The Murdoch family fired Bill OReilly today the top personality on cable news for the past 15 years.
James and Lachlan Murdoch, two committed leftists, have a much different vision than their father for the FOX News channel.
The new FOX News will not include Bill OReilly. In fact, the Murdoch family did not even allow Bill to say good-bye to his friends and millions of fans.
They wiped Bill OReillys name from The Factor on Wednesday night.
Bill made them billions. The Murdoch family did not even let him say goodbye.
Many conservatives are hoping OReilly will join with Roger Ailes and start a new network to compete with FOX News.
In another sign of the direction of the new FOX News the Murdoch family not only dumped Bill, but promoted far left hacks Bob Beckel and Juan Williams.
Tucker Carlson is moving to the 8 PM slot. Sean Hannity will keep his 10 PM slot. And FOX will move The Five to the 9 PM slot. The Five a panel show with six co-hosts: Kimberly Guilfoyle, Dana Perino, Bob Beckel, Greg Gutfeld, Jesse Watters and Juan Williams.

The Murdochs believe the FOX viewers want to see more of far left hacks Williams of Beckel.
Seriously?
This will not end well.
Poster Comment:
The Murdochs must be crazy! Since the majority of O'Reilly's viewers are Conservatives, the last thing they want to see more of are these two bumbling phony liberal shills for Hillary and anything DemocRAT.
I can't believe that these allegations were enough to justify paying off these gals and ruining a man's career and name. This country has been going down the shitter for years now, since the presidency of 'slick willy'. Bill O might be a womanizer, but I don't see him as the type who takes advantage of women or that the high-heeled, blonde chicks are afraid that he might assault them sexually or rape them!
Perhaps they want their ratings to descend to the level of MSNBC or CNN.
#1: Tooconservative To: HomerBohn (#0)
He made lewd suggestions to a number of FNC women. He'd call them up and breath heavy while whacking off. Supposedly, a few of them had recordings. The latest one to come forward was a black woman staffer who was sick of him calling her "hot chocolate".
It might not be rape or sexual assault but it is well beyond just being obnoxious.
What the hell. O'Reilly and Ailes were rich as hell, could find women to put up with them while dating or just hire escorts to get sex. Instead, they had to perv their way around Fox News and the hot blonde women who worked there 'cause those women were handy at work and they thought they were too charming and sexy to have to pay for sex, despite being disgusting old goats.
It's kinda pathetic really.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-21 08:47:23 Reply Private Reply
#2: Gatlin To: HomerBohn (#0)
I am no fan of either Bill OReilly or Roger Ailes.I am however a huge fan of justice. I have read where charges against them were made, and huge monetary settlements were paid out, but I never read where they had any chance at all to defend themselves .either in a court of law or in the court of public opinion.
And that, I strongly feel was wrong .definitely wrong.
I didnt closely follow either the situation with OReilly or Ailes. I would only hear or read a minute of so comment made from time to time. I remember that supposedly 10 or so women came forward with a statement that they had been sexually offended by what OReilly said to them.
I remember the last two made against OReilly.
One who said she was sexually offended, was a black female who had an office nearby OReillys office and as he would pass by he would occasionally refer to her as hot chocolate .as in how is my hot chocolate doing today? Now, I am not a black woman. But I feel if I were and some world famous male referred to me hot chocolate then I would feel highly complimented.
The one I heard yesterday, was a woman who came forward and stated that she was sexually offended by OReilly because he occasionally said youre looking good to her.
Until I learn factual truth, I say all of the charges and actions against O [Reilly and Ailes went beyond stupid.
If it is proven that either OReilly or Ailes did something for which they should have been fired .then I am comfortable with that and they should have been fired. But that they were fired simply because women came forward with charges raised my hackles.
I say go for it Bill and Roger. And if you join together to form an new network, then I will turn every TV set in my home to your new channel 24/7/365, except to channel select on the one I am watching, to add to the ratings. Furthermore, I will actively email support to all the advertisers. I will then continue to do everything I can to make the new venture a success .including becoming a stock holder.Gawd, I hate jump on tactics and agenda drives by PC critters with a passion .as much as I dislike cop-haters who show no justification for their opinions and condemnation remarks which they base their solely on what they read in fake news and yellow journalism articles.
Bill and Roger, you two can become our modern day version of the Lone Ranger and Tonto
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-21 09:13:44 Reply Private Reply
#3: Stoner To: Tooconservative (#1)
Well, hr is that, and it sounds like he is weird.
