Trump's anarchist Juggalo supporters, Insane Clown Posse

Trump's anarchist Juggalo supporters, Insane Clown Posse

Fake News....just some more of your lies.

Insane Clown Posse Juggalos March on Washington Outnumbers Pro-Trump Rally

A mile and a world apart, Juggalos and Trump fans descend on Washington

Meet the Juggalos Joining the Far-Left Resistance

Are you an anarchist yet? Join Us: The Free Thought Project

Deckard is promoting the Free Thought Project and taking names for anyone want to join the group with him.

You'll never be able to convince the Burnside Bums & anarchist Juggalos to hate President Trump, don't even bother trying!

You'll never be able to convince the Burnside Bums & anarchist Juggalos to hate President Trump, don't even bother trying!

Convince someone to hate President Trump?

Pray tell why I would ever want to even try to convince anyone to hate such a wonderful man as President Trump?

You are becoming more irrational all the time.

Are you an anarchist yet? Join Us: The Free Thought Project.

Anarchist, huh?

Where are all the posts on this FB page calling for violence against the government?

Good grief - you weren't embarrassed enough by the last article you posted Parsons? Doubling down on your idiocy is not really very smart.

The leftist-penned, attempted hit piece you posted earlier was roundly mocked and deservedly went down in flames, and now THIS?

The Free Thought Project is dedicated to holding those who claim authority over our lives accountable.

And there's your real problem with FTP - your submissive fealty to the almighty state doesn't allow you to question, criticize or hold accountable those in power.

a hub for Free Thinking conversations about...

So "free thinking" that they haven't realized they lean more left... then they do right.

Are you an anarchist yet? Join Us: The Free Thought Project.

Anarchist, huh?

Hey, Bubba....it’s their FB page and they are the ones calling themselves anarchists.

Are you saying they are lying?

Are you saying that the cofounder is a liar when he proclaims himself to be an anarchist at 1:02 in this video:

Where are all the posts on this FB page calling for violence against the government?

Where is your understanding of anarchy?

The word Anarchy comes from the Greek, meaning without force, without violence or government, because government is the very fountainhead of violence, constraint, and coercion.

You need not call for violence against the government for you to be a hardcore anarchist.

Good grief - you weren't embarrassed enough by the last article you posted Parsons? Doubling down on your idiocy is not really very smart.

One, I am destroying your ideal where you would not admit the one cofounder of TFTP is an anarchist, before I provided evidence to you where he admitted in the video interview that he is an anarchist.¹

And two, I am forcing the reality on you that Matt Agorist the second cofounder hides behind a pen name and will not take personal responsibility for his articles or his actions.²

The leftist-penned, attempted hit piece you posted earlier was roundly mocked and deservedly went down in flames, and now THIS?

Parsons

hides behind a pen name and will not take personal responsibility

So your real name is Tater Gatlin, Parsnip?

Bucket 'O Taters

So your real name is Tater Gatlin, Parsnip?

… hides behind a pen name and will not take personal responsibility

Since it is this forum’s policy to allow the use screen names, I will continue to do so.

It is not, and should never be, the policy of a Web News Publication for their Editor in Chief to use a pen name.

If you cannot verify who the “Editor in Chief” of a publication is....how can you expect any of the information to be accurate if only a “John Doe” is to be held accountable?

It is not, and should never be, the policy of a Web News Publication for their Editor in Chief to use a pen name.

There he goes again folks - Parsons declaring himself the king of all media and the sole arbiter of journalistic standards.

Anyone not adhering to his arbitrary specifications is an unperson in the eyes of the Party.

Hey - you gonna join the lefties and require licenses for journalists as well? I mean really man - that's where your jihad is eventually going.

You've already shown your admiration for leftist ideology on the other thread which was a not-so-thinly veiled denigration of capitalism.

The word Anarchy comes from the Greek, meaning without force, without violence or government,

Oooh - so scary. An ideology that values individuals over the State and eschews violence.

I can see why the term "anarchist" makes you wet your Depends. Same way the term "libertarian" does.

You need not call for violence against the government for you to be a hardcore anarchist.

