums in which the ancient Romans buried their dead. When the persecutions began and intensified under Nero, the Christians found that they could retreat into these labyrinthine networks of tunnels to escape the notice or pursuit of Roman soldiers or citizens wishing to turn them in to the authorities. The Early Church developed a vast support network and series of hiding places based on the catacombs. Meanwhile, the use of a public mausoleum as a hiding place caused wild rumors about Christian rituals and practice to spread amongst the Romans. Some Romans believed that the Christians sacrificed their children and performed bizarre, secret worship rituals at midnight. Another rumor was that the Christians drank human blood. This may have come from a misinterpretation of Jesus' command: "Behold, This is my blood. Take ye and drink in remembrance of Me."
Today, the Catacombs attract visitors from all over the world. The Christian Church spread throughout the world largely as a result of the persecutions by the Romans. The faithful come to see the places where the early ssaints gathered and the students of history to marvel at the sheer extent of these massive underground galleries and chambers.
Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-18 11:51:18 Reply Private Reply
#23: Deckard To: sneakypete, Liberator, hondo68, A K A Stone (#18)
Somehow I don't believe that was what the Founders had in mind when they wrote the First Amendment.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
Deckard posted on 2018-02-18 12:04:28 Reply Private Reply
#24: sneakypete To: Liberator (#20)
No. The only time I "talk" about religion,or even think about it,is when I am on a web site and some "true believer" thinks he's Moses declaring the 10 Commandments to be the Law of the Land.
Ever hear of "HATE CRIMES"? Or "HATE SPEECH"? Sure you have. They are Special Protections and laws enacted EXCLUSIVELY for "The Church of Homosexual."
I am no fan of that church,either. I'm a live and let live guy. I don't care what you want to believe,as long as you don't try to insist that I have to live according to your beliefs,or that your beliefs trumps the Bill of Rights.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 12:40:02 Reply Private Reply
#25: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#24)
The Bible trumps the bill of rights in spades.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-18 12:45:14 Reply Private Reply
#26: sneakypete To: Liberator (#21)
Yes,they are no different than the Bible Thumpers shouting their insanity and demanding everybody fall in line and follow their beliefs.
Same dance,different song.
OTOH, Christians are NOT "screaming" at anyone. So why are you exaggerating??
HorseHillary! One of the biggest lies ever told. I even remember the airport out in Denver having to get a restraining order to keep a local fundie preacher and his flock of fools from harassing passenger going through the terminal,shouting hell fire and damnation,and telling people God wanted them to donate money.
I've seen and heard similar crap my whole life,and so have you. You just happen to agree with it so you don't see it as harassment.
I even had to chase a Born Again off a job site because the SOB just would NOT listen to reason when I told him to leave me alone because I didn't want to hear it. He didn't listen,so I went after him. I guess maybe you think he had a right to harass me because he was "doing the Lords work and trying to save my soul",right.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 12:47:36 Reply Private Reply
#27: buckeroo To: A K A Stone (#25)
Therefore: KJV, both (Leviticus 24:17-23; Luke 6:27-36)
buckeroo posted on 2018-02-18 12:51:04 Reply Private Reply
#28: sneakypete To: hondo68 (#22)
Not true. I don't give a damn where they go,as long as they leave me alone and don't go shouting in my face and waving a Bible at me.
You have a right to believe any damn fool thing you want to believe if that's what makes you happy,but you don't have the right to push that crap off on me once I tell you I don't want to hear it.
BTW,You don't own the bleeping streets,either. If you want to preach,go to your version of Section 8 housing with the steeple and preach there.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 12:51:15 Reply Private Reply
#29: Fred Mertz To: sneakypete (#26)
I believe that would be mission impossible.
Fred Mertz posted on 2018-02-18 12:54:02 Reply Private Reply
#30: sneakypete To: Deckard (#23)
Believe whatever you want,just don't try to use the force of law to try to force me to agree with it.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,...
