|
Attorney General Jeff Sessions will soon receive a report he has been waiting for. The document, from the Presidents Task Force on Crime Reduction and Public Safety, is expected to clarify the federal governments position on marijuana and the conflicts that exist between state and federal laws. It clear what Sessions wants to do: Over the past month, he has asked Congress for permission to prosecute medical cannabis suppliers who are acting in accordance with their states laws, reauthorized civil asset forfeiture (a highly controversial practice used in drug cases), and announced his desire to start a new war on drugs. On at least one front, however, Sessionss new war on drugs is likely to fail. In taking on cannabis particularly the medical uses of cannabis he is staking out a position that is at odds with powerful interests and an overwhelming majority of Americans from nearly all walks of life. This tide is too strong to swim against. The first obstacle is that the medical community has largely resolved the question of whether cannabis is clinically useful. In January, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) reported that there is conclusive evidence that cannabis (both whole plant and extracts) is clinically effective at treating some diseases, including chronic pain. Cannabis may prove to be a pain management strategy that could substitute for opioids for many desperate patients, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) acknowledges that cannabis may be an effective tool to combat the opioid crisis. Researchers studying the relationship between medical cannabis laws and opioid use have found that states with such laws have nearly a 25 percent reduction in opioid-related deaths. The contrast between opioids which killed more than 33,000 Americans in 2015 and cannabis could not be more striking. As NIDA states on its DrugFacts Marijuana Web page: There are no reports of teens or adults fatally overdosing (dying) on marijuana alone. Further, medical cannabis may also save lives in unexpected ways. Data published in the American Journal of Public Health in February suggests that laws allowing it were associated with fewer traffic fatalities. While we always have to be careful about making claims that a policy caused an outcome, evidence from multiple studies, with careful statistical analyses, is building a case that medical cannabis has real, beneficial, spillover effects. State governments are a second major hurdle for Sessions. States are sharply opposed to his moves to crack down on their cannabis policies. Eight states (with nearly one-fifth of the U.S. population) have legalized recreational cannabis use by adults. Even more striking, 29 states and the District of Columbia have approved the medical use of botanical cannabis, with 17 more having cannabis extract laws in place. This doesnt just save lives; it also saves money. In two studies, we find substantial reductions in a broad array of prescription spending for both Medicare and Medicaid in states that have medical cannabis laws in effect. Medicare and Medicaid dont cover cannabis, but it nevertheless appears to substitute for many prescription drugs that the programs do cover. Nationally, the savings could be in the billions of dollars across the two programs if all states would adopt medical cannabis laws. States benefit directly. Our work on Medicaid spending shows that they saved money as much as $98 million in the case of California in 2014 when they implemented medical cannabis laws in an environment in which the federal government took a hands-off attitude. . . . |
Poster Comment:
Excerpted. The remainder of the article talks about economic benefits to the cannabis industry and that 75% of Americans live in states with cannabis laws on the books already.
#1: Hank Rearden To: Tooconservative (#0)
We don't care what they "think" because they don't. That's why they can only get government jobs.
F'em.
Hank Rearden posted on 2017-08-01 18:54:57 Reply Private Reply
#2: rlk To: Tooconservative (#0)
Then the country is going to be lost to a population of dazed reality-estranged potheads.
rlk posted on 2017-08-01 19:06:51 Reply Private Reply
#3: Hank Rearden To: rlk (#2)
Because you can't open a bottle of wine without guzzling the entire thing in one sitting, doesn't mean that's true for everybody.
See how this works?
Hank Rearden posted on 2017-08-01 19:12:57 Reply Private Reply
#4: rlk To: Hank Rearden (#3)
It doesn't work.
rlk posted on 2017-08-01 19:16:29 Reply Private Reply
#5: Vicomte13 To: rlk (#2)
Holland isn't.
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-08-01 19:27:32 Reply Private Reply
#6: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#0)
Then it should be easy to pass legalization at the federal level. But it won't because that premise is a lie.
