Cannelton, IN Volunteer Fire Chief Christopher Herzog was recently arrested for attempting to prevent a police officer from making a fire worse. However, the police version of the story makes it sound like Herzog was some crazed assailant attacking heroes. Now, the firefighter is facing a felony.
When kindergartners are taught to stop drop and roll, they are also taught that fire feeds on oxygen and that sometimes a suddenly opened door or window could cause a fire. Unfortunately, Cannelton police officer Ryen Foertsch did not get the memo.
Foertsch was at the location of the fire and in plain clothes, not dressed as an officer and was attempting to smash in one of the windows of the house, a move that could have obviously made the fire far worse. Herzog arrived on the scene to witness the blunder, and attempted to prevent the officer from literally adding fuel to the fire, and tried to get him away from the house.
Sensing that his authority was being threatened, Foertsch arrested the fire chief as the house continued to burn.
To make matters worse, as the house burned, the police ordered the remaining fire crew off of the property, preventing them from doing their jobs and putting lives and property at risk. Officer Foertsch claims that Herzog was shouting obscenities at him and shoving him. However, Herzog says that he was simply attempted to diffuse a dangerous situation, and even if he was shouting at the officer, he had every right to considering the circumstances.
Chris Zukeschwerdt, the man who owns the house that was burning, was horrified by the encounter that he witnessed.
I was in shock. When I saw the faces of those firefighters to see their leader being pulled out of here while he was fighting a fire was just unreal, Zukeschwerdt said.
Zukeschwerdt said that he heard the chief yell to the other firefighters to stay and make sure the fire was put out, as he was dragged away in handcuffs. However, he says that next the police officers took over the scene and ordered the firefighters to leave.
Were in charge of this scene now, Zukeschwerdt says he heard an officer say. Zukeschwerdt said at that point, a lot of the fire department guys started saying lets grab out gear and go.
Sadly, after the chief was arrested and the other firefighters sent away, the police officers did nothing and allowed the fire to completely destroy the house. Herzog was taken into custody and lodged in the Perry County Jail on a charge of battery against a public safety official, a level 6 felony.
Soon after the arrest, Herzog was bailed out of jail by Cannelton Mayor Mary Snyder.
It is important to note that the National Incident Management System, which sets national standards for first responders in emergencies such as this, states that the first fire unit arriving on the scene of a house fire are the ones to take command of the incident, which means that Herzog was within his rights to take charge of the situation when he arrived on the scene.
It seems that officer Foertsch was more concerned with his own ego and perceived authority than he was with saving lives, which is a dangerous consequence of giving a person unlimited power.
#1: Stoner To: Deckard (#0)
Stoner posted on 2016-12-31 07:29:13 Reply Private Reply
#2: Stoner To: Deckard (#0)
Even though the house does not appear to be large or expensive, it appears to be a total loss. And, with contents that should be a somewhat large claim / loss to the company.
Stoner posted on 2016-12-31 09:47:14 Reply Private Reply
#3: Roscoe To: Stoner (#1)
The article neglects to mention that officers were entering the building looking for possible victims, and that Herzog was actually arrested by State Troopers, rather than the police. Of course, facts infuriate Deckard.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 09:57:33 Reply Private Reply
#4: Deckard To: Stoner (#1)
I found it interesting that the comments from the linked "Law Officer" site were opposed to what officer Ryen Foertsch did at the scene.
And these guys are cops.
Here's one - Breaking windows and letting more oxygen into a fire is a no no. It sounds like the chief might have gotten carried away but he is the supervisor and the highest Authority on the scene and everyone else needs to follow his commands.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 10:32:30 Reply Private Reply
#5: Vinny To: Flame (#0)
Vinny posted on 2016-12-31 10:37:02 Reply Private Reply
#6: Deckard To: Vinny (#5)
Soon after the arrest, Herzog was bailed out of jail by Cannelton Mayor Mary Snyder.
You think the Mayor would have bailed him out had he been drunk?
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 10:48:46 Reply Private Reply
#7: Gatlin To: Roscoe (#3)
Does to hear the rest of the story mean to hear the events following to the arrest?
Or is it what Paul Harvey meant when he said and now for the rest of the story, you were to hear the true story?
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 10:51:57 Reply Private Reply
#8: Gatlin To: Deckard, Roscoe, Vinny (#4)
Have you set a precedent here that we all may regard as an example and guide to be considered in your future posts?
We can only vaguely hope so and that this is a prelude to you becoming truthfully objective
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 11:19:43 Reply Private Reply
#9: Vinny To: Deckard (#6)
KooK, should I get stewed like Herzog, then pick a fight with cops at a fire scene, my pic will be available, not before. Now beat it dimwit, and go pick a fight with a cop. I'd love to see you deposited head first in a garbage dumpster.
