The FBI's investigation of Donald Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, includes a keen focus on a series of suspicious wire transfers in which offshore companies linked to Manafort moved more than $3 million all over the globe between 2012 and 2013.
Much of the money came into the United States.
These transactions which have not been previously reported drew the attention of federal law enforcement officials as far back as 2012, when they began to examine wire transfers to determine if Manafort hid money from tax authorities or helped the Ukrainian regime close to Russian President Vladimir Putin launder some of the millions it plundered through corrupt dealings.
#7: Jameson To: Liberator (#5)
Sure, they were ahead of the curve on reporting this morning, but if you don't like Buzzfeed, check out any other news outlet -
Secondly, when are the Feebs going to bust Hitlery for her Foundation, the Uranium Deal, the Dossier, her Private Server, 0bama, Lynch, and Holder?
I have no idea. But your false argument really has nothing to do with Manafort's crimes does it?
The ONLY reason Mannafort is busted is to supposedly embarrass Trump.
You are welcome to your opinion, but it is far more likely that embarrassment is not even on the list of reasons Manafort and Gates are facing very serious terms in Federal Prison.
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 11:17:50 Reply Private Reply
#8: misterwhite To: Jameson (#0)
4 years before Trump's campaign.
misterwhite posted on 2017-10-30 11:18:25 Reply Private Reply
#9: Liberator To: Jameson (#7)
Please explain how the select NON-INDICTMENT of obvious High Crimes committed by Hitlery, Holder, 0bama, Lynch, Awan Bros, etal has "nothing to do" with implementing REAL justice?
Mannafort's "crime" is one and the same were the Feebs to investigate and prosecute half of Congress and ALL of the DNC. THIS investigation was and is a political stunt.
Are you satisfied with political diversions, BS stunts and Kangaroo Courts?
Are you satisfied with Deep State and Alphabet agys and "Investigations" that are politically directed? Steer resources and focus AWAY from obvious High Crimes? A simple YES or NO will suffice.
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 11:34:24 Reply Private Reply
#10: Liberator To: Jameson, A K A Stone (#7)
You have a funny way of endearing yourself to the Forum owner.
Nice seeing ya.
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 11:35:57 Reply Private Reply
#11: Liberator To: Stoner (#4)
I never believed that BS for a second. People in high places often compliment their opponents as a set up for future action.
I construed Trump's above kind words as a negotiation of sorts, conciliatory and empathetic in tone (given the Witch's staggering to the finish line with all kinds of undisclosed physical-mental maladies.)
Now that Hitlery (like ALL deranged liberal-statist totalitarians) has declared war on him, rejecting Trump's magnanimous olive branch -- which the patently stupid, fat, and drunk Hitlery has recently chosen to ignore - will manifest itself in unpleasant ways.
Now Trump knows... it's GAME ON.
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 11:46:54 Reply Private Reply
#12: Jameson To: misterwhite (#8)
Correct
OF course, Meuller's job is to investigate issues with the 2016 election...of which Manafort was a key player...
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 12:01:05 Reply Private Reply
#13: Jameson To: Liberator (#9)
As I stated "Your false argument really has nothing to do with Manafort's crimes does it?"
Your position has nothing to do with the topic being discussed.
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 12:03:07 Reply Private Reply
#14: Jameson To: Liberator (#10)
Funny,
Those were his words to me.....
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 12:04:36 Reply Private Reply
#15: Jameson To: Liberator (#9)
If you are suggesting Meuller's investigation and the FBI are politically directed by the "Deep State" - you have taken up residency within the lunatic fringe.
Are you satisfied with political diversions, BS stunts and Kangaroo Courts?
I'm certain you are referring to the non-stop tweeting by 45....so "NO"
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 12:12:47 Reply Private Reply
#16: Hank Rearden To: Liberator (#11)
Yeah, we'll see.
John Koskinen and Lois Lerner retired on full stolen-taxpayer-money pensions after weaponizing the IRS for Odumbass - Trump/Sessions just let them walk.
