A Kansas cop shot and killed the service dog of an army veteran who suffers from PTSD on Thursday, according to the Daily Haze.
Augusta police officer Devon Keith says he was forced to shoot Alan Fitzgeralds dog Midnite claiming the dog charged an animal control officer after ramming a door until it opened making the animal control officer fear for his life.
But Fitzgerald said his dog didnt do anything wrong and officer Keith shot him for no reason.

Alan Fitzgerald and his service dog, Midnite, before a cop shot and killed it.
Neighbors who witnessed the shooting said the animal control officer was the one who opened the door and began acting aggressively towards the dog before shooting it.
Augusta police, along with animal control, showed up at Fitzgeralds house Thursday afternoon after a neighbor called to complain about a German Shepard.
Fitzgerald said Midnite got out on Thursday, presumably chasing rabbits and cats as he often did. Midnite ended up several mobile homes down from his home, hovering over a neighbors small dog.
Its how he plays, Fitzgerald explained.
Fitzgerald talked to the small dogs owner, who said the smaller dog wasnt hurt, just shaken up from Midnite towering over it.
Things settled and Fitzgerald returned home and was in the shower when he heard Midnite bark and then gunshots.
All of a sudden, I heard this pound pound pound on the screen door, Fitzgerald recalled.
And I heard Midnite barking, obviously hes going to bark because hes guarding the house. All of a sudden then I heard shots fired and I heard my dog screaming in agony.
Fitzgerald came out to see what was going on only to have a gun pointed at him inside of his own house.
I got halfway out the door, and about right here where this crack is, theres an officer standing with his gun pointed at me. I said what are you guys doing here, why did you kill my dog? he said, Get on the ground, I said, Im not gonna get on the ground so I went inside and slammed the door, he told KSN.
August Police Chief Tyler Brewer defended officer Keith.

The animal control officer felt in fear for his life, the chief said.
These officers feel horrible for having to do that.
According to chief Brewer, when the animal control officer knocked on the door, Midnite answered.
The front door was open but the glass screen door was shut, Brewer explained. The dog rushed and hit the glass of the screen door and startled the animal control officer.
Officer Keith was forced to shoot Midnite when the animal control officer fell off the porch, hitting his head, trying to bite the officer, according to Brewer.

Midnite
But Fitzgeralds neighbor Charmin Drake says the dog got out because the animal control officer actually opened the door, not Midnite, then entered without a warrant and began kicking and even hitting Midnite with a baton.
After beating the dog, officers went outside and shot Midnite. Then they issued Fitzgerald two citations for having a vicious animal.
Fitzgerald rescued Midnight in 2015 and obtained an ADA service dog certificate, which required the dog to pass behavioral tests without showing signs of aggression, and said he had Midnite for his PTSD.
Whenever I was having some sort of episode of oncoming anxiety, he knew what to do. Hed come up and nudge me or do something silly. Hed turn over on his back and give that little smile, you know, that dogs give. Im just going to miss all of that.
Check out the Daily Haze interview with Alan Fitzgerald below.
Poster Comment:
The animal control officer felt in fear for his life, the chief said.
Of course he did - the frigging sadistic coward.
#59: Gatlin To: Deckard (#41)
This one taken before the shooting or after the shoot when the door had been repaired .shows the storm door with the window and screen intact.
This one taken when the do way laying dead on the porch with blood everywhere shows the bottom window and screen broken trhough.
Either someones lying or the pictures are lying .which do you think?
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 21:53:24 Reply Private Reply
#60: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#59)
Well, at least there is some misreporting. Maybe to help gin up a clickbait headline on a cop-hater site.
You've probably noticed that "Beware Of The Dog" sign that I mentioned on the door by now. If Midnite was such a well-trained and non-aggressive dog, why did he post that sticker?
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 22:02:04 Reply Private Reply
#61: Tooconservative To: Deckard (#58)
Stop trying to change the subject. We are discussing this guy and his dog in Augusta KS. Not anyone else.
