In the United States, in 2017, according to the government data, eight events took place on American soil that were classified as acts of terrorism. The combined death toll from all eight terroristic acts in 2017 is 12. Twelve people were killed on American soil by other people attempting to make a political statement through an act of violence and yet we are told the threat of terror inside the United States is at an all-time high. Nothing could be further from the truth.
However, there is another number that is particularly worrisome and it has to do with how many people American police have killed this year. As of the publishing of this article, the number of people whove been killed by police in 2017 is 1,184. This is nearly 100 times the number of people killed by terrorists inside the United States this year and yet the government and the media at large remain entirely silent on this violent epidemic.
While the shootings in Nevada and Texas were horrific and some of the deadliest to take place on American soil, they are not technically classified as terrorism as they were not carried out in the name of a political ideology. Even if we include the deaths from these mass shootings, police have still killed far more people than all the mass shooters in 2017 combined.
Our televisions and politicians constantly remind us of this essentially nonexistent terror threat while ignoring the very real threat from law enforcement. The victims of law enforcement are written off by society because their guilt is assumed and therefore they are dehumanized easily dismissed.
However, not a single one of these 1,184 people who were killed by police in 2017 had a chance to be proven guilty. Whats more, many of these victims were unarmed and innocentsome of them were even innocent children.
When the ostensible protectors of our even more ostensible freedoms are nearly 100 times more deadly than the people we are told hate our freedoms, something is definitely wrong.
Why is it that cops in America kill more people than any other civilized country? Do we have a higher crime rate?
The short answer is no. If we look at our neighbors across the pond in the United Kingdom, their total crimes per 1,000 citizens is 109.96. This is a whopping three times more than the United States whose total crimes per 1,000 is only 41.29.
However, police in England have only killed a total of 4 people in 2017. Cops in America have killed close to 300 times more than them. If this doesnt say, hey we have a problem, what does?
With only a few hours left in 2017, American cops have broken last years record of killings and show no signs of slowing down.
But America has a much larger population than England and therefore these numbers dont equate, right? Wrong.
China, whose population is 4 and 1/2 times the size of the United States, hasnt recorded a single killing by law enforcement officers in all of 2017.
In fact, more people were killed by American police in just the last four days than were killed in 2017 in Germany, England, Spain, Switzerland, and Iceland combined.
If we look at the total for the year, American cops have killed more people in 2017 than the above countries have killed in decades.
It is also important to point out that US citizens arent attacking cops either as 2017 was one of the safest years for police officers in the last five decades.
So why are police in America far deadlier than the rest of the world?
As the Free Thought Project has pointed out time and again, the lack of punishment police receive for brutality and killing seemingly encourages this violent and irresponsible behavior.
Police killings go unpunished because initial investigations are usually conducted by the police department where the alleged perpetrator works, because prosecutors have wide discretion over presenting charges, and because the use of force is not subject to international standards, according to a report out of Reuters.
Aside from the lack of punishment, the job description of a cop has changed drastically following the onset of the drug war. Police have morphed into a standing army using the same weaponry and tactical gear that can be found on the battlefield in one of the many countries occupied by the United States military. They are actively engaging otherwise entirely innocent and peaceful citizens in this war on drugs which makes the people the enemy.
The overwhelming majority of police brutality cases stem from the war on drugs. When so many people are tasked with finding and prosecuting those in possession of a substance deemed illegal by the state, the interactions become more frequent and less cordial. If we end that, we get the state out of the private lives of most individuals. This will only serve to lessen the scope of police harassment, in turn lessening the instance of brutality and killings.
We can look at the prohibition of alcohol and the subsequent mafia crime wave that ensued as a result.
Criminal gangs form to protect sales territory and supply lines. They then monopolize the control of the constant demand. Their entire operation is dependent upon police arresting people for drugs as it creates a monopoly on distribution for those willing to break the law. However, the illegality of drug possession and use is what keeps the low-level users and dealers in and out of the court systemsfeeding the prison-industrial complex while fostering the police state.
This revolving door of creating and processing criminals also fosters the phenomenon known as Recidivism. Recidivism is a fundamental concept of criminal justice that shows the tendency of those who are processed into the system and the likelihood of future criminal behavior.
