A convicted traitor would make a terrific senator for a shithole like Maryland.

A convicted traitor would make a terrific senator for a shithole like Maryland.

He/she/it would be a perfect match.

I can hear the campaign promise of "It's a proven fact that I can run away with it,vote for me!"

There isn't enough silly faggots to make him viable.

Don't bet on it.

In Connecticut the former mayor of Bridgeport, the state's largest town, served 7 years in prison for bribery on city contracts. They just re-elected that shitbird in 2015. Now he's running for governor of CT. Nice.

And now we have this shitbird Manning. He's actually a mentally ill person and he was long before he became obsessed with mutilating himself sexually. He was mentally unfit for any position in the military, even more so for a posting overseas or handling sensitive information.

Maybe this is the new Dem strategy: run shitbird corrupt traitors and convicts for public office. Bonus points if they can't decide whether they're a boy or girl.

Chelsea Manning files...

You go, girl!

On the flip side, I won't forget any time soon the videos that Manning released of the massacre in Iraq, something none of us would have seen or known about otherwise.

Chelsea Manning, the transgender former Army private who was convicted of passing sensitive government documents to Wikileaks, has filed to run for the U.S. Senate in Maryland,

An individual who has already been convicted of passing sensitive government documents thinks they should be elected to the Senate? Then what -- get a position on the Senate Intelligence Committee?

Yet we're told it is Trump who is unfit for office.

On the flip side, I won't forget any time soon the videos that Manning released of the massacre in Iraq, something none of us would have seen or known about otherwise.

I would NEVER consider this monster as government material to be accepted even in the lowest form of life. It is an atrocity of life.

Shooting journalists for fun?

What was his treason exactly?

If you're still unaware of his crimes, look it up for yourself. Even the wiki page is pretty detailed.

He should have been executed IMO.

BTW, if he did get elected, there's no way the Senate would seat him. They don't have to accept anyone if they really don't want to. Roy Moore might not have gotten seated if he'd won and there's no way Manning would. The Stain and Tom Cotton and others would see to it.

If you're still unaware of his crimes, look it up for yourself.

Sex "change"?

Sex "change"?

Try treason, pecker puffer.

Go play with Meguro.

He should have been executed IMO.

Not unlike the people depicted in the video he released, perhaps.

When one commits a crime by reporting to the world crimes committed by governments, the debate becomes one of legality vs morality.

When one commits a crime by reporting to the world crimes committed by governments, the debate becomes one of legality vs morality.

What kind of people does not want to understand this?

What kind of people does not want to understand this?

The morally bankrupt Bush/Kerry neocons.

An individual who has already been convicted of passing sensitive government documents thinks they should be elected to the Senate?

No. He can run, but there is no state in the Union that will elect him. People are not THAT crazy anywhere. Even San Francisco wouldn't elect him.

You have to defer to the resident homosexuals; they are disgusting the monster running for Senate.

Could you restate that in English, please?

Is it strange that Manning picked Chelsea for his/her/its first name.

I think he lost his mind because of mistreatment.

I think he lost his mind because of mistreatment.

You stretch to the ends of the earth, to find reasons to feel sorry for or make excuses for this freak of nature sick twisted TRAITOR. That's a liberal trait. Snowflake.

"I think he lost his mind because of mistreatment."

You stretch to the ends of the earth, to find reasons to feel sorry for or make excuses for this freak of nature

I am sure you will be titillated: The Guardian, 3/15/2011

"Mr Manning is accused of giving Wikileaks the video of a helicopter killing civilians in Baghdad, the logs documenting disasters of war in Afghanistan, and the 250,000 diplomatic cables which have shed such a dramatic light on world affairs. As a result, Mr Manning is made to stand naked outside his cell this morning, and apparently on all future mornings. This is the culmination of a punitive regime which has gone on for 10 months under which, although untried and unconvicted, he is not allowed to sleep or exercise in his cell during the day, is denied any personal possessions and is barred from conversing with the guards.

Every five minutes he is required to answer that he is fit and, if he turns his face away while asleep, he is immediately forcibly woken up. In an Orwellian trick, this is dubbed "prevention of injury" for his own protection. When Manning finally protested, sarcastically, that he could no doubt injure himself with the boxer shorts which are all that he is left with at night, the boxer shorts, too, were taken away. This regime of near-torture is perhaps designed to break him, in the hope he will incriminate WikiLeaks chief Julian Assange and other associates on some conspiracy charge."

Too much of a SJW kOoK!

Mr Manning is accused of giving Wikileaks the video of a helicopter killing civilians in Baghdad, the logs documenting disasters of war in Afghanistan, and the 250,000 diplomatic cables which have shed such a dramatic light on world affairs. As a result, Mr Manning is made to stand naked outside his cell this morning, and apparently on all future mornings. This is the culmination of a punitive regime which has gone on for 10 months under which, although untried and unconvicted, he is not allowed to sleep or exercise in his cell during the day, is denied any personal possessions and is barred from conversing with the guards.

You do understand that he was in prison and facing treason charges,right? What did you expect,chartered trips to Hollywood to party with the rich left?

Every five minutes he is required to answer that he is fit and, if he turns his face away while asleep, he is immediately forcibly woken up. In an Orwellian trick, this is dubbed "prevention of injury" for his own protection. When Manning finally protested, sarcastically, that he could no doubt injure himself with the boxer shorts which are all that he is left with at night, the boxer shorts, too, were taken away. This regime of near-torture is perhaps designed to break him, in the hope he will incriminate WikiLeaks chief Julian Assange and other associates on some conspiracy charge."

How about I promise to feel sorry for him/her/multiple-choice in my next lifetime?

Not that any of this will be seen as anything but a plus by the typical Dim voter.

You do understand that he was in prison and facing treason charges,right? What did you expect,chartered trips to Hollywood to party with the rich left?

Since when unconvicted (or convicted) person should be tortured?

You might be next, BTW. And it will serve you right.

Since when unconvicted (or convicted) person should be tortured?

When they commit treason. They should be killed where found if it is impossible to seize them for interrogation.

"Since when unconvicted (or convicted) person should be tortured?"

When they commit treason.

1. You mean when they get ACCUSED of treason?

2. Is revealing that journalists are shot for fun a treason? Was revealing what goes on at Abu Ghraib a treason?

3. Revealing information to the enemy is treason. Who is the enemy in this case - _general public_ is the enemy? Enemy of whom?