A Kansas cop shot and killed the service dog of an army veteran who suffers from PTSD on Thursday, according to the Daily Haze.
Augusta police officer Devon Keith says he was forced to shoot Alan Fitzgeralds dog Midnite claiming the dog charged an animal control officer after ramming a door until it opened making the animal control officer fear for his life.
But Fitzgerald said his dog didnt do anything wrong and officer Keith shot him for no reason.

Alan Fitzgerald and his service dog, Midnite, before a cop shot and killed it.
Neighbors who witnessed the shooting said the animal control officer was the one who opened the door and began acting aggressively towards the dog before shooting it.
Augusta police, along with animal control, showed up at Fitzgeralds house Thursday afternoon after a neighbor called to complain about a German Shepard.
Fitzgerald said Midnite got out on Thursday, presumably chasing rabbits and cats as he often did. Midnite ended up several mobile homes down from his home, hovering over a neighbors small dog.
Its how he plays, Fitzgerald explained.
Fitzgerald talked to the small dogs owner, who said the smaller dog wasnt hurt, just shaken up from Midnite towering over it.
Things settled and Fitzgerald returned home and was in the shower when he heard Midnite bark and then gunshots.
All of a sudden, I heard this pound pound pound on the screen door, Fitzgerald recalled.
And I heard Midnite barking, obviously hes going to bark because hes guarding the house. All of a sudden then I heard shots fired and I heard my dog screaming in agony.
Fitzgerald came out to see what was going on only to have a gun pointed at him inside of his own house.
I got halfway out the door, and about right here where this crack is, theres an officer standing with his gun pointed at me. I said what are you guys doing here, why did you kill my dog? he said, Get on the ground, I said, Im not gonna get on the ground so I went inside and slammed the door, he told KSN.
August Police Chief Tyler Brewer defended officer Keith.

The animal control officer felt in fear for his life, the chief said.
These officers feel horrible for having to do that.
According to chief Brewer, when the animal control officer knocked on the door, Midnite answered.
The front door was open but the glass screen door was shut, Brewer explained. The dog rushed and hit the glass of the screen door and startled the animal control officer.
Officer Keith was forced to shoot Midnite when the animal control officer fell off the porch, hitting his head, trying to bite the officer, according to Brewer.

Midnite
But Fitzgeralds neighbor Charmin Drake says the dog got out because the animal control officer actually opened the door, not Midnite, then entered without a warrant and began kicking and even hitting Midnite with a baton.
After beating the dog, officers went outside and shot Midnite. Then they issued Fitzgerald two citations for having a vicious animal.
Fitzgerald rescued Midnight in 2015 and obtained an ADA service dog certificate, which required the dog to pass behavioral tests without showing signs of aggression, and said he had Midnite for his PTSD.
Whenever I was having some sort of episode of oncoming anxiety, he knew what to do. Hed come up and nudge me or do something silly. Hed turn over on his back and give that little smile, you know, that dogs give. Im just going to miss all of that.
Check out the Daily Haze interview with Alan Fitzgerald below.
Poster Comment:
The animal control officer felt in fear for his life, the chief said.
Of course he did - the frigging sadistic coward.
#7: Deckard To: Gatlin (#2)
At least two of the killed cops - as opposed to zero, zilch, nada, bupkis cops killed by dogs.
This was a service dog - they are trained to be non-aggressive.
Fitzgerald rescued Midnight in 2015 and obtained an ADA service dog certificate, which required the dog to pass behavioral tests without showing signs of aggression, and said he had Midnite for his PTSD.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 11:42:41 Reply Private Reply
#8: Deckard To: Gatlin (#6)
They don't as history has proven numerous times.
Either that or they just don't give a rat's ass what or who they kill.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 11:43:49 Reply Private Reply
#9: Stoner To: Deckard (#0)
What a damn shame !!!
Stoner posted on 2017-04-19 12:06:14 Reply Private Reply
#10: Gatlin To: Deckard (#7)
I dont care what a dog was trained to do, I care what a dog did .as you should also.Passing behavioral tests one day is suppose to be an indication of what a dog might do the next day. However, that test is not, and can never be, an absolute guarantee of what a dog will do the next day.
