Theres already plenty of articles about how libertarians shouldnt be as divided as we are and how the infighting will prevent us from making progress, but theres a specific item that I wanted to address in regards to this division between different factions of libertarians.
It has been highlighted to me most recently by the current dispute between some Anarchyball editor, and Jared Howe, and recent debates between anarchists and minarchists. These debates always seem to be end in hurt feelings, or plain ad hominem attacks.
Open borders supporters call closed border supporters fascists, while the latter calls the former communists. Anarchists claim that minarchists need to open their eyes and stop being sheep, while minarchists claim that anarchists are idealists with no real answers.
These are great topics for debate, but libertarians cant let these differences in ideas stop them from the ultimate goal: liberty that consists of individualism, natural rights and property rights.
So, allow me to ask some questions:
Is society at the point yet where it matters if our ideologies lean towards some form of state, or none at all?
Is the welfare state small enough where debating between open or closed borders is relevant?
Are property rights even remotely existent in todays society?
By asking these questions, I am not saying that libertarians shouldnt be having these debates, but it shouldnt become a point of division. Discussions in the theoretical realm of each persons perfect libertarian society can assist in bettering the ideals and maybe converting some to other factions within libertarianism, but the butthurt and shunning needs to cease.
The goals of liberty lovers are so overlapping at this point, because of the massive, intrusive government currently in place, that we should be working together to strip away the power of the state in general.
An anarchist society, minarchist society, or a constitutionalist society will not happen overnight. Libertarians need to think of the long-game, which currently should be about decreasing the amount of regulations, eliminating victimless crime laws, and chipping away at the statist mindset of the general population.
So, lets all fight to end silly regulations within our communities. Lets fight to have marijuana legalized nationwide. Lets fight to create or fund alternatives to government services to demonstrate the inefficiency of the state.
Let us fight for these things and not fight with each other. Until the time comes when it truly matters to debate the amount of government society should have, we should unite.
Thomas Jefferson once said, I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend, and while I may sincerely disagree with anarchists, classical liberals and conservatarians, I still consider each of these liberty-minded individuals a companion and a comrade (and not in the Stalin sense).
The end goal is liberty, and while everyone is going to have a different definition of it, the current predicament in the country should be enough for libertarians to put their differences aside to make some change.
#1: Gatlin To: All (#0)
Working as a shadow party within a party is essentially a system that is unviable. The libertarian obstructionists in Congress who insist on their way or no way need to have a come to Jesus moment to face the truth of the matter with a sudden intuitive insight into the reality of reassessing priorities. Those acting like spoiled kids need to realize that are still ways to work within the system and handle the politics without constantly trying to upend a system that has on balance worked pretty well for over 200 years.
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 06:01:26 Reply Private Reply
#2: Deckard To: Gatlin (#1)
Good grief! You really believe that shit?
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."
This was originally written in 1996 - it's getting closer to the day when the only recourse left is to shoot (or hang) the bastards.
The police state is becoming more entrenched by the day, and quislings like you cheer the tyranny.
Deckard posted on 2017-07-10 08:45:17 Reply Private Reply
#3: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#2)
Can you give us an example of how the government tyranized you personally?
Do they stop you on your way to work?
Do they randomly come to your house?
Do they come and beat you up?
Do they fuck your wife?
Do they pick on your kids?
What did they do to you personally?
A K A Stone posted on 2017-07-10 08:53:16 Reply Private Reply
#4: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#0)
Tooconservative posted on 2017-07-10 09:20:00 Reply Private Reply
#5: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#3)
Didn't you get roughed up by the local cops once? Anyway, that was my recollection.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-07-10 09:21:25 Reply Private Reply
#6: Gatlin To: Deckard (#2)
That concept is so simplistically true that even a libertarian idiot should understand it. Why does understanding it give you so much trouble?
Nope! It is violent crime that is becoming more entrenched by the day. I recall a 2015 report revealed there was an increase in violent crimes in the United States. So, what you are seeing is an increase in police activity to counter the increase in violent crimes and it is libertarian assholes like you along with anarchists, activists, attorneys, academicians and arrested persons relatives in subcultures of crime and conflict who act as bleeding hearts to promote hating the cops who are doing thei jobs.With all the political correctness that has now invoked silence on so called slang, pejorative and hateful words even some of the finest citizens have been caught up to say they hate cops .that theyre corrupt, lazy, pompous and stupid. Oh some are, probably 1 percent. But does the action of that 1 percent call for unleashing such a vendetta against cops? Hardly not? So, there must be other reasons. Why dont you state your reasons?
When events happen, even those that can be deemed normal or neutral, the police are not allowed to narrate or explain the event. The public is only allowed to hear one side. There is no Al Sharpton to step out and speak on behalf of the police. All we get to see is partial raw videos that never show the beginning cause and listen to angry relatives and biased activists. It is always bad news for the cops with never a police perspective .is it?
You hate cops assholes are constant Internet trumpets with your clarion blaring discordant presence. A simple Google will bring up endless amounts of random noise rants and more importantly it brings up organized hate movements such as those your promote.
You fail to realize the seeds of hate you sow when your antagonistic and divisive rhetoric spreads to become contagious and eventually jeopardizes cops safety on the streets.
There is never a focus on Positive Policing. Why is that? Telling success stories about the good actions of cops on forums and social media can help balance negative stories to place everything into a proper perspective.
But some dont want a proper perspective .all they want is to spread HATE.
