Shortly after placing the recorder in her daughter’s backpack, it was found by the school who has a no electronic device policy.

How did they find it? If the school searches packpacks every day, then perhaps the girl should have told her mother that it wasn't a good idea.

Something is being left out of this story. Given that this article is from the freethoughtproject, that wouldn't surprise me.

Something is being left out of this story. Given that this article is from the freethoughtproject, that wouldn't surprise me.

You can read the same story here from one of your precious MSM sources:

Mom charged after putting recording device in daughter’s backpack

With a mommy that stupid... no wonder her mutts get harassed at school.

Her daughter was then moved to a new class and police came after Sims.

Based on this, it appears as though the daughter told her mother she was being bullied by the teacher, so the mother decided to record the teacher.

Now that makes a little more sense and explains why the school was reluctant to take action against the "bully" and why the school is pressing charges.

the mom did everything she could to get the school to address the problem.

She has a bridge to sell you, you naïve shit stain. lol

Yup, she did all she could do... TO BREAK THE LAW... using her child to do so. Keep defending such a poor decision, like all our ignorant millennials do.

This shitty fucking article even tossed in some unrelated cop hatred at the end...

You're saying they made this up?

A Pinellas County school resource officer, serving in Osceola Middle School, was caught on audio recordings abusing the autistic child. Ironically, the officer, Ural Darling, had been celebrated as one of Florida’s top school resource officers for his work in preventing bullying. All that has since changed now that Darling has been found to be the bully, caught by the student’s mother verbally torturing the child.

Good grief - your submissive fetish for authority knows no bounds, does it?

This shitty fucking article even tossed in some unrelated cop hatred at the end... to trigger the LF antifa stupid.

ROTFL

to trigger the LF antifa stupid.

You, being one of them.

lol

With a mommy that stupid... no wonder her mutts get harassed at school.

When I first read the story, I just assumed her daughter was being bullied by other students. But it now appears as though she was reprimanded by either her teacher or the school resource officer for her behavior in the classroom.

Of course the little darling would call it bullying because she dint do nuffin. So her mom seeks revenge for her daughter's treatment by attempting to record the confrontation in the hopes of getting them fired.

How in this world, do you arrive at that conclusion on this phantastick day?

Shit, lay off the crack pipe. Every yella article Dicktard posts, triggers you into a Paultard frenzy.

The government is always negligent. It will always be this way. And you love it!

that parents cannot collect objective evidence to support their otherwise serious complaint.

That millennial whore can collect all the evidence she desires... she can't break the law to do it. Maybe she should have applied for a warrant to record.

Shut your Paultard flaps.

Shit, lay off the crack pipe. Every yella article Dicktard posts, triggers you into a Paultard frenzy.

While I have my family celebrating this phantastick day here at my home in Belize, I invited them to witness some of the fine dialogue that occurs on a chit-chat channel and especially towards me.

They all went outside after seeing your post. Best to use the boat and enjoy life.

Best to use the boat and enjoy life.

Best to use the boat and enjoy life... and smoke a doobie and make the thin skinned intolerant snowflake feelings go away.

was caught on audio recordings abusing the autistic child.

By today's standards, that verbal abuse probably consisted of calling him a brat.

is that parents cannot collect objective evidence

If the parent wanted to be objective she wouldn't have told her daughter about the hidden recorder. Since the daughter knew SHE was also being recorded, she behaved herself.

Progressive edumacators don't like having their ERRORS __________d.

"The most commonly-invoked exception is consent. Thirty-eight states and the District of Columbia have so-called “one-party consent” statutes."

http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/business- career/legal/it-legal-record-conversation

Maybe she should have applied for a warrant to record.

While I have my family celebrating this phantastick day here at my home in Belize ...

Rose needs to change her FB page from “Lives in Riverside, California” to “Lives in Belize.”
That is, if it is as you say…she is there with you.
BTW – That really is a dumb picture of you on the FB page.
You have the look of a hardened career criminal in a lineup with guilty written all over your face.
LOL …

So if the student is part of the conversation

I doubt an elementary school child can legally consent. It's why the ignorant bimbo was charged with endangerment... dumb shit

lol

Don't you libtards know that "bullies" have been in existence since the caveman. Why is it just lately, it's a matter of national security?