As soon as I saw the source of the article you posted, photographyisnotacrime.com a warning immediately flashed through my mind to indicate that I am looking at another ad-driven agenda site on the same level as The Free Thought Project. After checking further, I knew that I definitely was.
So you must understand that I cannot give any credence to your source or accept what some undocumented Journalist [you like that .I just coined it] named, Ben Keller, who resides in Austin, Texas [a bastion of liberalism], where much of his activism centers around government accountability. He thinks the public should have more access to court rooms. [What?] He volunteers for Peaceful Streets Project as well as other groups [protests] who shine light on government corruption. He has no degree and only studied [attended a few classes in] English Literature and Philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin.
Hey, Bubba .your Ben Keller is a Matt Agorist [of TFTP] on steroids. Here are just a few of his recent articles. Not only is he prolific, he also has a fetish for capitals .which you cannot help but notice. That definitely indicates to me that he is no journalist.
Do you kinda get the theme of what Ben is all about and what his motives are. If not, then you are more stupid than I ever thought.According to The Daily Blaze
Maybe there is a way, but I fail to understand multiple how neighbors could have have seen this without being on the front porch with the police officer and the animal control officer. How did that know the Fitzgerald did not call from the back his home for the officers to come in? They did not. Fitzgerald and his mother could not possibly have know what happened since they were in the back of the house and saw nothing of the incident.Sport, there is just not any factual data for me to either condemn or support this action by the officers, and I will be damned and gone to Hell before I would ever convict them on hearsay from Ben Keller, who was nowhere near Augusta and simply took a story form the local newspaper and fabricated spin for his own agenda driven hit piece. You of course can do that, convict the officers. Wait, you have already done that. You are complete biased idiot. There has never been an ounce of objectivity in your mind .and there never will be. Pathetic
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 13:32:48 Reply Private Reply
#11: Tooconservative To: Deckard (#5)
Every dog owner always insists their dog is just being playful or was just "defending" themselves.
That's very weak as an argument.
The better question is why the cops shot the dog through the door when it was not posing a threat to anyone. Why couldn't they wait for the owner to get out of the shower, etc.?
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 13:33:24 Reply Private Reply
#12: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#10)
More heat than light.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 13:34:39 Reply Private Reply
#13: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#11)
An even better question is how do you know the cops shot the dog through the door when it was not posing a threat to anyone?
It was reported in the local newspaper that: Neither Fitzgerald or his mother were in the front of the residence when the shooting happened. And it was also reported: Multiple neighbors who witnessed the shooting claim to have seen Officer Devon Keith enter Fitzgeralds home, without permission.
So was the dog inside the house or maybe outside .were the cops inside the house or outside .did the cops shoot the dog through the door .or not.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 13:51:13 Reply Private Reply
#14: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#12)
I agree....there is no way to decide right or wrong from this article.
I feel that I established that the author has an agenda.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 13:54:50 Reply Private Reply
#15: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#13)
It sounds like he either entered the house or shot through the door.
No one is saying the dog was outside.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 13:59:40 Reply Private Reply
#16: Gatlin To: Deckard (#8)
There is no recorded history to prove any such thing .if you can find some, then link to it.
You are simply making a statement based on information you read on ad-driven agenda spin sites such as thefreethoughtproject.com , photographyisnotacrime.com and the likes.
Those, are not sources of history .they are the Internet equivalent to The National Inquirer and you need to realize that.
That is a completely irresponsible and totally irrational fabrication for which you have no basis to make such an assertion.Your problem accepting reality grows more severe with each passing day .you need to tend to it.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 14:13:08 Reply Private Reply
#17: Tooconservative To: Gatlin, Deckard (#14)
DailyHaze: Augusta Kansas Police shoot and kill Veterans service dog Midnite then issue him two citations
They include photos of the broken door and the dead dog outside.
Interesting to see more details here that fill out the picture. Without such detailed reporting, we all just fill in details and make assumptions on our own.
