Here’s a video documenting another case of law enforcers not enforcing the law… on law enforcers.
A man who had been issued a ticket – that is, ordered to hand over a sum of money as punishment for violating the law requiring both a front and a rear license plate – went to the local police department parking lot, where he video’d several vehicles without front license plates (and one – a Chevy Tahoe – with no license plates at all) but no tickets being handed out.
A law enforcer was present, so the man approached him to ask why he wasn’t doing anything to enforce the law which was enforced without mercy on him. As they talk, the SUV with no plates at all starts up and leaves. The law enforcer takes no action to enforce the law prohibiting the operation of a vehicle on public roads without tags. He expresses no “concern” about this “suspicious” vehicle.
He is also indifferent about the several other vehicles – all of them apparently personal vehicles, not for “official use only” – parked nearby without front tags.
The guy recording the video asks the law enforcer whether he is electing not to enforce the law because the cars without tags (or only one tag) are owned by fellow law enforcers. The law enforcer does not directly answer this question but instead claims there is no violation of law because the vehicles are parked (try that excuse next time you get ticketed for not having a front plate).
Except for the plate-less Tahoe, which started up and backed out of its parking spot as they talked. In plain view of a law enforcer.
There was no “hot pursuit.”
Instead, what is known as the Blue Discount was applied. This is like the Race Card; both grant special privileges and immunities which the rest of us are not supposed to question. If we do, it is considered to be racist with regard to the former and “anti-cop” with regard to the latter.
The plate-less Tahoe departed without incident.
They Have a Job to Do, you see. Stop interfering.
Here’s another video of law enforcers serially “running” stop signs. In blatant view of other law enforcers… who do not enforce the law requiring a complete stop before proceeding:
Law enforcers also routinely overlook mandatory “buckle up” laws ignored by their fellow enforcers – and often ignore this law themselves. Because they find the wearing of a seatbelt inconvenient, a hassle. Of course, so do we. It is an annoyance and besides, we’re not children.
But the law only applies to us.
Like the laws about having plates front and rear.
The front plate is ugly and often requires drilling holes in the bumper, forever marring it. But we are required to have the front plate, no exceptions, in order to make it easier for them to identify (and ticket) us. There are no excuses. The law is the law… unless you are a law enforcer.
Then the Blue Discount applies.
Law enforcers also officially flout laws forbidding the use of sail fawns while driving, having deeply tinted windows and driving faster than the posted speed limit. Not infrequently, a lot faster than the posted speed limit. Often, while texting on their sail fawns.
But if these laws are truly about “safety,” as we’re told, then there is no excuse for exceptions. The wearing of a uniform doesn’t decrease braking distances, for instance. Nor will a badge protect the wearer from impact forces in the event of a crash. Waving a gun around (“brandishing,” if we do it) is dangerous.
What about the officer safety we hear so much about?
What about our safety? Which, surely, is put in jeopardy by speeding cops, for example. And by cars without plates that can’t be easily identified. And by the waving around of guns.
Of course, it’s not about “safety” – theirs or ours.
It’s about showing who’s boss. Control – and collecting money.
From us.
Submit, Obey – and Pay.
They ought to put that in between quote marks and plaster it on the sides of their cars.
#1: Gatlin To: Deckard (#0)
First, an article is posted about how wonderful it was when a cop used “officer discretion” to have a kid do 200 push ups instead of being arrested for smoking marijuana.
The officer was greatly praised for his use of such “a powerful, basic tool in policing” and it was expressed that without “officer discretion” there would be too many unnecessary arrests.
Now, you post an article where “officer discretion” may be a damnable abomination when some irate individual was berating an officer for not ticketing a Chevy Tahoe for the same offense he had been ticketed….that being having no front license plate.
While the irate individual, who was recording at the time, chastised the officer for not doing anything to enforce the law which was enforced without mercy on him and was taking no action to enforce the law against the driver of the Tahoe….the driver of the Tahoe was able to quietly drive away.
Dog gone it, the irate citizen probably caused us to miss his recording of the Tahoe driver doing 200 push ups in the parking lot.
I am truly pissed …
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 10:49:28 Reply Private Reply
#2: Deckard To: Gatlin (#1)
You did read the article, didn't you?
The "heroes" are not being ticketed for not having a front plate on their personal vehicles...because - blue privilege.
Most folks believe that the police should abide by the same laws as we mundanes do. Then there are those folks who believe that police officers are a special class and are exempt from the same laws that govern the rest of us citizens.
From your posting history here one can deduce that you are in the second category.
Interesting that you didn't mention cell phone use and texting by police while driving even though it was also featured in the article.
