A bill was introduced early January that calls for the removal of the United States from the United Nations.
According to the Congress website, H.R. 193 known as the American Sovereignty Restoration Act was introduced to the House on January 3 and referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs.
While its official title says it seeks to end membership in the U.N., there are several other key components of the bill which include: ending the 1947 agreement that the U.N. headquarters will be housed in the U.S., ending peacekeeping operations, removing diplomatic immunity, and ending participation in the World Health Organization.
Poster Comment:
Is this fake news, how come it has been supressed until now, after the inaugeration?
#1: Stoner To: paraclete (#0)
Wonderful news, and loooooong overdue, if True!!
I found these sources:
https://www.rt.com/usa/374754-us-leave-united-nations-bill/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_withdrawal_from_the_United_Nations
jezebel.com/republicans-introduce-bill-proposing-withdrawal-from-un-1791494159
https://christiantruther.com/conflicts/united-states-leave-united-nations/
www.nationalreview.com/article/443642/us-leave-united-nations
So paraclete, what is your source ?
Stoner posted on 2017-01-23 08:25:21 Reply Private Reply
#2: misterwhite To: paraclete (#0)
The headline is fake news.
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 09:27:00 Reply Private Reply
#3: Stoner To: misterwhite (#2)
That is really too bad !!
I wish it would happen. US Membership has been nothing but a detriment to us, and it has been a colossal waste of US dollars. I really hope Trumps moves to make it true !!
I have long been an advocate of: GET THE US OUT OF THE UN, AND GET THE UN OUT OF THE US. Move them to someplace more appropriate, like Somalia, WITHOUT US dollars !!
Stoner posted on 2017-01-23 09:58:04 Reply Private Reply
#4: misterwhite To: Stoner (#3)
If we pulled out of the UN, that would make every vote against Israel a unanimous one. The UN would then send in a peacekeeping force to move the Israeli settlers out of the West Bank and East Jerusalem in the enforcement of UN 242 and 383.
Hmmmm. Maybe you're on to something here.
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 10:14:42 Reply Private Reply
#5: A K A Stone To: Stoner, misterwhitepowder (#3)
If we left the UN mister white powder would cry. He thinks they are in charge of the world
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-23 10:19:51 Reply Private Reply
#6: Stoner To: misterwhite, A K A Stone (#4)
Without US participation, the UN peacekeeping force would get their asses handed to them by the Israeli's!
Stoner posted on 2017-01-23 10:28:23 Reply Private Reply
#7: Stoner To: A K A Stone (#5)
That is good. The links I found indicate there was such a bill. I pray that it passes. The US will then save a lot of money, and headaches.
I don't care who crys about it, the UN is not in charge of jack shit. Eff em !! The UN needs to drastically be cut down to size, like the size of demonturds brains. SMALL, microscopic !!
Stoner posted on 2017-01-23 10:33:57 Reply Private Reply
#8: misterwhite To: Stoner (#6)
Israel would defeat the military forces of Russia, China, Germany, Japan, Great Britain (and every Arab country gleefully joining the fray)?
For what? To defend their illegal settlements?
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 10:37:32 Reply Private Reply
#9: A K A Stone To: misterwhite, stoner (#8)
Told you. If the UN had a dick misterwhitepowder would suck on it.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-23 10:39:12 Reply Private Reply
#10: Tooconservative To: Stoner (#1)
GovTrack.us: H.R. 193: American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017
The one-line description: "To end membership of the United States in the United Nations."
The bill itself has only one listed sponsor, Mike Rogers of Alabama's third district. However, the bill does mention the following in its preamble: "Mr. Rogers of Alabama (for himself, Mr. Jones, Mr. Biggs, Mr. Smith of Missouri, and Mr. Massie) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs". So there is a little interest among Rogers' colleagues.
This bill seems unlikely to go anywhere and will likely be buried quietly in committee.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-01-23 10:41:25 Reply Private Reply
#11: Stoner To: Tooconservative (#10)
Could be. But it passing would be good for the US!
Stoner posted on 2017-01-23 11:15:10 Reply Private Reply
#12: Stoner To: A K A Stone (#9)
Stoner posted on 2017-01-23 11:17:11 Reply Private Reply
#13: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#10)
Yep. And Representative Mike Rogers will go back to his third district and campaign on the fact that "he tried".
