Two women have been sentenced to a year in jail after it was discovered that they allowed their dog to eat an elderly army veteran alive.
According to reports, Hayley Sulley and Della Woods starved their dog for two days before he attacked the 79-year-old Clifford Clarke. Sulley and Woods ignored their dog Charlie for two days and allowed him to run around their yard freely, so when neighbor Clifford Clarke opened his door, the dog ran and mauled him to death.
Prior to eating Clarke alive, the dog was so hungry that it attempted to eat a plastic bowl and some cigarette butts. When a neighbor noticed the dog foaming at the mouth, the police were called, but by the time they arrived, Clarke had already been eaten by the ravenous dog. Police say that the dog even tried to eat the end of the gun used to kill it. The brutal killing was described in court proceedings, as it appears the dog literally amputated one of Clarke’s arms.
“I am satisfied this dreadful and forceful attack on Mr. Clarke was entirely avoidable,” said Judge Mark Brown to the women in court. “Mr. Clarke was literally eaten alive by Charlie when large amounts of tissue were ingested by the dog and that is a very shocking, appalling and tragic event. Mr. Clarke suffered a horrific death and you have taken away from his family the love and companionship he would have provided.”
Prosecutor Gary Simpson said that the women deserve their sentence for allowing their dog to get to the point it did, ultimately ending in an innocent man’s death.
“This was a vicious attack on a defenseless man who was powerless to fight back against this large and powerful dog,” said Simpson. “The guilty pleas of these two women have thankfully brought this case to a relatively speedy conclusion and have saved Mr. Clarke’s relatives the ordeal of a trial. Hayley Sulley and Della Woods were both responsible for the dog’s welfare and behavior on that fateful day. Their failure to make sure the dog was cared for and under control has led to a man’s death and they must now come to terms with that. Our thoughts are with the family of Mr. Clarke at this sad time.”
Once they are done serving their prison sentence, both Sulley and Woods are banned from ever owning another dog again.
Sources: Liverpool Echo, The Independent, Mirror
Poster Comment:
Does Hillary have a dog?
#1: Tooconservative To: IbJensen (#0)
They should have served 10-15 at at least.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-27 12:51:06 Reply Private Reply
#2: Vicomte13 To: Tooconservative (#1)
They should be put to death.
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-10-27 13:15:41 Reply Private Reply
#3: Tooconservative To: Vicomte13 (#2)
Only if they intended to kill him. I'm a little surprised you aren't paying more heed to criminal intent.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-27 13:23:42 Reply Private Reply
#4: Stoner To: Vicomte13 (#2)
They should be taken to shark infested waters, sliced up with razors to bleed profusely, then dumped over board.
Stoner posted on 2017-10-27 13:24:36 Reply Private Reply
#5: Vicomte13 To: Tooconservative (#3)
I'm not being legal or just, I am killing here in anger. They starved a dog who killed a vet, and then was shot. The dog and the vet were victims. The women were callous and stupid. Feed them into woodchippers.
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-10-27 13:39:51 Reply Private Reply
#6: Tooconservative To: Vicomte13 (#5)
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-27 14:37:12 Reply Private Reply
#7: no gnu taxes To: Vicomte13 (#5)
no gnu taxes posted on 2017-10-27 18:35:37 Reply Private Reply
#8: Vicomte13 To: no gnu taxes (#7)
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-10-27 18:46:52 Reply Private Reply
#9: Tooconservative To: no gnu taxes, Vicomte13 (#7)
What, no PPV? You guys have really given this some thought. : )
Britain is way too lenient on some crimes. I have to think that the old vet would have gotten more than a year in prison if he'd had a handgun to defend himself from that dog.
Even Michael Vick got a year or two in a federal prison just for his dog cruelty. Not sure if it was a Club Fed or not. I resented that the NFL ever allowed him to play again. Then that asshole was trying to get his right to own a dog reinstated, not sure how that turned out.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-27 19:14:50 Reply Private Reply
#10: Stoner To: Vicomte13 (#5)
Very imaginative !
Stoner posted on 2017-10-27 19:18:33 Reply Private Reply
#11: redleghunter To: IbJensen (#0)
Lesbians?
redleghunter posted on 2017-10-27 21:39:36 Reply Private Reply
#12: IbJensen To: redleghunter (#11)
Why of course not. Lesbians? They are living a lifestyle as Godly and wholesome as a crack house whore. The duo shouldn't be faulted for having a somewhat usual way of entertaining themselves rather than the hum-drum of sitting on one another's face.
IbJensen posted on 2017-10-28 08:17:23 Reply Private Reply
#13: sneakypete To: IbJensen (#0)
sneakypete posted on 2017-10-28 10:12:38 Reply Private Reply
#14: sneakypete To: redleghunter (#11)
Who knows? Half of England are on welfare,so they might just be two parasites sharing a squat to save money for alcohol and drugs?
sneakypete posted on 2017-10-28 10:14:38 Reply Private Reply