In the special election for Alabamas U.S. Senate seat, Judge Roy Moore is the clear front-runner.
Moore holds a commanding 10-point lead over incumbent Senator Luther Strange, according to a poll conducted by potential primary challenger Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala. Roy Moore leads the race with 30 percent, followed by Strange at 20 percent, and Rep. Brooks in the low double-digits.
Strange was appointed to Attorney General Jeff Sessions former Senate seat by disgraced former Gov. Robert Bentley before he resigned last month. Many see the appointment as a corrupt deal struck between a governor, Bentley, mired in scandal and the state attorney general, Strange, prosecuting him.
Gov. Kay Ivey, Bentleys successor, called for an early special primary election on Aug. 18 followed by a runoff on September 26 and a general election on December 12.
Moores candidacy in Alabama is strong. Many Alabamians see Moore the former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court as a martyr for the social conservative cause after he was removed from office for directing state probate judges not to issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples.
"I have done my duty under the laws of this state to stand for the undeniable truth that God ordained marriage as the union of one man and one woman," Moore said during the press conference in front of the state capitol after the Alabama Supreme Court upheld the decision to remove Moore from the court.
The Washington establishment is backing Senator Strange for reelection. McConnell allies in the National Republican Senatorial Committee are threatening potential primary challengers to Strange to dissuade them from running.
"We have made it very clear from the beginning that Sen. Luther Strange would be treated as an incumbent," NRSC spokeswoman Katie Martin reportedly told Politico. "It has also been a clear policy that we will not use vendors who work against our incumbents."
Despite the NRSCs threats, the polling shows that there is a race in Alabama, and the conservative challenger has a clear shot at winning.
#1: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#0)
They hate Moore and the GOPe is closing ranks to defeat him.
Why they want this corrupt former AG in the Senate is beyond me.
OTOH, they do hate Moore because he would be as big a bull-in-a-china-shop as Ted Cruz is.
A few days back on AL.com:
Time is precious.
But about a week ago, he says, that firm called to let him know they couldn't run his campaign, after all. When Marsh asked them why, they explained that they could suffer political retaliation.
State Rep. Ed Henry says he's run into the same problems.
"It is evident that Washington, D.C., controls Washington, D.C.," Henry said. "The people of Alabama or any other state have very little influence on these races."
As stories go, this one might should come with a tinfoil hat, except that it's true.
The National Republican Senatorial Committee has warned national political consulting firms to stay away from anyone challenging Luther Strange.
It makes no difference to them that Strange has only been in Washington a couple of months.
It doesn't matter that Strange was appointed to the office by Robert Bentley, a widely unpopular governor who was forced from office, to cheers from across the state.
It matters not that Strange solicited that appointment from Bentley while his office had an open investigation into the governor and his staff.
The NRSC is making no secret about it. Strange is, in their book, an incumbent, and just like any other Washington insider, he is entitled to the benefits and privileges that club membership confers.
"We have made it very clear from the beginning that Sen. Luther Strange would be treated as an incumbent," NRSC spokeswoman Katie Martin told Politico. "It has also been a clear policy that we will not use vendors who work against our incumbents."
Got that? If a firm works for Marsh, Henry, Roy Moore or anyone else who might jump in, then they're blackballed. With 33 Senate races on the ballot in 2018, with about half of those expected to be competitive, getting cut out of 2018 is an existential threat for these consultants, and a risk that most will refuse to take.
The NRSC's threat to campaign consultants follows reports that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell personally asked Gov. Kay Ivey not to schedule a special election to replace Jeff Sessions until 2018.
Meanwhile, Strange already has $763,612 in his campaign account, while his opponents will have to catch up with him $2,700 at a time, the maximum contribution allowed under federal campaign law.
And it's important to understand that these political consulting firms are instrumental not for how to spend campaign money, but raising it. They're the guys with the lists of donors and the secret passageways around campaign finance restrictions. Without one of these teams on your side, a candidate can die in the desert.