You libtards love weakening the populace... I guess in your libtard mind, you've gotta protect everyone... just like your libtard welfare ideas of feeding the animals.

Don't you libtards know that "bullies" have been in existence since the caveman. Why is it just lately, it's a matter of national security?

Because bullying an autistic child is a crime and the person(s) responsible for their egregious behavior towards this child can expect to be sued under the ADA Act and possibly proceed per the Civil Rights Act based their appearance and denial of equal protections of the law as well as hostile environment created by the perpetrator(s).

I doubt an elementary school child can legally consent.

Who signs the permission slips for their child... dumb shit?

http://www.nhc s.net/mosleyplc/documents/Picture_Release.pdf

See, now this is why nobody ever invited you to those LEO family picnics and fishing trips.

Because bullying an autistic child is a crime

We don't need laws that specifically name blacks, fags, cops, woman, Muslims or even autistic persons as victims in a hate crime. It's not illegal to hate. Harassment and assault covers EVERYONE... even if you weak snowflakes crumble at the term "bully"... it doesn't make it illegal unless the suspect party knowingly committed an act against the victim within the Harassment or Assault statutes. And don't friggin suggest such bullshit. Even autistic, artistic and retards need to learn how to defend themselves.

Who signs the permission slips for their child...

She used the child to commit a crime, dumb shit... she probably won't be signing the child's permission slips much longer. lol

You must have been the class parent of your trailer park. Here's a note, child... go buy me some smokes. Haaaaa

She used the child to commit a crime, dumb shit

The crime of recording the conversation the child was involved in, dumb shit?

"The family filed a civil lawsuit against the school district and were awarded $300,000 in damages."
https://www.today.com/parents/teachers-caught-tape- bullying-special-needs-girl-2D80555826

I predict a cashectomy in the future of the school, district, and your fellow badged bully/dumb shits.

The crime of recording the conversation the child was involved in, dumb shit?

No... the crime of recording the teacher AND ANYONE ELSE BESIDES HER CHILD you simpleton stupid mother fucker. You think the child was turning the recording device on and off when OTHER PEOPLE were being recorded, outside of any conversation the child was involved in?

The articles incident happened in "Norfolk, VA — For weeks, Sarah Sims"... not OHIO... you ignorant pile of anarchist shit.

so angry, why haven't you killed yourself yet? I do give you credit for keepin on in a life that by all signs must be a misery of never ending endurance of the unendurable.

How did I know that you will be on the side of a bully?

So people who stop students from disrupting the class are bullies?

they are already a protected class by the federal government.

You preach limited government to suck the asses of the banned Free Republic filth that post here... and then suck the ass of big daddy gov when it suits your weak snowflake feelings.

Show me a law in your state that specifically protects an autistic person from "bullying".

And I don't consider autism as retardism...I merely was pointing out whether your AUTISTIC, artistic... retarded, female, queer, black, law enforcement or the family pet... you don't deserve nor need a special law that protects you. There are already laws on the books that protect against Harassment and Assault. Hatred IS NOT A CRIME.

Show me a law in your state that specifically protects an autistic person from "bullying".

How about the law of compassion? Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

I realize that a big, tough, macho man, internet warrior like you has the compassion of Hitler - but most rational people will agree that you don't bully anyone, let alone someone who is retarded or austic.

Hatred IS NOT A CRIME.

Lucky for you - if it were, you'd be doing consecutive life sentences.

https://www.autismandhealth.org/?theme=lt&a=pt&p=detail&t=pt_aut&s=aut_laws&size=small

https://www.ada.gov/cguide.htm#anchor65310

[To: GrandIsland] I realize that a big, tough, macho man, internet warrior like you has the compassion of Hitler

You are not fair to Hitler. He wasn't so mendacious.

But some of his lower ranking goons were.

If the time comes when mendacious goons come to power, we will be know how they are.

1) How about the law of compassion? Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

2) Hatred IS NOT A CRIME.

Lucky for you - if it were, you'd be doing consecutive life sentences.

