They're not partisan appointees. They're career staffers who span multiple administrations.
Some are partisan appointees while the majority are not .but they are worse than partisan appointees.
They are confirmed loyal diehard card carrying Democrats whose employment span multiple administrations and need to be "drained from the swamp.
Records show that of the roughly $2 million that federal workers from 14 agencies spent on presidential politics by the end of September [2016], about $1.9 million, or 95 percent, went to the Democratic nominees campaign.
Employees at all the agencies analyzed, without exception, are sending their campaign contributions overwhelmingly to Clinton over her Republican counterpart.
Several agencies, such as the State Department, which Clinton once led, saw more than 99 percent of contributions going to Clinton.
They're not partisan appointees. They're career staffers who span multiple administrations.
Is that like a joke?
These guys do not sneeze before checking the demoncrap play book!
These guys should have been removed when Bush was elected but he wrongly thought you can reason with demoncraps. So ALL of Clinton's hacks were left in under bush and then Obummer made it worse by appointing even more political demoncrap hacks.
Trump is beating the demoncraps like they have never been beaten and they are freaking out! OMG its so fun to watch!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah .theyre Americans, thats true. But as I so correctly pointed out to you: theyre also confirmed loyal diehard card carrying Democrat Party Americans who did NOT want Trump to become president and will do everything they can clandestinely possible do to make Trump either fail or embarrass him, DAMMIT
I remind you that:
Several agencies, such as the State Department, which Clinton once led, saw more than 99 percent of contributions going to Clinton.
Records confirm this.
Trump should be impeached ...
Oh, ABSOLUTELY he should be .but ONLY when there is proven and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors." None of this has happened .and therefore, you are simply making a radically emotional statement. For any further considerations, I respectfully refer you to: Article II of the United States Constitution states in Section 4 .you might want to check that out.
And fuckin' Putin has no goddam business meddling in our affairs...
Federal government employees are opening their wallets to help Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump on Nov. 8.
Of the roughly $2 million that federal workers from 14 agencies spent on presidential politics by the end of September, about $1.9 million, or 95 percent, went to the Democratic nominees campaign, according to an analysis by The Hill.
Employees at all the agencies analyzed, without exception, are sending their campaign contributions overwhelmingly to Clinton over her Republican counterpart. Several agencies, such as the State Department, which Clinton once led, saw more than 99 percent of contributions going to Clinton.
Employees of the Department of Justice, which investigated Clintons use of a private email server while she was secretary of State, gave Clinton 97 percent of their donations. Trump received $8,756 from DOJ employees compared with $286,797 for Clinton. From IRS employees, Clinton received 94 percent of donations.
Federal government employees overwhelmingly backed Clintons presidential campaign no matter which agency The Hill analyzed using Federal Election Commission data covering donors giving more than $200.
[ ]
This report received EXTENSIVE coverage as shown HERE and nowhere has it been disputed.
10 most damning findings from report on Russian election interference
This is the MOST damning you can find? Clearly quantity cannot replace quality. Like these two:
7 "Russian media hailed President-elect Trump's victory as a vindication of Putin's advocacy of global populist movements - the theme of Putin's annual conference for Western academics in October 2016 -- and the latest example of Western liberalism's collapse."
10 "In early September, Putin said publicly it was important the DNC data was exposed to Wikileaks, calling the search for the source of the leaks a distraction [from the content of data] and denying Russian 'state-level' involvement."
There can be no continuity of policy with with Cold War era. That is what "continuity" means, and what the Democrats, Establishment Republicans, and State Department staffers who span multiple administrations want.
You might as well say "span multiple generations" as many of them actually represent old-line New England as well as OLD England banking families.
There is a VERY incestuous relationship between Old Money European banking families and the US State Department. The old family people like the Harriman's seem to be out of the picture these days,but in many cases they are still there,but hiding under the names the Harriman daughters and their daughters married into. One married a man named Prescott Bush in the last century,for example.
These people represent no one but themselves and the family banking interests. Sometimes that is the same as American interests,but that is just a coincidence.
Some are partisan appointees while the majority are not .but they are worse than partisan appointees.
They are confirmed loyal diehard card carrying Democrats whose employment span multiple administrations and need to be "drained from the swamp.