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 09:55:23 Reply Private Reply
#7: Gatlin To: Tooconservative, A K A Stone (#5)
Is there a reason why as of late you have joined Deckards inner sanctum on the hate cop threads?
Oh, dont you dare deny you have not
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 10:08:15 Reply Private Reply
#8: Deckard To: Gatlin (#6)
Oh geesh! Not this shit again.
Deckard posted on 2017-07-10 10:20:26 Reply Private Reply
#9: Vicomte13 To: Gatlin (#0)
Yes, and they are quite robust. If somebody steals something of mine that is of great value, he will do some hard time.
What property rights are not, and never can be in the real world, are absolute. This is where libertarians go berserk and lose the thread of reality.
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-07-10 10:22:56 Reply Private Reply
#10: Gatlin To: All (#0)
Nothing new here
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 10:24:31 Reply Private Reply
#11: Deckard To: Gatlin (#6)
You really like making shit up, don't you?
Careful with the Panic: Violent Crime and Gun Crime Are Both Dropping
Today, the national crime rate is about half of what it was at its height in 1991. Violent crime has fallen by 51 percent since 1991, and property crime by 43 percent. In 2013 the violent crime rate was the lowest since 1970. And this holds true for unreported crimes as well. According to the National Crime Victimization Survey, since 1993 the rate of violent crime has declined from 79.8 to 23.2 victimizations per 1,000 people.
Heres the trend since 1960. As you will see, the lines go up and then the lines go down. This is A Good Thing.
Do Americans know this? Apparently not, no:
The same trend is evident in the realm of gun crime. Per a Pew analysis of DOJ statistics:
Deckard posted on 2017-07-10 10:27:50 Reply Private Reply
#12: Gatlin To: Deckard (#8)
How many of those in that graph chart died when someone walked up to the window of their car and ambushed them by shooting them in their head?
Keep egging on the violence against cops you libertarian asshole
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 10:29:07 Reply Private Reply
#13: Deckard To: Gatlin (#0)
Not Really.
Woman could face jail time over garden
Deckard posted on 2017-07-10 10:29:16 Reply Private Reply
#14: Gatlin To: Deckard (#11)
I am sure some folks in Chicago will be pleased to learn this.
Tell us....how may were shot there "this" weekend?
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 10:31:09 Reply Private Reply
#15: Gatlin To: Deckard (#13)
It is you libertarians who think you can pick and choose which laws you wish to obey and which you can ignore.
But, Sport....it doesn't work that way...
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 10:33:59 Reply Private Reply
#16: Deckard To: Gatlin (#12)
I point out the corruption and criminality that is evident in many of the "heroes" who work in Law Enforcement.
DEA Allowed Criminal Cops to Build Their Own Drug Empires for Over a Decade
I'm not egging on any violence.
Law Enforcement? When did that become a thing? When did we go from we go from Officer Friendly to today's heavily militarized cops.
Being a cop is safer than any of those occupations listed above.
Cop groupies like you believe otherwise.
Deckard posted on 2017-07-10 10:34:32 Reply Private Reply
#17: Gatlin To: All (#15)
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 10:35:02 Reply Private Reply
#18: Deckard To: Gatlin (#15)
In December, King said an anonymous complaint led to an arrest citation. It details "overgrowth" in her yard and said she's violating a city code that prohibits "excessive growth."
"We asked him for a definition of excessive, which he could not provide," King said.
Deckard posted on 2017-07-10 10:35:35 Reply Private Reply
#19: Gatlin To: Deckard (#16)
You are a lying asshole!!!!
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 10:36:04 Reply Private Reply
#20: Gatlin To: Deckard (#18)
So King said ...
And because that was the only statement made....we are to completely believe that is the entireity of the exchange?
You can....but I will not form an opinion on something presenting from only one side.
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 10:38:29 Reply Private Reply
#21: Gatlin To: All (#20)
Libertarians need to stop acting like demigods thinking they are a national party with the prominence to support national ambitions. If libertarians wish to get anything accomplished, they MUST for strategic partnerships with the Republicans. Otherwise, libertarians will continue doing what they have always done .pissing into the wind. This may sound to libertarians like apostasy and selling out, but it is not. What it is .it is as I have someone say many times: The Art of the Deal.
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 10:39:17 Reply Private Reply
#22: Deckard To: Gatlin (#19)
Frankly Gatslime - it's you, whitey and the other cop worshipers here who are egging on the violence - committed by police against unarmed and innocent citizens.
S.D. Cops Forced Catheters for Drug Testing
Deckard posted on 2017-07-10 10:47:15 Reply Private Reply
#23: Tooconservative To: Gatlin, A K A Stone, Deckard (#7)
Of course not. But I seem to recall that Stone mentioned an incident where he was.
I don't think I have, Granny Gatlin.
I find his regular half-dozen-straight cop-hater threads as annoying as your regular half-dozen-straight liberty-hater threads in our sidebar. Talk about wallpapering a forum with your own fetish...
Tooconservative posted on 2017-07-10 12:11:06 Reply Private Reply
#24: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#5)
A K A Stone posted on 2017-07-10 18:25:02 Reply Private Reply
#25: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#24)
Ah. You sound a little less forgiving of them this time. When you told us about it before, you seemed remarkably mellow to me, considering the level of abuse.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-07-10 18:45:40 Reply Private Reply
#26: Gatlin To: Deckard (#16)
When all of this happened!
Gatlin posted on 2017-07-10 19:31:35 Reply Private Reply