There are many shades of anarchism. Your problem is that you equate the term with violence.

Anyways, it's ironic when a full-blown statist calls an anarchist a threat to society.

... government is the very fountainhead of violence, constraint, and coercion.

I think Reagan agreed with that.

The two articles you posted about the FTP show that you reek with desperation.

…. the sole arbiter of journalistic standards.

I am the arbiter of no journalistic standards.

It is the Society of Professional Journalists who prescribe a Code of Ethics.

Listed last in these Code Of Ethics is:

BE ACCOUNTABLE AND TRANSPARENT
Ethical journalism means taking responsibility for one's work and
explaining one’s decisions to the public.
Journalists should:

• Explain ethical choices and processes to audiences. Encourage a civil
  dialogue with the public about journalistic practices, coverage and news
  content.
  
• Respond quickly to questions about accuracy, clarity and fairness.
  
• Acknowledge mistakes and correct them promptly and prominently. Explain
  corrections and clarifications carefully and clearly.
  
• Expose unethical conduct in journalism, including within their organizations.
  
• Abide by the same high standards they expect of others

Which begs the question:

How can the Editor in Chief of a Web publication be accountable and transparent by taking responsibility for one’s work and explaining one’s decisions to the public when he hides behind a pen name in violation of ethical journalism standards?

Answer that for me …

The word Anarchy comes from the Greek, meaning without force, without violence or government, Oooh - so scary.

Where are all the posts on this FB page calling for violence against the government?

Where is your understanding of anarchy?

The word Anarchy comes from the Greek, meaning without force, without violence or government, because government is the very fountainhead of violence, constraint, and coercion. You need not call for violence against the government for you to be a hardcore anarchist.

You made a false predication that anarchy requires violence and you were proven to be wrong. Then you try to deflect with garbage when attempting to cover up your ignorance.

You do need to stay on point and not always divert into your spin mode when you are confronted with something you cannot handle.

At least, try …

I can see why the term "anarchist" makes you wet your Depends. Same way the term "libertarian" does.

You see nothing of the sort and a flippant remark is no acceptable substitute when you are unable to come up with an intelligent response.

I do find it puzzling that you separate the words “anarchist” and “libertarian” when it is commonly accepted that libertarianism is also referred to as “anarcho- capitalism” and “philosophical anarchism.”

If fact you will find that the word “libertarian” was used by French anarchists in the 1890s as a synonym for “anarchist.” Therefore, some contemporary anarchists refer to themselves and/or anarchy as “libertarian.” I am surprise you did not know this or maybe you did not want to admit this.

The word Anarchy comes from the Greek, meaning without force, without violence or government...

Only a statist would make the claim that someone who holds these beliefs is somehow a danger to society.

...government is the very fountainhead of violence, constraint, and coercion.

And of course, in your submissive fealty to your god, the State - you believe that anyone who expresses those views should earn one a trip to Gitmo.

You need not call for violence against the government for you to be a hardcore anarchist.

There are many shades of anarchism. Your problem is that you equate the term with violence.

You have lost your gourd and become completely irrational in you incoherent responses.

It was not I who equated the term anarchist with violence, it was you.

Since you have forgotten, read back through your posts….I am not going to look it up a third time for you.

Now you want to quibble about libertarianism vs anarchism as if you think you're displaying some sort of intellectual prowess. You have only one agenda - to praise the government and to denigrate those who hold views that are pro-freedom.

Libertarians want less government - anarchists want none.

Your idiocy is off the charts with this article and the other one you posted.

Oh, BTW - did I thank you yet for posting that leftist-penned article that had the effect of validating the FTP?

Well - thanks - you also made it clear that you value leftist opinion in your quest to smear libertarians.

The word Anarchy comes from the Greek, meaning without force, without violence or government...

Only a statist would make the claim that someone who holds these beliefs is somehow a danger to society.

I am neither a statist nor did I ever make such a claim.

Please, please….try to stay coherent and stop with the damned rambling with extemporaneous spotted remarks.

It was not I who equated the term anarchist with violence, it was you.

Then what is your frickin' problem? You're scared of the term "anarchism" and you are allaying that fear into a broad-brush smear of anyone who you have labeled as such.

