In his State of the Union address on January 30, US President Donald J. Trump referred to the brutal murder of two 16-year-old girls from Long Island in December 2016 by members of the "savage MS-13 gang," responsible for a spate of other gruesome killings in the area, as well. Many of these gang members, he explained, had entered the United States illegally. "For decades, open borders have allowed drugs and gangs to pour into our most vulnerable communities," he said. Calling on Congress "to finally close the deadly loopholes that have allowed... criminal gangs to break into our country," he listed the four pillars of his immigration-reform proposal:
Although he did not specify this in his speech, Trump reportedly is seeking $25 billion from Congress to fund the wall. Opponents of the wall have been arguing that illegal immigrants do not commit crimes at a higher rate than legal immigrants or native-born Americans; that illegal immigration has been a boon to the economy, rather than a drain on it; and that the cost both of deportation and a wall far exceeds the benefits of both. These claims are repeatedly voiced by the Trump administration's detractors, as part of their campaign to accuse the president of racism; but what are the facts? To set the record straight, let us take a look at a number of those that have been obscured or ignored by the media. As far as the cost of the wall is concerned, a study released in September 2017 by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) reveals that, "At the federal, state, and local levels, taxpayers shell out approximately $134.9 billion to cover the costs incurred by the presence of more than 12.5 million illegal aliens, and about 4.2 million citizen children of illegal aliens." This, the report says, is a nearly $3 billion increase in the cost since 2013. It is also rather more than the single payment of $25 billion that it will cost to build a wall five and a half times more, and every year. The same goes for the cost of deporting illegal immigrants. According to Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies,
The question of the rates of criminality among illegal aliens vs. those of legal immigrants and American-born citizens has been examined by John R. Lott, Jr., president of the Crime Prevention Research Center, using Arizona's prison population as a microcosm for study. According to Lott, the ability to measure the crime-rate among illegal immigrants in the U.S. has been difficult, due to many factors, including the lack of a national data base and "primitive" methodology such as "simple, cross-sectional analysis to see whether areas with higher immigrant populations have higher crime rates," and "a purely time series approach... look at the United States as a whole and note that crime has decreased since 1990 as immigration has increased." The advantage of the Arizona Department of Corrections study, Lott says, is that
Peter Kirsanow wryly solved the mystery in National Review, writing:
According to Lott, whose research spans 1985-2017:
The findings are unequivocal, as the following summary illustrates:
These numbers do not even include the cost to American taxpayers of the toll taken on America's children by illegally imported drugs. Although available information on this is at best spotty, the key finding from the DEA's 2017 National Drug Threat Assessment is that the "most commonly reported greatest drug threat was heroin, at 44.1 percent of law enforcement responses... This was followed by 29.8 percent of respondents indicating methamphetamine was their greatest drug threat, 9.3 percent reporting controlled prescription drugs..." This tells us something about the extent of the problem, but not enough. The 2010 drug-threat assessment, released a year after the previous administration took office, revealed that,
In 2015, included in the DEA's drug-threat assessment was the fact that drug overdoses killed more people in the United States than car accidents or guns. As was noted by the BBC at the time, "Many of these drugs are smuggled in large volumes by drug cartels..." The late Democrat Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan famously said, "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." His successors in Congress would do well to remember this while debating the issue of illegal immigration. They certainly need to keep it in mind when voting on the administration's proposed plan. |
Poster Comment:
A lot of good info in one article here, including John Lott's recent study.
#1: Hondo68 To: Tooconservative, Stuck in LBJ Great Society, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#0)
One thing conspicuously missing from all presidents since Ike Eisenhower is enforcing existing immigration law, and deporting illegal aliens.
Republican and Democrat globalists just don't believe in US sovereignty, and the Rule Of Law. The D&R party is all about America-last since Ike.
The uni-party faithful seem to be stuck in LBJ's Great Society, and can't figure how to vote their way out of his and Poppy's bipartisan NWO.
Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-07 20:44:11 Reply Private Reply
#2: VxH To: Tooconservative (#0)
That's myth rooted in the mistaken belief that the financial system is still grounded in the reality of supply and demand.
The 1s and 0s that constitute today's "wealth" have very very little to do with supply and demand, and haven't since at least 2006, when the owners stopped publishing m3.
How do they factor in the Quadrillions of "dollars" worth of derivative a$$paper floating in the global economic cesspool?
They don't. The whole system is largely a make believe casino.
From the perspective of the owners of the system/casino, illegal immigration facilitates positive velocity of their almighty 1s and 0s, and the associated processes wherein they siphon off hard assets and... POWER.
VxH posted on 2018-02-08 10:43:39 Reply Private Reply
#3: VxH To: hondo68 (#1)
Yep.
Observe how the advent of the Bush Family Kleptocracy closely parallels the rise of something else Eisenhower tried to warn us about in 1961.
VxH posted on 2018-02-08 10:50:14 Reply Private Reply
#4: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#0)
There is no way we're going to save $134.9 billion because there is no way we're going to deport 12.5 million illegals. Unless we put a bounty on them.
Hell, we can't even get rid of 700,000 DACA illegals and their parents. And we know who they are.
misterwhite posted on 2018-02-08 10:50:44 Reply Private Reply
#5: Hondo68 To: misterwhite, *The Two Parties ARE the Same* (#4)
How about cutting off the $134.9 billion in freebies that the D&R party is giving them to stay? Food Stamps, free housing, medical, schools, amnesty(s) bills, multi lingual everything, chain migration, free drugs, gov cheese, DACA sanctuary protection nationwide, political refugee visas/citizenship, anchor baby birthright citizenship, motor voter and a host of other gov programs to encourage illegal aliens to invade and make themselves at home.
Not going to happen with the D&R party running the show.
Hondo68 posted on 2018-02-08 11:17:24 Reply Private Reply
#6: A K A Stone To: hondo68 (#5)
Trump's economy already took four million off food stamps. No thanks to you Hillary supporters.
A K A Stone posted on 2018-02-08 11:23:00 Reply Private Reply
#7: sneakypete To: VxH (#3)
Yup,while the Dims are foolish enough to focus on giving money away to poor minorities,the alleged Republicans sent the Bush Crime Family Forward to give welfare to the international bankers and arms dealers.
You might say,a "Full Service Welfare Program that doesn't discriminate against the wealthy."
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-08 14:27:37 Reply Private Reply
#8: sneakypete To: hondo68 (#5)
Do that and they self-deport.
sneakypete posted on 2018-02-08 14:28:46 Reply Private Reply