Oh,it's worse than that. I bet if you were to check the family blood lines of the top administrators you would discover family linkages that go all the way back to right after the Revolutionary War.
They are in fact a shadow government. Sometimes that works for peace because they work for economic stability because it's good for business,but at other times they work for war because someone has taken over another government,booted out their family representatives in that nation,and shut down their profits and their influence. That's when they want to go to war.
HUNDREDS of ways,just like every other national leader meddles in the politics of every other government on the planet in order to seek better deals for his or her own nation.
#33:A Pole
To: sneakypete, ConservingFreedom, Willie Green, Vicomte13, TooConservative(#32)
"How exactly Putin meddles in American politics?
HUNDREDS of ways,just like every other national leader meddles in the politics of every other government on the planet in order to seek better deals for his or her own nation.
It's a prime part of the job.
I know, but I expected something more spectacular - like Russian hackers falsifying American elections or at least putting some stuff in Mrs Clinton's coffee to make her say stupid things during her presidential campaign.
You might as well say "span multiple generations" as many of them actually represent old-line New England as well as OLD England banking families.
There is a VERY incestuous relationship between Old Money European banking families and the US State Department. The old family people like the Harriman's seem to be out of the picture these days,but in many cases they are still there,but hiding under the names the Harriman daughters and their daughters married into. One married a man named Prescott Bush in the last century,for example.
These people represent no one but themselves and the family banking interests. Sometimes that is the same as American interests,but that is just a coincidence.
Old line families are not much anymore.
The problem is that corporations simply amass too much money and power too quickly, with much greater command and control. Families are quarrelsome, small, and the individuals don't have staffs to deal with one another the way that corporate bodies too.
It's swell to be part of an old line family, and there is certainly the security of wealth there for many of them, but the wealth fades in comparison to the wealth of modern corporations. There are very few truly large wholly family-owned corporations.
I know, but I expected something more spectacular - like Russian hackers falsifying American elections
Not needed. There is an excess of leftist fools that are Americans who are more than willing to do that,and more.
or at least putting some stuff in Mrs Clinton's coffee to make her say stupid things during her presidential campaign.
Stupid is her normal mode. Putting a chemical in her coffee,or more likely morning glass of wine,to make her stupider might even have the opposite effect. After all,you can't go any further than to the bottom,and then you have to start coming back up.
#45:Tooconservative
To: A Pole, ConservingFreedom(#33)
I know, but I expected something more spectacular - like Russian hackers falsifying American elections or at least putting some stuff in Mrs Clinton's coffee to make her say stupid things during her presidential campaign.
Clearly, the Xlinton campaign was totally inept at computer security. Their own fault, particularly Podesta's emails. Their errors were pretty much self-inflicted.
To the extent that the Russians "hacking" (i.e. revealing that the DNC stacked the deck against Bernie, the true disparaging opinions of Xlinton insiders like Podesta toward their own voters) affected the election, it was because the voters had accurate info about the candidate and how much she and the Xlinton gang despised pretty much everyone.
As SoS, Hitlery did meddle in Vlad's 2011 election, more to delegitimize his inevitable election rather than a serious attempt to unseat him. So Vlad was, in many ways, trying to return the favor to her. We should not too readily dismiss a certain Russian habit of revenge for perceived insulting behavior.
I don't think the Russians ever imagined, any more than anyone else in the West, that Trump would actually beat Hillary. I do think that Vlad would find delegitimizing the American election, worthwhile in itself but even more so against Hitlery, to be in his own interests as he is not a fan of democracy to begin with. He tolerates it, or at least the trappings of it.
Vlad made a typical Russian play to downgrade a democratic election in the leading Western country with an eye to upcoming elections in the EU, eastern Europe and Turkey. Russia is authoritarian and prefers to deal with other autocratic regimes.
I'll just go with you're a little PC at times unless you say otherwise.
FWIW,I am personally opposed to "convenience" abortions after the 3rd month.
However,what I am opposed to and what makes me happy are irrelevant because we are talking about a law,and laws have to be defined in black and white so people understand what they can do legally,and what they can't do legally.
And regardless of how *I* think about abortion,I am not arrogant enough to demand that MY opinion outweigh the opinion of some young girl or woman who is pregnant as the result of a rape,or whose life would be at risk if she were to try to carry to term. EVERYBODY has the right to self-defense,even pregnant woman.
