I watched it live....I was impressed.

But then, I am always impressed when truth prevails

I believe I have driven that point home before....yes, I have.

Mostly because he is too stupid and lazy to think of it.

I am almost positive President Dindu Nuffins is innocent.

Mostly because he is too stupid and lazy to think of it.

He may not have ordered it to happen....but I am almost postive he was briefed that it was happening.

but I am almost postive he was briefed that it was happening.

Maybe,but I'm not so sure of that. He wouldn't understand it if you told him,and he's so stupid he might just brag about it on the golf course.

Chances are his senior level handlers did it and didn't even bother telling him. After all,he is just a figurehead and is as dumb as dirt anyhow,so why bother?

Wow, this is a pretty compelling case that Trump and/or his surrogates are in bed with the Russians.

After all the shit. Your head is still up Obama's ass. No wonder your people lost the continent.

*WWBD?

*What Would Buckeroo Do?

Why would a FISA judge authorize a warrant if there was no probable cause?

It was Obama asking? They will have to issue warranty too see it? MSM prints fake news and the government takes this to the judge and its a done deal. Please its the demoncrap party they just have to give their people a way out.

I have told people make laws so as it can not be abused by your enemy against you. Thats how you make laws.

" Mark Levin PROVES Obama Wiretapping on President Donald Trump | Fox & Friends 3/5/17 "

Levin presents a very strong case. Seems pretty solid to me. Especially when you consider that Levin is not real fond of Trump. Levin was a rabid Cruz supporter.

I have heard various commentators on the radio all morning claiming that there was no proof to Pres Trumps claims. Those idiots should spend the time to hear Levin make the case. I see no reason to doubt!

Mark Levin PROVES Obama Wiretapping on President Donald Trump

Oh, how I would love this to be have been true and watch Obama do a perp walk into a federal courthouse. However, wanting and having are entirely two different things.

I like Levin and I watched intensely as he pleaded a passionate case against the Obama administration’s spying on Trump. All the time Levin was making his impassioned presentation, I kept waiting for evidence. The hard evidence that would stand up in court….it never came.

All I heard from Levin was the use of multiple media reports to frame his prosecutorial argument. So, in essence, with everything he presented…. the complete underlying Levin framework against Obama was based solely on news reports.

Congress will now investigate this matter. If there is hard evidence to be found, and I really want there to be….I hope they find it.

I am waiting to see the FISA requests published. News reports [if they are to be trusted] show the first request in June specified Candidate Trump by name, and was denied. The a second request was “narrowed” [which probably eliminated Trump’s name] and it was approved.

While I have found no firm evidence anywhere, I do have an opinion. I believe there were FISA requests and Loretta Lynch initiated the FISA requests, then directed the whole process….while keeping Obama fully informed as to what was going on. More specifically, not what they thought was going on with Trump. If this all goes South on Obama....I fully expect him to throw Loretta Lynch under the bus.

Where am I wrong on this …

Why would a FISA judge authorize a warrant if there was no probable cause?

The president does not have the authority to instigate a wiretap, especially without probable cause.

This is just more whining from Trump and his cult.

The president does not have the authority to authorize a wiretap.

Since Chan is not here, “I’ll be your huckleberry” and set you straight.

Let’s go to the law:

In Chapter 36 of Title 50 of the US Code *War and National Defense", Subchapter 1, Section 1802, we read the following:

(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—

(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at—
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;
(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and
(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.

Repeating for emphasis:

”Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order …”

This is just more whining from Trump and his cult.

Your false statement is just lying bullshit from a Paultard libertarian asshole.

(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)

Idiot! Your long-winded screed says nothing about a president arbitrarily ordering electronic surveillance on a political rival.

The president does not have the authority to instigate a wiretap, especially without probable cause.

This is just more whining from Trump and his cult.

The president didn't have the authority to ignore immigration law either. But the magic negro did just that.

You drug cultists need to sober up.

The president didn't have the authority to ignore immigration law either.

When Obama deported aliens in record numbers, the media yawned.

drug cultists

ESAD asshole.

drug cultists

ESAD asshole.

You are in a druggy cult. It is the paradigm by which you live your life.

You champion a state of mind that is drug addicted and stupid.

I mean you believe in talking lizards. I saw Nice Dreams but it wasn't real. Lizards don't talk.

Idiot! Your long-winded screed says nothing about a president arbitrarily ordering electronic surveillance on a political rival.

