
Republican leadership's plans for the Obamacare repeal were recently leaked, though "repeal" is perhaps too strong a word. "Tweaks" more accurately describes the work of Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and other House Republicans. It does not go back to ground zero, where this disaster began. Instead, the plan is to go for "Obamacare Lite." It's simply a different version of Obamacare a Republican version of Obamacare. It's how President Obama himself might have done it.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has said, "The best interest of the country would be achieved by pulling out Obamacare, root and branch." More recently, Ryan reiterated that the House plans to repeal Obamacare, adding that "you can't" repair "a collapsing law." Ryan has also said that repeal of Obamacare is entitlement reform.
Like Obamacare, the plan has an individual mandate through fines for those who don't keep continuous coverage. Like Obamacare, it has a Cadillac tax, which will eventually impact most insurance plans. Most egregiously, however, the bill would create a new entitlement through refundable tax credits. Republicans appear to be "reforming" an entitlement by "replacing" it with ... another entitlement.
This is not repeal. It's tinkering around the edges, and it's failing to keep campaign promises. A truly conservative agenda for repealing Obamacare is getting rid of it all of it and going back to 2009 to enact various improvements to the insurance market.
We can address regulations that increase costs by returning regulation of the health insurance industry to the states. Why should the federal government not negotiate Medicare Part D benefits to lower prices? Why can't health savings accounts be used to buy health insurance?
Conservative grassroots activists stand 100 percent behind the efforts of Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Mike Lee, R-Utah, Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and members of the House Freedom Caucus and the Republican Study Committee to repeal Obamacare and replace it with a patient-centered alternative. Specifically, we endorse the Obamacare Replacement Act, introduced by Paul and Rep. Mark Sanford, R-S.C.
This bill provides a complete reworking of our healthcare system, focusing on real patient-centered alternatives. It starts by repealing every word of Obamacare and its regulations. It also legalizes affordable health insurance coverage, expands the use of HSAs to include buying health insurance, and equalizes the tax treatment for insurance so that individuals receive the same tax deduction that employers receive to help pay for coverage.
Additionally, the bill allows organizations and non-profits to band together and negotiate lower prices for health plans in a group market. It gives patients with pre-existing conditions a two-year open enrollment period under which they can obtain coverage.
Lastly, the Paul-Sanford plan repeals Medicaid expansion. Two-thirds of people who received Medicaid coverage after Obamacare were already eligible for it prior to expansion. The bill allows states to apply for waivers to set up Medicaid programs that best fit their needs. All these steps will increase choices, increase ways to pay, and increase portability, the lack of which exacerbates the problem of pre-existing conditions. Above all, it lets individuals have the freedom to buy coverage that suits them, not the dictates of bureaucrats in Washington.
However, even if this legislation passes, it is not the end of the story. There is still more work to do to make the market work more efficiently and provide genuinely affordable healthcare. Block grants for Medicaid, state innovation grants, and federally-funded high-risk pools there are plenty of conservative ways to restore control of healthcare to the patient, if Republicans have the boldness to seize the opportunity.
At the very least, however, they must rework the current plan. It doesn't get us back to square one. It takes the rare chance to deliver on campaign promises made for the better part of a decade and it squanders them. Given a chance like this, Americans deserve a better plan than this. It's up to Republicans to give it to them and soon.
Poster Comment:
Voters rejected RomneyRyanCare in 2012.
Primary Paul Ryan out of the Senate. He needs to be repealed and replaced!

#1: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#0)
"Paul Ryan out of the Senate."
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-04 04:03:14 Reply Private Reply
#2: Hondo68 To: Gatlin (#1)
Thanks to Mittens on the job training, Ryan can look forward to an exciting career in the submarine sandwich biz.
Hondo68 posted on 2017-03-04 04:06:12 Reply Private Reply
#3: rlk To: gatlin (#0)
rlk posted on 2017-03-04 04:17:14 Reply Private Reply
#4: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#0)
WASHINGTON, D.C. Yesterday, U.S. Senator and physician Rand Paul introduced S. 222, the Obamacare Replacement Act, to provide Congress with a health care plan grounded in broadly supported conservative reforms that is ready for an immediate vote after Obamacare is repealed. Dr. Pauls proposal would expand access to higher-quality, lower- cost health care for more Americans, regardless of medical history.
Getting government out of the American peoples way and putting them back in charge of their own health care decisions will deliver a strong, efficient system that doesnt force them to empty out their pockets to cover their medical bills, said Dr. Paul. There is no excuse for waiting to craft an alternative until after we repeal Obamacare, and the Obamacare Replacement Act charts a new path forward that will insure the most people possible at the lowest price.
The Obamacare Replacement Act empowers the American people to: 1.) Choose inexpensive insurance free of government dictates; 2.) Save unlimited amounts in a health savings account (HSA) and have wider options for using those funds; 3.) Buy insurance across state lines; and 4.) Join together in voluntary associations to gain the leverage of being part of a large insurance pool.