See,you can copy and past a simple sentence,but you still can't understand it because establishing YOUR superstition as the law of the land is EXACTLY what you want.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 12:55:11 Reply Private Reply
#31: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#28)
If little faggoty snowflakes dont want their little girl feelings hurt they should stay indoors on their personal property. Little faggoty snowflakes don't have a right to demand anyone shut up. Even if it makes them cry.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-18 12:58:01 Reply Private Reply
#32: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#25)
Only on Planet KooKoo.
BTW,WHICH Bible? Or are you claiming they all trump the BoR's?
Good to see you come out of the closet and admit you are an anti-American that wants to establish a religious police state,though.
Maybe you could get some Muslim clerics to give you some tips on how to run it?
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 12:58:13 Reply Private Reply
#33: sneakypete To: Fred Mertz (#29)
And you are right.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 13:01:19 Reply Private Reply
#34: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#31)
So,when are you going to start?
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 13:02:28 Reply Private Reply
#35: A K A Stone To: buckeroo (#27)
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-18 13:14:19 Reply Private Reply
#36: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#32)
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-18 13:15:46 Reply Private Reply
#37: no gnu taxes To: sneakypete (#34)
"I know you are but what am I."
At least you have graduated to second grade retorts.
no gnu taxes posted on 2018-02-18 13:18:00 Reply Private Reply
#38: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#34)
So if one of your queer relatives came up and said I'm married to a fag. Then I tell him to shut up and if he doesn't he is breaking the law? No prter even fags have free speech and I would have no constitutional right to make it shut up as offensive as it may be.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-18 13:19:50 Reply Private Reply
#39: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#32)
Idiot the constitution's first amendment only recognized pre existing rights How can a pre existing right be trumped by a document who recognizes it?
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-18 13:22:35 Reply Private Reply
#40: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#32)
Maybe you can get some Muslims to go to your house and play with your goats.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-18 13:24:37 Reply Private Reply
#41: tpaine To: A K A Stone, yall (#25)
AKA --- Do you really believe and insist that others should have to live according to your beliefs?
This position violates every principle inherent in our Constitutional Republic...
tpaine posted on 2018-02-18 13:30:10 Reply Private Reply
#42: A K A Stone To: tpaine (#41)
I didn't say that and I don't believe that. However what I say is the truth. No one forced to accept it.
That's the way I want to live my life and nobody's going to convince me otherwise
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-18 13:33:19 Reply Private Reply
#43: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#36)
Which one of us is thinking about the size of the others penis?
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 16:06:43 Reply Private Reply
#44: sneakypete To: no gnu taxes (#37)
Is that the best you can do,Bubba? Maybe you need to go back to your cult leader and get some quotes?
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 16:08:09 Reply Private Reply
#45: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#38)
Yes. How can you possibly be so dense you can't understand that is harrassment,which is one form of attack?
If he does it in his house,it's legal because you have the option of leaving. If he does it in your house or in public and refuses to back away and leave you alone,you have been verbally,and maybe even physically assaulted.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 16:10:53 Reply Private Reply
#46: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#39)
What right does the Bible give you,other than the right to burn in hell for eternity if you don't follow the rules like a good little slave?
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 16:12:41 Reply Private Reply
#47: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#39)
The Bill of Rights is just a "document" that recognized "pre existing rights"?
The BoR is a STATEMENT that NATURAL RIGHTS will be respected. Those are the rights all humans are said to be born with.
Pre existing rights will vary from one place to another,depending on local history.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 16:17:30 Reply Private Reply
#48: Hondo68 To: sneakypete, A K A Stone (#47)
Most Christians believe that these rights don't pre-exist God. He created them too.
God came first,then your rights. Have you thanked him today?
Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-18 16:36:23 Reply Private Reply
#49: sneakypete To: hondo68 (#48)
You are free to believe anything you want to believe.
God came first,then your rights. Have you thanked him today?
No,and for the same reason I never thanked the Santa,the Easter Bunny, or the Tooth Fairy.
Fictional creatures don't need thanks.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-18 21:39:49 Reply Private Reply