More stories from the same source:
City of Augusta, Kansas threatens arrest for anybody attending a vigil for a veterans service dog shot by an Augusta police officer
Augusta Police exonerate officer who killed a veterans service dog
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 14:14:24 Reply Private Reply
#18: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#15)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 14:15:55 Reply Private Reply
#19: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#17)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 14:17:55 Reply Private Reply
#20: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#17)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 14:28:02 Reply Private Reply
#21: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#17)
The broken through door and the dead dog at the edge of the porch when added to the police supervisors statement that the dog came flying through the door at the animal control officer .makes me lean to a justifiable, but terribly unfortunate, shooting.
I do feel sorry for the Vet, it is undoubtedly a terrible loss.
So, I therefore will now write off yet another of Deckards foray into his la la world .forever trying to convince folks how terrible cops are.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 14:43:06 Reply Private Reply
#22: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#21)
So now we have two sets of pix showing the screen door. One shows the door broken with a dead dog and blood stains. The other pic is claimed to have been taken within a few hours and the door looks untouched and no blood. Somehow, the "nothing wrong" version doesn't look quite the same as the one with the dead dog, like maybe it was taken at a much different time than just a few hours after the shooting.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 14:49:01 Reply Private Reply
#23: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#22)
Why Science Tells Us Not to Rely on Eyewitness Accounts.
Deckard seems to rely heavily on the eye witness accounts in the articles he posts.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 14:56:55 Reply Private Reply
#24: rlk To: Deckard (#0)
rlk posted on 2017-04-19 14:57:35 Reply Private Reply
#25: Tooconservative To: Deckard, Gatlin (#21)
Did the Krooked Kops just slap that on there or something?
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 15:05:58 Reply Private Reply
#26: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#23)
Are we going to start casting doubt on every case we read about because they relied on eyewitness testimony?
I don't think so. Despite the problems with eyewitnesses (including cops and trained observers), those are often all you've got to prosecute a case with.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 15:07:54 Reply Private Reply
#27: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, Truth Justice and the American Way, Super Journalists (#10)
Yes there are a lot of bad cops, and disguised as a mild mannered reporter he's Fighting for Truth, Justice, and the American Way!
Hondo68 posted on 2017-04-19 16:17:22 Reply Private Reply
#28: Stoner To: rlk (#24)
Stoner posted on 2017-04-19 17:32:35 Reply Private Reply
#29: Gatlin To: Tooconservative, Deckard (#25)
WHAT?
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 17:52:28 Reply Private Reply
#30: Deckard To: Tooconservative, Gatlin, hondo68 (#17)
Hmmm...not only are the cops in that town encouraged to shoot non-aggressive service dogs, but it's also a place that does not allow freedom of assembly.
Sounds like a place Gatlin would enjoy living in.
Augusta Police exonerate officer who killed a veterans service dog.
Of course they did. He used the magic words "I feared for my life".
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 19:09:31 Reply Private Reply
#31: Deckard To: Gatlin (#10)
You should use that for a tagline.
Or just shorten it to "I fail". That would be even more accurate.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 19:10:55 Reply Private Reply
#32: Gatlin To: Deckard (#31)
Thanks for the prompt
I fail to understand Deckard, he is a complete idiot.
How is that for a tagline?
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 19:29:28 Reply Private Reply
#33: Deckard To: Tooconservative, Gatlin, hondo68, Stoner (#17)
Multiple neighbors who witnessed the shooting claim to have seen Officer Devon Keith enter Fitzgeralds home, without permission, at which point he got into a confrontation with Midnite.
Neither Fitzgerald or his mother were in the front of the residence when the shooting happened. Multiple witnesses say they saw Keith kick Midnite multiple times before finally shooting the German Sheperd.
Despite witness accounts, the officer who shot Midnite has been exonerated because he feared for his life. Augusta Public Safety Director Tyler Brewer has been doing everything in his power to make sure the police narrative is what is heard.
The Wichita Eagle released an article so biased towards the police narrative that Brewer might as well written it. It is common for local media outlets to side with police in the area, as they deal with them so frequently. It is something we have witnessed happen time and time again all over the country.
In this case, Brewers account of how the shooting played out just does not seem to add up.
*****
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 19:30:47 Reply Private Reply
#34: Deckard To: Gatlin (#32)
Just go to settings.
You can add your appropriate tagline in a few simple steps.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 19:32:38 Reply Private Reply
#35: Gatlin To: Deckard (#30)
Most all cities do.