You're trying to conflate those other incidents with this one. It doesn't work.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 22:03:46 Reply Private Reply
#62: Gatlin To: Deckard (#58)
Countless times .when a family pet pit bull was completely docile and not attacking a cop.
But, of course .The Free Through Project never reports that .does it?
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 22:04:51 Reply Private Reply
#63: Deckard To: Tooconservative (#61)
Your contention that a fence would have saved Midnite was a supposition on your part.
I merely pointed out your misconception.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 22:06:02 Reply Private Reply
#64: Gatlin To: Tooconservative. Deckard (#61)
He does that all the time.
His next post will probably contain 5 links on an unrelated topic.
Thats always an indication that he has given up trying to prove any point he though he may have had.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 22:07:40 Reply Private Reply
#65: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#64)
I'm not sure that merely trying to change the subject is tantamount to an admission but you have to keep it in mind.
Posting another half-dozen anti-cop/anti-gooberment articles in the sidebar might be a way to try to change the subject but I can't say that is the only reason to post so many at once.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 22:09:24 Reply Private Reply
#66: Gatlin To: Deckard. Tooconservative (#63)
Sure you did
And you tried to divert away from the primary conversation by adding:
Heartbroken Salt Lake City man berates cops after they shoot dog in back yard
Cops Show Up To Wrong House And Shoot Little Boys Dog
Both of which are off topic
Stop lying .its getting old stuff.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 22:11:48 Reply Private Reply
#67: Deckard To: Gatlin (#64)
I've made my point - this cop (as well as most others who shoot family pets) are cowards.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 22:12:53 Reply Private Reply
#68: Deckard To: Gatlin (#66)
Sod off tosser.
I responded to Tc's claim that Midnite would be alive if he had been fenced in.
History has proven that cops will kill family pets even when they are fenced in.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 22:16:17 Reply Private Reply
#69: Gatlin To: Deckard (#67)
You have made no point .you have made a complete idiot of yourself.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 22:17:38 Reply Private Reply
#70: Gatlin To: Deckard (#68)
That's another lie....history has not proven that.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 22:18:55 Reply Private Reply
#71: Deckard To: Gatlin (#69)
So sayeth LF's village idiot.
I made my point - you are just too much of a simpleton to understand it.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 22:19:31 Reply Private Reply
#72: Deckard To: Gatlin (#70)
I gave four examples you reprehensible assclown.
One can only hope that if you have a dog, you suffer the same sad fate as this Veteran.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 22:20:47 Reply Private Reply
#73: Gatlin To: Deckard (#72)
Thats a very uncivil and inconsiderate wish to make on someone.
But since when have you ever been civil and considerate.
Your remark reflects poorly on your upbringing
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 22:33:05 Reply Private Reply
#74: Gatlin To: Deckard (#73)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 22:35:59 Reply Private Reply
#75: Deckard To: Gatlin (#73)
Not at all - It would be ironic if you suffered at the hands of the Amerikan police state, the one that you so slavishly worship.
Your remark reflects poorly on your upbringing
Why don't you reflect on your own multitude of faults before presuming to lecture someone else?
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 22:39:03 Reply Private Reply
#76: Deckard To: Gatlin (#74)
To quote Tc...Stop trying to change the subject. We are discussing this guy and his dog in Augusta KS. Not anyone else
The dogs in your videos have nothing to do with this story.
Oh, and while you're at it - sod off.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 22:41:02 Reply Private Reply
#77: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, Tooconservative, Deckard (#59)
In the bottom pic the lower sliding glass window is raised all the way up, and the screen is partially punched out with the retaining bead hanging.
The cop went in and beat the dog with a baton and kicked it repeatedly and then shot it, so the dog punched through the screen to escape, and expired on the porch.
Most of the blood is in the top right, so someone may have moved the body to get the door to open further.
