What a f**king joke.

The child shares DNA with only one of them.

In time, that will be remedied, unfortunately.

The kid needs to be taken away and put with normal people.

Nice theory. Especially when you consider what laughingly passes for "normal people" these days.

You need to ask yourself this,"If "normal" people were available to adopt that child and wanted to adopt that child,why didn't they?".

You don't need to answer this question,but I am curious if you think a child is better off in a orphanage than as an adopted child of a homosexuals couple that want a child?

I'm for re-classifying acts of perversion as crimes.

Ahhhh,"bring back the sex police!" That's a cry I haven't heard in decades.

HAVE YOU LOST YOUR FREAKING MIND?

Re-write the laws so that buggery is again a crime and a sin.

Just because someone humped your bumper against your will doesn't mean that consensual bumper-humping should be a crime. The crime was RAPE,not bumper humping,and rape is still and will always remain illegal.

Unless of course you are a Kennedy,a Clinton,etc,etc,etc.

If the marriage goes sour, they have to share the child or even lose it or, if they die, their partner can take the child away and cut off the DNA donor's own family from any contact.

So if they just don't tie the knot, they have complete control over the child's custody in any event.

This is not necessarily a win-win for gay marriage. It could lead to a decrease of some types of gay marriages once they realize what is involved.

This is not necessarily a win-win for gay marriage.

It's certainly a lose-lose situation for the unfortunate offspring. He or she doesn't have parents, per se, rather he has two mentally disturbed perverts who are play acting the roles of father and mother.

Further, these 'parents' are rapidly heading for a 'crack up' (npi) as they daily look in a mirror at themselves and eventually realize how filthy is their absurd method of lovemaking. Ingesting of bodily fluids as well as fecal matter causes more than mere indigestion.

An orphanage would be preferable to any any every homo raising kids.

It's certainly a lose-lose situation for the unfortunate offspring. He or she doesn't have parents, per se, rather he has two mentally disturbed perverts who are play acting the roles of father and mother.

Good thing that's never the case with male and female couples,huh?

Further, these 'parents' are rapidly heading for a 'crack up' (npi) as they daily look in a mirror at themselves and eventually realize how filthy is their absurd method of lovemaking. Ingesting of bodily fluids as well as fecal matter causes more than mere indigestion.

You seem to have a strange fixation on that sort of thing for a man that doesn't seem to understand that some heterosexual couples do the same things.

It shouldn't be lawful for two perverts to adopt a child let alone allow insemination.

Yeah,what this country needs is a strong government who will give the people all the rights they need,huh?

You don't have the first clue as to how insane you sound,do you?

Children should not be raised by sex perverts. That is what homosexuals are.

Be the first loon in your church to take a public stand,and announce right here and now that heterosexual couples that practice oral and/or anal sex should not be allowed to marry or have children.

BTW,what would be your plan for homosexual women who are already pregnant when you become the new Maximum Leader of Nazimerika,forced abortions?

Ingesting of bodily fluids as well as fecal matter causes more than mere indigestion.

Lesbians are generally "cleaner" than either hetero couples or (especially) homo men. It somewhat spoils the argument you're trying to make.

Do you disapprove of them more because they're perverted or because you consider their sexual habits unhygienic?

Be the first loon in your church to take a public stand,and announce right here and now that heterosexual couples that practice oral and/or anal sex should not be allowed to marry or have children.

Well, sodomy is sodomy. The old morality laws from 50 years ago forbade hetero couples from sodomy the same as homo couples until 1962. Then states started reducing penalties for the sodomy laws or legalizing it for married or unmarried hetero couples. These laws were rarely enforced after WW II for hetero couples unless there was prostitution involved.

Wiki has a nice chart detailing the state of sodomy laws in the various states for hetero and homo couples.

In 2003, Lawrence v. Texas struck down all the remaining sodomy laws, paving the way for legalizing sodomy marriage.

