Records confirm this.

Baloney... what records? Alternative records from wikileaks & the Kremlin?

And fuckin' Putin has no goddam business meddling in our affairs...

Finally a guy who can explain to me this mystery :)

How exactly Putin meddles in American politics?

Records confirm this.
Baloney... what records?

I’ll post it, but it probably is a waste of my time….since you will not believe it anyway. The information doesn’t fit into your agenda.

“In terms of dollar amount, Clinton received over $1.85 million in donations from federal employees, while Trump received just more than $106,500.”

Government workers shun Trump, give big money to Clinton.

Federal government employees are opening their wallets to help Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump on Nov. 8.

Of the roughly $2 million that federal workers from 14 agencies spent on presidential politics by the end of September, about $1.9 million, or 95 percent, went to the Democratic nominee’s campaign, according to an analysis by The Hill.

Employees at all the agencies analyzed, without exception, are sending their campaign contributions overwhelmingly to Clinton over her Republican counterpart. Several agencies, such as the State Department, which Clinton once led, saw more than 99 percent of contributions going to Clinton.

Employees of the Department of Justice, which investigated Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of State, gave Clinton 97 percent of their donations. Trump received $8,756 from DOJ employees compared with $286,797 for Clinton. From IRS employees, Clinton received 94 percent of donations.

Federal government employees overwhelmingly backed Clinton’s presidential campaign no matter which agency The Hill analyzed using Federal Election Commission data covering donors giving more than $200.

[…]

This report received EXTENSIVE coverage as shown HERE and nowhere has it been disputed.

10 most damning findings from report on Russian election interference

Written By: Eugene Scott, CNN

Get REAL....Willie!

10 most damning findings from report on Russian election interference

This is the MOST damning you can find? Clearly quantity cannot replace quality. Like these two:

7 "Russian media hailed President-elect Trump's victory as a vindication of Putin's advocacy of global populist movements - the theme of Putin's annual conference for Western academics in October 2016 -- and the latest example of Western liberalism's collapse."

10 "In early September, Putin said publicly it was important the DNC data was exposed to Wikileaks, calling the search for the source of the leaks a distraction [from the content of data] and denying Russian 'state-level' involvement."

Very damning indeed!

Trump should be impeached & tried for High Treason...

And you should be found at the bottom of the Tallahatchie River.

The PRESIDENT decides what American interests are. Functionaries in the government EXECUTE policy, but they do not MAKE it.

Here,here!

We are in complete agreement. I don't,and never have trusted those bastards any further than I could throw Rosie O'Donnell.

Why should Trump have to work with Obama appointees?

They're not partisan appointees.

Yeah,and water ain't wet,and Oprah is a skinny white woman.

There can be no continuity of policy with with Cold War era. That is what "continuity" means, and what the Democrats, Establishment Republicans, and State Department staffers who span multiple administrations want.

You might as well say "span multiple generations" as many of them actually represent old-line New England as well as OLD England banking families.

There is a VERY incestuous relationship between Old Money European banking families and the US State Department. The old family people like the Harriman's seem to be out of the picture these days,but in many cases they are still there,but hiding under the names the Harriman daughters and their daughters married into. One married a man named Prescott Bush in the last century,for example.

These people represent no one but themselves and the family banking interests. Sometimes that is the same as American interests,but that is just a coincidence.

Some are partisan appointees while the majority are not….but they are worse than partisan appointees.

They are confirmed loyal diehard “card carrying” Democrats whose employment span multiple administrations and need to be "drained from the swamp.”

Oh,it's worse than that. I bet if you were to check the family blood lines of the top administrators you would discover family linkages that go all the way back to right after the Revolutionary War.

They are in fact a shadow government. Sometimes that works for peace because they work for economic stability because it's good for business,but at other times they work for war because someone has taken over another government,booted out their family representatives in that nation,and shut down their profits and their influence. That's when they want to go to war.

hey are confirmed loyal diehard “card carrying” Democrats whose employment span multiple administrations and need to be "drained from the swamp.”

Yeah... but they're AMERICANs, DAMMIT...

BullBush! They are INTERNATIONALISTS!

AKA: "Globalists".

Is is they and their ilk that are pushing for a One World Government. THEY are the money people behind the end of sovereign nations.

These guys do not sneeze before checking the demoncrap play book!

You have it backwards. The Dims don't sneeze without their permission.

But it is also correct that you should be prosecuted as an accessory to murder.

"Murder"??

WTH did THAT come from?

How exactly Putin meddles in American politics?

HUNDREDS of ways,just like every other national leader meddles in the politics of every other government on the planet in order to seek better deals for his or her own nation.

It's a prime part of the job.

"How exactly Putin meddles in American politics?

HUNDREDS of ways,just like every other national leader meddles in the politics of every other government on the planet in order to seek better deals for his or her own nation.

It's a prime part of the job.