Police Officer Will Not Be Charged For Killing Napster Exec While Texting And Driving — Because It's Apparently OK For Police To Do That
Yet another example of "blue privilege" - had this death been caused by a lowly serf and not a cop, do you really think the outcome would be the same?
Deckard posted on 2017-01-02 11:05:14 Reply Private Reply
#3: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#2)
I drove for years without a front plate. Officers just gave me a warning. I'm not even blue.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-02 11:06:38 Reply Private Reply
#4: Deckard To: A K A Stone (#3)
Some states don't require a front plate.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-02 11:09:08 Reply Private Reply
#5: Gatlin To: Deckard (#2)
You really need to stop with eternal use of your erroneous suppositions.
Your pot damaged brain didn’t allow you to comprehend my witty form use of sarcastic humor, did it?
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 11:23:39 Reply Private Reply
#6: Fred Mertz To: Deckard (#4)
Fred Mertz posted on 2017-01-02 11:27:23 Reply Private Reply
#7: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#4)
I know that. They wouldn't have given me a warning if it wasn't the law in my state.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-02 11:30:16 Reply Private Reply
#8: Gatlin To: Deckard (#4)
It is rather foolish of you to make that comment.
In fact, it is an extremely stupid statement since the information is universally known.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 11:32:54 Reply Private Reply
#9: Gatlin To: Fred Mertz (#6)
Obviously you state doesn’t have a requirement that prevents an imbecile from driving either.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 11:36:42 Reply Private Reply
#10: Deckard To: Gatlin (#9)
Interesting that you focus on the license plate requirement and nothing else in the article.
You know the score, pal. (if) you're not cop, you're little people!
Deckard posted on 2017-01-02 11:46:00 Reply Private Reply
#11: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#10)
He said he would like to punch his partner that he rides in in the face and that he is an asshole.
Said they don't go by the rule book. His father my brother told him to go by the rules and screw the ones who don't.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-02 11:51:33 Reply Private Reply
#12: Gatlin To: Deckard (#10)
Read Post #5 again …
Never mind, I will repost my original message to you:
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 12:28:45 Reply Private Reply
#13: Roscoe To: Gatlin (#12)
Roscoe posted on 2017-01-02 12:30:12 Reply Private Reply
#14: Deckard To: Gatlin (#5)
No, that was not sarcasm, it was you evading the topic of the article that I posted.
I suppose it was too much to expect that you would add anything to the discussion.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-02 12:56:57 Reply Private Reply
#15: Gatlin To: Roscoe (#13)
It made me think of a discussion I read this morning on another thread.
It is so fitting of Deckard….I went back to look it up.
One poster ask another poster this question:
The second poster answered: I laughed when I read this, I immediately felt they surely were discussing Deckard …Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 12:59:59 Reply Private Reply
#16: Gatlin To: Deckard (#14)
I can never add anything to a yellow journalism article.
I can however usually make numerous factual corrections….something you are well aware of that I very often do.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 13:04:44 Reply Private Reply
#17: Deckard To: Gatlin (#16)
Oh that's right.
Anything that accurately portrays police in a bad way or shows the double standard practiced by the badged "heroes" is "yellow journalism" - at least in Gatlin Bizarro World.
I can however usually make numerous factual corrections….
Nah...you just spin the facts to fit your pro-cop agenda.
Most folks believe that the police should abide by the same laws as we mundanes do. Then there are those folks who believe that police officers are a special class and are exempt from the same laws that govern the rest of us citizens.
Which category are you?
Never mind, your posts here and elsewhere on this site have clearly shown us which philosophy you embrace.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-02 13:11:42 Reply Private Reply
#18: Gatlin To: Deckard (#14)
Okay…I’m Your Huckleberry.
I will be right back …
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 13:13:46 Reply Private Reply
#19: Deckard To: Gatlin (#15)
How ironic, I was just thinking that word perfectly describes you and the other clown you seem to have a man-crush on.
I mean really man, why is it that you and Roscoe seem to be unable to post on a thread like this without fawning over each other while completely ignoring the article?
You both seem to believe that cops are a privileged class and as such there is no need for them to follow the same laws as we mundanes.
I'll have to say, the police state stench emanating from the two of you is particularly odious.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-02 13:18:53 Reply Private Reply
#20: Deckard To: Gatlin (#18)
Don't bother.
I was under the mistaken assumption that this was a discussion site, not a place where trolls permeate the threads with snide remarks and evade any meaningful conversations.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-02 13:21:21 Reply Private Reply
#21: Gatlin To: Deckard (#18)
If they would only check they would find, as there are in all professions, bad cops. It has been stated that 1% of cops are bad. Let me show you some examples of how those “bad” cops are ticketed and arrested….then perhaps you can show those folks who believe that police officers are a special class and are exempt from the same laws that govern the rest of us citizens that they are wrong….ever so wrong.