And right now, Strange's D.C. supporters are cutting Alabama candidates off from this kind of help. Because God help us if we ever had a fair fight.
This is how the power of incumbency works, and it's also how democracy rots, because it deprives voters of the thing they need for this system to work -- a choice.
Moore did install his own private 2.5-ton 10 commandments monument in the state judicial building with no authorization. So he is more than a little flaky. You just aren't allowed to install your own religious brick-a-brac in state buildings on a personal whim or as a political tactic.
So I guess this is a runoff between the Flake (Moore) and the Fluke (Strange).
Given how Alabama is, I'd bet on the Flake to win easily. No one except the GOPe will be shedding any tears over Strange losing this seat he obtained so corruptly, almost certainly by blackmailing a corrupt AL governor who he was investigating at the time.
Strange would have had a better chance if the GOPe wasn't backing him so much. Alabama voters will (rightly) perceive that the Swamp is trying to shove a corrupt former A.G. down their throats.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 08:00:47 Reply Private Reply
#2: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#1)
An just how is "Alabama" that other states are not?
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 08:57:12 Reply Private Reply
#3: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#1)
People who call the honorable Roy Moore a flake are faggots who want to pretend to be married.
Your comment makes you sound like a whining liberal.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 09:05:31 Reply Private Reply
#4: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#3)
Gee, are you single, AKA? We could be so happy together. My digestive tract is aching to be filled with your man-love. Can't we exchange diseases like any other couple? LOL
Yes, it is flaky for judges to put up 2.5-ton religious monuments inside state judicial buildings. If you want to do something like that, run for the legislature or for governor and pass a law to authorize it. Crackpot judges don't get to just install their own personal monuments on state property.
Moore is a weirdo and a very poor choice as a judge, whether you agree with the outcomes in any particular case that he heard. But he will probably win that senate seat in a landslide after the GOPe carries out a full character assassination that will only cement his already-strong support in AL. That doesn't make him a good choice, just a very likely winner.
I will be watching this race. I expect the GOPe will pull out all the stops and campaign against Moore in much the same way they campaigned against David Duke when he tried to run for senate in Lousiana. In that instance, the GOPe behaved the same way they are now treating Moore and eventually urged Republicans to vote against Duke and endorsed Duke's Dem opponent so they could stop Duke.
I have to wonder whether Trump will pick a side in the Alabama race or (wisely) stay out of it completely.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 09:20:55 Reply Private Reply
#5: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#2)
The kind of state that would make Roy Moore a chief justice.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 09:22:01 Reply Private Reply
#6: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#4)
No people who disagree with Moore are mostly sickos.
Not you. It surprises me you attack a constitutionalist.
Can you give me 3 or 5 decisions that Roy Moore got wrong.
I've never heard a case where he got anything wrong.
The 10 commandments belong in the courthouse. It is the basis of all law.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 09:29:30 Reply Private Reply
#7: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#5)
Smart moral people?
Not dummies like in California.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 09:30:08 Reply Private Reply
#8: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#5)
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 09:38:18 Reply Private Reply
#9: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#4)
And people who allow men to marry men and women to marry women are not weirdos?
How about people who marry animals .will they be next and they will not be weirdos?
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 09:42:48 Reply Private Reply
#10: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#7)
Would you approve of allowing the chief justice of the state of California (or New York) to install their own monuments to every left-wing cause they favor?
This whole bit about having the ten commandments in statehouses and courthouses dates back to the late Fifties, when Cecil B. DeMille cooked it up as a promotional scheme for his movie which was called ... The Ten Commandments.
Chron.com: 'Ten Commandments' went from film to stone
DeMille was already dead by the time his PR patsies, the Fraternal Order of Eagles, ramped up their Ten Commandments monument distribution for parks and courthouses and other city/state properties. But then, how many Texans today will proudly recite "Don't mess with Texas" as a semi-threat without knowing that it was actually just an anti-littering slogan put on signs on a rural stretch of northeastern Texas highway during Lady Bird Johnson's anti-littering jihad?