1) I'm not sure how I'd craft that into a criminal complaint or accusatory instrument to be filed with court?

2)... and I'm good with this concept... unlike libtards, I don't require non friends or family to like me. I could give 2 shits if any of you do. Freedom isn't free, bitch.

rational people will agree that you don't bully anyone,

And I'll tell you that "bullying" is an important and needed facet to human nature... its part of our checks and balances... keeping us from becoming weak as a species. You'd rather have everyone cry over everything, and get fucking HIGH to cope with that which you're too weak to stomach. Then... you toss the word "Hitler" back like Black Lies Matters tosses "RACISM" back to justify their position.

GFY

And I'll tell you that "bullying" is an important and needed facet to human nature... its part of our checks and balances... keeping us from becoming weak as a species.

That line of thinking went out with the Neanderthals.

Fortunately, the vast majority of our species have evolved past that hideous worldview.

It's truly unfortunate that those like you still think that way.

Then... you toss the word "Hitler"

If the shoe fits...

You'd rather have everyone cry over everything, and get fucking HIGH to cope with that which you're too weak to stomach.

Stop lying piggie.

As I have stated emphatically in numerous posts - I don't use drugs.

I am a fervent believer that legalization is the best way to get a handle on the drug problem.

See Portugal for more information.

FYI - it's a country in Europe.

That line of thinking went out with the Neanderthals.

You certainly are FREE to evolve into the masses of WEAK snowflakes we have today... but natural selection does not change. The WEAK die first.

I am a fervent believer that legalization is the best way to get a handle on the drug problem.

See Portugal for more information.

Okay, let’s do that….look at Portugal for more information.

Drugs in Portugal were not legalized.

In Portugal, drugs are still illegal, but any user carrying less than 10 days’ worth of illicit substances will simply have their supply confiscated. They will then undergo an assessment with a social worker, psychologist, and lawyer. Only a small fraction of users will experience further consequences. These can range from a few days’ community service to a ban on visiting venues in which the person is known to obtain or use drugs. Some high-risk cases may receive invitations to undergo treatment. Drug rehab is voluntary in all but the most exceptional circumstances.

In Portugal, recreational use of cannabis is still forbidden by law.

Decriminalization is NOT legalization.

Decriminalization in Italy was an abject failure.

So, you really don’t know what you are talking about….pothead.

In 2001, the Portuguese government did something that the United States would find entirely alien. After many years of waging a fierce war on drugs, it decided to flip its strategy entirely: It decriminalized them all.

If someone is found in the possession of less than a 10-day supply of anything from marijuana to heroin, he or she is sent to a three-person Commission for the Dissuasion of Drug Addiction, typically made up of a lawyer, a doctor and a social worker. The commission recommends treatment or a minor fine; otherwise, the person is sent off without any penalty. A vast majority of the time, there is no penalty.

Fourteen years after decriminalization, Portugal has not been run into the ground by a nation of drug addicts. In fact, by many measures, it's doing far better than it was before.

What's gotten better? In terms of usage rate and health, the data show that Portugal has by no means plunged into a drug crisis.

As this chart from Transform Drug Policy Foundation shows, the proportion of the population that reports having used drugs at some point saw an initial increase after decriminalization, but then a decline:

"We're losing badly the war on drugs," Trump said in 1990, per The Herald. "You have to legalize drugs to win that war."

"You have to take the profit away from these drug czars."

Trump further explained that tax revenues from a legal drug trade could be used to educate the public about "the dangers of drugs."

The point is -

The real point is that you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about. You said Portugal legalized drugs and that was a LIE.

So decriminalization has been tried in two Western countries. It has partially succeeded in Portugal and was an abject failure in Italy.

What makes you think that decriminalization would work in America since certain specific aspects (cherry picking) of Portugal’s model have been used to either support or critique decriminalization as an answer to various social problems. While many of these statistics can be difficult to measure and interpret, it would appear that it’s had had both positive and negative impacts. You and your other advocates for a drugged society only try to present some of the few positive aspects….but NEVER do you mention the negative impacts. Why is that? Strongly biased….are you? Of course you are.