Hondo68 posted on 2017-04-19 22:44:51 Reply Private Reply
#78: Fred Mertz To: hondo68 (#77)
I might have to sleep on that decision.
Fred Mertz posted on 2017-04-19 22:54:42 Reply Private Reply
#79: Stoner To: Deckard (#72)
Deck, I would not wish that on the dog. He/she is suffering enough to live there. Wish it on him/her, not the dog.
Stoner posted on 2017-04-19 22:56:33 Reply Private Reply
#80: Gatlin To: Fred Mertz (#78)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 23:02:13 Reply Private Reply
#81: Tooconservative To: hondo68 (#77)
I noticed too. Not sure how many conclusions we can draw.
Yeah but there is no mention or pix of blood inside the house. So I don't think so.
I do have to give you points for imagination.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 23:04:27 Reply Private Reply
#82: Gatlin To: TooConservative (#80)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 23:12:57 Reply Private Reply
#83: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#82)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 23:17:42 Reply Private Reply
#84: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#83)
Hmm...that doesn't sound like a trained service animal to me.
It seems that "Beware Of The Dog" sign on the front door was there for a reason: a known aggressive biting dog was on the premises.
I notice the police chief said they couldn't find a record of any state certification of the dog as a service animal. So it isn't clear if this was a lawful service animal or if he just had some training but didn't get certified (because he was too busy biting kids and cops to finish getting certified).
Apparently, Kansas has a law against claiming a dog is a service dog unless the dog is fully certified. The chief says they're investigating and hasn't ruled out filing charges on the service dog certification issue.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 23:25:08 Reply Private Reply
#85: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#82)
Seemed a fitting background sound.
In the "interview", the guy sounds guilty. He didn't protect his dog and he didn't control his dog. I bet this dog has a lot more history than these articles are telling us.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 23:32:17 Reply Private Reply
#86: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#82)
At 1:02 Alan stated this dog darted out the door [to chase a rabbit or cat] .so the dog had charged through the door before.
In a newspaper report [and I cant find where again] a police officer said they had trouble there (at Alans residence) before (did no say with the dog). as best as I remember.
This is obviously confirmed [that the police had been to the Firzgerald residence before] because at 5:07 Alan Fitzgerald said: There was a private call coming through on his phone. I knew it as them because they always call that way. I repeat, Alan said: I knew it as them because they always call that way. I wonder if the police always call that way because of a problem with the dog, a problem with Alans PTSD, or another problem with Alan or someone else at the residence. So, this would indicate that Alan and the police were no strangers to each other .that is an apparent conclusion.
At 3:43 Alan said he heard banging on his door and then he heard shots. I did not pause between those two statements. So, there is no way of know the time line between the knock and the shots. The way Alan told the story makes me question the neighbors eyewitness statement that the police officer opened the door and went in.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 00:25:16 Reply Private Reply
#87: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#85)
I just posted someting below to indicate that same thing.
Interesting....
It seems, by his own admission, he was no stranger to the police.
"I knew it was them, they always call that way."
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 00:27:55 Reply Private Reply
#88: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#87)
Exactly. Notice the mention of the chief when he said they sent a cop with an animal control officer because in one (or more) previous calls to that address, a lone animal control officer wasn't enough.
Maybe the animal control officer in this dinky burg knew this dog and had good cause to be afraid of him.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-20 00:32:13 Reply Private Reply
#89: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#84)
I came to the conclusion some time ago, that people throw the term "service dog" around far too loosely.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 00:34:16 Reply Private Reply
#90: Gatlin To: Deckard (#83)
Hey, Deckard, listen to the video in the link, you will hear
KWCH12: Alan tells me the previous incident with Midnite - the dog bit his teenage nephew at El Dorado lake last summer, and the teen had to get stitches but was okay.
Well, Bubba .that DEBUNKS the Hell out of your service dog trained to be non-aggressive bullshit .doesnt it?