The War on Drugs creates criminals every single minute of every single day. The system is set up in such a way that it fans the flames of violent crime by essentially building a factory that turns out violent criminals. And when cops respond to situations, their training teaches them to treat everyone like they are one of these violent criminals.
The system knows this too.
When drugs are legalized, gang violence drops drastically. Not only does it have a huge effect on the localized gangs in America, but the legalization of drugs is crippling to the violent foreign drug cartels too. This is the reason Norway just moved to decriminalize all drugs.
Until Americans educate themselves on the cause of this violence, uninformed and corrupt lawmakers will continue to focus on controlling the symptoms.
We will see more senseless killings and more innocent lives stripped of opportunity by getting entangled in the system. It is high time we #End the Drug War and retrain police to see the American public as a friendand not an enemy.
#1: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#0)
Fear propaganda for the AGENDA of legal drugs.
GrandIsland posted on 2018-01-02 07:40:40 Reply Private Reply
#2: Deckard To: GrandIsland (#1)
If we look at the total for the year, American cops have killed more people in 2017 than the above countries have killed in decades.
It is also important to point out that US citizens arent attacking cops either as 2017 was one of the safest years for police officers in the last five decades.
Deckard posted on 2018-01-02 08:38:03 Reply Private Reply
#3: Stoner To: Deckard (#2)
Stoner posted on 2018-01-02 12:39:02 Reply Private Reply
#4: Gatlin To: Deckard (#0)
Lets objectively look at the facts.
Leaving property crimes, burglary and motor vehicle theft aside .the violent crime rate in American is nearly 373 violent crimes per 100,000 inhabitants in the U.S. while guns were used in almost three quarters of the murders, nearly 41 percent of the robberies, and about a quarter of the aggravated assaults,
There are 1.1 million law enforcement officers and 326 million people In America. Using the latest U.S. crime rate date, there were 1.1 million LEOs working to prevent and solve violent crimes committed by 1,215,980 individuals in the U.S. while there were only 12 terrorist committing acts last year.
So, that information is nihil ad rem....not important and with no useful purpose. While there are three types of lies lies, damn lies, and statistics .there is also agenda driven bullshit. And that is what you are presenting here, Deckard, agenda driven bullshit.You cop-haters and anarchists like to show numbers that can in-fact be used to mislead with half truths. That is what you and your anarchists cop-cohorts do across the Web .continually misuse statistics in your propaganda.
You need not always have to fabricate or mislead, it is clear that your ilk is prone to bias that skew the statistical interpretation processes. It is imperative in todays rapidly evolving world that we all must become intimately familiar with the basics of statistical misuse.
A careful exercise in due diligence is necessary to prevent you lying bastards from purposefully misusing statistics with the malicious intent to influence with misleading statistics that surely magnifies bias.
I am watching you, boy
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-02 14:57:57 Reply Private Reply
#5: buckeroo To: Deckard, tater (#4)
I would be scared to death, if I were you, Deckard.
buckeroo posted on 2018-01-02 15:18:10 Reply Private Reply
#6: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, Jack Booted Canaries, whack and stack, *Arab Spring Jihad* (#4)
Why do you Jack Booted Canaries love to kill heterosexual Christians, is it the cannabis bird seed?
Hondo68 posted on 2018-01-02 15:27:27 Reply Private Reply
#7: Gatlin To: Deckard, GrandIsland (#2)
The people in the US own 795 motor vehicles per 1000....while the people in Togo own 2 motor vehicles per 1000.
You will no doubt fail to see the importance of comparing the number of Americans killed by police when compared to some European countries.... and the relativity of comparing the number of Americans killed in auto accidents with those killed by auto accidents in Togo.
But study on it for a while....and it may come to you.
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-02 16:10:44 Reply Private Reply
#8: Deckard To: Gatlin (#4)
Deckard posted on 2018-01-02 16:22:53 Reply Private Reply
#9: Deckard To: Gatlin (#7)
The article isn't about auto accidents Parsons.
America has a much larger population than England and therefore these numbers dont equate, right? Wrong.
China, whose population is 4 and 1/2 times the size of the United States, hasnt recorded a single killing by law enforcement officers in all of 2017.
In fact, more people were killed by American police in just the last four days than were killed in 2017 in Germany, England, Spain, Switzerland, and Iceland combined.