Many proponents of decriminalization CLAIM that Portugal managed to decrease overall drug use, but it really depends on how we choose to interpret the statistics. Lifetime drug users (defined as people who have tried any drug, even once) actually rose from 8% to 12% between 2001-2007, then declined once more to 9.5% in 2014. ‘Problem’ drug users–those who have come into contact with the police or rehabilitation facilities due to their drug habit–seem to have decreased by more than 10%. However, these statistics could be flawed due to differences in measurements through the years. Past month and year drug use has remained steadily low, with only 5% of 18-24 year olds, for example, having used cannabis in the past month. This is what you call a SUCCESS rate….one that you can proudly point to? You completely ignore the fact that a lack of information makes it difficult to plot usage of ‘harder’ drugs over time. Get fucking real!!!

While you druggies try to cherry pick information and show only a few positive benefits in the crime rates in Portugal, you all have completely ignored and it will come as a surprise to others that these sweeping changes to the legal system have also resulted in some negative repercussions. Arguably, the most glaring issue is the rise in homicides, which climbed by about 60%from 2001-2007. They have evened out since, though, and currently sit at a little more than 10% more than they were pre-decriminalization. Ah ha!

The criminal landscape has certainly changed by incarcerations, but it doesn’t seem to be growing smaller. Incarcerations have risen slightly from 2001 to 2012 despite the fact that fewer than half as many people are now incarcerated for drug crimes. Those who are pro-decriminalization often point to this statistic as a sign that police are now unburdened from their duties in persecuting small drug offenses, and are now able to tackle more substantial crime. Others argue that lax drug laws have led to more crime, and back up their claim by referencing the growing underground population reported by undercover agents interviewed in the study.

You want to as a takeaway from Portugal’s drug policy a reason to cite the Portuguese model is evidence that the US should adopt a similar policy. Well, that wrong….Bubba. Because there is no evidence that America could apply their techniques as they currently stand. All you have is a dream and a desire and you want to undertake a vast social experimentation. Again, Bubba….get fucking real. You fail to realize that Portugal stands on a strong foundation of socialized public health care which differs enormously from what we have in the US. Portugal coddles their addicts with socialized medicine. Americans don’t need or want socialized medicine.

Finally, it’s important to step back and remember that large-scale social transformation doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Portugal, like the rest of the world, has witnessed unprecedented change since 2001. Factors including the technological revolution, the growth of the EU, and the economic crisis must all be considered. Still, anyone advocating for decriminalization should analyze the results carefully. .

Good morning. Let us now continue to address your “fervent belief.”

I am a fervent believer that legalization is the best way to get a handle on the drug problem.

See Portugal for more information.

Portugal is a country run by a government of the left, supported by a coalition of the left, a country that has turned its back on austerity with its social programs and created dire times for the country. Portugal was such a debt-laden country that it required an international bailout.

Yet, you are saying the US should replicate Portugal’s programs to solve the drug problems here. In doing that, you are saying that you want the US to have socialized medicine and furnish free medical service to all druggies like Portugal. Do you actually want the US to adopt a policy like Portugal? Carefully think about that as you read the rest of this post.

Decriminalization of drugs in Portugal began with establishing state-funded treatment and prevention centers throughout the country under socialized medicine costs. Nowhere can I find the actual monetary cost amount to Portugal for their multitude of state-funded treatment and prevention centers run under their socialized medicine program. I cannot help but wonder with all the information you drug advocates put out about emulating Portugal’s drug program why the cost of their socialized system is NEVER stated anywhere.

You don’t understand what is going on in Portugal with their drug program. You are so ignorant about it that you even call it “legalization” when it definitely is not. You are seemingly unaware that Portugal set up a multitude of networks at various levels of the drug problem for individuals under their “socialized medicine” program, the cost of which they have not or have refused to state. And I’ll bet you didn’t know that your tax dollars went to Portugal for the international bailout of their debt ridden socialized government programs.

Okay, you “fervent believer that legalization (decriminalization ) is the best way to get a handle on the drug problem”….tell us exactly why you point with great pride to Portugal as a model the US should follow to solve its drug problem.

