|
Pretty soon, it could be NFL team owners on their knees begging TV viewers to come back. Once again in Week 4 of the 2017 season, as players continued their sitting-kneeling protests against something, former fans silently exercised their right of free speech using TV remotes. Despite the always insightful, candid commentary of Jon Gruden, this weeks Monday Night game on ESPN lost audience again. It was actually a pretty good game, by all accounts. After the 29-20 win, Kansas City remained the only unbeaten team at 4-0, while Washington fell to 2-2. This game though drew 13% fewer viewers than last week. And the drop was worse 16% in the key demo that ad buyers covet. The game drew 11.9 million viewers, down almost two million from last week. Perhaps even more disturbing for the 32 billionaire team owners, another sponsor pulled its ads over the protest controversy. Said Steve Kalafer, a mega-car-dealer and baseball team owner in New Jersey:
Kalafer said a decision on his 2018 substantial ad buy remained undecided now pending NFL action. He explained his problem is with the league and owners who failed to give direction to players on how best to exercise their free speech rights while also showing respect to the flag and National Anthem. Owners buried their heads in the sand, Kalafer added. The Wall Street Journal reported that despite an appearance of league unity, team owners clashed in a recent meeting over the leagues combative response to White House criticisms. We made our point, said league spokesman Joe Lockhart, who used to be Bill Clintons spokesman. There was no point in responding to every tweet or every statement. Reaction against protests by the multi-millionaire players has been emotional and nationwide with President Trump weighing in. We wrote here Monday about a Georgia high school football team that had its own surprising patriotic response to the pro protests. The next opportunity for angry fans to not view a televised NFL game comes Thursday evening when the Patriots visit the Buccaneers. As a disappointed and likely apocryphal Hollywood producer once said about a box-office flop, If people dont want to come, you cant stop them. |
Poster Comment:
Another big regional sponsor gone & Budweiser wavering.
#1: Vicomte13 To: Tooconservative (#0)
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-10-04 17:16:01 Reply Private Reply
#2: Tooconservative To: Vicomte13 (#1)
Nothing so dramatic, I'm afraid. We're seeing a slow steady hemorrhaging.
A lot of people who had been watching out of habit and because that is what people talk about are reconsidering spending 4 hours at a time watching games without a lot of action. Saturday, Sunday afternoon, Monday night, Thursday night, it's way overdone.
I do think at some point this winter, people get bored with themselves and they start quietly tuning back in. And I think the NFL is counting on that happening.
If they just keep dangling that cheese, the mice will return to the maze. They are probably right.
OTOH, if they lose Budweiser as sponsor, that could hit their revenues hard enough to make difference. And the networks would start looking for more profitable programming to displace the Thursday night games and maybe one or more of the weekend slots.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-04 17:23:17 Reply Private Reply
#3: Vicomte13 To: Tooconservative (#2)
Go Bud, go! Trample the NFL under those Clydesdale hooves!
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-10-04 17:39:22 Reply Private Reply
#4: Tooconservative To: Vicomte13 (#3)
Just as pols or companies or event organizers or merchants try to create a bandwagon effect to convince people to take part, to be part of the popular crowd or just not wanting to feel left out of The Next Big Thing and we call this a bandwagon effect, there can be such a thing as a reverse-bandwagon, where something like the NFL that has benefited from a bandwagon effect for many years and then starts to lose some of those loyal viewers/fans. At a certain point with people drifting away, the social capital of the NFL diminishes until that trickle of defecting fans turns into a flood.
We aren't there yet. But the trend is very dismal for the NFL. Even if they pull out of their nosedive, they face reduced revenues and other problems.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-04 23:21:27 Reply Private Reply
#5: nolu chan To: Tooconservative, Vicomte13 (#4)
http://nbc4i.com/2017/10/04/nfl-ratings-down-on-weekend-of-boycott/
= = = = = = = = = =
Week 01. 16.3 million ±0.0m, % change (cumulative fm Week 1)
Week 02. 15.8 million -0.5m, minus 3.0%
Week 03. 14.8 million -1.0m, minus 9.2%
Week 04. 13.8 million -1.0m, minus 15.3%
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Only a what if, but if the current trend continued....
projected continuing trend to lose 1m per week
Week 05. 12.8 million - 1.0m, minus 21.5%
Week 06. 11.8 million - 1.0m, minus 27.6%
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The decline in viewers week by week, using Week 1 as the baseline, indicates a 15.3% cumulative decline since Week 1. A half million viewers were lost on Week 2, a million more on week 3, and yet another million on week 4, for a total of 2.5 million viewers lost in three weeks, and with a downward trendline.