I know, but I expected something more spectacular - like Russian hackers falsifying American elections or at least putting some stuff in Mrs Clinton's coffee to make her say stupid things during her presidential campaign.

You might as well say "span multiple generations" as many of them actually represent old-line New England as well as OLD England banking families.

There is a VERY incestuous relationship between Old Money European banking families and the US State Department. The old family people like the Harriman's seem to be out of the picture these days,but in many cases they are still there,but hiding under the names the Harriman daughters and their daughters married into. One married a man named Prescott Bush in the last century,for example.

These people represent no one but themselves and the family banking interests. Sometimes that is the same as American interests,but that is just a coincidence.

Old line families are not much anymore.

The problem is that corporations simply amass too much money and power too quickly, with much greater command and control. Families are quarrelsome, small, and the individuals don't have staffs to deal with one another the way that corporate bodies too.

It's swell to be part of an old line family, and there is certainly the security of wealth there for many of them, but the wealth fades in comparison to the wealth of modern corporations. There are very few truly large wholly family-owned corporations.

"Murder"??

WTH did THAT come from?

Kelleyanne Conway's alternative universe, no doubt...

Willie votes for murder too.

Put his faggity ass on trial too.

Willie votes for murder too.

And you suck Jim Robinson's dirty dick...

Willie votes for murder too. And you suck Jim Robinson's dirty dick...

Willie you are our token liberal here.

That is why I allow you here.

For laughs only.

Also what I said is true. You regularly vote for murder.

What you said is actually what interests you. Typical baby killing liberal response.

I know, but I expected something more spectacular - like Russian hackers falsifying American elections

Not needed. There is an excess of leftist fools that are Americans who are more than willing to do that,and more.

or at least putting some stuff in Mrs Clinton's coffee to make her say stupid things during her presidential campaign.

Stupid is her normal mode. Putting a chemical in her coffee,or more likely morning glass of wine,to make her stupider might even have the opposite effect. After all,you can't go any further than to the bottom,and then you have to start coming back up.

The cunt votes to murder babies.

So what you MEANT to say was "She is pro-abortion",but your insanity kicked in and garbled the message.

"Murder" is a legal term,not an emotional one.

So what you MEANT to say was "She is pro-abortion",but your insanity kicked in and garbled the message.

"Murder" is a legal term,not an emotional one.

abortion is a political term for cunts and pussies who don't want to admit they are murderers.

I never took you for one to mince words. I guess you can be a bit of a coward and a pussy too.

Either that or you are a murderer at heart too.

I'll just go with you're a little PC at times unless you say otherwise.

but your insanity kicked in and garbled the message.

"Insanity" is also a legal term and shouldn't be used to describe slobbering ignorance.

There is an excess of leftist fools that are Americans who are more than willing to do that,and more.

My suspicion is that Trump has won in a landslide about 60% of votes. But somehow it did not show in the official results. I wonder ...

"Murder" is a legal term,not an emotional one.

When people kill, not being aware what they do, it is a manslaughter, not murder.

Just my opinion.

I know, but I expected something more spectacular - like Russian hackers falsifying American elections or at least putting some stuff in Mrs Clinton's coffee to make her say stupid things during her presidential campaign.

Clearly, the Xlinton campaign was totally inept at computer security. Their own fault, particularly Podesta's emails. Their errors were pretty much self-inflicted.

To the extent that the Russians "hacking" (i.e. revealing that the DNC stacked the deck against Bernie, the true disparaging opinions of Xlinton insiders like Podesta toward their own voters) affected the election, it was because the voters had accurate info about the candidate and how much she and the Xlinton gang despised pretty much everyone.

As SoS, Hitlery did meddle in Vlad's 2011 election, more to delegitimize his inevitable election rather than a serious attempt to unseat him. So Vlad was, in many ways, trying to return the favor to her. We should not too readily dismiss a certain Russian habit of revenge for perceived insulting behavior.

I don't think the Russians ever imagined, any more than anyone else in the West, that Trump would actually beat Hillary. I do think that Vlad would find delegitimizing the American election, worthwhile in itself but even more so against Hitlery, to be in his own interests as he is not a fan of democracy to begin with. He tolerates it, or at least the trappings of it.

Vlad made a typical Russian play to downgrade a democratic election in the leading Western country with an eye to upcoming elections in the EU, eastern Europe and Turkey. Russia is authoritarian and prefers to deal with other autocratic regimes.

Either that or you are a murderer at heart too.

I'll just go with you're a little PC at times unless you say otherwise.

FWIW,I am personally opposed to "convenience" abortions after the 3rd month.

However,what I am opposed to and what makes me happy are irrelevant because we are talking about a law,and laws have to be defined in black and white so people understand what they can do legally,and what they can't do legally.

