Hidden camera: Hundreds of Twitter Employees Paid to View "Everything You Post Online" Including Private "Sex Messages"

Source: Project Veritas
Published: Jan 15, 2018
Author: staff
Post Date: 2018-01-15 13:23:39 by Tooconservative
Views: 1738

Clay Haynes: “There’s teams dedicated to it… at least, three or four hundred people… they’re paid to look at d*ck pics.”
Pranay Singh, Twitter Engineer, Says “All your sex messages… d*ck pics… like, all the girls you’ve been f*cking around with, they’re are on my server now…”
“Everything you send is stored on my server… You can’t [delete it], it’s already on my server.”
Claims Twitter Stores Your Private Data to Sell to Advertisers, “They’ll make a virtual profile about you”
“You’re paying for the right to use our website with your data basically.”
“You leak way more information than you think… Like, if you go to Twitter for the first time, we have information about you.”

(San Francisco) Project Veritas has released undercover footage of Twitter Engineers and employees admitting that Twitter employees view all of your private messages on their servers and analyze it to create a “virtual profile” of you which they sell to advertisers.

The footage features four current Twitter software engineers–Conrado Miranda, Clay Haynes, Pranay Singh, and Mihai Alexandru Florea.

Haynes, who was featured in part one of the Twitter exposé, admitted in a January 6, 2018 meeting that Twitter has hired hundreds employees with the express purpose of looking at these “d*ck pics,” stating:

“There’s teams dedicated to it. I mean, we’re talking, we’re talking three or four… at least, three or four hundred people… Yes, they’re paid to look at d*ck pics.”

Haynes continues to elaborate that even he himself has seen these “d*ck pics”

“I’ve seen way more penises than I’ve ever wanted to see in my life.”

“That’s, yeah… You know, actually… This sounds horrible, but I’m actually glad and fortunate it’s just dicks, it’s just blow job pictures, it’s just that type of stuff.”

Pranay Singh, a Direct Messaging Engineer for Twitter corroborated Haynes claims in a meeting with a Project Veritas journalist on January 5, 2018:

“Everything you send is stored on my server… So all your sex messages and you, like, d*ck pics are on my server now…”

“All your illegitimate wives and, like, all the girls you’ve been f*cking around with, they’re are on my server now… I’m going to send it to your wife, she’s going use it in your divorce.”

“So, what happens is like, you like, write something or post pictures on line, they never go away… Because even after you send them, people are like analyzing them, to see what you are interested in, to see what you are talking about. And they sell that data.”

According to Twitter software expert Mihai Florea, “To actually charge the advertisers the money we have to prove it was you, and that’s why using email address, or like a cookie or something that can track you.” Florea continues, saying, “You’re paying for the right to use our website with your data basically.”

Even those without Twitter accounts have their data stored in their databases, according to Conrado Miranda: “You leak way more information than you think. Like, we have information from people–Like, if you go to Twitter for the first time, we have information about you.”

When asked how to protect people if that power fell into the wrong hands, Miranda responded “You don’t… There is no way.”

Clay Haynes also expressed his discomfort for Twitter’s policy in a December 29, 2017 meeting:

“It is a creepy Big Brother. It’s like a level… I don’t want to say it freaks me out, but it disturbs me.”

When Haynes was asked if this type of private information could leak from Twitter, he had this to say:

“Oh yeah, and it’s a genie out of the bottle kind of thing after that point. You know? Sure, I can fire them. Heck, I could probably even sue them, in some cases. But, the genie’s already out of the bottle. Like, how do actually recoup costs… you can’t calculate the cost or the damage of that.”

“Twitter is aggressively harvesting your personal information and tracking your every movement, selling your virtual dossier to the highest bidder ” says Project Veritas Founder James O’Keefe. “Even more alarming is that these Twitter employees don’t seem to think that they are the ‘biggest brother’ out there… We have more to come – stay tuned.”

Poster Comment:

It is every bit as bad as many of us have warned about.

Not only are they looking at your DMs and dick pix, there is nothing to stop them from selling those to the highest bidder.

And Facebook is even worse.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: sneakypete    To: Tooconservative (#0)

There can only be ONE possible reason for Twitter to do this,and that reason is to mine the posts for possible blackmail material on people who are prominent in politics.

After all,you don't really need dirt on Senator Daddy if you have dirt on the activities of Senator Daddy's children that could send them to prison.

sneakypete posted on 2018-01-15 13:49:59   Reply   Private Reply

#2: Tooconservative    To: sneakypete (#1)

There can only be ONE possible reason for Twitter to do this,and that reason is to mine the posts for possible blackmail material on people who are prominent in politics.

You might have a few rogue employees try that.

The bigger issue is that they are selling everything about you to their real customers, the advertisers.

Same with Facebook.

Apple keeps its info to itself. Google does as well for the most part.

Facebook and Twitter are by far the biggest abusers of public trust.

Tooconservative posted on 2018-01-15 14:16:04   Reply   Private Reply

#3: Fred Mertz    To: Tooconservative (#2)

Facebook and Twitter are by far the biggest abusers of public trust.

I don't have accounts there and never would.

I do view some of them based on my personal interests or URLs e.g. horse racing stuff.

Fred Mertz posted on 2018-01-15 16:36:50   Reply   Private Reply

#4: buckeroo    To: Fred Mertz (#3)

The problem is: the Internet is a PUBLICK METHOD OF COMMUNICATIONS INTERCHANGE. You have no way of knowing who or whom is viewing your transmitted or received data even if you have a secure link.

As an example, I use TOR just to connect to various URLs such as Liberty's_Flame. This method of IP guarding allows some security but it is incomplete as I have no idea who may read my data at the destination even though I control the source material. I have used this method for as long as I remember and certainly before posting @LF, 4um, FU, the REAL Liberty Forum, etc.

There will never be a complete solution to anonymous access to the Internet, either. It is impossible despite what Julian Assange set up @Wikileaks.

buckeroo posted on 2018-01-15 21:13:13   Reply   Private Reply

#5: sneakypete    To: Fred Mertz (#3)

Facebook and Twitter are by far the biggest abusers of public trust.

I don't have accounts there and never would.

I have an account at Facebook to keep anyone else from opening an account in my name. Should probably do the same with twitter,but just can't seem to get around to it.

Proactive defensive move.

sneakypete posted on 2018-01-15 22:34:01   Reply   Private Reply

#6: Fred Mertz    To: sneakypete (#5)

Are you therealsneakypete?

Fred Mertz posted on 2018-01-15 22:35:21   Reply   Private Reply

#7: misterwhite    To: Tooconservative (#2)

The bigger issue is that they are selling everything about you to their real customers, the advertisers.

Advertising what?

What market am I in where I would pay large amounts of money to obtain the Twitter data of those who look at dick pics?

misterwhite posted on 2018-01-16 07:12:46   Reply   Private Reply

#8: sneakypete    To: Fred Mertz (#6)

Are you therealsneakypete?

No,but I heard of that guy posting somewhere. Can't remember where or what he posted,though.

The only screenames I have used on political boards are sneakypete,and sneakypete1 when I forgot my password and had to re-register to sign on.

sneakypete posted on 2018-01-16 18:09:45   Reply   Private Reply