They can't lose a million per week forever, but they have incurred significant loss, and network tv series are just starting back up, along with NHL ice hockey and NBA basketball.
Next week, bye weeks kick in and there are two less NFL games.
Also, early season ratings indicate the two highest rated series on tv are The Big Bang Theory and spinoff Young Sheldon. They had a viewership of 17.2m and 17.7 million. Both move to Thursday night. TNF is going to have some competition.
nolu chan posted on 2017-10-05 04:35:33 Reply Private Reply
#6: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#5)
That alone is pretty disturbing. BBT got tired and formulaic after 3-4 years. Still, no doubt it is popular, here and overseas.
You have to consider the NFL hardcores. At what point do they desert the NFL? Is is when the playas decide to burn a flag while the anthem is playing? You'd probably not faze something like 5-10M hardcore NFL fans with that.
Trying to think like the NFL owners and the networks, they have to be considering what is their base hardcore audience. They must think it is at least 12M. Still a major audience but much diminished from the height of its power.
Even so, their current business model, profits from broadcast, merchandise, endorsements, NFL sponsors, tickets have to look rather different now from what they were a year or two back.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-05 07:43:32 Reply Private Reply
#7: Vicomte13 To: Tooconservative (#6)
Otherwise, TV is useless.
I get dragged into watching "Caso Cerrado" because my wife likes it, and Dr. Phil, and the various Simon Cowell Talent Show vehicles. But that's because it's on for them, not because I want to watch it. Home alone, I never turn it on. Haven't since 1981.
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-10-05 07:50:55 Reply Private Reply
#8: Hank Rearden To: Tooconservative (#2)
It is simply not possible for me to become bored enough to want to waste any time watching inarticulate, below-avg-intelligence, adult mouthbreather men play kids' games, and it never has been.
Lack of interest in this crap goes back to my early teen years, when I noticed that it was a complete, boring waste of time. The only possible upside is the snacks, but I can get those to go.
Hank Rearden posted on 2017-10-05 13:59:42 Reply Private Reply
#9: Tooconservative To: Hank Rearden (#8)
I understand the impulse but that just means you're irrelevant to the NFL if you're not a regular fan, buying tickets and merchandise and upping their ratings.
To measure whether the NFL is being hurt, you have to find if hardcore fans stopped watching or if some people decide maybe one game a week is all they want instead of 2-3.
I'm sure the NFL and the networks are trying to understand who and what their audience is, week by week. There is big money at stake.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-05 14:46:55 Reply Private Reply
#10: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#6)
I don't watch either one. I find laugh tracks irritating. But by deliberately moving two series with 17m viewers each straight up against NFL football, CBS is throwing down against the NFL. Thursday Night Football is an NFL weak link. It will be interesting to see what happens.
There are no doubt millions of them. Also to be considered are hard core flag wavers. There are millions of them too.
A big, big problem is that diminished revenue is not offset by comparable diminished expenses. Very costly contracts do not diminish automatically in response.
nolu chan posted on 2017-10-05 15:39:09 Reply Private Reply
#11: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#10)
They will.
If NFL revenues stay down, some of these playas simply won't get as good a contract renewal. They might even join Kaepernick as unemployable but with a similar unemployment insurance deal like he has for $12M even if he doesn't play at all.
Kaep's deal isn't all that bad. But it is probably for only one year. Those had to be some very very high premiums he paid.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-05 20:36:05 Reply Private Reply
#12: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#10)
HotAir: NFL star: Its funny to see a female talk about routes
He laughed in their faces. Now the NFL has condemned him, Dannen Yogurt dropped him as an endorser (he's probably a rapist), and the Womyn Reporterette has been investigated and found admitting she laughed at her dad making racist jokes about Navajo while driving through their territories about 5 years back.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-05 21:45:32 Reply Private Reply
#13: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#11)
nolu chan posted on 2017-10-06 03:30:38 Reply Private Reply
#14: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#12)
Yeah, I thought it was the first time ever that a woman had asked him about routes, and he gave a genuine expression of his surprise and finding it humorous. To Cam it may have sounded like Mona Lisa Vito testifying to her general automotive knowledge.
nolu chan posted on 2017-10-06 03:42:29 Reply Private Reply
#15: nolu chan To: All (#13)
I have been watching the ESPN listings for attendance. I recall the days when ticket demand exceeded supply, and home games not sold out were blacked out on local tv channels. The Fed government twisted the arm of the NFL and forced it to lift its blackout policy. Most games remained sold out until recently.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Football_League_television_blackout_policies
What is not symbolic is that threats to the NFL anti-trust exemption persuades the NFL to sit, lay down, or roll over as Congress desires.