If we look at the total for the year, American cops have killed more people in 2017 than the above countries have killed in decades.
It is also important to point out that US citizens arent attacking cops either as 2017 was one of the safest years for police officers in the last five decades.
Deckard posted on 2018-01-02 16:27:29 Reply Private Reply
#10: Gatlin To: Deckard (#8)
New year - and you still cannot handle truth and facts.
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-02 18:09:13 Reply Private Reply
#11: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#2)
Then move to progressive SNOWFLAKE Europe, you fucking asshole.
GrandIsland posted on 2018-01-02 18:24:25 Reply Private Reply
#12: GrandIsland To: Gatlin (#7)
DickTard will be the first person to bitch if we were to shift our gun laws (and percentages of gun per person) to be in line withPROGRSSIVE LIBTARD EUROPE... but also would be first to compare Europe to the US TO FURTHER HIS ANTI COP, PRO DRUG AGENDA.
Well, to DickTard, I say, FUCK YOU, and your YELLA statistical debate methods. Move to Europe if you get a big fucking chubby over England's gun death statistics.
Freedom isn't free, DickTard... your drug dealing pals and non complying urban potatoes will die for freedom.
GrandIsland posted on 2018-01-02 18:32:09 Reply Private Reply
#13: Gatlin To: Deckard (#9)
Rather than report police activity to the outside world, the Chinese government is much too busy building their big data policing platforms that collect and analyze extraordinary amounts of citizens personal information. Their governmental abusive Police Cloud system actually tracks and predicts the entire scope of activities by all activists, dissidents, and ethnic minorities.
China has no protections for the privacy rights against their massive state surveillance system. China is a true POLICE STATE of the first order and you dare to try a point out ONE single aspect where they are better than America based on totally unverifiable data.
New year and you still are a gullible idiot.
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-02 18:36:15 Reply Private Reply
#14: Gatlin To: Deckard (#9)
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-02 18:39:46 Reply Private Reply
#15: Deckard To: GrandIsland (#12)
Lying sack of shit,
Deckard posted on 2018-01-02 19:48:02 Reply Private Reply
#16: Deckard To: Gatlin (#13)
Right - like fed.gov here is not?
Deckard posted on 2018-01-02 19:49:01 Reply Private Reply
#17: Deckard To: Gatlin (#13)
Right - we have protections here and United States government agencies don't spy on Americans.
The surveillance matrix is the same here as there, yet you and your asshole, ex-cop man crush keep insisting that we live in a "free" country.
Deckard posted on 2018-01-02 19:57:28 Reply Private Reply
#18: Gatlin To: Deckard (#16)
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-02 20:00:05 Reply Private Reply
#19: Gatlin To: All (#13)
You want America to be like China when you say that China hasnt recorded a single killing by law enforcement officers in all of 2017.
Well, Dufus .they dont record killings by LEOs in China they simply make thousands VANISH in China as totalitarian far-left police state goes into overdrive (dont let this happen in America).
The Chinese Communist Party has ruled the country since 1949, tolerating no opposition and often dealing brutally with dissent.
China Is what A 21st-Century police atate really looks like.
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-02 20:09:39 Reply Private Reply
#20: paraclete To: Deckard (#0)
so that means to the police have become the terrorists
paraclete posted on 2018-01-02 21:32:04 Reply Private Reply
#21: paraclete To: Gatlin (#19)
paraclete posted on 2018-01-02 21:38:06 Reply Private Reply
#22: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#15)
Then stop using progressive LIBTARD EUROPE as a comparison to the United States... you deceitful sucker of cock.
GrandIsland posted on 2018-01-02 21:44:58 Reply Private Reply
#23: GrandIsland To: Deckard, paraclete (#20)
I always find it amusing how well you and the site libtards hit it off. You ever wonder why all the sites snowflakes agree with you so much? lol
GrandIsland posted on 2018-01-02 21:54:15 Reply Private Reply
#24: Gatlin To: paraclete (#21)
Please permit me to give you a sound and valid reason for the little perspective which you so appropriately and suitably observed.The reason you saw very few police officers during your travel through China may be more easily explainable than simply saying the Chinese population are mainly Chinese. Research shows that the reason the Peoples Armed Police doesnt need a large number of Peoples Armed Police is easily understandable.