And regardless of how *I* think about abortion,I am not arrogant enough to demand that MY opinion outweigh the opinion of some young girl or woman who is pregnant as the result of a rape,or whose life would be at risk if she were to try to carry to term. EVERYBODY has the right to self-defense,even pregnant woman.

And don't try to pull that "the baby has a right to life,too!" nonsense because a fetus is NOT a baby. If it were a baby,the legal term for it would be "baby",NOT fetus. Don't like the law? Change it.

When people kill, not being aware what they do, it is a manslaughter, not murder.

Just my opinion.

I am NOT a legal expert,but I THINK "manslaughter" is a big gray zone in the law,where it is not clear the doer's life was at risk,but it's not really clear it wasn't,either.

This way a jury of his or her peers,proving his or her peers are retired geezers with nothing else to do,bored housewives,or unemployed men,get to make the call instead of a judge.

And of course,it is probably rare in cases where the defendant is charged with manslaughter for the defendant to get serious prison time,or for them to not be able to return a "justifiable homicide" verdict. After all,if it was murder,the charge should have been murder.

I don't think the Russians ever imagined, any more than anyone else in the West, that Trump would actually beat Hillary.

Hell,I voted for Trump,and even I didn't think he was going to win.

Hell,I voted for Trump,and even I didn't think he was going to win.

I voted for Trump and knew he was going to win. I knew it when he announced. I knew it would resonate with regular folks.

 Russia is authoritarian and prefers to deal with other autocratic regimes.

It is nice that America is not authoritarian and stays away from the Saudis. Isn't it?

Hell,I voted for Trump,and even I didn't think he was going to win.

Thank Putin :)

Trump sure brought the libtard trash out of the closet on this site. HAAAA

Trump, making America AMERICAN again, one smelly illegal alien at a time. (That's my original quote, you may use that).

Keep your libtard slanted YELLA articles off the site

This is supposed to be a free speech zone, not JimRob site. Please.

Tpaine, pinguinite, sneakypete. You dont call randge a paultard but i think she supported him too.

This is supposed to be a free speech zone, not JimRob site. Please.

You have no constitutional rights here, libtard. Lies & YELLA propaganda, meant to agitate, ARE NOT SPEECH.

pinguinite, I pay no attention to.

Either way, I personally don't care if any one of our sites geriatric hippies supported Trump. He would have still won without the three votes... and the three you speak of, lick the boots of Decktard and hondope... sleep with dogs, wake with fleas.

It isn't right to write off everyone on California. You don't win by running away.

So you suggest you win by paying outrageous amounts of school and property taxes where the state USES YOUR TAX MONEY TO DEFEND THEIR OWN NAZI RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWS against you? Is that how you win?

When a KOOKIFONIAN sues the state for immoral laws... where do you think the state gets the legal funds to pay for the states DEFENSE, you think that's free?

lol

"everyone in KOOKIFONIA" pays, in some form for their chains. Some like the chains, others don't... both are equally guilty of supporting the hand that binds them.

"This is supposed to be a free speech zone, not JimRob site. Please."

You have no constitutional rights here, libtard. Lies & YELLA propaganda, meant to agitate, ARE NOT SPEECH.

Jim, is it you?

Tpaine, pinguinite, sneakypete.

the three you speak of, lick the boots of Decktard and hondope...

Report to the sobriety checkpoint, comrade.

Most of the people here you call paultards voted for Trump.

They say they did and if they did….then it proves that a few Paultard libertarians can occasionally display some good sense.

But that does not hold true for the numbers of libertarians who are emerging as Trump resistance. As some Never Trumpers slowly fade off into the sunset….libertarians have taken up the cause.

You find the voices that have aligned with liberty movement are more often among the loudest ones now pushing back on Trump and his various proposals as libertarians continue to express misgivings.

The priorities are diverse in the often-contrarian liberty movement, and there has been diversity, too, in their criticism, ranging from the sense that the “Wall Street establishment” has been overly empowered by a number of Trump’s personnel selections who have deep ties to Goldman Sachs, to fears for civil liberties protections. Many libertarians were also plenty critical of George W. Bush, some activists note, so it’s not a big leap for them to express concerns about another Republican president.

Libertarians are a fickle group….unreliable and unpredictable.

Don’t believe me….that libertarians are anti-Trump?

Then just take a look at what the libertarian’s Bible, reason.com, has to say about it:

*Of Course* Libertarians Are Leading the Charge Against Trump's Authoritarianism

See, I told you …

Or, at least I tried to tell you!

Keep your libtard slanted YELLA articles off the site, monkey boy.

WOW! I had no idea you owned Liberty's Flame now.

AKA,did you sell it to him,or just turn over control?

You have no constitutional rights here, libtard.

And here I was thinking this site was hosted in America,and owned by an American that believed in freedom of speech and thought.

Guess I was wrong,and it's now owned by a leatherboy homosexual so deep in the closet he over-compensates for being a sissy-boy.