Cannabis may prove to be a pain management strategy that could substitute for opioids
Not a chance in hell. That's like offering a glass of near beer to an alcoholic who consumes a quart of whiskey a day.
misterwhite posted on 2017-08-01 20:03:14 Reply Private Reply
#7: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#0)
misterwhite posted on 2017-08-01 20:08:55 Reply Private Reply
#8: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#0)
in accordance with their states lawscontrary to federal laws which have been in place for almost 50 years.There. Fixed it.
misterwhite posted on 2017-08-01 20:11:24 Reply Private Reply
#9: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#0)
Yeah. And 13% of them voted for a referendum to legalize it while the rest stayed home.
misterwhite posted on 2017-08-01 20:18:15 Reply Private Reply
#10: misterwhite To: rlk (#2)
Who will promptly challenge all the "under the influence" laws because they use it for medical reasons.
misterwhite posted on 2017-08-01 20:23:55 Reply Private Reply
#11: Stoner To: Tooconservative (#0)
Stoner posted on 2017-08-01 21:50:51 Reply Private Reply
#12: rlk To: Stoner (#11)
I've dealt with people using the shit for more than 50 years. My unalterable conclusion is conclusion is that it produces the same psychological effects as heroin without the same physical effects or dependence. It's dangerous and seriously debilitating. A culture full of potheads will collapse. Sessions knows that and is trying to prevent it. if Sessions loses the war, America loses and will become a third rate has been country.
rlk posted on 2017-08-01 22:40:17 Reply Private Reply
#13: Tooconservative To: Vicomte13 (#5)
Even Amsterdam somewhat curtailed its drug culture and the drug tourism. They discovered being a drug tourism destination drove off a lot of other tourists. So they made restrictions on tourists being allowed in coffeehouses and other drug venues.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-08-01 22:47:35 Reply Private Reply
#14: Tooconservative To: Stoner (#11)
He does. And Congress isn't giving him any encouragement or money for pot enforcement the way they used to.
Sessions hasn't made any headway trying to get a drug warrior faction in Congress to take a stand. Sessions may have been the last hardcore GOP drug warrior. Even a former federal prosecutor like Trey Gowdy seems pretty agnostic, at least as far as introducing any legislation to support a drug war, especially on cannabis.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-08-01 22:53:38 Reply Private Reply
#15: Hank Rearden To: rlk (#4)
Your lack of self-control is no basis to assume the same lack in everybody else.
So don't.
Hank Rearden posted on 2017-08-01 22:55:52 Reply Private Reply
#16: Tooconservative To: rlk (#12)
Eventually, well maybe.
But what we have now is an opoiod crisis that is killing more people than guns do (including gun suicides).
You can't say the same about Da Ganja.
Sessions has more important business fighting international drug and crime cartels like his recent jaunt to Guatamala to build support and ties to fight MS-13 gangs that traffic in narcotics and human smuggling.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-08-01 22:57:04 Reply Private Reply
#17: rlk To: Tooconservative (#16)
Good! That's the choice they made. Take their bodies and throw them in the garbage pit. Their demise will make the country stonger. Let the buzzards and crows eat em. They have to make a living too.
rlk posted on 2017-08-01 23:37:04 Reply Private Reply
#18: Vicomte13 To: Tooconservative (#13)
But that was not my point. The contention was made that if marijuana is legalized, it's the end of the country as everybody turns into a drug-numbed zombie. I pointed out that that didn't happen in Holland.
What you say is true: there were effects of drug tourism that the Dutch didn't like. But the country did not turn into zombieland. That was my point.
Colorado hasn't turned into zombieland either.
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-08-02 06:26:21 Reply Private Reply
#19: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#0)
Chronic pain is a disease?
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) reported....
And why would an opinion of the National Academy of Engineering be relevant?
The National Academy of Medicine is a private organization whose opinions mean next to nothing in determining whether a substance is clinically effective at treating any disease.
By law, the Department of Health and Human Sciences (DHHS) is solely empowered to make a decision on whether any substance is clinically effective at treating any disease. DHHS has determined that, "Marijuana has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States."
The DHHS recommendation of how to schedule a substance is binding on the Attorney General per 21 U.S.C. § 811.
nolu chan posted on 2017-08-02 16:33:24 Reply Private Reply
#20: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#19)
I would say we are seeing segments of the federal government dissenting from past policy and promoting change in the laws.
