
Those of you who can remember trigonometry can feel free to forget it, because ancient Babylonian mathematicians had a better way of doing it using base 60!
That's the conclusion of a new paper, Plimpton 322 is Babylonian exact sexagesimal trigonometry, in the new issue of the journal Historia Mathematica.
The Plimpton 322 from the title is a clay tablet inscribed with cuneiform script. Discovered in the early 1900s, the tablet has been of interest to mathematicians for years because it describes Pythagoras' theorem, yet is thought to have been created around 1800BC, more than a thousand years before Pythagoras was born and started tinkering with triangles.
The rest of the tablet's four columns and fifteen rows of numbers have been debated for some time, but in the paper Daniel Mansfield and N.J. Wildberger, both of the University of New South Wales' School of Mathematics and Statistics, suggest it was a trigonometric table.
Mansfield explains his work in the video below:
#1: Tooconservative To: Deckard (#0)
Every number base has its peculiar advantages for certain types of problems, just as binary and hexadecimal are so vital to computer work.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-08-25 12:51:52 Reply Private Reply
#2: Pinguinite To: Deckard (#0)
Pinguinite posted on 2017-08-25 12:56:38 Reply Private Reply
#3: Justified To: Pinguinite (#2)
Even binary system is nice but cumbersome to humans.
Justified posted on 2017-08-25 13:27:16 Reply Private Reply
#4: Pinguinite To: Justified (#3)
We all have experience with the base 10 system, but none with a base 12 system. I would question the credibility of any claim that 10 is better than 12 based on experience when there is clearly no one with experience with base 12 system.
It's a clear fact that 12 divides much more cleanly much more often than 10 does. For multiplying, either is fine, but when it comes to dividing, it's a different story.
Pinguinite posted on 2017-08-25 13:43:05 Reply Private Reply
#5: rlk To: Deckard (#0)
I don't believe it. Just another pipsqueek looking for attention.
rlk posted on 2017-08-25 14:40:12 Reply Private Reply
#6: Hank Rearden To: Pinguinite (#2)
Yes, there's a lot of sense in that; we're just used to being able to count on our fingers from the cave days.
A couple more symbols tacked on after the number 9 and it would be just as natural - if we'd grown up with it.
Hank Rearden posted on 2017-08-25 15:54:46 Reply Private Reply
#7: misterwhite To: rlk (#5)
I agree. It's like they're saying, "Look what we found. It's very important because we say it is."
Base 60. Pffft! They still need a trig table so what good is it?
Ever hear of the ruins of Babylon? There you go. Shows you how much good that Base 60 system did them.
misterwhite posted on 2017-08-25 17:37:50 Reply Private Reply