But, at least they can not call him " Gay ". At least, not yet.
Stoner posted on 2017-04-21 09:18:52 Reply Private Reply
#4: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#1)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-21 09:31:19 Reply Private Reply
#5: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#2)
They were the most powerful people at the network. I think they had plenty of representation to tell their side of the story.
They weren't shitcanned for no good reason. The Murdochs aren't dumb. O'Reilly was a regular gold mine for them.
An underreported aspect here is that dumping O'Reilly is considered to strengthen the bid being made by the Murdoch boys to buy Sky cable in Britain. After Lachlan's little media spying scandal, they are under extra scrutiny but firing O'Reilly supposedly makes them look more responsible and mainstream.
So firing O'Reilly to help them close on a huge media purchase in Europe makes some sense. And how many more years was O'Blarney going to keep going anyway? The Murdoch boys are young and looking decades down the road, well beyond any tenure O'Reilly could have had.
Maybe. Typically, these high-end media contracts contain no-compete clauses. So with Ailes taking $40M and O'Reilly taking $25M in separation allowance for early contract termination, there are probably clauses in that that prevent them from discussing the settlement or the case(s) in public or in working for any other network for a few years.
Look at Dan Rather on that HDNet channel with his sad little show. Or Larry King who, I think, ended up on RussiaToday. Or even Leno who decided to just fully retire and not come back again.
I think they're both gone for good.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-21 09:32:01 Reply Private Reply
#6: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#4)
They haven't been in court and the settlements silence the women with NDAs.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-21 09:33:32 Reply Private Reply
#7: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#6)
I am saying, we are only dealing with allegations and public opinion.
And fear of adverse public opinion dictated actions in both these cases.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-21 09:45:22 Reply Private Reply
#8: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#7)
Fear of losing big lawsuits and the public's reaction is more accurate.
If they could have kept him, they probably would have.
I notice a lot of media outlets mentioning the Sky cable angle, that that is what James and Lachlan Murdoch were most worried about. Lachlan initially sided with Rupert on keeping O'Reilly but moved over to James' side as the internal investigation proceeded, at least according to the rumor mill. We had the same rumors about Lachlan sticking with Rupert on Ailes too, until James convinced him that Ailes had to go.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-21 09:58:30 Reply Private Reply
#9: nativist nationalist To: Gatlin (#4)
If the story was from freethoughtproject the headline would read; "END OF AN ERA: Murdoch Family Fires Innocent Bill OReilly."
nativist nationalist posted on 2017-04-21 10:53:45 Reply Private Reply
#10: BorisY To: HomerBohn (#0)
get eleanor clift
make it the real
manson family
love
boris
BorisY posted on 2017-04-21 11:29:03 Reply Private Reply
#11: misterwhite To: HomerBohn (#0)
Promoted them from what to what? "Promoted" because FOX moved The Five to the 9 PM slot?
misterwhite posted on 2017-04-21 11:38:23 Reply Private Reply
#12: HomerBohn To: misterwhite (#11)
Hardly a promotion, eh?
These two shills for the leftist agenda and the death of America should have their own show. Add a fifth true Conservative to the group.
HomerBohn posted on 2017-04-21 11:44:14 Reply Private Reply
#13: misterwhite To: HomerBohn (#12)
Too bad the other networks don't balance their panels with two conservatives.
misterwhite posted on 2017-04-21 12:21:09 Reply Private Reply
#14: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#11)
A silly assertion.
They are contracted paid contributors at FNC. So it is unlikely they get anything more out of their current contract unless they get to renegotiate due to moving from afternoon to primetime.
I wouldn't bet that they're getting any more money. Not under their current contract.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-21 14:25:44 Reply Private Reply
#15: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#14)
But ... but ... the headine says they were promoted. Is that a lie? Would they lie to us just to get us to click on the article?
misterwhite posted on 2017-04-22 10:29:28 Reply Private Reply
#16: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#15)
Perish the thought. Now I'm a little ashamed of myself.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-22 10:36:05 Reply Private Reply
#17: Hank Rearden To: HomerBohn (#0)
Hank Rearden posted on 2017-04-22 13:45:56 Reply Private Reply
#18: HomerBohn To: Hank Rearden (#17)
HomerBohn posted on 2017-04-22 18:53:03 Reply Private Reply
#19: Deckard To: Stoner (#3)
Deckard posted on 2017-04-22 19:09:38 Reply Private Reply
#20: Gatlin To: HomerBohn, Hank Rearden (#18)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-22 19:40:13 Reply Private Reply