And don't try to pull that "the baby has a right to life,too!" nonsense because a fetus is NOT a baby. If it were a baby,the legal term for it would be "baby",NOT fetus. Don't like the law? Change it.
When people kill, not being aware what they do, it is a manslaughter, not murder.
Just my opinion.
I am NOT a legal expert,but I THINK "manslaughter" is a big gray zone in the law,where it is not clear the doer's life was at risk,but it's not really clear it wasn't,either.
This way a jury of his or her peers,proving his or her peers are retired geezers with nothing else to do,bored housewives,or unemployed men,get to make the call instead of a judge.
And of course,it is probably rare in cases where the defendant is charged with manslaughter for the defendant to get serious prison time,or for them to not be able to return a "justifiable homicide" verdict. After all,if it was murder,the charge should have been murder.
I was telling your forum he'd win as soon threw his red MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN hat in the ring... and your PAULTARD posting cult that lives here mocked me.
Trump, making America AMERICAN again, one smelly illegal alien at a time. (That's my original quote, you may use that).
Tpaine remains a paultard for willingly living in the worst Nazi state, KOOKIFONIA. Stinky will remain a paultard for his LIBERALtarian love for fags.
pinguinite, I pay no attention to.
Either way, I personally don't care if any one of our sites geriatric hippies supported Trump. He would have still won without the three votes... and the three you speak of, lick the boots of Decktard and hondope... sleep with dogs, wake with fleas.
#11: Hondo68 To: Willie Green, Rainbow Trump (#0)
Rachel Maddow likes lesbians, and Trump likes all the queers. That's what she's really complaining about.
Putin ain't going for any of it.
Hondo68 posted on 2017-03-09 12:43:30 Reply Private Reply
#12: Gatlin To: Willie Green, misterwhite (#4)
They are confirmed loyal diehard card carrying Democrats whose employment span multiple administrations and need to be "drained from the swamp.
Records show that of the roughly $2 million that federal workers from 14 agencies spent on presidential politics by the end of September [2016], about $1.9 million, or 95 percent, went to the Democratic nominees campaign.
Employees at all the agencies analyzed, without exception, are sending their campaign contributions overwhelmingly to Clinton over her Republican counterpart.
Several agencies, such as the State Department, which Clinton once led, saw more than 99 percent of contributions going to Clinton.
How about them apples .Willy?
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-09 13:04:54 Reply Private Reply
#13: Willie Green To: Gatlin (#12)
Yeah... but they're AMERICANs, DAMMIT...
And fuckin' Putin has no goddam business meddling in our affairs...
Trump should be impeached & tried for High Treason...
Willie Green posted on 2017-03-09 13:14:38 Reply Private Reply
#14: Justified To: Willie Green, misterwhite (#4)
Is that like a joke?
These guys do not sneeze before checking the demoncrap play book!
These guys should have been removed when Bush was elected but he wrongly thought you can reason with demoncraps. So ALL of Clinton's hacks were left in under bush and then Obummer made it worse by appointing even more political demoncrap hacks.
Trump is beating the demoncraps like they have never been beaten and they are freaking out! OMG its so fun to watch!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Justified posted on 2017-03-09 13:21:55 Reply Private Reply
#15: Justified To: Willie Green (#13)
Well then you need to talk to Clinton and Obama who actually conspired with Russia all the time!
Justified posted on 2017-03-09 13:26:42 Reply Private Reply
#16: Gatlin To: Willie Green (#13)
Yeah .theyre Americans, thats true. But as I so correctly pointed out to you: theyre also confirmed loyal diehard card carrying Democrat Party Americans who did NOT want Trump to become president and will do everything they can clandestinely possible do to make Trump either fail or embarrass him, DAMMIT
I remind you that:
Records confirm this.
Oh, ABSOLUTELY he should be .but ONLY when there is proven and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors." None of this has happened .and therefore, you are simply making a radically emotional statement. For any further considerations, I respectfully refer you to: Article II of the United States Constitution states in Section 4 .you might want to check that out.
Congratulations, Willy .you got that ONE right.
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-09 14:19:07 Reply Private Reply
#17: A K A Stone To: Willie Green (#13)
That is correct little green willie.