And the reason is not what a state like China does is make work for idle hands, thus less social problems. The reason is because the neighborhood committees 居民委 员会 in China constantly and closely monitors all human activity in each neighborhood with their boxes usually at street corners in the city for reporting suspicions activity. The boxes are routinely managed by women who are 60 + years old, who make it their business to mind everyone else's business in the neighborhood.
For example....Paul Denlinger lived in China, Taiwan and Hong Kong; fluent in Mandarin (written, spoken) and said he thought a lot of credit for the low crime rate in cities has to go to the neighborhood committees 居民委员会 .
Paul Denlinger reported:
High credit is widely given to these neighborhood committees 居民委员会 for holding the official crime rate in China so low and the reason China maintains such a low number of Peoples Armed Police force officers.Deckard believes we have the same type system here. Instead of neighborhood committees 居民委员会....Deckard likes to inflammatory refer to them as the:
But then you must of course realize that Deckard is clinically certifiable paranoid about all conspiracies, any rumors and how people come to believe the things they do....that everywhere there are those who are constantly watching everyone.Deckard will be along shortly with his usual and predictable morning raging rant about all of this ...
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-03 02:59:49 Reply Private Reply
#25: paraclete To: Gatlin (#24)
You know, the system works, we have neighbourhood watch, and our crime rate is low, leaves the police free to catch criminals. You have heavy handed government and where has it got you, wall to wall police and plenty of trouble.
ssssh! big brother is watching
paraclete posted on 2018-01-03 07:10:12 Reply Private Reply
#26: Deckard To: Gatlin (#18)
Good grief - what a naive sheep you are.
Deckard posted on 2018-01-03 07:10:14 Reply Private Reply
#27: Gatlin To: Deckard (#26)
Not by any reason, means, even a long shot or any stretch of the imagination....can I to be considered naive.
What you see but refuse to recognize is that I simply have the experience, wisdom, judgment and straightforward analytical style to see through all the lies and propaganda in your daily posts while you for some unknown reason cannot.
I can totally reject the attempted use of sophisticated artistic techniques by the pseudo journalists....all of which are used to produce shit posing as legitimate journalism. These pseudo journalists make their efforts typically using loaded yet explosive and sympathy producing words with the resemblance of a childs vivid working fantasy in bright colors with little or no perspective.
So, because I am no fear monger the same as you to spread this yellow journalism and that I dont shit my pants the same as you in petrified amazement while reading this yellow journalism....you decide to call me naïve.
Thats fine and you may do that. While all the time you will continue to believe the trashy shit some erroneously call journalism you spread....and all the while I will continue to relax here in beautiful Scottsdale to enjoy this glorious spring-like day.
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-03 08:33:47 Reply Private Reply
#28: Deckard To: Gatlin (#27)
Effing moron!
Deckard posted on 2018-01-03 09:16:22 Reply Private Reply
#29: Gatlin To: Deckard (#28)
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-03 09:31:18 Reply Private Reply
#30: Deckard To: Gatlin (#29)
Unreal! I'd post the links to sites that will prove you are a liar, but we all know you don't care much for facts, do you Parsons?
Oh well - here goes anyways - the government has ADMITTED that it spies on Americans.
NSA Spying
The US government, with assistance from major telecommunications carriers including AT&T, has engaged in massive, illegal dragnet surveillance of the domestic communications and communications records of millions of ordinary Americans since at least 2001.
Secret government documents, published by the media in 2013, confirm the NSA obtains full copies of everything that is carried along major domestic fiber optic cable networks. In June 2013, the media, led by the Guardian and Washington Post started publishing a series of articles, along with full government documents, that have confirmed much of what was reported in 2005 and 2006 and then some.
The reports showed- and the government later admitted that the government is mass collecting phone metadata of all US customers under the guise of the Patriot Act.
Moreover, the media reports confirm that the government is collecting and analyzing the content of communications of foreigners talking to persons inside the United States, as well as collecting much more, without a probable cause warrant. Finally, the media reports confirm the upstream collection off of the fiberoptic cables that Mr. Klein first revealed in 2006.
Do some frickin' homework before you spout your ignorance.