Of course, all of this mostly illustrates how culturally retarded America really is.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 09:46:08 Reply Private Reply
#11: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#9)
I dunno. Ask the Supreme Court. More directly, ask which way Anthony Kennedy, Supreme Dictator of the United States, is flapping in the wind on any given day.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 09:48:22 Reply Private Reply
#12: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#10)
That makes Moore a weirdo?
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 09:48:33 Reply Private Reply
#13: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#11)
The Supreme Court did not call Moore a "weirdo"....you did.
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 09:50:11 Reply Private Reply
#14: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#10)
Sounds like a plan to me.
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 09:51:51 Reply Private Reply
#15: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#10)
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 09:55:56 Reply Private Reply
#16: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#15)
So if Moore goes to the Senate and offers a bill to ban divorce (and re-marriage), you would support that?
Some of these things only sound good until you actually follow them to their inevitable conclusion.
I think Moore is a phony and a hypocrite who has spent quite a number of years grandstanding himself in the public eye. And I think he is about to be rewarded for it by the voters of Alabama.
OTOH, Luther Strange is a creature of the Swamp Things in the Beltway (known as the GOPe) and got his position by blackmailing a corrupt governor a month before Governor Naughty Pants got run out of orifice.
So Moore vs. Strange is a choice but it's still a bad choice IMO.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 10:02:06 Reply Private Reply
#17: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#10)
Because someone does good doesn't mean you have to let someone do evil.
Can you comprehend that simple concept?
Who gives a shit what leftists want. They are luck to be breathing.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 10:05:41 Reply Private Reply
#18: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#16)
There is no such thing as divorce.
If you divorce your wife and you "mary" another you are committing adultery.
That is a simple second grade fact if you comprehend it or not.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 10:07:08 Reply Private Reply
#19: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#14)
(Spuriously) attributed to Sinclair Lewis.
Moore reminds me of this. Just like Huckabee does.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 10:07:48 Reply Private Reply
#20: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#18)
So you want Roy Moore to lead the Senate in a charge to outlaw divorce unconditionally?
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 10:08:47 Reply Private Reply
#21: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#16)
On this thread that could be said of you. You are grandstanding saying Moore is a flake and other insults. But I ask you a simple question to tell us what decisions you disagree with. You seem at a loss of words to give us details. You just continue to grandstand and talk about divorce.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 10:08:59 Reply Private Reply
#22: A K A Stone To: Gatlin (#12)
Moore is no weirdo.
You are just to the right of sortaconservative.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 10:10:29 Reply Private Reply
#23: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#20)
So you want everyone to be forced to mary someone of the same sex?
That is how stupid your question was.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 10:11:19 Reply Private Reply
#24: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#21)
Are you serious?
This entire forum has about 15-20 active users, maybe another 10 intermittent posters.
I hate to break it to you but LF is just a little chat board. How do you compare some posts on an anonymous forum to having the kind of power that a state chief justice has or a U.S. senator has?
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 10:12:39 Reply Private Reply
#25: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#22)
You aren't going to change my handle again, are you?
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 10:13:28 Reply Private Reply
#26: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#23)
Sure. Why not? It would be good for a laugh.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 10:13:57 Reply Private Reply
#27: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#4)
You think that's flaky? How about those who put dead bodies in the Capitol rotunda? Weird.
By the way, this "religious" monument was also covered with quotes from the Declaration of Independence, the national anthem, and various Founding Fathers.
If the mere presence of the Ten Commandments makes this a "religious monument", then I assume you'd describe Elizabeth Warren as a Cherokee Indian.
misterwhite posted on 2017-05-06 10:14:14 Reply Private Reply
#28: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#24)
You're off topic.
I just said you were grandstanding.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 10:14:37 Reply Private Reply
#29: A K A Stone To: misterwhite (#27)
I give you a hard time sometimes.