But it is also correct that you should be prosecuted as an accessory to murder. Along with all the democrat filth you take the knee pads for.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-09 14:46:21 Reply Private Reply
#18: Willie Green To: Gatlin (#16)
Baloney... what records? Alternative records from wikileaks & the Kremlin?
Willie Green posted on 2017-03-09 16:51:20 Reply Private Reply
#19: A Pole To: Willie Green (#13)
Finally a guy who can explain to me this mystery :)
How exactly Putin meddles in American politics?
A Pole posted on 2017-03-09 17:19:23 Reply Private Reply
#20: Gatlin To: Willie Green (#18)
Ill post it, but it probably is a waste of my time .since you will not believe it anyway. The information doesnt fit into your agenda.
In terms of dollar amount, Clinton received over $1.85 million in donations from federal employees, while Trump received just more than $106,500.
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-09 17:44:54 Reply Private Reply
#21: Willie Green To: A Pole (#19)
Willie Green posted on 2017-03-09 17:51:06 Reply Private Reply
#22: Gatlin To: Willie Green, A Pole (#21)
Written By: Eugene Scott, CNN
Get REAL....Willie!
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-09 17:58:48 Reply Private Reply
#23: A Pole To: Willie Green (#21)
This is the MOST damning you can find? Clearly quantity cannot replace quality. Like these two:
7 "Russian media hailed President-elect Trump's victory as a vindication of Putin's advocacy of global populist movements - the theme of Putin's annual conference for Western academics in October 2016 -- and the latest example of Western liberalism's collapse."
10 "In early September, Putin said publicly it was important the DNC data was exposed to Wikileaks, calling the search for the source of the leaks a distraction [from the content of data] and denying Russian 'state-level' involvement."
Very damning indeed!
A Pole posted on 2017-03-09 19:53:22 Reply Private Reply
#24: GrandIsland To: Willie Green (#13)
And you should be found at the bottom of the Tallahatchie River.
GrandIsland posted on 2017-03-09 20:33:15 Reply Private Reply
#25: sneakypete To: Vicomte13 (#1)
Here,here!
We are in complete agreement. I don't,and never have trusted those bastards any further than I could throw Rosie O'Donnell.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 04:24:51 Reply Private Reply
#26: sneakypete To: Willie Green (#4)
Yeah,and water ain't wet,and Oprah is a skinny white woman.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 04:26:38 Reply Private Reply
#27: sneakypete To: Vicomte13 (#7)
You might as well say "span multiple generations" as many of them actually represent old-line New England as well as OLD England banking families.
There is a VERY incestuous relationship between Old Money European banking families and the US State Department. The old family people like the Harriman's seem to be out of the picture these days,but in many cases they are still there,but hiding under the names the Harriman daughters and their daughters married into. One married a man named Prescott Bush in the last century,for example.
These people represent no one but themselves and the family banking interests. Sometimes that is the same as American interests,but that is just a coincidence.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 04:32:07 Reply Private Reply
#28: sneakypete To: Gatlin (#12)
Oh,it's worse than that. I bet if you were to check the family blood lines of the top administrators you would discover family linkages that go all the way back to right after the Revolutionary War.
They are in fact a shadow government. Sometimes that works for peace because they work for economic stability because it's good for business,but at other times they work for war because someone has taken over another government,booted out their family representatives in that nation,and shut down their profits and their influence. That's when they want to go to war.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 04:37:10 Reply Private Reply
#29: sneakypete To: Willie Green (#13)
BullBush! They are INTERNATIONALISTS!
AKA: "Globalists".
Is is they and their ilk that are pushing for a One World Government. THEY are the money people behind the end of sovereign nations.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 04:39:23 Reply Private Reply
#30: sneakypete To: Justified (#14)
You have it backwards. The Dims don't sneeze without their permission.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 04:40:11 Reply Private Reply
#31: sneakypete To: A K A Stone, Willie Green (#17)
"Murder"??
WTH did THAT come from?
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 04:41:45 Reply Private Reply
#32: sneakypete To: A Pole (#19)
HUNDREDS of ways,just like every other national leader meddles in the politics of every other government on the planet in order to seek better deals for his or her own nation.
It's a prime part of the job.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 04:43:16 Reply Private Reply
#33: A Pole To: sneakypete, ConservingFreedom, Willie Green, Vicomte13, TooConservative (#32)
I know, but I expected something more spectacular - like Russian hackers falsifying American elections or at least putting some stuff in Mrs Clinton's coffee to make her say stupid things during her presidential campaign.