Tyron Garner & John Lawrence On September 17, 1998, John Geddes Lawrence Jr.,[10][11] a gay 55-year-old medical technologist, was hosting two gay acquaintances, Tyron Garner,[12] age 31, and Robert Eubanks,[13] 40, at his apartment in northeast Harris County, Texas,[14] east of the Houston city limits.[15] Lawrence and Eubanks had been friends for more than 20 years. Garner and Eubanks had a tempestuous on-again off-again romantic relationship since 1990. Lacking transportation home, the couple were preparing to spend the night. Eubanks, who had been drinking heavily, left to purchase a soda from a nearby vending machine. Apparently outraged that Lawrence had been flirting with Garner, he called police and reported "a black male going crazy with a gun" at Lawrence's apartment.[16] Four Harris County sheriff's deputies responded within minutes and Eubanks pointed them to the apartment. They entered the unlocked apartment toward 11 p.m. with their weapons drawn. In accordance with police procedures, the first to arrive, Joseph Quinn, took the lead both in approaching the scene and later in determining what charges to bring. He later reported seeing Lawrence and Garner having anal sex in the bedroom. A second officer reported seeing them engaged in oral sex, and two others did not report seeing the pair having sex. Lawrence repeatedly challenged the police for entering his home. Quinn had discretionary authority to charge them for a variety of offenses and to determine whether to arrest them. When Quinn considered charging them with having sex in violation of state law, he had to get an Assistant District Attorney to check the statutes to be certain they covered sexual activity inside a residence. He was told that Texas' anti-sodomy statute, the "Homosexual Conduct" law, made it a Class C misdemeanor if someone "engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex".[17] The statute, Chapter 21, Sec. 21.06 of the Texas Penal Code, had been adopted in 1973 when the state revised its criminal code to end its proscription on heterosexual anal and oral intercourse.[18] Quinn decided to arrest Lawrence and Garner and charge them with having "deviate sex". In the separate arrest reports he filed for each, he wrote that he had seen the arrestee "engaged in deviate sexual conduct namely, anal sex, with another man".[19] Lawrence and Garner were held in jail overnight. At a hearing the next day, they pleaded not guilty to a charge of "homosexual conduct". They were released toward midnight.[20] Eubanks pleaded no contest to charges of filing a false police report. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail but released early.[21]

Well, sodomy is sodomy. The old morality laws from 50 years ago forbade hetero couples from sodomy the same as homo couples until 1962. Then states started reducing penalties for the sodomy laws or legalizing it for married or unmarried hetero couples. These laws were rarely enforced after WW II for hetero couples unless there was prostitution involved.

Well,that does sound fairer since it treats all citizens alike,but it's still un-Constitutional because it is not any of the governments business what two or more consenting adults do in the privacy of their homes or behind locked doors.

Do you disapprove of them more because they're perverted or because you consider their sexual habits unhygienic?

Both.

You're not a lesbian are you? How healthy can eating shit be for one and lapping up vaginal secretions as part of a 'love' act? It sounds not only disgraceful and sinful, but very unhealthy as one should be careful about what they swallow.

Who knows if the vagina someone is attracted to has been sanitized? Some lesbians are untidy.

Be the first loon in your church to take a public stand,and announce right here and now that heterosexual couples that practice oral and/or anal sex should not be allowed to marry or have children.

There is another teaching, that masturbation, oral and anal sex are sinful. They are listed in order of unhealthiness.

Since you mentioned abortion, it is worse than all three above.

Heterosexual couples who engage in aberrant sex have an equal chance of disease due ingesting the above named substances.

LOL! You don't get out much,do you?

"aberrant sex" is a sure tip-off.

BTW,you sound like someone that is asexual. Which is fine,if that is what makes you happy to be that sort of sexual pervert. You can't hurt anyone else as long as you never gain political power,and you won't.

There is another teaching, that masturbation, oral and anal sex are sinful.

Which one is this?

"There is another teaching, that masturbation, oral and anal sex are sinful."

Which one is this?

Lesbianism? I assume, first and second.

How healthy can eating shit be for one and lapping up vaginal secretions as part of a 'love' act?

I'm really not sure how much buttlicking the average lesbian does. I don't think I want to google that.

Who knows if the vagina someone is attracted to has been sanitized?

Who indeed? LOL

I assume you have to be joking. Otherwise, I want to hear a lot more about these properly sanitized vaginas. Sounds like a riot.

How healthy can eating shit be for one and lapping up vaginal secretions as part of a 'love' act?

I'm really not sure how much buttlicking the average lesbian does. I don't think I want to google that.

No problem. Just ask HomberBohn. I'm pretty sure he has both videos and 8x10 color glossies.

BTW,is "Bohn" German for "Simpson"?

That boy has sum problems.

leazy Pete probably has a hard drive full of downloaded perversion.

And you sound jealous at the possibility.

And you sound like a full-blown hairless boy lover.

I understand that is one of your fantasies,Precious,but I am hopelessly heterosexual.

Hopefully that will be remedied in short time.

Meanwhile don't waste your time responding to anything I post.

Meanwhile don't waste your time responding to anything I post.

Why? Does reading it cut into your time downloading and watching homo porn?