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 12:00:01 Reply Private Reply
#14: misterwhite To: Stoner (#12)
You obviously did not read the book on the Yom Kippur War. That only involved Egypt and Syria and Israel almost lost that war.
Israel blackmailed the U.S. into sending them additional military equipment or they would use their nukes.
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 13:32:04 Reply Private Reply
#15: Stoner To: misterwhite (#14)
Not the book I was referring to.
You made reference to " Israel would defeat the military forces of Russia, China, Germany, Japan, Great Britain (and every Arab country gleefully joining the fray)? "
That does not sound like " the Yom Kippur War ".
Stoner posted on 2017-01-23 14:21:25 Reply Private Reply
#16: nativist nationalist To: Stoner (#6)
Exactly.
nativist nationalist posted on 2017-01-23 14:25:58 Reply Private Reply
#17: misterwhite To: Stoner (#15)
My point was that Israel almost lost the Yom Kippur War and they were only fighting two pissant countries.
Yet you're insinuating that a UN peacekeeping force consisting of Russia, China, Germany, Japan, Great Britain and every Arab country "would get their asses handed to them by the Israeli's"?
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 14:29:01 Reply Private Reply
#18: Tooconservative To: misterwhite (#13)
It's all good...
Sometimes you need a bill, even a doomed bill, to widen some public discussion of key issues. And clipping the U.N.'s wings is long overdue, given their miserable performance as an organization and the hazard they pose to those they claim to be helping.
Tooconservative posted on 2017-01-23 14:41:21 Reply Private Reply
#19: Stoner To: misterwhite, A K A Stone (#17)
"Yet you're insinuating that a UN peacekeeping force consisting of Russia, China, Germany, Japan, Great Britain and every Arab country "would get their asses handed to them by the Israeli's"? "
If you would go & read the Book of Revelations you will see that when the coalition you speak of attacks Israel, they will receive exactly that. Then, Israel & the ultimate alley will decimate said coalition.
You may choose to disbelieve that. Your choice.
Stoner posted on 2017-01-23 15:00:34 Reply Private Reply
#20: A Pole To: Stoner (#19)
You mean not the Jewish Apostles who accepted Jesus as Christ/Messiah, but those who rejected Him?
A Pole posted on 2017-01-23 15:04:14 Reply Private Reply
#21: misterwhite To: Tooconservative (#18)
I think trying to leave the UN and failing sends a worse message than not trying at all.
"And clipping the U.N.'s wings is long overdue"
They need to be slapped around, sure. But not by taking our ball and going home.
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 15:07:35 Reply Private Reply
#22: misterwhite To: Stoner (#19)
Who said anything about attacking Israel? I said a UN peacekeeping force would remove the illegal Israeli settlers from land that does not belong to Israel.
If Israel chooses to attack peacekeeping forces from Russia, China, Germany, Japan, Great Britain and every Arab country, I don't think it will go well for Israel.
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 15:12:22 Reply Private Reply
#23: A Pole To: misterwhite (#22)
But time came to settle and make a deal.
A Pole posted on 2017-01-23 15:21:40 Reply Private Reply
#24: misterwhite To: A Pole (#23)
I think everyone knows what Israel is trying to do.
But they'll end up making peace that much harder to achieve. Makes we wonder if they even want peace.
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 15:28:48 Reply Private Reply
#25: Stoner To: misterwhite (#22)
"I said a UN peacekeeping force would remove the illegal Israeli settlers "
Six of one, half a dozen of another. Same thing. I doubt the IDF would just sit there & watch.
Stoner posted on 2017-01-23 15:37:22 Reply Private Reply
#26: misterwhite To: Stoner (#25)
It's not their land. The settlers are there illegally. Yeah. Sit there and watch.
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 16:34:13 Reply Private Reply
#27: A K A Stone To: A Pole (#20)
I thought those people died off thousands of years ago.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-23 16:51:29 Reply Private Reply
#28: A K A Stone To: misterwhite (#26)
Translation. You believe in globalism. You think the UN is superior to every sovereign nation on earth.
Like I said if the UN had a weiner you would suck on it.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-23 16:52:42 Reply Private Reply
#29: A Pole To: A K A Stone (#27)
But their followers live on.
Those who follow New Testament and those who follow other tradition.
A Pole posted on 2017-01-23 16:56:08 Reply Private Reply
#30: A Pole To: misterwhite (#24)
Depends. If this will be a good choice for both sides, they will follow it.