A Pole posted on 2017-03-10 06:08:44 Reply Private Reply
#34: Vicomte13 To: sneakypete (#27)
Old line families are not much anymore.
The problem is that corporations simply amass too much money and power too quickly, with much greater command and control. Families are quarrelsome, small, and the individuals don't have staffs to deal with one another the way that corporate bodies too.
It's swell to be part of an old line family, and there is certainly the security of wealth there for many of them, but the wealth fades in comparison to the wealth of modern corporations. There are very few truly large wholly family-owned corporations.
Vicomte13 posted on 2017-03-10 09:12:44 Reply Private Reply
#35: Willie Green To: sneakypete (#31)
Kelleyanne Conway's alternative universe, no doubt...
Willie Green posted on 2017-03-10 09:29:05 Reply Private Reply
#36: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#31)
Willie votes for murder too.
Put his faggity ass on trial too.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-10 09:31:34 Reply Private Reply
#37: Willie Green To: A K A Stone (#36)
And you suck Jim Robinson's dirty dick...
Willie Green posted on 2017-03-10 10:07:52 Reply Private Reply
#38: A K A Stone To: Willie Green (#37)
Willie you are our token liberal here.
That is why I allow you here.
For laughs only.
Also what I said is true. You regularly vote for murder.
What you said is actually what interests you. Typical baby killing liberal response.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-10 10:13:39 Reply Private Reply
#39: sneakypete To: A Pole (#33)
Not needed. There is an excess of leftist fools that are Americans who are more than willing to do that,and more.
or at least putting some stuff in Mrs Clinton's coffee to make her say stupid things during her presidential campaign.
Stupid is her normal mode. Putting a chemical in her coffee,or more likely morning glass of wine,to make her stupider might even have the opposite effect. After all,you can't go any further than to the bottom,and then you have to start coming back up.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 10:23:04 Reply Private Reply
#40: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#36)
So what you MEANT to say was "She is pro-abortion",but your insanity kicked in and garbled the message.
"Murder" is a legal term,not an emotional one.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 10:25:11 Reply Private Reply
#41: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#40)
abortion is a political term for cunts and pussies who don't want to admit they are murderers.
I never took you for one to mince words. I guess you can be a bit of a coward and a pussy too.
Either that or you are a murderer at heart too.
I'll just go with you're a little PC at times unless you say otherwise.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-10 10:31:57 Reply Private Reply
#42: Willie Green To: sneakypete (#40)
"Insanity" is also a legal term and shouldn't be used to describe slobbering ignorance.
Willie Green posted on 2017-03-10 10:53:27 Reply Private Reply
#43: A Pole To: sneakypete (#39)
My suspicion is that Trump has won in a landslide about 60% of votes. But somehow it did not show in the official results. I wonder ...
A Pole posted on 2017-03-10 13:01:08 Reply Private Reply
#44: A Pole To: sneakypete, A K A Stone (#40)
When people kill, not being aware what they do, it is a manslaughter, not murder.
Just my opinion.
A Pole posted on 2017-03-10 13:03:23 Reply Private Reply
#45: Tooconservative To: A Pole, ConservingFreedom (#33)
Clearly, the Xlinton campaign was totally inept at computer security. Their own fault, particularly Podesta's emails. Their errors were pretty much self-inflicted.
To the extent that the Russians "hacking" (i.e. revealing that the DNC stacked the deck against Bernie, the true disparaging opinions of Xlinton insiders like Podesta toward their own voters) affected the election, it was because the voters had accurate info about the candidate and how much she and the Xlinton gang despised pretty much everyone.
As SoS, Hitlery did meddle in Vlad's 2011 election, more to delegitimize his inevitable election rather than a serious attempt to unseat him. So Vlad was, in many ways, trying to return the favor to her. We should not too readily dismiss a certain Russian habit of revenge for perceived insulting behavior.
I don't think the Russians ever imagined, any more than anyone else in the West, that Trump would actually beat Hillary. I do think that Vlad would find delegitimizing the American election, worthwhile in itself but even more so against Hitlery, to be in his own interests as he is not a fan of democracy to begin with. He tolerates it, or at least the trappings of it.