Think you can handle that with this information:
Furthermore: Yep, there are “bad” cops, 1% of the profession, and when those bad cops break the law, they are arrested. They are not treated differently. You should be embarrassed to continue spreading all your yellow journalism lies …Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 14:16:22 Reply Private Reply
#22: Gatlin To: Deckard (#20)
Oh, it was no bother….no bother at all
Presenting factual information to show the lies in your yellow journalism is never a bother for me.
In fact….it is always my distinct please to do so.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 14:20:16 Reply Private Reply
#23: Gatlin To: Deckard (#20)
Deckard, you you thick-headed POS, I read your posts….you have never had a “meaningful conversation.”You are an agenda driven libertarian asshole….blindly and constantly trying to dogmatically force your warped views on others.
How’s that working out for you?
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 14:30:45 Reply Private Reply
#24: Deckard To: Gatlin (#23)
No one is holding a gun to anyone's head.
I post articles in hopes of generating civil discussions about cherished American values - freedom, liberty and articles which point out the encroaching police state, articles that document government corruption and crime, including the double standards that are practiced by your badged "heroes".
There are those here who are capable of responding on a civil intellectual level. You - not so much. Your posts are stale, unimaginative and banal - your statist views are abhorrent to me as well as to those here who see you as an aberration and the antithesis of what the founders and free citizens in general believe in.
You have refused twice to answer a question I posed - well you answered it only by posting a litany of titles to articles that you somehow believe validates your points and somehow invalidates the point of the original article - they don't. You've responded to me and others here in an arrogant troll-like manner thinking you and only you are the supreme arbiter of truth - you aren't.
I've really tried to cut you some slack here in hopes that light bulb in your head would finally flicker but there is no way you will ever be anything more than a sheep, a follower and champion of the status quo and obedient slave to the almighty State.
Your inability to think outside the box while at one time amusing has just recently made me start to have pity on you.
There's really no hope for you, and It would be a waste of time to try and engage further in any dialogue with you on this thread.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-02 14:51:01 Reply Private Reply
#25: Gatlin To: Deckard (#24)
No you don’t….you may try to think that is what you are doing for self-justification as your continue to encounter your personal cognitive dissonance….posting yellow journalism hate-America and hate-cop articles with information that is not valid and shows immature rationality or just plain ignorance.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 15:30:18 Reply Private Reply
#26: Gatlin To: Deckard (#24)
That is the Johnny One Note message you continue when preaching your unjustified hatred of America….it is immature and pointless. To this end, you invariably try to make cops the scapegoat for your “perceived“ evils. Which is stupid. It is difficult to get you to think about this rationally.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 15:45:56 Reply Private Reply
#27: Gatlin To: Deckard (#24)
You have allowed your ignorant herd-mentality and stupidity to cause you to create a strong anti-Americanism obsession….and you have made your goal in life to spread it to others.
Your immature hate should have vanished with maturity or thought….unfortunately, it did not. It is as though you are subconsciously prone to resent any authority figure or large institution.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 16:11:41 Reply Private Reply
#28: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#27)
buckeroo posted on 2017-01-02 16:35:31 Reply Private Reply
#29: Gatlin To: Deckard (#24)
"You sound mad, Princess" ...
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 18:24:22 Reply Private Reply
#30: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#29)
buckeroo posted on 2017-01-02 19:05:46 Reply Private Reply
#31: Gatlin To: Deckard (#2)
I did that and you sluffed off the accumulated factual data that graphically and unequivocally proved to you and “those folks” who held that belief….you all are unreservedly incorrect in your uninvestigated false belief.
All this, and you had the unmitigated gall to suggest that I was “evading any meaningful conversation” when the entire time I was presenting facts as evidence to contradict your malicious charge.
A “meaningful conversation” to you is one that agrees with you.
For some unknown reason, Deckard, you simply cannot handle facts unless they are facts you already agree with….shame on you, Deckard, shame on you for that!!!
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 22:25:09 Reply Private Reply
#32: Gatlin To: Deckard (#0)
Such yellow journalism ignorance.
There is absolutely no need to drill holes.
Get one of many models of a no drill front license plate brackets available.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 23:05:07 Reply Private Reply
#33: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#30)
Gay?
I’m straighter than the pole your mom danced on.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-02 23:47:37 Reply Private Reply
#34: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#28)
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-03 00:11:23 Reply Private Reply
#35: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#33)
You personnaly fucked "yukon" ... there are a lot of rumours based on known records & documents.
Some of us have pity on you for obvious pornographic behaviour of fucking your good friend in the ass in Alaska.
buckeroo posted on 2017-01-04 22:11:15 Reply Private Reply