In fact, Sheryl Attkisson just last week said her sources informed her that Koskinen wasn't fired on Jan. 20th (as he should have been) because waiting until last week allowed his pension to fully vest and maximize.
That's our "new" Just Us department. I'm not holding my breath for ANYBODY to be held to account.
Hank Rearden posted on 2017-10-30 12:18:56 Reply Private Reply
#17: sneakypete To: Stoner (#4)
No RINO won the primary. Get over it.
I personally hope no RINO is EVER elected again.
ESPECIALLY none named Bush.
sneakypete posted on 2017-10-30 12:29:38 Reply Private Reply
#18: sneakypete To: Liberator (#5)
I have it from a reliable source that they are going to do this on the 31st of Feb,in the year of our masters,3035.
Game may be delayed or postponed due to inclement weather,of course.
THIS TIME THEY REALLY GONNA DO IT!
unlike the previous 917 times.......
The ONLY reason Mannafort is busted is to supposedly embarrass Trump.
BINGO!
sneakypete posted on 2017-10-30 12:31:54 Reply Private Reply
#19: Liberator To: Jameson (#15)
I hope the constant bleating isn't straining you vocal chords too much.
IF your biggest complaint about the lack of justice and honest investigations is NOT the mockery of and middle-finger to We The People...but "tweets" by Trump, then your reality is impossibly irredeemable. Good luck with that.
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 12:40:25 Reply Private Reply
#20: misterwhite To: Jameson (#12)
Hmmm. Here I thought Mueller's job was to investigate any connection between Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia, not a 2012 connection between Manafort and the Ukraine.
misterwhite posted on 2017-10-30 12:45:24 Reply Private Reply
#21: Jameson To: Liberator (#19)
I'm not complaining about"lack of justice...blah, blah, blah...
You are.
I'm discussing Meuller's investigation in general, and today's indictments of several of 45's key players.
You can understand the difference, right?
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 12:50:37 Reply Private Reply
#22: Liberator To: Hank Rearden (#16)
Good point and observation. Koskinen and Lois Lerner should be in jail for a very long time. And coughed up NAMES. We have still not determined where their orders to weeaponize the IRS and harass ONLY conservatives came from.
Jeff Sessions is NOT to be trusted. We saw exactly whose side he really plays for when he recused himself from the fake "Russia" brouhaha.
I realize there are many who feel Trump as President needed to immediately drain The Swamp. He was in no position while there was a coup and mutiny afoot and few allies wanting to step forward. Now that he's survived it, I look for REAL future justice.
In fact, Sheryl Attkisson just last week said her sources informed her that Koskinen wasn't fired on Jan. 20th (as he should have been) because waiting until last week allowed his pension to fully vest and maximize.
That is disgusting. I HOPE a deal has been made, or else this grave injustice will have been rewarded instead of heavily penalized. Again, I believe Sessions is part of the problem, and deals made behind the scenes -- some of which )hopefully) may not pay off till later.
That's our "new" Just Us department. I'm not holding my breath for ANYBODY to be held to account.
I share your pessimism.
Remember that many of Bammy's holdovers still infect the supposed "DoJ," as well as rogue DS globalists.
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 12:56:33 Reply Private Reply
#23: Liberator To: sneakypete (#17)
Amen!
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 12:57:02 Reply Private Reply
#24: VxH To: Liberator, sneakypete (#23)
VxH posted on 2017-10-30 13:03:05 Reply Private Reply
#25: Liberator To: sneakypete (#18)
I hear ya...
Speculation of course, base on observations and circumstatial evidence, but again -- to be fair, Trump was in the middle of fending off a coup and his own personal survival. It's ridiculous to say this of an incoming President, but Trump was in no position to wade into matters where DS tools were shielded by Bammy's holdovers, aided and abetted by the same GOPe Congressional Globalists who actually supported Bammy and The Hag (and STILL do.)
Yes...Mannafort's indictment has only that single solitary purpose: EMBARRASS TRUMP.