Vinny posted on 2016-12-31 11:35:06 Reply Private Reply
#10: Gatlin To: Deckard, Vinny (#6)
Your analogy for as a supporting purpose is deserving of derisive ridiculing mockery.
And .I just finished doing just that.
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 11:57:55 Reply Private Reply
#11: Deckard To: Vinny (#9)
Your statement borders on slander.
There is absolutely no evidence that Herzog was "stewed".
This is just another example of the arrogance of cops.
The Fire Department Chief has control of the scene, not the police.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 12:00:08 Reply Private Reply
#12: Deckard To: Gatlin (#8)
Common sense tells anyone that this is a fact.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 12:01:27 Reply Private Reply
#13: A K A Stone To: Roscoe (#3)
You obviously didn't watch the video. Which is part of the article.
A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-31 12:14:08 Reply Private Reply
#14: Vinny To: Deckard (#11)
KooK, his face is red and his nose basically blinks. He's stewed to the balls. Even someone with your remedial education and drug addled brain should be capable of seeing that.
Vinny posted on 2016-12-31 12:18:33 Reply Private Reply
#15: Roscoe To: A K A Stone (#13)
No, you obviously didn't watch the video. None of the footage aired of the event contradicted anything I posted.
Read it again, man up, and apologize.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 12:22:45 Reply Private Reply
#16: Deckard To: Vinny (#14)
Please state your evidence that Herzog was drunk.
Oh, you can't?
Typical.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 12:24:44 Reply Private Reply
#17: Deckard To: Roscoe, A K A Stone (#13)
That isn't their job at a fire scene unless requested by the Fire Chief, who has command.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 12:26:46 Reply Private Reply
#18: Roscoe To: Deckard (#17)
Please state your evidence that it isn't their job at a fire scene unless requested by the Fire Chief, who has command.
Oh, you can't?
Typical.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 12:29:44 Reply Private Reply
#19: A K A Stone To: Roscoe (#15)
You need reading comprehension classes.
You said the article did not mention..........
It was in the video. Hence my comment.
Try to pay attention. Try to keep up.
A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-31 12:44:24 Reply Private Reply
#20: buckeroo To: A K A Stone, roscoe (#19)
buckeroo posted on 2016-12-31 12:48:02 Reply Private Reply
#21: Roscoe To: A K A Stone (#19)
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 12:55:00 Reply Private Reply
#22: Gatlin To: Deckard, Roscoe, Vinny (#12)
Each PD, FD and EMS has published procedures to follow .or definitely should have .and each department coordinates with the other departments in establishing those procedures. There are a number of these procedures posted on the internet. All are basically the same, especially when relating to task priority. I randomly picked one to quote for you, it is from Phoenix:
As the IC, the volunteer fire chief was not following the tactical objectives.The cops arrived on the scene, recognized that, and the were following the procedure accepted as the published norm .they were checking for endangered occupants.
Something the volunteer fire chief should already have done .but obviously had not since he violently tried to stop the cops from performing the correct task.
The volunteer fire chief was apparently too shot in the ass with his authority and position to follow standard procedures and he got belligerent ..like might be expected from an uncompromising drunkard.
Screw that! Breaking windows might cause the house burn faster but a house can be replaced. The life of an unconscious person who may be in the room the officer was breaking the glass for entry .cannot be replaced. He definitely got carried away!And the rest of the statement is pure BULLSHIT for you dont blindly follow orders [as you have said numerous times] when you know those orders are totally incorrect, completely asinine and lives may be endangered.
The fire chief was wrong .and the fire chief was arrested
The cops were not wrong and the cops were not arrested.
Hey, asshole, stop with your damned whining
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 13:12:33 Reply Private Reply
#23: Roscoe To: Gatlin (#22)
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 13:21:29 Reply Private Reply
#24: Gatlin To: Deckard, Roscoe, A K A Stone (#17)
The published normal procedure upon arriving at the scene of a fire is:
Again: The volunteer fire chief was WRONG in that he had not properly performed the first assigned task and then violently tried to prevent the cops for doing that.The cops recognized that the volunteer fire chief had NOT performed that task and THEY PERFORMED THE TASK.
The cops are to be commended, the incompetent hothead volunteer fire chief needed to be arrested .HE WAS.
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 13:27:47 Reply Private Reply
#25: Gatlin To: Roscoe (#23)
These cop-hating assholes are oblivious to checking facts .they ignore them.
All that matters is their agenda and personal opinions.
Disgraceful
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 13:32:31 Reply Private Reply
#26: Gatlin To: Deckard, Vinny (#11)
TOO FUNNY
The volunteer fire chief lost control of himself at the scene and acted irrationally, not the police.