NSA admits to years of illegal searches on Americans
James Clapper Finally Admitted the NSA Used PRISM to Spy on US Citizens
Deckard posted on 2018-01-03 10:05:50 Reply Private Reply
#31: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, Granny Songbird, Deckard, paraclete (#24)
And you've reproduced this chicom paradise in your gated community, McCain Acres. Your rice bowl floweth over, granny tater!
You're a certified statist kOoK!
Hondo68 posted on 2018-01-03 11:29:29 Reply Private Reply
#32: Gatlin To: Deckard (#30)
What is real is that you post links to sites loaded with invalidated information.
And you invariably continue to blindly accept the untrusted input from those sources as you cherry pick sources that agree with you as a means to support your agenda....while you completely disregard sources with important contradictory points.
Deckard, you are a proven devious and unethical asshole in that you neglect the important task of detecting untrustworthy information when such information usually indicates critical, unusual, or suspicious activities.
You really need to address the problem you have of fusing untrustworthy reports that more times than not use unnamed sources. Using unnamed sources and leaked information is beleaguered with ethical and legal perils and yet you place blind trust in it.
Why is that ...
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-03 12:09:05 Reply Private Reply
#33: Stoner To: hondo68 (#6)
Stoner posted on 2018-01-03 21:27:17 Reply Private Reply
#34: paraclete To: hondo68 (#31)
yes the Chinese have even found a job for busybodies, now let me see, what 60+ woman do we know who fits that description.. Don't rush now, think about it
paraclete posted on 2018-01-03 22:27:58 Reply Private Reply
#35: buckeroo To: Deckard, tater (#30)
tater is blind; he admitted as much a few days back. Please be kind with our resident silly and continually snippitty geriatric.
buckeroo posted on 2018-01-03 23:13:37 Reply Private Reply
#36: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#31)
Scottsdale was already long established as one of the finest residential addresses in the world when I made the wisely prudent decision to relocate here in 1975 and go into full retirement at the ripe old age of 41 years.
Life is good as you can see from these randomly selected images of Scottsdale .
Should you ever have the desire to move to paradise, here are a few luxury home listings by Sothebys International Realty for your consideration.
I would even ask boss gardener to let you mow the acres of lawns like Trump let an 11-year-old boy mow the White House lawn.
See how nice I am.
Nah, John lives in the downscale place called Phoenix.Gatlin posted on 2018-01-03 23:44:53 Reply Private Reply
#37: Hondo68 To: Gatlin (#36)
Fearless Police Hero
Hondo68 posted on 2018-01-04 00:00:59 Reply Private Reply
#38: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#37)
His name is Houston James Largo and he built an amazing legacy in such a short time that he was called a hero and warrior by the Navajo Nation people.
By Susan Montoya Bryan - Associated Press.Gatlin posted on 2018-01-04 00:20:21 Reply Private Reply
#39: Hondo68 To: Gatlin (#38)
No one cares if the cop comes home after his shift.
Hondo68 posted on 2018-01-04 00:27:23 Reply Private Reply
#40: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#39)
Some People Just Need Killing -
Some People Just Need Killing - Quest - World of Warcraft - WowheadGatlin posted on 2018-01-04 00:41:02 Reply Private Reply
#41: Deckard To: Gatlin (#32)
Good grief - the fact is that NSA spies on American citizens has been validated and verified and admitted by the effing government themselves, and still you deny this fact.
WTF is wrong with you man?
Deckard posted on 2018-01-04 01:59:10 Reply Private Reply
#42: Deckard To: Gatlin, hondo68, A K A Stone (#40)
Are death threats against posters here going to be allowed?
Deckard posted on 2018-01-04 05:10:50 Reply Private Reply
#43: Deckard To: hondo68, Gatlin (#39)
Why Officer Philip Brailsford Is A Murderous Piece of Shit And Deserves To Die.
Now, here's the pig in question. Looks like some hyped up CoD player trying to be a badass:
The press, btw, chose to edit the photos not to show the tattoos.
"The judge did not allow jurors to hear about an etching on the dust cover of the rifle Brailsford used to shoot Shaver, which said "You're f--ked," because he felt it was prejudicial."