Vlad made a typical Russian play to downgrade a democratic election in the leading Western country with an eye to upcoming elections in the EU, eastern Europe and Turkey. Russia is authoritarian and prefers to deal with other autocratic regimes.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-03-10 13:10:10 Reply Private Reply
#46: sneakypete To: A K A Stone (#41)
FWIW,I am personally opposed to "convenience" abortions after the 3rd month.
However,what I am opposed to and what makes me happy are irrelevant because we are talking about a law,and laws have to be defined in black and white so people understand what they can do legally,and what they can't do legally.
And regardless of how *I* think about abortion,I am not arrogant enough to demand that MY opinion outweigh the opinion of some young girl or woman who is pregnant as the result of a rape,or whose life would be at risk if she were to try to carry to term. EVERYBODY has the right to self-defense,even pregnant woman.
And don't try to pull that "the baby has a right to life,too!" nonsense because a fetus is NOT a baby. If it were a baby,the legal term for it would be "baby",NOT fetus. Don't like the law? Change it.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 17:09:02 Reply Private Reply
#47: sneakypete To: A Pole (#44)
I am NOT a legal expert,but I THINK "manslaughter" is a big gray zone in the law,where it is not clear the doer's life was at risk,but it's not really clear it wasn't,either.
This way a jury of his or her peers,proving his or her peers are retired geezers with nothing else to do,bored housewives,or unemployed men,get to make the call instead of a judge.
And of course,it is probably rare in cases where the defendant is charged with manslaughter for the defendant to get serious prison time,or for them to not be able to return a "justifiable homicide" verdict. After all,if it was murder,the charge should have been murder.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 17:13:38 Reply Private Reply
#48: sneakypete To: Tooconservative (#45)
Hell,I voted for Trump,and even I didn't think he was going to win.
sneakypete posted on 2017-03-10 17:15:02 Reply Private Reply
#49: A K A Stone To: sneakypete (#48)
I voted for Trump and knew he was going to win. I knew it when he announced. I knew it would resonate with regular folks.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-10 17:28:29 Reply Private Reply
#50: A Pole To: Tooconservative (#45)
It is nice that America is not authoritarian and stays away from the Saudis. Isn't it?
A Pole posted on 2017-03-10 19:08:30 Reply Private Reply
#51: A Pole To: sneakypete (#48)
Thank Putin :)
A Pole posted on 2017-03-10 19:11:03 Reply Private Reply
#52: A Pole To: TooConservative, sneakypete, ConservingFreedom, Willie Green, Vicomte13 (#45)
A Pole posted on 2017-03-11 05:12:38 Reply Private Reply
#53: GrandIsland To: Willie Green (#0)
Trump sure brought the libtard trash out of the closet on this site. HAAAA
GrandIsland posted on 2017-03-11 07:21:37 Reply Private Reply
#54: GrandIsland To: A K A Stone (#49)
Trump, making America AMERICAN again, one smelly illegal alien at a time. (That's my original quote, you may use that).
GrandIsland posted on 2017-03-11 07:25:32 Reply Private Reply
#55: A Pole To: GrandIsland, Willie Green (#53)
This is supposed to be a free speech zone, not JimRob site. Please.
A Pole posted on 2017-03-11 08:45:37 Reply Private Reply
#56: A K A Stone To: GrandIsland, randge (#54)
Tpaine, pinguinite, sneakypete. You dont call randge a paultard but i think she supported him too.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-11 09:05:39 Reply Private Reply
#57: GrandIsland To: A Pole (#55)
You have no constitutional rights here, libtard. Lies & YELLA propaganda, meant to agitate, ARE NOT SPEECH.
GrandIsland posted on 2017-03-11 09:12:51 Reply Private Reply
#58: GrandIsland To: A K A Stone (#56)
pinguinite, I pay no attention to.
Either way, I personally don't care if any one of our sites geriatric hippies supported Trump. He would have still won without the three votes... and the three you speak of, lick the boots of Decktard and hondope... sleep with dogs, wake with fleas.
GrandIsland posted on 2017-03-11 09:25:01 Reply Private Reply
#59: A K A Stone To: A Pole (#55)
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-11 09:33:15 Reply Private Reply
#60: A K A Stone To: GrandIsland (#58)
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-11 09:34:27 Reply Private Reply