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 13:54:02 Reply Private Reply
#27: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#0)
And this YELLA journalistic piece of shit is just as slanted.
GrandIsland posted on 2016-12-31 14:04:06 Reply Private Reply
#28: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#25)
Yes you are, sucking yukon's asshole. You are a queer, just like him.
buckeroo posted on 2016-12-31 14:04:44 Reply Private Reply
#29: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, Roscoe, Deckard (#25)
Proving that the Fire Chief was right, and the arsonist cops fueled the fire, and rekindled it, and burned the house.
The Fire Chief will be found, NOT GUILTY. The fact that he was arrested is just further testimony to the incompetence and malice of the scofflaw pigs.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-12-31 14:08:34 Reply Private Reply
#30: Roscoe To: GrandIsland (#27)
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 14:10:42 Reply Private Reply
#31: Roscoe To: hondo68 (#29)
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 14:12:36 Reply Private Reply
#32: A K A Stone To: Roscoe (#21)
I pointed out that in fact that video did in fact mention that. So I was right and you have a reading comprehension problem.
So shut your pathetic pie hole.
A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-31 15:03:22 Reply Private Reply
#33: Roscoe To: A K A Stone (#32)
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 15:28:24 Reply Private Reply
#34: Gatlin To: Deckard. Vinny (#16)
You said to me after ONLY reading an article, that:
Then Vinny said to you, that Then you have the unmitigated gall to challenge Vinny to: You need to stop with your continued hypocritical double standard in that it is okay if you use something but then let your total absence of any good moral principles apply to be condemningly different and more rigorously judgmental to someone in a another circumstance using the same methodology.You straying from the accepted right and normal way of objectively analyzing something and deviating into La La Land is so atypical of a sane and rational person.
At least try to stay consistent while living in your warped world
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 15:53:00 Reply Private Reply
#35: Deckard To: GrandIsland (#27)
Who has authority at a fire scene, the Fire Chief or a patrolman?
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 15:57:03 Reply Private Reply
#36: Deckard To: hondo68, Gatlin, Roscoe (#29)
Most likely due to the "police officer" breaking the windows.
I say let the experts handle a fire, the cops should only be there to direct traffic.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 15:59:58 Reply Private Reply
#37: Deckard To: Roscoe (#18)
Oh gee, the Fire Chief has the training and experience fighting fires.
The cops - not so much.
But if it is your contention that cops should be placed in charge of residential fire scenes, people will die as a result.
Do you really want that?
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 16:12:36 Reply Private Reply
#38: Deckard To: Gatlin (#22)
Oh, so that's your rationale now?
There is no evidence to show that the Fire Department failed to search the house. It makes sense to me that experienced and highly trained firefighters would know to do that first.
To make matters worse, as the house burned, the police ordered the remaining fire crew off of the property, preventing them from doing their jobs and putting lives and property at risk.
Apparently the cops were not really interested public safety.
It was just another example of an arrogant cop flexing his authoritah when he should have been directing traffic or fetching donuts and coffee for the real heroes.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 16:22:56 Reply Private Reply
#39: Deckard To: Roscoe, A K A Stone (#33)
Just a suggestion - maybe you could get an update on your 64K phone modem so you are able to watch videos and not appear to be so much of a lying assclown.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 16:26:11 Reply Private Reply
#40: Gatlin To: Deckard GrendIsland (#35)
Furthermore, a better question to ask: Is a patrolman allowed to take direct action when a volunteer fire chief does not follow the published procedure and lives may be endangered because of that?
The volunteer fire chief did NOT check the house for any endangered occupants. He was negligent in his duty by not following established procedure.
Follow Up Question: Since the volunteer fire chief did not perform his duty at all .then is the patrolman to stand down and not check the house for occupants after an irresponsible hothead volunteer fire chief abdicated his duties and acted irrationally by not following published procedures?
Any volunteer fire chief who lost control of himself at the scene and reacts violently by physically attacking a Public Safety Official should be arrested and relieved of his duty as the volunteer fire chief.
The Indiana State Troopers independently investigate the incident and they arrested the volunteer fire chief.
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 16:26:24 Reply Private Reply
#41: Deckard To: Gatlin (#34)
Thanks for your cooperation.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 16:28:37 Reply Private Reply
#42: Roscoe To: Deckard (#36)
Your posted article doesn't say he broke the window. It shows that he was feloniously assaulted while he was "attempting to smash in one of the windows of the house."
You can't even keep your lies straight.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 16:30:13 Reply Private Reply
#43: Roscoe To: Deckard (#39)
noun
a piece of writing included with others in a newspaper, magazine, or other publication.