Dr. Paul has led the charge to replace Obamacare at the same time it is repealed, and he has been joined in calling for simultaneous action by fellow Republicans including President Trump and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.
You can see Dr. Pauls entire plan laid out section by section HERE, and you can find summary information below.
Dr. Rand Pauls Obamacare Replacement Act, S. 222:
Legalizes Inexpensive Insurance Plans:
Protects Individuals with Pre-Existing Conditions:
Helps More People Save To Buy Health Insurance and Cover Medical Costs:
Guarantees Fair Tax Treatment of Health Insurance:
Helps Individuals Join Together to Purchase Insurance:
Allows the Purchase of Insurance Across State Lines:
Increases State Medicaid Flexibility:
Empowers Physicians:
https://www.paul.senate.gov/news/press/dr-rand- paul-unveils-obamacare-replacement-act
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-04 04:21:54 Reply Private Reply
#5: Gatlin To: rlk (#3)
I should DO the SAME thing that Hondo did?
LMAO ...Gatlin posted on 2017-03-04 04:25:50 Reply Private Reply
#6: Gatlin To: A K A Stone (#4)
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-04 05:04:31 Reply Private Reply
#7: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, wealth spread canary, less gov is improved gov (#6)
In general less government meddling is better. Repeal ObamaCare and Bush Medicare part D, and replace with NOTHING.
IOW, free market capitalism. Less Marxism and more competition, improves services and lowers prices.
The trick to lowering costs and improving availability of health care, is to get government out, and capitalism in. Start whacking gov alphabet agencies, and the economy will take off like a rocket.
So Rand's bill is roughly 4000% better than the RomneyGruberRyanObamaCare socialized medicine boondoggle "tweak".
Hondo68 posted on 2017-03-04 06:10:36 Reply Private Reply
#8: A K A Stone To: Gatlin (#6)
So Poltico can have a copy but a Senator can't. Interesting.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-04 07:44:07 Reply Private Reply
#9: A K A Stone To: hondo68 (#0)
Trump should take a baseball bat to POS Ryan.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-04 07:45:33 Reply Private Reply
#10: A K A Stone To: Gatlin (#6)
More pages means more confusing and more chances for many more interpretations. imo.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-03-04 07:47:54 Reply Private Reply
#11: Tooconservative To: Gatlin (#6)
I'm not sure of that.
As you recall, Massachusetts elected a GOP senator, Scott Brown, to fill Teddy the Swimmer's seat. This meant that the Dems no longer had their 60 votes. However, they had already marked up and voted on the bill then existing in the Senate.
They could still pass 0bamaCare with a simple majority in the Senate via budget reconciliation. However, the House had to vote in lockstep to pass the same exact bill as the Senate bill. There could be no alterations in the House and there was no further reconciliation at all.
If you pass something via budget reconciliation, there is no horsetrading in the usual House/Senate reconciliation committee. It just becomes law.
It kinds sucks to have to learn about all these obscure rules and all their endless exceptions.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-03-04 11:02:37 Reply Private Reply
#12: Gatlin To: A K A Stone (#10)
On the other hand, more clarifications and specific directions that cannot be misinterpretated.
Half full - half empty glass ...
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-04 11:49:37 Reply Private Reply
#13: Gatlin To: Tooconservative (#11)
That is definitely true ...
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-04 11:50:25 Reply Private Reply
#14: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#7)
Is your ass jealous of the amount of shit that just came out of your mouth?
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-04 15:43:08 Reply Private Reply
#15: Gatlin To: A K A Stone (#8)
What is really interesting is that Rand Paul knows perfectly well what is going in the House bill and that is why he was over there doing his drama queen performance before the press conference he called at the closed door. There are things in the House bill that he doesnt like and he is throwing a hissy fit for attention.
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-04 15:58:03 Reply Private Reply
#16: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#2)
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-04 16:04:41 Reply Private Reply
#17: Hondo68 To: Gatlin (#16)
Your soul mate Maxine, loves your Senator McCain too!
Hondo68 posted on 2017-03-04 19:42:16 Reply Private Reply
#18: Fred Mertz To: hondo68 (#17)
Good one, hondolt!
Fred Mertz posted on 2017-03-04 20:34:35 Reply Private Reply
#19: Hondo68 To: Fred Mertz, A K A Stone, buckeroo (#18)
Hondo68 posted on 2017-03-04 21:01:23 Reply Private Reply
#20: Fred Mertz To: hondo68, sneakypete, A K A Stoned (#19)
I should stop posting, but I've just slowed down since Pebbles did the unthinkable.
Fred Mertz posted on 2017-03-04 21:13:49 Reply Private Reply
#21: Gatlin To: Fred Mertz (#20)
Thats good, Ethel.
No one has mentioned they missed you or even cared that you were not posting.
Keep doing it
Gatlin posted on 2017-03-04 22:06:09 Reply Private Reply
#22: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, free buckeroo (#21)
Hondo68 posted on 2017-03-04 22:32:55 Reply Private Reply