I have to wholeheartedly agree with your sentiments on this topic.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 10:15:48 Reply Private Reply
#30: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#26)
So laws should be passed so you can have a good laugh.
Got ya.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 10:16:29 Reply Private Reply
#31: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#27)
I dislike having dead bodies in legislative buildings for any reason. I would not allow any of them to lie "in state".
Besides, it's too hard to distinguish real corpses from the undead hacks we elect to those legislatures.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 10:17:42 Reply Private Reply
#32: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#25)
Not a chance.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 10:17:46 Reply Private Reply
#33: A K A Stone To: Tooconservative (#20)
Do you think that if you "divorce" your wife and start up with another lady that it isn't adultry?
Do you believe in marriage?
Do you believe in until death do us part?
A K A Stone posted on 2017-05-06 10:19:43 Reply Private Reply
#34: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#19)
-- (Spuriously) attributed to Huey Long.
Or, Antifa as it is called today. I think Huey Long is closer to the real truth.
misterwhite posted on 2017-05-06 10:21:01 Reply Private Reply
#35: Tooconservative To: A K A Stone (#33)
Yep.
In theory. In practice, not so much.
Did the apostle Paul? He seemed to allow divorce/remarriage just because your spouse was not a Christian.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 10:27:25 Reply Private Reply
#36: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#31)
Yeah. It kinda makes the presence of a granite monument a preferable option, huh?
misterwhite posted on 2017-05-06 10:29:29 Reply Private Reply
#37: sneakypete To: Tooconservative (#1)
Well stated.
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 10:33:49 Reply Private Reply
#38: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#16)
Thats a stupid hypothetical question to ask
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 10:34:30 Reply Private Reply
#39: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#3)
Moore ain't all that honorable because he wants to use the power of the government to stuff his religion down everyone's throat.
If he had his way,the US would be a Christian version of Saudi Arabia.
You up for that,Stone?
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 10:35:33 Reply Private Reply
#40: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#16)
You are allowed to think what you want to .God Bless America.
And Moore is allowed to stand up for what he fells is right.
But who is the hypocrite just to call someone a hypocrite because they dont agree with him?
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 10:37:47 Reply Private Reply
#41: Gatlin To: A K A Stone (#17)
If they were on the basic heritage of our country and the founding principles .I would feel comfortable with that.
Just as as federal district court found printing In God We Trust on legal tender does not violate the Constitution .I dont feel that Moore placing the Ten Commandments in the court building violated the Constitution.
And just a in God We Trust appears on the facade of the U.S. Supreme Court building, I dont feel that Moore placing the Ten Commandments in the court building violated the Constitution.
The National Motto, In God We Trust, appears in the the House and Senate Chambers and yet Moore could not place a monument of the Ten Commandments in the Alabama Supreme Court building.
Now, tell me again about being hypocritical
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 10:48:21 Reply Private Reply
#42: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#40)
Nope.
If Moore is so dead-set against divorce, why didn't he find a case to rule against divorce entirely in the state of Alabama? He certainly could have. But he didn't.
That's called hypocrisy.
He just says these things. Actually do something about it? Not much.
His history of grandstanding doesn't inspire much confidence.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 10:49:49 Reply Private Reply
#43: sneakypete To: Gatlin (#12)
It makes him a traitor that puts America 3rd.
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 10:57:17 Reply Private Reply
#44: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#41)
I wouldn't object to Moore placing his wooden wall plaque on his own courtroom wall. That's how all this began, back in the Nineties (as I recall it).
It's when he became chief justice and unilaterally placed a 2.5-ton granite monument in the rotunda of Alabama's state judicial building that he clearly crossed the line.
Monuments on state property are the business of the legislature, not a judge who sneaks it in under the cover of night, not even knowing whether the building's floor could support such a heavy stone piece. Then his allies at Coral Ridge Ministries (who funded it) took video of this illegal installation and sold DVDs to make money off it. Kinda like how DeMille got the F.O.E. to fund all those 10 commandments plaques and monuments around the country as a promotional for his movie.