They blacked out home games not sold out for over forty years. Ticket demand exceeded supply and games sold out regularly.
With demand exceeding supply, they could lose some demand for tickets and it would not show up as empty seats at the stadiums. Half the games for week 4 failed to sell to capacity. The week 5 Pats @ Bucs Thursday game failed to sell to capacity.
The initial losses were hidden by different people buying the available tickets. Ticket demand has fallen to the point where games are not selling out. Further erosion of demand will directly result in more empty seats.
Week 4 - games with attendance under capacity
92% Bengals @Browns
95% Bills @ Falcons
94% Jags @ Jets
91% Lions @ Vikings
96% Panthers @ Pats
**% Eagles @ Chargers 25,374 (cap ~27K)
97% Giant @ Bucs
97% Redskins @ Chiefs
**% Saints @ Dolphins 84, 423 (Wembley cap 86,000 for Am. football)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Week 5 - games with attendance under capacity
98% Pats @ Bucs
nolu chan posted on 2017-10-06 03:58:06 Reply Private Reply
#16: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#15)
What will be more telling is how much seats are being discounted in various cities, how low the price goes with scalpers, etc.
Of course they can sell out and make it a practice to do so, just to continue the confidence game of their huge popularity. Empty seats in those stadiums makes viewers at home think that stadium tickets aren't all that desirable. So they don't want empty seats visible on TV or on social media posts by fans as that is likely to cause a downward spiral in ticket prices and demand. Something like this could be building across the league and remain largely unnoticed.
Sports reporters may be largely compromised on reporting things like this as news as they may be inclined to protect the NFL as a sport industry and not write stuff that could harm it. Also, their access for interviews could be threatened by reporting such stories.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-06 05:43:39 Reply Private Reply
#17: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#16)
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/todd-gurley-is-begging-los-angeles-fans-to-come-to-rams-home-games/
Sorry dude. They are exercising their constitutional right to not associate.
nolu chan posted on 2017-10-06 12:52:28 Reply Private Reply
#18: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#17)
If they show up to a packed stadium with tickets sold at full price, then maybe the anthem controversy doesn't have much impact, at least in L.A.
If they discount tickets or sell large blocs of tickets cheap to scalpers just to fill the stadium (to create a bandwagon effect), then they're in trouble. Or at least underperforming their previous potential in ticket/merchandise/broadcast profits.
It really is difficult to measure the net income streams of the NFL, its players, and its owners. You have to wait to see gross sales over a period of weeks.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-06 13:19:23 Reply Private Reply
#19: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#18)
The Rams face problems additional to the protests. They are playing in a stadium built in 1923 and seating 93,607. I do not see them packing it any time soon, but maybe if they keep winning.
The Rams opened Week 1 with 60,128. That was 33,479 short.
Week 2 fell to 56,612. That was 36,695 short.
http://theramswire.usatoday.com/2017/09/27/nfl-los-angeles-rams-attendance-worst-2017/
They are supposed to a new Jerry World like stadium in 2020.
The Chargers don't need too much to achieve a sellout. The StubHub only seats 27,167. They haven't filled it yet. In 2016, the LA Galaxy averaged 25,138 in the same stadium. The Seattle Sounders FC averaged 42,636 in their stadium where the Seahawks play. That's the left coast and soccer for ya.
Dang, an NFL team that can't fill a 27,000 seat stadium. They are struggling to outdraw the Major League Soccer team that plays in the same stadium. That is just pitiful.
nolu chan posted on 2017-10-06 17:09:53 Reply Private Reply
#20: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#19)
You have to wonder if their owner is breaking even at this point.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-06 19:04:48 Reply Private Reply
#21: Stoner To: nolu chan (#19)
I wonder if they are still proud that they kissed kaperdicks ass, and followed him down the drain?
Stoner posted on 2017-10-06 19:07:35 Reply Private Reply
#22: Hank Rearden To: Tooconservative (#9)
Hank Rearden posted on 2017-10-08 13:21:33 Reply Private Reply
#23: Tooconservative To: Hank Rearden (#22)
Yeah, I don't think the NFL is too worried about whether you or I will return because we weren't their fans to begin with.
I really do wonder how many of the hardcore NFL fans will slowly return to the NFL, even if they're mad now and vowing never to go back. No doubt, some won't return but I still think most will. It's their scene. They socialize with the other NFL fetishists. It's a whole social scene for the hardcores, not just a few games they watch. It is part of the social fabric of their weekends.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-10-08 14:23:51 Reply Private Reply