That Mueller has been allowed to become a "Special Prosecutor" tells me either a quid pro quo deal has been made...OR, the infighting between DS'ers and Patriots Within rages on.
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 13:03:55 Reply Private Reply
#26: VxH To: Jameson (#6)
If that's true he needs to be drained along with the other snakes in the swamp.
VxH posted on 2017-10-30 13:04:47 Reply Private Reply
#27: Liberator To: Jameson (#21)
Thanks for noticing.
Because ONE of us is quite willing to accept the Totalitarian One World Gubmint noose around our neck.
I'm discussing Meuller's investigation in general, and today's indictments of several of 45's key players. You can understand the difference, right?
"Key players"?? "Mueller's 'investigation'"??
HA! Chyeah, right. Bleat on.
Unless Hillary's name pops up as THE star-criminal, then this is BS.
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 13:07:05 Reply Private Reply
#28: Jameson To: misterwhite (#20)
Although I have to source to cite at the moment... (I just heard a news broadcast from the BBC) Meuller's indictments specifically reference transactions and activities well into 2016...
FYI
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 13:08:04 Reply Private Reply
#29: Jameson To: Liberator (#27)
You're embarrassing yourself.
Your comments smell of the putrid waste that spews from the mouths of Glen Beck, Alex Jones, and Sean Hannity
You are the "fake news"
We're finished here, you're incapable of intelligent discourse.
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 13:13:44 Reply Private Reply
#30: Liberator To: Jameson (#29)
We never began. Well...not on your end, anyway.
You start and end with 0bama and Hillary and their globalist puppetmeisters as innocent bystanders. And a MSM's altar at which you kneel. How precious.
Thanks for playing.
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 13:15:55 Reply Private Reply
#31: Jameson To: VxH (#26)
"Drain the swamp"
It was a great campaign slogan, I'd guess that the copywriter who came up with that has been well compensated.
In reality, what was sold and what has taken place have been anything but draining the swamp...
You see, draining the swamp was all about ridding Washington of the influence of Wall Street, Big Banking, Big Business, and Big Health/Insurance concerns.
45 was going to give the nation back to the people.....
A cruel joke.
Now - regarding Manafort - he is what's wrong with America.
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 13:24:42 Reply Private Reply
#32: misterwhite To: Jameson (#28)
Perhaps. But Manafort was lobbying to get the Ukraine into the EU. Nothing to do with the Trump campaign or Russia.
misterwhite posted on 2017-10-30 13:27:14 Reply Private Reply
#33: Jameson To: Liberator (#30)
It's sad how willfully ignorant you are.
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 13:27:58 Reply Private Reply
#34: VxH To: Jameson (#31)
Yeah, so was "you'd be in jail".
[Crickets and Wind 9 hours of relaxing sounds to help you fall asleep - White noise]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g04EtOyVeHY
VxH posted on 2017-10-30 13:28:23 Reply Private Reply
#35: VxH To: Jameson (#1)
Like the Clinton Foundation?
... Etc Etc:
Oct 30, 2017
[Awan Uranium One. Brillient Apps For NaDRA]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snR5voVy-T4
VxH posted on 2017-10-30 13:35:29 Reply Private Reply
#36: no gnu taxes To: Jameson (#0)
Who was President then? And what does this have to do with Trump and this investigation?
As for Manafort, Geez, most of us do so called suspicious things all the time. If I drive 5 miles over the speed limit, it might be deemed suspicious that I might have illegal drugs in my car. Or that I am speeding away from a robbery scene.
Also what crime is evident in what Manafort is accused of doing.
no gnu taxes posted on 2017-10-30 13:45:03 Reply Private Reply
#37: Liberator To: VxH, Jameson (#35)
Exactly.
The cognitive dissonance of prog tools is stunning.
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 13:47:11 Reply Private Reply
#38: Jameson To: misterwhite (#32)
I understand the argument.
