Mother should I trust the government?
-Pink Floyd, Mother
Elon Musk just announced that SpaceX abandons propulsive landing plans for Red Dragon mission to Mars.
In my opinion, we should not be surprised.
NASA supposedly used propulsive landing for the Apollo missions to the moon...in 1969.
I ask you to please click the following hyperlinks to read three articles, carefully, watch one 3-1/3 minute video, closely, and then draw your own conclusions about the Apollo Moon landings that we are told occured nearly 50 years ago.
First, an article from RT, today:
SpaceX abandons propulsive landing plans for Red Dragon mission to Mars
“The reason we decided not to pursue that heavily is that it would have taken a tremendous amount of effort to qualify that for safety for crew transport,” Musk said. “That’s why we are not pursuing it. It could be something that we bring back later, but it doesn’t seem like the right way to apply resources right now.”
Musk added that he did not think that propulsive landing was the best approach.
Second, my article from ZeroHedge, last year, 2016:
I like velcro and used to drink Tang, but about the moon, was NASA really full of horseshit?
" My premise is that President Kennedy wasn't an aerospace engineer, he was a politician faced with the Russians and their satellites scaring the shit out of his constituency. He called our shot, but we couldn't make it. So they lied."
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-03/i-velcro-and-used-drink-tang-wa...
Third, an article from Physics Professor, Dr. Oleg Oleynik, in 2012, and updated in 2017*:
A Stereoscopic method of verifying Apollo lunar surface images
"Thus, based on the above examples, this study concludes that the Apollo 15 photographic record does NOT depict real lunarscapes with distant backgrounds located more than a kilometre away from the camera."
"These pictures were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective."
Fourth, a youtube video of the Apollo 11 astronaut press conference upon returning from the moon, July 20,1969*:
Apollo 11 Television Press Conference
* Hat tip to Cognitive Dissonance
Do these three guys, who supposedly just came back from the moon with two of them landing and returning, look and sound like they just came back from the moon?
And here is the full hour and half press conference. Listen to the actual words and sentence structure as well as the body language, which is screaming out-loud disingenuous...
What do you think, now?
#1: jeremiad To: Deckard (#0)
jeremiad posted on 2017-07-23 14:39:12 Reply Private Reply
#2: Operation 40 To: Deckard (#0)
Here's a MUST READ- even for those who believe the US landed on the moon. You'll bust out laughing many times. It's a masterpiece. A work of art.
"Wagging the MoonDoggie"
http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/
Absolutely fantastic writing from the late Dave McGowan who also wrote the highly acclaimed "Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon: Laurel Canyon, Covert Ops & the Dark Heart of the Hippie Dream"
Amazon reviews: https://www.amazon.com/Weird-Scenes-Inside-Canyon-Laurel/dp/1909394122
A few things many people don't know about the Moon "landings"
A "moon rock" given to Holland turned out to be fake
Moon landing tapes got erased, NASA admits
These were the most valuable tapes to ever exist in human history and NASA "Lost" them? Seriously? ROFL
Under the lander: Where's the evidence of rocket thrust?
A low budget sci-fi scene or Astronauts lifting off from the moon: NASA allegedly filmed that final lift-off
NASA claims that the camera was mounted on the abandoned lunar rover... and that the pan and zoom functions were operated remotely by the ground crew back on Earth. You couldn’t control your television from across the living room in those days, but NASA could pan and zoom a camera from 234,000 miles away. Awesome! ...Apparently there wasn’t any delay in the signal...
This thing was supposed to have fit in the Lunar Lander. It weighed ~400 pounds. They drove it around...why?
Try to fold that thing up and fit it in this, try to jam it in around the batteries, fuel cells, food, space suits, nav and com equipment etc.:
Dimensions 23 feet 1 inch (7.04 m) high
31 feet (9.4 m) wide
31 feet (9.4 m) deep
overall, landing gear deployed
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Lunar_Module
Operation 40 posted on 2017-07-23 15:54:07 Reply Private Reply
#3: Deckard To: jeremiad (#1)
Seems like you and I are the only two here who find articles like this worthy of comment.
Doesn't matter - I know folks here are reading them.
Deckard posted on 2017-07-23 16:01:26 Reply Private Reply
#4: Deckard To: Operation 40 (#2)
McGowan's articles and book about Laurel Canyon are must-reading for anyone who want's to really understand the late 60's music scene an how the government co-opted the entire hippie movement.
I am just starting to delve into his research on the moon landings.
Deckard posted on 2017-07-23 16:06:57 Reply Private Reply
#5: Liberator To: Deckard, jeremiad (#3)
Yes, they are being read...
But remember -- this is a small forum.
Liberator posted on 2017-07-23 16:14:12 Reply Private Reply
#6: jeremiad To: Liberator (#5)
jeremiad posted on 2017-07-31 23:22:20 Reply Private Reply