I thought it was interesting that Cory Booker introduced a bill in the Senate to reclassify cannabis. It won't get anywhere but the article appeared yesterday and, surely by sheer coincidence, Booker has his new bill out today.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-08-02 23:57:33 Reply Private Reply
#21: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#20)
It will play well with his constituents.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1689
S.1689 - A bill to amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for a new rule regarding the application of the Act to marihuana, and for other purposes.
115th Congress (2017-2018)
The bill text is not available yet at congress.gov. The following comments are available in the Congressional Record from 1 Aug.
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2017/8/1/senate-section/article/s4669-1
https://www.congress.gov/crec/2017/08/01/CREC-2017-08-01-pt1-PgS4669.pdf
I like the investments.
Because users of legal pot are expected to hang out in the library.
Because employers are looking for stoners who fail their drug screen.
Stoned drivers will not. Stoned workers will not improve workplace safety. On a coffee/smoke break, they can join the tobacco smokers and roll up a doobie.
Of course, if it is made legal, all will be able to obtain a note from Dr. Feelgood to get something for their medical condition. If the bill makes it a medicine, all will be forced to pay for this medicine.
I suspect this will cost a fortune in lost alcohol taxes. We would just have to wait and see on that one.
It should make for a fun time with DUI. There is not exactly a breathylizer test for pot. I wonder how much the ticket might rise to cover the cost of testing.
And then pot addiction will become a disease and we will be asked to pay for them not to work because of their disease.
nolu chan posted on 2017-08-03 18:55:07 Reply Private Reply
#22: Hondo68 To: nolu chan (#21)
Do you think it being illegal is stopping these guys? The WOD on drugs is a failure, just like the war on alcohol was.
It's a social problem, deal with it from that perspective.
Hondo68 posted on 2017-08-03 19:14:11 Reply Private Reply
#23: Tooconservative To: nolu chan, Deckard, misterwhite, hondo68, redleghunter (#21)
Maybe they could set up a toking section where they keep their Furry Freak Brothers comic books. Just don't call it a 'smoking area'. Call it a 'therapeutic zone' for medical ganja instead.
From a Schedule I drug to the number #1 taxpayer-subsidized drug in the country, all in one fell swoop! Ain't 0bammyCare grand?
The alcohol and beer distributors think so too. You recall recently that Oregon legalized and had a state emergency with a shortage of weed in their outlets. And now the liquor stores and alcohol distributors are trying to horn in on the new marijuana distribution chain. So you aren't the only one thinking that way.
There's just no making you happy. LOL
Flagging Deckard, hondo, and redleg just for the comics...
Tooconservative posted on 2017-08-03 19:25:36 Reply Private Reply
#24: Tooconservative To: hondo68 (#22)
Tooconservative posted on 2017-08-03 19:26:43 Reply Private Reply
#25: Hondo68 To: Tooconservative, NY Values, Trump voters (#24)
They way they're sucking up the booze and weed, it's no wonder that Trump won Michigan, if they stayed true to form!
This bunch seems to represent "NY Values" like Bernie and Donald. Ted Cruz warned us about their type.
Canadians from the oil patch don't like NYC progressives.
Hondo68 posted on 2017-08-03 20:12:28 Reply Private Reply
#26: Tooconservative To: hondo68 (#25)
You're so right. Ted did try to warn us. But we wouldn't listen!
what they want, and deserve to get it...good and hard.
H. L. Mencken
Tooconservative posted on 2017-08-03 20:17:01 Reply Private Reply
#27: nolu chan To: hondo68 (#22)
Murder being illegal does not stop murderers, and theft being illegal does not stop thieves. Workplace rules do not stop on the job drinking. The laws and rules establish a penalty for those who get caught.
nolu chan posted on 2017-08-04 00:41:08 Reply Private Reply
#28: nolu chan To: Tooconservative (#23)
Maybe it could be an ingredient in a brownie mix and go on the EBT card.
nolu chan posted on 2017-08-04 00:57:32 Reply Private Reply
#29: Tooconservative To: nolu chan (#28)
Tooconservative posted on 2017-08-04 08:38:57 Reply Private Reply