Will you please do that?

Your link is NOT the same incident as the article DICKTard posted..

Ohio's wiretapping law is a "one-party consent" law - the same as Norfolk, VA, Comrade Douche Bag.

No... the crime of recording the teacher AND ANYONE ELSE BESIDES HER CHILD you simpleton stupid mother fucker.

Classrooms aren't private, Comrade Stasi Dipshit.

[Only “Private” Conversations are Protected

Under these laws, the first question you should always ask yourself is whether the conversation you’re thinking of recording is actually covered by the statute.]

http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/business-career/legal/it-legal- record-conversation

Classrooms aren't private,

Really, cum stain? Try just walking into any elementary school these days or any classroom... most schools are locked down, shit breath.

Hopefully, the school resource officer sticks his Glock in your Paultard maw.

That would be your like-minded badged thugs got a cashectomy in Ohio.

Have a nice day!

"Florida’s wiretapping law requires that both parties in a conversation give consent before a recording can be made. Florida makes it a crime to intercept, or record, any “wire, oral, or electronic communication,” unless all parties to the communication give consent. However, the law allows recordings to be made in places where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, such as a conversation in a public where they could be overheard. In such cases, consent is not needed for someone to make a recording." http://www.ocala.com/news/20101225/is-it-legal-to-secretly-record-a-teacher- in-class

recordings to be made in places where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, such as a conversation in a public

For the last time, a school classroom isn't "public". You can be told you aren't allowed inside the school. A classroom isn't any more public than the inside of the Whitehouse... think that place is public, cock breath?

For the last time, a school classroom isn't "public".

Poor ignorant, unreasonable, racist, buffoon.

Not surprising reading comprehension isn't your forte.

"

... The school district’s attorney says the classroom is a public place, so the recording was legal.

...

The courts have said, according to Haldin, that a party has no reasonable expectation of privacy “in a place of business and, therefore, recording without a party’s knowledge in a place of business is not prohibited by the statute. Here, the party’s place of business is the school classroom. “ 

... 

filled with students and “is accessible throughout the day by administrators, paraprofessionals, parents and other teachers and students.” “

It cannot reasonably be considered a private place for a teacher.

The courts have gone on to say that in addition to a party expecting privacy at a location, the expectation must include a ‘societal recognition that the expectation is reasonable,’ ” Haldin quoted from a court decision."

http://www.ocala.com/news/20101225/is-it-legal-to-secretly- record-a-teacher-in-class

usatoday

Game, Set, Match!

Amanda Howie, spokeswoman for the attorney's office, told CNN that the office decided against prosecuting the case despite having evidence to support the charges.

It wasn't "game set or match". The DA decided to drop the charges because you and libtard society feel the need to make "bullying" the next Ebola epidemic... so we can weaken our future millennials further. There was over 6,000 petitions signed by SHEEP that didn't give a fuck about the legality or constitutionality of the case... they, like you, couldn't cope with a child being bullied. If big fat black mom walked in the school and shot the teacher... libtards like you would want her not charged. It's YOU that's wrong with society. It's your thinking that's moved us LEFT THROUGH WEAKNESS.

So shut your libtarded shit slapper.

you and libtard society feel the need to make "bullying" the next Ebola epidemic... so we can weaken our future millennials further.

So...bullying weaker kids is a "good" thing?

There's no doubt in my mind that when you were in school, you constantly bullied smaller kids, maybe even kids simply because they were smarter than you.

That's probably the reason you became a cop. Your badge encouraged you to be a sadistic asshole - and you got paid to do it.

Your pseudo macho rants here are indicative of an authoritarian tyrant who would like to eliminate those who are in his eyes "unworthy".

Kind of like that guy who ruled Germany a few decades ago.

shut your libtarded shit slapper.

Still waiting for the case precedents.

{ crickets crickets crickets }

If big fat black mom walked in the school and shot the teacher... libtards like you would want her not charged.

Figures you can't tell the difference between murdering someone and recording a public conversation with no reasonable expectation of privacy,

But then that's probably also why you never got invited to those LEO family picnics or fishing trips.

Racist bully-goons like you can never change your spots.