You are so pathetic .always defending a lost cause, only because you hate the police so much that you can never be objective about anything involving them.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 00:38:11 Reply Private Reply
#91: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#88)
You also noticed that Alan said there was absolutely no problem with the neighbor lady and Midnite.
However, the Chief said they received a call about a German Sheppard running loose and Alan said 2 hours after he talked to the lady .the police was banging on his door.
Who else but the lady could have called? Maybe someone, but my guess would be that it was the lady and Alan was skipping some details about the incident of Midnight with her dog.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 00:44:27 Reply Private Reply
#92: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#91)
In fairness, every neighborhood does have at least one Gladys Kravitz snooping around, calling the cops out on their neighbors. The little dog owner may not have done anything.
After all, we know this dog did love to chase cats around in the neighborhood, according to his owner's confession on YouBoob. Maybe one of the cat owners called the cops out.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-20 00:54:09 Reply Private Reply
#93: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#92)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 01:09:26 Reply Private Reply
#94: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#92)
I find numerous sources on the Web where you can self-register your dog as a service dog and they will send you an ID Card after receiving payment.
Service dog fraud on the rise
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 01:13:57 Reply Private Reply
#95: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#94)
Thats Not a Service Dog, But It Is a Working Dog
According this information, he does NOT have a service dog.
He has an
Emotional Support Animal (ESA) work with an individual who needs comfort. They require no specialized training, have no public access, and can be any species. The DOJ/HUDs Fair Housing Act does protect an owners right to reside with their Emotional Support Animal in accommodations that dont allow pets, and with proper documentation, a person can fly with their ESA.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 01:34:02 Reply Private Reply
#96: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#84)
What he has is
KANSAS SERVICE DOG LAWS[ .]
Service dog means a dog which has been specially selected, trained and tested to perform a variety of tasks for persons with disabilities. These tasks include, but are not limited to: Pulling wheelchairs, lending balance support, picking up dropped objects or providing assistance in, or to avoid, a medical crisis, or to otherwise mitigate the effects of a disability.
The presence of a dog for comfort, protection or personal defense does not qualify a dog as being trained to mitigate an individuals disability and therefor does not qualify the dog as an assistance dog covered under the provisions of this act.
[ .]
FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION
It is a class A nonperson misdemeanor for any person to:
- represent that such person has the right to be accompanied by an assistance dog or that such person has a right to be accompanied by a professional therapy dog
- represent that such person has a disability for the purpose of acquiring an assistance dog unless such person has such disability.
[Assistance dog means any guide dog, hearing assistance dog or service dog].
I think I read that he already received 2 citations .with Chief checking on his service dog qualification he may be receiving another.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 02:21:28 Reply Private Reply
#97: Justified To: All (#0)
Kinda of a backdoor get to take my animal anywhere and you can not object! Landlord you can not say a damn thing but you still are liable for aggressive dogs actions!!!
Justified posted on 2017-04-20 08:03:27 Reply Private Reply
#98: Justified To: Gatlin, Tooconservative (#97)
Justified posted on 2017-04-20 08:18:38 Reply Private Reply
#99: Deckard To: Justified (#98)
Fitzgerald rescued Midnight in 2015 and obtained an ADA service dog certificate, which required the dog to pass behavioral tests without showing signs of aggression...
Deckard posted on 2017-04-20 08:33:08 Reply Private Reply
#100: Justified To: Deckard (#99)
Someone is lying. I know you think so but people do not go around shooting nice dogs just because they feel like it.
Justified posted on 2017-04-20 08:41:41 Reply Private Reply
#101: Gatlin To: Justified, Tooconservative (#98)
I too became intrigued while participating on this thread to learn about service dogs since I basically only knew there were such animals used for special purposes. I found the same as you did and also discovered a hundred or so places online where all you do is fill out a form and pay money to register a dog in 3 or 4 different Assistant Dog categories. Because of the ongoing discussion on this thread, I concentrated on Kansas for information and found sites with some good info .including one with the Kansas law.