This is the kind of thing that caused Roy Moore to be removed as chief justice. After he grandstanded his way back on to the state court in 2013, his pay was suspended in 2016. And then he resigned from the court last month, facing a half-dozen ethics charges (which he had already lost) so he could run for Senate.
I'm surprised Moore still has a law license. I expect the GOPe will try to find a way to go after that as well, probably during the upcoming campaign.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 11:00:00 Reply Private Reply
#45: sneakypete To: Tooconservative (#16)
I still maintain that there should be a box to mark on every ballot that has "none of the above",and that every time "None of the above" wins,there should immediately be another election with all new candidates (mandatory) that is paid for in full by the part coffers to the parties that backed a candidate in the first election. NO PUBLIC MONEY.
That would quickly guarantee better candidates than "loser number 1" and "loser number 2'.
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 11:16:16 Reply Private Reply
#46: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#17)
Can YOU comprehend "Equal Justice for ALL"?
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 11:17:22 Reply Private Reply
#47: BobCeleste To: Tooconservative (#1)
Yup, just like they did Donald, but CHRIST had other plans.
BobCeleste posted on 2017-05-06 11:19:29 Reply Private Reply
#48: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#18)
What color is the sky on your home planet?
"Marriage" and "divorce" are civil legalities.
Or are you going to try to claim you paid GAWD for your marriage license?
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 11:19:43 Reply Private Reply
#49: sneakypete To: Tooconservative, Gatlin (#19)
Amen,amen,AMEN!
Evidently some people think THEIR fascist flavor is non-fattening and good for you,unlike all the other fascist flavors.
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 11:22:35 Reply Private Reply
#50: sneakypete To: misterwhite (#27)
Where does it say both can't be flaky?
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 11:25:14 Reply Private Reply
#51: sneakypete To: Tooconservative (#26)
Uhhhh,because it would essentially be enslaving the entire population?
It would be good for a laugh.
No,it wouldn't.
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 11:26:59 Reply Private Reply
#52: Tooconservative To: sneakypete (#45)
I think many of us believe something like that would work.
But it fails to account for the perversity of voters and the stubbornness of candidates.
It would be nice if it really were that simple. But it isn't. The voters would screw up a system like that too.
Let's imagine there are only two strong "qualified" candidates in a race. Each one gets 32% and 34% of the voters give their none-of-the-above votes. Now you've disqualified the only two candidates that everyone knows. It's entirely possible that either candidate with the 32% would be preferred by the other party over any other new second-round candidates. But you would have prevented them from running again.
The courts wouldn't allow it anyway. They'd say you were limiting freedom of speech by the candidates and inhibiting their qualifications for office (by imposing requirements for election to office that the Constitution itself does not, much as they said whenever some state tries to impose term limits for federal offices).
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 11:29:27 Reply Private Reply
#53: sneakypete To: Gatlin (#40)
Yes,he is. In his role as a private citizen,but NOT when he dons the judicial robes and is standing in a public building.
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 11:29:40 Reply Private Reply
#54: Tooconservative To: sneakypete (#49)
Well, if I'm getting a chorus of amens from you, I'm either dead right or on the path to hell.
But it's a beautiful morning so I'm not going to worry too much about it today.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-05-06 11:30:52 Reply Private Reply
#55: sneakypete To: Gatlin (#41)
You already know all about it,and the proof is in your position that since wrong has already been done and is accepted,what harm could more wrong do?
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 11:31:44 Reply Private Reply
#56: sneakypete To: BobCeleste (#47)
CHRIST voted for Trump???????
Seriously?
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-06 11:33:18 Reply Private Reply
#57: Gatlin To: A K A Stone (#22)
I think you misread my post .or either I misunderstand your post.
I was challenging TC with the question.
Moore is no weirdo.