On your other thread - you slammed FTP because they made money - now you are trying to claim that their anarchism is dangerous.

I am neither a statist nor did I ever make such a claim.

Oh, my sides!!!

Good grief man - you are the biggest, most outspoken statist on this site!

... you believe that ...

I believe that it would be hard to find movements in the U.S. today that harbors stranger political ideas and performs more weirdo actions than the self-proclaimed libertarians. No doubt, not every self-proclaimed libertarian believes in strange ideas, but libertarianism is a space which nurtures fruit cakes like you. The weird actions by libertarians and the extreme nature of the ideology give evidential cause to libertarianism strangest and most extreme notions.

I believe that it would be hard to find movements in the U.S. today that harbors stranger political ideas and performs more weirdo actions than the self-proclaimed libertarians.

Your opinion is duly noted, however your vehement anger and unchecked bile goes much deeper than that.

The anti-libertarian jihad you are waging has been consuming your mind for years if not decades. How did that start? Did a libertarian steal your girlfriend in high school?

Good grief man - you are the biggest, most outspoken statist on this site!

In your libertarian circles, we often refer to someone as a "statists." So much so that the term gets overused and misused by you.

You refer to anyone who disagrees with you as a “statist.” When you are unable to counter a valid point I make, all you have left is to call me a “statist.”

That’s fine, you may continue to use the term….but not as name calling in lieu of an intelligent response.

Oh, my sides!!!

… your vehement anger …

Now that you have no rational comments, you are just starting to make up shit….drama queen.

I never display anger, let alone any “vehement anger.”

I am cool, calm and collected.

The anti-libertarian jihad you are waging …

I do however find it so easy to lampoon libertarian philosophy since it often attracts the most outspoken fringe members of society. Look no further than those here on LF who profess to be libertarians to see examples of fringe members of society. I see libertarians, who like theists, start by forming a conclusion and then developing arguments to fit that conclusion.

Arguments that are always so wrong and misguided …

You refer to anyone who disagrees with you as a “statist.”

One who worships the state and deflects any criticism of government criminal activity or corruption and believes the official narratives and propaganda spewed by fed.gov without question and is in favor of more laws, more surveillance, more wars, more tanks for local cops and overall hates freedom is a statist.

Like you for instance.

Jihad? I am in no way engaging in “a struggle or fight against the enemies of Islam.”

Your seething hatred of those who believe in more freedom and less government is indeed a jihad.

Like the muslims - you believe your fight is a holy one.

The State is your religion.

Did a libertarian steal your girlfriend in high school?

OMG….do tell!

I knew that libertarians did strange things but I never knew they stole girlfriends in high school.

Tell me about the age of consent for libertarians.

Your seething hatred of those who believe in more freedom and less government is indeed a jihad.

I did tell you that I find it so easy to lampoon libertarian philosophy since it often attracts the most outspoken fringe members of society.

That still goes….and you give me such an easy platform for the lampooning task.

You refer to anyone who disagrees with you as a “statist.”

One who worships the state ...

Like you for instance.

And I will continue to do that to counter your propaganda and your cop-hating agenda.

Welcome to the Free Thought Project Facebook Page -- a hub for Free Thinking conversations about the promotion of liberty and the daunting task of government accountability.

That's hilarious. It's the equivalent of promoting a gathering of blind fighter pilots.

Anarchy is for people completely devoid of reason because the core of it is the "You are not the boss of ME!" petulant whine of a 5 year old. It defies nature because mankind is emotionally and intellectually "programmed" at birth to give or follow orders. "Order" is something humans crave at the genetic level,or we would have gone extinct a long time ago.

There has never been and there will never be any form of government where someone isn't in charge and enforcing rules someone else doesn't like.

There is one universal truth we can all believe. NOTHING that goes against human nature lasts,and that includes governless societies. You can bet your ass that SOMEBODY is going to be in charge by the end of Day 2.

Where are all the posts on this FB page calling for violence against the government?

There are no anarchists here this time of the day because their mommies are taking their computers away from them and making them go eat dinner,take a bath,put on their Spider Man jammies,and go to bed.