For months, Trump administration officials up to and including the president himself have hinted that not everything in New Hampshires slice of the 2016 election was on the up and up. As part of the administrations commitment to find, identify, and root out election fraud around the country, several officials both inside and outside the federal government have shone a light on the states unusual aberrations some of which may indicate that New Hampshire was actually called wrong on November 8.
According to New Hampshires House Speaker Shawn Jasper, more than 6,500 people registered to vote in the election using out-of-state identification, and most of those people have nearly a year later not bothered to obtain a New Hampshire drivers license. These people, all of whom registered to vote on the day of the election, are considered by state conservatives to be a high risk population when it comes to voter fraud. This is especially true, Republicans say, thanks to New Hampshires not-so-strict rules governing proof of residency at the ballot box.
The new numbers bring old concerns back into the spotlight. Earlier this year, White House adviser Stephen Miller said that New Hampshires election disparities were one of the primary reasons that President Trump was commissioning a voter fraud panel to investigate irregularities.
Having worked before on a campaign in New Hampshire, Miller said in February, I can tell you that this issue of busing voters into New Hampshire is widely known by anyone whos worked in New Hampshire politics. Its very real. Its very serious.
Jaspers figures do not prove that there was fraud in New Hampshires election, but they do raise concerns. One of those concerns, of course, is that many same-day registrees voted in both their home states and New Hampshire, which would be illegal fraud. Currently, there are 196 open investigations of such double voting in the state, but that number could skyrocket if Jaspers figures hold up. And since Hillary Clinton only bested Trump by 2,736 votes in November, the window for potential fraud holds open the possibility however slim that the president actually won the state.
Effectively, it wouldnt matter. Trump cant be more president than he already is. But when were talking about something as sacrosanct as our federal elections, its another sign that the administrations quest to shore up ballot box integrity is a worthy one.
Poster Comment:
Election fraud is nation wide, and it has nothing to do with the Russians and everything to do with the lengths the evil Democrats go to steal elections. Americans can no longer trust the people who count the votes.
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything." ----Joseph Stalin
#1: Tooconservative To: IbJensen (#0)
Probably. I've suspected that Massholes were voting in NH for a number of election cycles now. This is the first time we've been able to quantify how many and have some kind of evidence trail to support that contention.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-09-11 11:28:20 Reply Private Reply
#2: Vicomte13 To: IbJensen (#0)
He said: "You know, comrades, that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this who will count the votes, and how." Stalin's concern was the same as ours in regards to our own corrupted election system. Stalin didn't really stuff ballot boxes in the party. He was more direct: he took physical reprisals against Party members who voted against his positions, such that soon enough the Communist Party members did not dare defy him. This is more the Clintonian approach of killing the people who know you, and less the Union approach of having elections that are rigged. Stalin didn't rig elections in the CPSU. He terrorized the elected representatives into rubber stamping what he wanted, on pain of death. In other words, Stalin was not a sneaky or petty tyrant but an outright absolute dictator. Doesn't matter who wins the elections, you will pass what I say, or you will die as a traitor and your replacement will do as I say.
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-09-11 11:29:23 Reply Private Reply
#3: Justified To: Tooconservative, IbJensen (#1)
If we had a MSM that was honest and non biased this type of stuff would be hammered everyday until something meaningful was done.
Justified posted on 2017-09-11 12:22:23 Reply Private Reply
#4: IbJensen To: Justified (#3)
IbJensen posted on 2017-09-12 04:06:06 Reply Private Reply