Asshole, you specifically said:

The president does not have the authority to authorize a wiretap.

And I have proven that was a LIE….he DOES.

Since Obama and Lynch felt Trump was colluding with the Russians, Obama could have authorized [through Lynch] a wiretap on Trump under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information. And I am guessing the devious bastards did exactly that.

There, you should now understand it!

You are in a druggy cult. It is the paradigm by which you live your life.

You are a freaking liar and a piece of shit.

I have made my views on ending the drug war clear at this shit-hole site, but ignorant turds like you are so enamored by the police state that you assume anyone who is against the WOD is automatically a junkie.

I mean you believe in talking lizards.

Once again, you have failed in your comprehension of what I have said.

I believe that what David Icke calls "lizards" are actually demons.

But then again you worship AC/DC so it's quite possible you are possessed.

Obama could have authorized

"Could have" is a long ways from having proof, which is what your idiotic article claimed.

You are in a druggy cult. It is the paradigm by which you live your life.

You are a freaking liar ...

Once again your fail to face truth and reality.

When will you ever ...

You are in a druggy cult. It is the paradigm by which you live your life. You are a freaking liar and a piece of shit.

You can be in a druggy cult without taking drugs.

You think it is ok to have a drugged society. Others think it is better if people are like God created them sober.

I think that sober people make better decisions then people on drugs. Which is what you constantly defend.

You are a freaking liar and a piece of shit.

When someone questions your beliefs you start lashing out.

Once again, you have failed in your comprehension of what I have said.

I believe that what David Icke calls "lizards" are actually demons.

Oh there are lizards walking around talking with human skin over them and they are demons. Sounds like a bizarre acid trip.

I proved Obama had the authority to authorize the wire tap on Trump....you said he could NOT authorize it.

Now, Congress will find out if he did ...

When someone questions your beliefs

You aren't questioning my beliefs - you are claiming something about me that your alcohol-sotted mind has invented.

But then again you worship AC/DC so it's quite possible you are possessed.

Worship a rock band.

Give me a break.

I like rock music and have for as long as I can remember.

They do it better then about anyone.

I also like Van Halen, Judas Priest, Motley Crue, Guns N Roses, Pat Benetar, Prince and even Michale Jackson's music.

But AC/DC blows them all away.

I like rock music and have for as long as I can remember.

They do it better then about anyone.

I seriously question not only your sanity, but you musical taste.

You aren't questioning my beliefs - you are claiming something about me that your alcohol-sotted mind has invented.

No I question your beliefs that the government has no right to regulate drugs. And that drugs should be legal. You on the other hand just claimed I am an alcohol sotted...

I hardly ever drink my friend. Maybe 2 or 3 times a year.

So it is you that is claiming something that your mind invented.

I seriously question not only your sanity, but you musical taste.

Then you question the tastes of the planet. No music group has a better selling album then Back in Black. Second highest grossing tour in world history known as black ice.

They sell out concerts in minutes wherever they play. Even with a replacement singer.

But this isn't the subject of the thread.

The president does not have the authority to instigate a wiretap, especially without probable cause.

You also say that the government doesn't have the right to make drugs illegal. But they do don't they?

I'm going to ask you a question please don't get mad and make up more false claims about me. Here goes. Are you so stupid that you believe that Obama obeys the law and checks on his former powers as President? If you do you are stupid.

The president does not have the authority to instigate a wiretap, especially without probable cause.

On October 31, Crooked Hillary sent out a tweet stating:

Clinton Tweet“Computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based server.”

Why do you think the cunt sent out that tweet? Inside knowledge provided by wiretaps.

You really are dense if you can't put this together. Come on Deckard put on your thinking cap.

Why would a FISA judge authorize a warrant if there was no probable cause?

The FISA court was lied to.

Your long-winded screed …

You can call it long-winded and you can call it a screed, but the one thing you can never call it….you can never call it untrue.

I posted the law and proved you totally wrong….accept that!

The president does not have the authority to instigate a wiretap, especially without probable cause.

The presidnet [Obama] did HAVE THE AUTHORITY and the probable cause he used was the collusion with a foreign power....Russia.

Can you ever get real....probably NOT.

" He may not have ordered it to happen....but I am almost postive he was briefed that it was happening. "

I would agree with that. Who ?? Could be Lynch, maybe even Jarret. Hopefully, all the truth will come to light.