Here is what the indictments are all about - Manafort has been on the Kremlin's payroll for years - he chose to hide the money he was paid from the IRS and more recently the FEC. He also chose to conceal the relationships he has had and the work he has performed to warrant such handsome paydays.
Is it possible that he was paid-off for his "work" in years well before the election cycle? sure!
But, let's be honest... this un-American acting foreign agent was working for the interests of those paying him - and now he's been caught.
And his work included running the campaign of 45.
This is not about his actions in 2013 it is about what he was paid to do in 2016.
IMHO
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 13:47:19 Reply Private Reply
#39: Liberator To: no gnu taxes, Jameson (#36)
HA!
Nice connection!
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 13:47:54 Reply Private Reply
#40: Jameson To: no gnu taxes (#36)
...Sigh... straw-man argument
As for Manafort, Geez, most of us do so called suspicious things all the time. If I drive 5 miles over the speed limit, it might be deemed suspicious that I might have illegal drugs in my car. Or that I am speeding away from a robbery scene.
You're a one-trick pony aren't you? STRAW-MAN
Also what crime is evident in what Manafort is accused of doing.
Here is the list:
conspiracy against the United States,
conspiracy to launder money,
unregistered agent of a foreign principal,
false and misleading US Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) statements,
false statements,
and seven counts of failure to file reports of foreign bank and financial accounts.
please check the newsfeed - I believe there have been several guilty pleas today...
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 13:54:26 Reply Private Reply
#41: no gnu taxes To: Jameson (#40)
Would you be willing to submit to them all?
no gnu taxes posted on 2017-10-30 14:05:52 Reply Private Reply
#42: Jameson To: VxH (#35)
If the Clintons or anyone else pulled this shit, nail them! do it now!
I won't defend them or their actions - and if you scroll up to the top, you'll see that I have not even mentioned anyone in any other administration.
And, yes, I understand that there are lots of folks around who can only grasp a "we vs. them" mentality, but that approach is negative and divisive.
I started this thread to discuss the current events of today regarding the investigation of the special prosecutor, and the ramifications.
To respond with: "Ah ha!! Clinton, Obama, NWO, blah, blah, blah... did it too!! only worse!! is just weak minded and pathetic.
Stop it!
Refute the facts or opinions I've put forth, or go troll some other thread.
No offense!
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 14:14:17 Reply Private Reply
#43: Jameson To: no gnu taxes (#41)
Are you really that dense?
are you suggesting that the office of the special prosecutor has "made up" these indictments?
You are aware that indictments like those presented today, are the result of evidence being presented to a grand jury who must determine whether or not a crime has been committed, right?
and on 12 counts, the grand jury determined that laws have been violated.
scroll up for the list
Nothing was "made up"
Your argument is invalid.
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 14:22:37 Reply Private Reply
#44: Liberator To: Jameson (#38)
Yes, "LET'S BE HONEST":
IF Mannafort was, an "un-American acting foreign agent was working for the interests of those paying him," as has been said, a President NOT named "TRUMP" was President.
Q: In which case, do do you believe 0bammy, the DS, and Hillary knew all about it?" OR were completely in the dark??
Remember -- you want to "BE HONEST," right?
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 14:26:49 Reply Private Reply
#45: no gnu taxes To: Jameson (#43)
But please come back and present some thinking more compellening.
no gnu taxes posted on 2017-10-30 14:28:09 Reply Private Reply
#46: VxH To: Jameson (#42)
All animals are equal! {uhh} But some are more equaler than others!
VxH posted on 2017-10-30 14:36:42 Reply Private Reply
#47: Jameson To: Liberator (#44)
How should I know?
What a stupid question.
If it is proven that Manafort and Co. worked against the interests of the people of the United States, prosecute him.
If it is proven that Ms. Clinton, President Obama, or anyone else was knowingly involved in any way, prosecute them too.
Don't try to involve me in your stupid partisan pissing match - I don't care.