Sounds to me like a bunch of libertarian assholes feel they can do whatever they want to and say f**k you to the city and all ordinances.
That is the way you libertarians operate .right?
Of course its right
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 19:37:00 Reply Private Reply
#36: Gatlin To: Deckard (#34)
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 19:38:34 Reply Private Reply
#37: Gatlin To: Deckard, Tooconservative (#33)
So, then Keith shot the dog inside the houes, threw the dog out through the bottom of the storm door and the dead dog landed on the outside edge of the porch.
Ger real!!!
You obviously didnt look at the pictures in the link supplied by TC ...
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 19:47:19 Reply Private Reply
#38: Gatlin To: Deckard (#33)
Wait just a minute.
It was reported that multiple neighbors saw Keith enter the house.
Then it was reported that multiple neighbors saw Keith kick the dog multiple times.
Query: How could the multiple neighbors see Keith kicking the dog inside the house?
Only if the multiple neighbors were standing on the porch looking directly inside the house.
Too many reports of too many neighbors seeing too many things
You yellow journalism article is a fraud .face it.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 19:54:10 Reply Private Reply
#39: Gatlin To: Deckard (#33)
ROTFLMAO
Pot <> Kettle = Black.
As many biased yellow journalism articles you post, that you should call a local newspaper article biased is the absolute ultimate height of hypocrisy.
You are amazing .amazingly ridiculous.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 20:00:24 Reply Private Reply
#40: Deckard To: Gatlin (#35)
Some folks who want to hold a candlelight vigil to show their support for a man whose dog was killed by a sadistic cop - all libertarians?
You need to get some help for your obsession with all things libertarian.
...say f**k you to the city...
The city (by exonerating the sadistic cop) has said "fuck you" to the residents there.
There was no investigation, they didn't even talk to any of the witnesses.
As we have seen time and time again, cops can use the magic words "I feared for my life" and be cleared of any crime.
Shoot a 5 pound dachshund? "I feared for my life".
Shoot a kid holding a wii controller? "I feared for my life". Same shit, different day.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 20:01:08 Reply Private Reply
#41: Deckard To: Gatlin (#37)
These Pictures?
In the article, Brewer continues to push the story that Midnite came blasting up and hit the glass door. Midnite charged the door a second time, which broke the latch loose.
Midnite was a 4-year-old 85 lbs. German Shepherd. Surely the glass door that he was blasting up against would have suffered some damage from Midnite charging so hard it resulted in breaking the latch loose.
TDH requested Fitzgerald send us pictures of his door. This is how the door currently looks after Midnite allegedly broke through it just two days ago.
We went to the Fitzgerald residence just hours after the shooting. Our entire time there, the front door was open and the glass door was closed, just as it was earlier in the afternoon. We entered and exited through the door with no problem what-so-ever. There was no apparent damage to the door, or the latch.
After busting through the glass door Midnite allegedly charged at the animal control officer, causing him to fall backward on the porch and hit his head. Amazingly, the officer managed to shoot Midnite as he was flying through the air towards the animal control officer.
Again, physical evidence shows Brewers narrative to be not impossible, but highly improbable. The Fitzgeralds do not have a large porch. Below are pictures of Fitzgeralds porch. The pictures give an idea of the porchs size and how hard it would be to fall backward on it, not to mention shoot a dog lunging off of it in midair.
Multiple neighbors claim to have seen Keith open the glass door and enter the house. Witnesses claim he was then seen kicking and struggling with the dog. Brewer claims to have witnesses contradicted that account, yet there is no information on who these witnesses are.
Fitzgeralds neighbor told TDH that they did not even get to give their statements to an officer. They were not interviewed, and instead told to give written statements that were later dismissed for reasons unknown.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 20:09:49 Reply Private Reply
#42: Gatlin To: Deckard (#40)
Thats the libertarian creed .fuck the law.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 20:49:29 Reply Private Reply
#43: Deckard To: Gatlin (#42)
The Supreme Court has held that it is constitutionally permissible that local governments require a permit to conduct a peaceful assembly. However, Augusta city officials are pushing that rule more than they should be.