A Pole posted on 2017-01-23 16:58:47 Reply Private Reply
#31: misterwhite To: A K A Stone (#28)
You thought they were great when they wrote UN Resolution 181 and gave the Jews land to form the State of Israel.
Now you realize that UN Resolution 181 also gave land to the Palestinians for them to form their state. Suddenly the UN sucks.
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-23 18:28:53 Reply Private Reply
#32: A K A Stone To: misterwhite (#31)
No idiot. I wasn't even born back then. The UN resolution is irrelevant and it didn't matter what they did. Israel would still be there and your relatives that resisted would still be dead.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-23 19:15:28 Reply Private Reply
#33: nolu chan To: paraclete (#0)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22hr193%22%5D%7D&r=1
https://www.congress.gov/115/bills/hr193/BILLS-115hr193ih.pdf
There is such a bill, introducted by Mike Rogers (R-AL-3) on 3 Jan 2017. It is 115-1 H.R. 193. It has not gone anywhere. It is just a bit premature to say that it will become law and actually do anything.
nolu chan posted on 2017-01-23 19:30:22 Reply Private Reply
#34: paraclete To: misterwhite (#26)
paraclete posted on 2017-01-24 06:43:03 Reply Private Reply
#35: misterwhite To: paraclete (#34)
Nope. Not since the 4th Geneva Convention, of which Israel is a signatory nation (1949):
Article 49: "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies."
misterwhite posted on 2017-01-24 10:24:37 Reply Private Reply
#36: interpreter To: Stoner (#1)
interpreter posted on 2017-01-24 22:06:24 Reply Private Reply
#37: interpreter To: paraclete (#34)
Exactly. The Jews have conquered the Holy Land, and pretty soon a branch of the Jews (called Christianity) will conquer the rest of the earth just as prophesied over 3000 years ago in Genesis.
interpreter posted on 2017-01-24 22:11:13 Reply Private Reply
#38: Stoner To: interpreter (#37)
To my knowledge, the US is the only nation that has not done that. With the exception of north America. Everywhere else, the US has only kept enough to bury our dead.
Stoner posted on 2017-01-25 06:23:14 Reply Private Reply
#39: Stoner To: interpreter (#36)
The UN was established to facilitate the establishment of the " New World Order ".
The land for the UN Building was donated by the Rockefeller family.
GET THE US OUT OF THE UN, AND GET THE UN OUT OF THE US !!!
Stoner posted on 2017-01-25 06:32:54 Reply Private Reply
#40: paraclete To: interpreter (#37)
paraclete posted on 2017-01-25 08:06:01 Reply Private Reply
#41: interpreter To: paraclete (#40)
What difference does it make whether or not today's Jews believe that Jesus is the Messiah? The fact remains that Jesus is a Jew and that He is the Jew's Messiah. That makes Christianity a branch of the Jews, and the fulfillment of several OT prophecies that say a branch of the Jews will someday rule the earth.
It is to start start this year when the 24th Christian throne that is to rule the earth is added to NATO (any day now), and the UN is disbanded (within a year or so), and the NATO nations "not wearing a wedding garment" are kicked out of NATO (also within a year or so). Also within a year or so, the last head of Satan (Islamic militants) will be so thoroughly defeated that Satan wont be heard from again for a thousand years, leaving the 24 Christian nations free to rule the earth unhindered by Satan for a millennium!
We live at a very exciting time. The old world order (the UN) will soon end up in the trash bin of history, and we are witnessing the birth of the New World Order that will rule the earth for Jesus for 1000 years!
interpreter posted on 2017-01-25 10:36:51 Reply Private Reply
#42: A K A Stone To: paraclete (#40)
You're really dumb.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-25 10:38:48 Reply Private Reply
#43: interpreter To: Stoner (#39)
I agree 100 percent. The UN will soon be the old "new world order," which leaves Christianity (and/or the 24 Christian nations in NATO) as the new "New World Order." God is great!
interpreter posted on 2017-01-25 10:45:50 Reply Private Reply
#44: Deckard To: A K A Stone (#28)
U.N to misterwhite:
Deckard posted on 2017-01-25 11:04:08 Reply Private Reply
#45: Stoner To: Deckard (#44)
Stoner posted on 2017-01-25 12:42:03 Reply Private Reply