What I do care about is that there is a very real chance that our democratic process of electing representatives might have been knowingly f-ed up by foreign interests - that is unacceptable, and I'd hope even you would get that.
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 14:43:06 Reply Private Reply
#48: Jameson To: VxH (#46)
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 14:44:13 Reply Private Reply
#49: no gnu taxes To: Jameson (#47)
Proven is an absolute standard.
However, I would suggest that since Mrs. Bill Clinton is way more involved in these matters in these matters than anyone, shouldn't she be questioned?
Hell, this is crap that occurred when Trump was running a reality show.
no gnu taxes posted on 2017-10-30 14:54:46 Reply Private Reply
#50: Liberator To: Jameson (#47)
Having a problem connecting the two dots, eh?
Mannafort was allegedly conducting a LOT of cloak & dagger business right under the nose of 0bama and Hillary as they were President and SoS respectively, and obviously needing SOME kind of clearance to deal with Russia (remember THEM? 0bama and Hillary ok'd the Uranium Deal, didn't they?)
If it is proven that Ms. Clinton, President Obama, or anyone else was knowingly involved in any way, prosecute them too. Don't try to involve me in your stupid partisan pissing match - I don't care.
Oh, but as a Prog, you DO care. That's why you're so gung-ho on Mannafort's indictment while ignoring the obvious high crimes committed by both your treasonous ex-President and Presidential criminal-wannabe.
What I do care about is that there is a very real chance that our democratic process of electing representatives might have been knowingly f-ed up by foreign interests - that is unacceptable, and I'd hope even you would get that.
How noble of you to care. NOW THAT TRUMP IS PRESIDENT.
How about your concern from 2008-2016 "very real" PROBABILITY that "our democratic process of electing representatives" has ALREADY been tampered with by subversive DOMESTIC interests? Like the DNC and 0bama's and Hitlery's minions?
Funny how you're conveniently forgotten all the clear cases of Election Fraud perpetrated by DNC and Democratic Precincts (Harry Reid's Nevada (D) computers were calibrated by one of his sons, Clark County commission chairman.) I could go on and on and enlighten you. But we both know your supposed neutral political interest and ethics are select.
Forget about ACORN? SEIU? THIS (New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case)?:
The DNC-CNN collusion during Hillary's-Trump debate, 0bama's promise to the Russian President that once he was elected, he' be able to "make deals"? How about key testimony that computerized voting machines can easily be tampered with?
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 15:28:57 Reply Private Reply
#51: Liberator To: no gnu taxes, Jameson (#49)
SPOT ON. On ALL counts.
Liberator posted on 2017-10-30 15:30:38 Reply Private Reply
#52: VxH To: Jameson (#48)
You've never read Animal Farm?
http://www.gutenberg.us/articles /Animal_Farm
VxH posted on 2017-10-30 16:10:54 Reply Private Reply
#53: Jameson To: Liberator (#50)
Oh please....
You're such a drama queen.
This discussion is about Mueller's investigation and the ramifications of it.
If there is any actual proof of any of your whack-job conspiracies please cite the associated criminal case....otherwise no intelligent person cares.
But please allow me to digress for one moment, to state something I believe 100% - you can disagree or not, I really don't care....
If it is truly possible to "hack" the ballot box.... it will happen in every single election every single time.
I'm finished on that topic.
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 16:14:51 Reply Private Reply
#54: Jameson To: VxH (#52)
Of course I have.
What does that have to do with my comment - that if there is any proof of wrong-doing - those responsable should be prosecuted?
My point was basic, I'm not defending either "party or ideology"
I'm just looking at this particular situation and giving my opinion......
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 16:19:31 Reply Private Reply
#55: Jameson To: Liberator (#50)
So... I couldn't find any indictments, convictions or pleas as it applies to "all the clear cases of election fraud in Nevada" - couldyou cite your sources?
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 16:24:19 Reply Private Reply
#56: Jameson To: Liberator (#50)
Please cite your source for these "facts"
Jameson posted on 2017-10-30 16:32:20 Reply Private Reply