What I found to be ironic is that you need no identification to show a dog is an assistance dog and legally no one can ask you for anything to show identification or certification. All you need do is say the magic words this is a service dog and all businesses must let you in with your dog. I also found out a business owner can kick your dog out only if it becomes unruly disruptive or if it is not house broken then pisses or shits in the business establishment.
I discovered something to be true that I have long suspected. While the original intended purpose of assistant dogs were necessary and noble, starting with the dogs who assist the blind, I find the concept has now been prostituted .as was the handicap parking procedure also prostituted. I feel sure you have seen as many situations as I have where assholes took dogs that one could see definitely did not qualify as assistant dogs into restaurants and food stores when they should not have .and spry young people placing a handicap placard on the mirror of their vehicle, only the then jump out and run into a store.
Yes, it is definitely as you say: This is a landlord, business owner and insurance nightmare.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 09:00:24 Reply Private Reply
#102: Justified To: Gatlin (#101)
If I could show you want renters do nobody would ever say a thing about slum lords. Then you add in the mix of animals and you can double the trouble. Here in Texas it takes a court order to get people out of the house and the renter can tear the house to pieces before they leave and you can only take a deadbeat to court to get your money back. But since they are deadbeats you lose the damage, court fee's and lawyer fee's. Couple of bad renters back to back and you can lose it all.
Don't even get me to talk about Handicap parking which is no more than quick in and out for people of certain groups who steal parking permits so they do not have to park a mile away from the store like the rest of honest hard working Americans!
Justified posted on 2017-04-20 09:21:50 Reply Private Reply
#103: Gatlin To: Deckard, Justified, Tooconservative (#99)
You can do your fact checking in the U.S. Department of Justice - Civil Rights Division - Disability Rights Section ADA Requirements Service Animals. These requirements, or rules, clarify and refine issues that have arisen over the past 20 years and contain new, and updated, requirements, including the 2010 Standards for Accessible Design (2010 Standards).
You will find in that link, their bold print on how a Service Animal is defined, it reads: Service animals are defined as dogs that are individually trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities.
You will find nowhere, nowhere, in the U.S. Department of Justice - Civil Rights Division - Disability Rights Section ADA Requirements Service Animals has it required the dog to pass behavioral tests without showing signs of aggression... as Ben Keller proclaimed and you so boldy repeated with bold print and underline.
In fact, if you check [and I will not take time right now to look it up for you] .you will find that an ADA service dog can be trained as an attack dog .I kid you not.
You need to stop believing everything someone posts on the Internet and parroting what they say .again, you need to start fact checking.
So, asshole, you lose again .you have been debunked royally by a Gold Member of the famous Canary Clan.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-20 09:45:28 Reply Private Reply
#104: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#94)
That article surprises me. I knew there was some fraud, as there is with handicapped parking tags, but not on such a scale.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-20 09:47:56 Reply Private Reply
#105: Tooconservative To: Gatlin, Deckard (#96)
Nice sleuthing through the statutes.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-20 09:50:42 Reply Private Reply
#106: Tooconservative To: Justified (#98)
That was what service dogs were supposed to be. But they rapidly expanded it so people can have service parrots, service ferrets, service iguanas, etc.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-20 09:52:29 Reply Private Reply
#107: Tooconservative To: Deckard, Justified (#99)
Apparently, he didn't pass the no-biting-teenage-nephews-at-the-lake test.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-20 09:53:39 Reply Private Reply
#108: Deckard To: Gatlin (#103)
WTF?
Now you are claiming that the dog was agressive simply because SOME service dogs MAY be trained to attack?
Man - you've lost what's left of your senile mind.
So, asshole...
Hey - go fuck yourself.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-20 09:55:00 Reply Private Reply