Gatlin posted on 2017-05-06 13:07:00 Reply Private Reply
#58: BorisY To: Tooconservative, small govT, bigboobs, swinger, liplicker, Tongueflasher, meTrosexuals (#46)
stupid ass dumb reTard liberal
equal resulTs - opporTunity - jusTice
doesn'T mean The resulTs are The same
unless you're a Twisted - spun - communisT - aTheist - social scienTisT - dupe - engineer
love
boris
BorisY posted on 2017-05-06 14:07:56 Reply Private Reply
#59: BorisY To: sneakypete (#46)
That's iT
Don'T equaTe winners
WiTh freaks - losers
Love
boris
BorisY posted on 2017-05-07 20:02:50 Reply Private Reply
#60: BorisY To: sneakypete (#46)
equal righTs for all
ThaT's iT
equal justice is an absurdity
sTupid * ass dumb reTard liberal
equal righTs - opporTunity - jusTice
doesn'T mean The resulTs are The same
unless you're a Twisted - spun - communisT - aTheist - social scienTisT - dupe - engineer
love
boris
* drug soused
BorisY posted on 2017-05-08 01:07:03 Reply Private Reply
#61: BorisY To: sneakypete (#46)
hhhmmmmm
equal income
wealTh Too
whaT does ThaT sound like
love
boris
BorisY posted on 2017-05-08 09:44:37 Reply Private Reply
#62: sneakypete To: BorisY (#61)
Another Boris brain fart?
sneakypete posted on 2017-05-08 16:40:16 Reply Private Reply
#63: BorisY To: sneakypete (#62)
Sow's ear
Silk purse Too
Love
boris
BorisY posted on 2017-05-08 19:53:24 Reply Private Reply
#64: BorisY To: sneakypete (#62)
Compared To The load
You're droping here
Love
boris
BorisY posted on 2017-05-08 20:40:06 Reply Private Reply
#65: BorisY To: sTeankypeTe (#62)
We are teaching little 2 and 3 and 4 year olds that males and females are interchangeable (Marxism) and we can become whatever we want, because there is NO Objective Truth (God) and NO Natural Law or Natural instincts (which is proven to exist) and NO Truth (God)-never proven.
Sowe are deliberately creating human beings who can not use their God-given mind for critical thought. They are being programmed only (Common Core/NCLB/Goals 2000) which deliberately warps all perceptionsespecially of identityso that indvidualism and free will will be impossible for any of these children who go through their indoctrination system which embeds dependency (vice/slavery). This brainwashing includes the sodomites in Hollywood who are raping all the little boys and PLAN how to WARP the desires and thinking of your little Johnny for their future orgies. Vice creates Slaves only. Virtue formation is essential for civil societies. FOR THE NWO utopia where Slavery is Freedom and Vice is Virtue and Boys are Girls.
They have to destroy the brain and interactions between both sides of the brain-to fracture itand make it impossible for critical thinking to occur.....they figured out this (the Jekyll Island Satanic worshippers) how to control the minds of children (and all adults) by repeating lies and disinformation (which will become the truth) and by normalizing evil, dysfunctional, degrading, dehumanizing behaviors like forcing sodomy and baby- killing into Just Laws (LOL) evil behaviors which erase the Christian worldview, the ONLY RATIONAL, just worldview in history.
Wisdom is the ability to discern Good and Evil (CIcero) and ALL MSM lie to us OVER AND OVER. We need the truth and if we know itwe will be free when we rid our country of ALL evil, vile Law and have TRUE freedom of the press(not owned by 6 people), and take back the Constitution and our economic system from the satanists and sodomites, which has been controlled by a few elites who forced us into all the wars for their filthy wealth and power control of all countries.
Without wisdom - true knowledge ... we are dupes --- incapable of free will.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3552185/posts?page=2#29
sneakypeTe
back sTroking a sepTic Tank - sewer
love
boris
BorisY posted on 2017-05-11 15:58:50 Reply Private Reply