Why not? Aren't they "Trained professionals"?

If you open your door to the police, they should shoot you?

How did you come up with that after what I wrote?

If you open your door to the police, they should shoot you?

How did you come up with that after what I wrote?

If the officer broke the law... he should be charged.

How did you come up with that after what I wrote?

Sorry, I misread your comments as sarcasm.

Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria

I don't speak French.

I barely speak yankee,and even try to avoid that.

Non auro, sed ferro, recuperando est patria

I don't speak French.

It's Latin, and means "Not gold, but iron redeems the native land".

Whatever the hell that means.

A better Latin phrase would be: Non aurum, sed in patria arma facis angelos terram

"Not gold, but weapons redeems the native land"

It's Latin, and means "Not gold, but iron redeems the native land".

Whatever the hell that means.

The words were uttered by Marcus Furius Camillus, in response to ransom of 1000 pounds of gold paid by Rome to lift a siege by the Gauls. Iron was considered the metal of war, so his use of "iron" got his point across. He went on to defeat the Gauls and redeem the native land.

On a different note, this may be a good case where innocent and surprised civilians are finally recognized to be entitled to be reasonably surprised by a police encounter and should not be shot for failure to recover from that surprise quickly enough. I for one am really tired of this "reaching for waistband" crap when the waistband is, after all, the natural place for ones hands to be in most situations.

Interview with the punk that make the bogus 911 call.

As a deterrent and a lesson.

The so called prankster should be tortured on pay per view, shot and dumped in the river.

The same for the trigger happy cop.

.I don't get it.

Seems like he wanted to be an internet legend in his own mind, which is clearly all F'd up!

I don't want to GET whatever it is that he and the psycho cop have.

If the officer broke the law... he should be charged.

This is not the point.

Police should be retrained, to stop to be so trigger happy. Invite British instructors.

Keep some distance, disperse, behave in not threatening manner - do not scare, involve verbal communication, recognize the situation. Than act.

It is better to let suspect escape than shoot innocent person.

Police should be retrained, to stop to be so trigger happy. Invite British instructors

Um... of course training is the ONLY course... but it's a bandaid. There is no erraticing this as long as "5 Deputies Shot, One Fatally, by Colorado Gunman, Officials Say" incidents occur, you'll always have trigger happy officers in ALL JURISDICTIONS.

It is what it is.

Being like progressive libtard U.K. Is not the answer... you'll see them shooting an unarmed bloke or two soon enough... give them fags a little time. Their society is just starting to get as violent as ours.

There is no erraticing this as long as "5 Deputies Shot, One Fatally, by Colorado Gunman, Officials Say" incidents occur, you'll always have trigger happy officers in ALL JURISDICTIONS.

Even if the police force got the same privileges, weapons and procedures Israeli army has versus Palestinian population, you will not eradicate risk to the officers, perhaps you will increase it.

Number of policemen killed as a result of crime in USA is about 50 a year (http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-36826297). Number of civilians is about 1 thousand. This proportion is satisfactory to you?

To compare to UK: "The 12 months to April 2016 saw cops discharge their weapons just seven times, with three people killed." (https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4103923/police-shootings-uk-2017/)

Don't tell me, that it is because of blacks, they make no more than 1/4 of people killed in USA, and UK also has many blacks and immigrants.

Don't tell me, that it is because of blacks, they make no more than 1/4 of people killed in USA, and UK also has many blacks and immigrants.

Funny how you seem to imply blacks don't murder at a higher rate that whites,while completely ignoring their NON-FIREARM murder rate in England.

Being like progressive libtard U.K. Is not the answer... you'll see them shooting an unarmed bloke or two soon enough... give them fags a little time. Their society is just starting to get as violent as ours.

They are more violent in the Muslim areas. We just don't hear about it because the British news doesn't want to be accused of racism,so they don't report it as often.

The British Police now have special squads armed with automatic weapons that roam around in vans in case unarmed Bobby's need backup. Which they DO need if they have to go into any of the Muslim areas of town or cities controlled by Muslims.

Another reason you don't hear much about crime in those enclaves is they are ruled by Sharia Law,not English Law. Enlish Law only applies of they leave their ghettos.

Funny how you seem to imply blacks don't murder at a higher rate that whites,while

Don't be too clever by half. 1/4 is much higher than their share in polulation.

Have you been in London?

No.

I have never been to the Moon either,but I know it is cratered.

Number of civilians is about 1 thousand. This proportion is satisfactory to you?

As a matter of fact, liberal scumbag, YES, it is.

Between DUE PROCESS for officers and the fact that officers are normally given the benefit of the doubt since they DON'T have a choice to be involved in deadly asshole incidents... yes, 1000 to 50 sounds good. Even if one of my relatives is in the 1000 group.

Have you been in London?

No.

I have never been to the Moon either,but I know it is cratered.

I have been several times in London and it is not cratered.

As a matter of fact, liberal scumbag

The way you address people, shows that you are a malicious person, not to be trusted.

The way you address people, shows that you are a malicious person, not to be trusted.

GI subscribes to the view that "if you're not cop, you're little people".

And you're right - he's a malicious person, incapable of any human empathy towards others.

And you're right

Isn't it interesting, how you continually rub elbows with admitted liberals of LF.

lol

Isn't it interesting, how you continually rub elbows with admitted liberals of LF.

You show also some paranoid delusions. I am not a liberal and I would never admit such mislabel.

Isn't it interesting, how you continually rub elbows with admitted liberals of LF.

You show also some paranoid delusions. I am not a liberal and I would never admit such mislabel.

Anyone critical of the establishment, who thinks cops should be held accountable or who isn't a die-hard supporter of Trump is a "liberal" to that foul-mouthed poster.

His spittle-flecked tirades towards the sane posters here are growing tiresome.

I am not a liberal and I would never admit such mislabel.

To be well understood. If I had liberal views, I would not be afraid to state them openly.

It is tedious to be pressured to prove that you are not a camel (Polish idiom).

"They deported him from Poland. He did not manage to prove that he is not a camel"