Deaf-blind patrons must be able to go to the movies too, court says

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/07/deaf-blind-patrons-must-be-able-to-go-to-movies-too-court-says.html
Published: Oct 7, 2017
Author: ap
Post Date: 2017-10-07 09:51:42 by Justified
Views: 2172

An appeals court ruled that federal disability law requires movie theaters to provide specialized interpreters to patrons who are deaf and blind. (iStock)

Federal disability law requires movie theaters to provide specialized interpreters to patrons who are deaf and blind, an appeals court said Friday.

The Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Cinemark, the nation's third-largest movie chain, in a case involving a Pennsylvania man who wanted to see the 2014 movie "Gone Girl" and asked a Cinemark theater in Pittsburgh to supply a "tactile interpreter." The theater denied his request.

The plaintiff, Paul McGann, is a movie enthusiast who reads American Sign Language through touch. He uses a method of tactile interpretation that involves placing his hands over the hands of an interpreter who uses sign language to describe the movie's action, dialogue and even the audience response.

AIRLINE DIDN'T ALLOW BLIND MAN, GRANDDAUGHTER ON PLANE

The federal appeals court concluded Friday that tactile interpreters are covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, which requires that public accommodations furnish "auxiliary aids and services" to patrons with vision, hearing and speech disabilities."

It would be impossible for a deaf-blind person to experience the movie and understand the content without the provision of tactile interpretation," said Carol A. Horowitz, managing attorney of Disability Rights Pennsylvania, which filed suit on McGann's behalf.

The ruling said Cinemark still can argue that providing the interpreters would present an "undue burden," an exception to the disability law that takes into account the cost of the accommodation and the business's ability to pay for it. It sent the case back to a federal judge to consider that argument.

WHY OTHER SENSES MAY BE HEIGHTENED IN BLIND PEOPLE

Because of the intensive nature of the work, McGann requires the services of two interpreters. The interpreters cost a few hundred dollars per showing.Cinemark earned $257 million in 2016. The movie chain also has said that before McGann, it had never before received a request for tactile interpretation.

A spokesperson for the Plano, Texas-based chain said Cinemark is evaluating its legal options.

The U.S. Department of Justice filed documents in support of McGann.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Justified    To: All (#0)

For those that don't understand this is what these crazy people are asking the movie theaters to provide. Im sorry you have issues but this is nuts on every level possible.

Nobody is going to stand there and be aggravated by them. Ticket prices will go up to pay for special seats and "interpreters".

Crazy people rule the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Justified posted on 2017-10-07 10:07:05   Reply   Private Reply


#2: misterwhite    To: Justified (#0)

"The interpreters cost a few hundred dollars per showing."

Oops. His ticket price just increased if he wants the theater to provide them. Or, he can bring his own tactile interpreters (and pay for their admission tickets).

The bottomline is this. The ADA requires reasonable accomodations. $200 worth of interpreters in exchange for a $9 admission is not anyone's idea of reasonable.

misterwhite posted on 2017-10-07 10:21:20   Reply   Private Reply


#3: misterwhite    To: Justified (#0)

Deaf-blind patrons must be able to go to the movies too, court says

No one's stopping them.

misterwhite posted on 2017-10-07 10:22:42   Reply   Private Reply


#4: Tooconservative    To: Justified (#0)

This could run about half the movie theaters in the country out of business or force them to raise their ticket prices 20% or more.

No matter how many interpreters you have, a blind-deaf person cannot "see" a movie. A movie is entirely an audio/visual medium. An interpretation is necessarily only a description of the movie, not the movie itself.

This seems like a lawsuit troll at work with some blind-deaf ringer as the client.

Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-07 10:25:39   Reply   Private Reply


#5: Vicomte13    To: Tooconservative (#4)

his seems like a lawsuit troll at work with some blind-deaf ringer as the client.

Seems like this "troll" is winning.

Vicomte13 posted on 2017-10-07 18:21:39   Reply   Private Reply


#6: Tooconservative    To: Vicomte13 (#5)

It's ridiculous. He cannot have the movie experience because it is inextricably tied to the visual/audio medium.

At most, he can have a description of the movie and how people in the theater are reacting. That is not watching a movie. Everyone knows it.

This is a perverse disability lawsuit, a nuisance lawsuit in many ways.

Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-07 18:24:15   Reply   Private Reply


#7: Vicomte13    To: Tooconservative (#6)

This is a perverse disability lawsuit, a nuisance lawsuit in many ways.

Of course.

But still, he's winning.

Vicomte13 posted on 2017-10-07 19:39:22   Reply   Private Reply


#8: Hank Rearden    To: Justified (#0)

The Cripplo-American Community is going to start being attacked and mowed down by pissed-off normal Americans.
How much more leftist crap should a rational society have to endure before it lashes back with a mighty vengeance?

Hank Rearden posted on 2017-10-10 00:10:38   Reply   Private Reply