A permit is typically required if it is going to be a march or parade that does not stay on the sidewalk and other events that require blocking traffic or street closure, a large rally requiring the use of sound amplifying devices; or a rally at certain designated parks or plazas. The vigil for Midnite does not meet any of those basic guidelines.
The City of Augusta was said to have stated they would not issue a permit for Midnites vigil. This alone is a problem. The Supreme Court has made it very clear that Government officials cannot prohibit a public assembly in their own discretion.
While some permits can take weeks to obtain, the First Amendment prohibits such an advance notice requirement from being used to prevent rallies or demonstrations that are rapid responses to unforeseeable and recent events.
Deckard posted on 2017-04-19 20:52:33 Reply Private Reply
#44: Gatlin To: Deckard (#41)
Yet the bottom of the glass storm door is broken open where the dog crashed through.
So, Keith went into the house, shot the dog and threw the dog out of the house through the bottom of the storm door?
Give me a break.
Thats make no sense .someone is lying.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 20:57:54 Reply Private Reply
#45: Gatlin To: Deckard (#44)
The picture shows the bottom of the glass strom door and screen broken through. If the dog did not come blasting up through the door .then what, or who, did? One or both of the officers.
Get real
Brewers version makes sense
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 20:58:29 Reply Private Reply
#46: Tooconservative To: Deckard (#30)
That is a lie!
He used the magic words, "I feared for my partner's life."
You recall the other guy, the animal control henchman who almost fell off the porch, forcing him to shoot the dog.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 21:01:57 Reply Private Reply
#47: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#38)
Well, it was a trailer park apparently. So at least one neighbor would have had a living room or kitchen window right next to the porch and less than 20' away. At least, that would be typical.
However, given how these trailer parks are laid out, any other nearby residents would have been 50'-75' away and looking at a poor angle at the porch and probably couldn't see inside the house since it was daylight outside and the inside of the house was dark. This is all consistent with the photos we've seen.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 21:04:33 Reply Private Reply
#48: Tooconservative To: Deckard (#41)
It looks like they have left a blank trailer lot between the two trailers and they're planting some tree or bush there.
So any neighbor who is a witness would be 50' away or so.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 21:10:35 Reply Private Reply
#49: Tooconservative To: Deckard (#43)
Suppose the dog owner had shot the cop.
You think the city would have insisted that any candle vigils would have to have a permit or they would get ticketed?
I don't.
Seems kinda chickenshit to pull that permit business. Obviously, the city didn't want to get any more heat for this doggie shooting.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-04-19 21:13:06 Reply Private Reply
#50: Gatlin To: Deckard (#41)
Your pictures are either taken before the shooting or after the shooting, when the porch was cleaned up and the door fully repaired.
Here is a picture of the dead dog with blood all over the porch.
Here is a picture of the storm door bottom with the glass and screen broken through.
Someone in your pictures did a clean up, repair and cover up to hide the evidence.
Or someone in my pictures replaced the good door with a broken bottom bad door and planted a dead dog with blood all over the porch.
Which do you logically think it is?
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 21:20:55 Reply Private Reply
#51: Gatlin To: Deckard (#43)
Yep, and the SCOTUS did not say that the City of Augusta could not pass an ordinance to require a permit for a public demonstration to assemble.
Check it out .numerous cities have an ordinance requiring a permit and it has never been challenged in the SCOTUS.
Another futile effort at spinning on your part .give it up.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 21:26:34 Reply Private Reply
#52: Gatlin To: Tooconservative, Deckard (#49)
The permit is for the protection of the city against lawsuits.
Of course, anyone can sue the city regardless as to a permit consideration.
But at least the city is partially covering its ass.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 21:29:27 Reply Private Reply
#53: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#49)
I do.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 21:30:32 Reply Private Reply
#54: Gatlin To: Tooconservative, Deckard (#48)
"Multiple neighbors"..."multiple neighbors"....
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 21:32:41 Reply Private Reply
#55: Gatlin To: Deckard (#41)
Bullshit .nothing amazing about that at all.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 21:38:08 Reply Private Reply
#56: Gatlin To: Deckard (#41)
The article I read said he fell backwards off of the porch .meaning backwards down the steps.
Debunked again .give it up.
Gatlin posted on 2017-04-19 21:40:55 Reply Private Reply