It should be prejudicial. If you or I had that dustcover on a rifle, it would be considered provocative. And note, he modified his issued duty weapon with this. That takes tools, it's not just a drop in, and is against department policy. Only the armorer gets to modify weapons. EDIT: apparently his personal weapon, which is supposed to meet specific department standards. Since they cited the dust cover as part of the reason for his firing, clearly that wasn't within standards.
This is a dickless little pussy, trying to look like a badass, with a hardon for shooting someone.
Now, watch the video above. What should have happened:
Suspect lies down. Officer gets good clear field of fire. Second officer approaches and cuffs suspect, then searches him. This takes seconds.
What did happen was five minutes of "Officer says stand up, officer says get down. Officer says raise hands. Officer says lower hands. Now crawl. I didn't say 'officer says.' BANGBANGBANGBANG!"
Interspersed with threats to shoot him if he doesn't perform some odd contortions that a trained gymnast can't do.
The department found his behavior, and the modified weapon, against policy to be grounds to fire him. Clearly, they did not think it was a good shoot.
Now, pay attention to the shot. Well, actually, it's a burst, which is criminally negligent under the circumstances, since there are lots of walls and lots of potential collateral casualties behind thin walls.
After the shot, does the pig say, "Fuck," or "Goddam," or even "Now I have do paperwork"?
No, he's placid. Like shooting someone is just second nature, like walking past them on the sidewalk. He's completely unfazed. It's like he was shooting targets at the range, waiting for the next popup.
The body cam doesn't show his massive erection. "Massive" relative, because you know it's possibly 2" long.
Deckard posted on 2018-01-04 05:24:12 Reply Private Reply
#44: Gatlin To: Deckard (#42)
Look here....SAD.
http://www.wowhead.com/quest=25681/some-people-just-need- killing Maybe you should have made your desperate plea to a higher authority: But then again, he may have your name on his shit list too and would have refused.
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-04 06:56:18 Reply Private Reply
#45: Gatlin To: Deckard (#43)
You are still digging in this shit.
What the Hell is wrong with you?
Will you ever stop with the ...
I know your are deeply troubled and mournfully sad so I will
help you get over it and move on along lifes beautiful highway.
Carefully and slowly read out loud this lovely ode ...
.... and then just give the fuck up with your continued whining!Its over, Dude.
There is even NO appeal of the verdict by the prosecutor.
its ALL over!
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-04 07:28:33 Reply Private Reply
#46: Hondo68 To: Deckard, Gatlin, Wowheads, FireIsland (#43)
If Gatlin had a daughter, she'd look like that!
Hondo68 posted on 2018-01-04 11:25:55 Reply Private Reply
#47: Gatlin To: Deckard (#41)
You and TFTP are using the same playbook.
You intentionally leave out IMPORTANT parts of the information you callously present in order to intentionally and maliciously make it appear to be something really bad and grossly threatening.
Devious ASSHOLES....the WHOLE lot of YOU, one and all.
Nothing that I cant handle....while effectively dealing with the deviously lying bastard that you are.
Gatlin posted on 2018-01-04 11:47:00 Reply Private Reply
#48: Deckard To: Gatlin (#47)
Good grief! You really are a government shill, aren't you? Lawful reasons? Like you mean without a warrant?
The US government, with assistance from major telecommunications carriers including AT&T, has engaged in massive, illegal dragnet surveillance of the domestic communications and communications records of millions of ordinary Americans since at least 2001.
Which agency do you work for Parsons?
Maybe read some more fed.gov propaganda while you're at it quisling.
Deckard posted on 2018-01-04 12:38:21 Reply Private Reply
#49: Gatlin To: Deckard (#48)
Good grief! No one ever said without a warrant until you just brought it up out of the clear blue sky....no scratch that....out of your ass.
You dont know that and you cannot prove that. All you can do, but intentionally neglected to do, is show that you copied that sentence from here....another one of your propaganda ridden anti-government trash sites. And they cant even prove it and make no attempt to do so. All they did was quote news reports in December 2005. None at the present, but I did once while proudly serving as an Officer in the United States Air Force. No need to read propaganda when truth is so readily available. Remember, truth is truth wherever you find it and truth is SO EASY to find. All you need do is look for it....try doing so.Gatlin posted on 2018-01-04 13:07:08 Reply Private Reply