Craven bitch #2.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 16:32:07 Reply Private Reply
#44: Roscoe To: Deckard (#37)
What a coward.
I'll try again: Please state your evidence that it isn't their job at a fire scene unless requested by the Fire Chief, who has command.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 16:35:08 Reply Private Reply
#45: Roscoe To: Gatlin (#40)
He'll flee your point, gibbering in angry terror.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 16:36:29 Reply Private Reply
#46: Vinny To: Deckard (#37)
KooK, tell that to the families of the 60 cops who died while evacuating the fire engulfed Twin Towers on 9/11.
Vinny posted on 2016-12-31 16:37:14 Reply Private Reply
#47: Roscoe To: Vinny (#46)
You nuked him.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 16:39:46 Reply Private Reply
#48: Gatlin To: Deckard, Roscoe (#36)
Besides, you need to read and comprehend the yellow journalism article you posted.
That was when the volunteer fire chief got into the fray with the cop. There is NO report that the window was ever smashed. I say that if the volunteer fire chief had been an expert, then he would have followed published procedures and checked the house for occupants. He did not. The cop was doing that, the duty unfulfilled by the irresponsible volunteer fire chief.Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 16:43:22 Reply Private Reply
#49: Deckard To: Vinny (#46)
Oh - were those cops also fighting the fires?
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 16:44:11 Reply Private Reply
#50: Vinny To: Deckard (#49)
Vinny posted on 2016-12-31 16:50:56 Reply Private Reply
#51: Gatlin To: Deckard, Roscoe (#37)
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 16:54:56 Reply Private Reply
#52: Deckard To: Vinny (#50)
Foertsch was at the location of the fire and in plain clothes, not dressed as an officer and was attempting to smash in one of the windows of the house, a move that could have obviously made the fire far worse.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 16:58:46 Reply Private Reply
#53: Gatlin To: Deckard (#41)
Non sequitur.
Ridiculous ...
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 16:59:38 Reply Private Reply
#54: Roscoe To: Gatlin (#51)
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 17:02:57 Reply Private Reply
#55: Gatlin To: Deckard (#38)
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 17:04:49 Reply Private Reply
#56: Deckard To: Gatlin (#48)
You probably should have checked the links and watched the video.
I was in shock, says Chris Zukeschwerdt, whose house was on fire.When I saw the faces of those firefighters to see their leader being pulled out of here while he was fighting a fire was just unreal.
Zukeschwerdt has spent 40 years as an EMT and says, I've never seen anything like it in my life.
Humphery recorded the aftermath on her cell phone. She watched first responders in blue and red butt heads, while a fire burned in the background.
They pulled the fire chief out, Zukeschwerdt said, while the fire was still smoldering. Humphrey saw him arrested and put in handcuffs.
Neighbors there say police officers then told Cannelton firefighters to pack up. A firefighter can be heard on video telling his crew to pick up the hoses and leave.
We're in charge of this scene now, Zukeschwerdt says he heard a police officer say, and a lot of the fire department guys started saying let's grab out gear and go.
Zukeschwerdt says he heard the assistant fire chief tell his firefighters to stay put and make sure this fire is out.
Well, it wasn't.
The house caught fire again, and torched the rest of the house.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 17:06:13 Reply Private Reply
#57: Roscoe To: Deckard (#52)
According to fire expert Matt Agorist.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 17:08:27 Reply Private Reply
#58: Vinny To: Deckard (#52)
Vinny posted on 2016-12-31 17:09:36 Reply Private Reply
#59: Roscoe To: Deckard (#56)
So the fire was OUT when the police were looking for possible victims.
What a great foot shot!
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 17:09:38 Reply Private Reply
#60: Gatlin To: Deckard (#38)
It was reported that the fire was out when the handcuffed volunteer fire chief departed the scene and that was when the police ordered the remaining fire crew off the property.
Try to keep up
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 17:10:45 Reply Private Reply
#61: Roscoe To: Vinny (#58)
The Ron Rico Purple Label is 151 proof. Highly flammable.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 17:12:40 Reply Private Reply
#62: Gatlin To: Deckard (#38)
No, this is just another example of the many yellow journalism article you post and your failure to fact check.
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 17:13:43 Reply Private Reply
#63: Roscoe To: Gatlin (#60)
You and your darn facts! Don't you know that mansplaining triggers the SJWs.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 17:14:16 Reply Private Reply
#64: Gatlin To: Roscoe (#45)
He is a weirdo....but I have yet to see a libertarian who is not.
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 17:15:55 Reply Private Reply
#65: Gatlin To: Roscoe, Vinny (#47)
He will still be the Phoenix rising from the ashes.
He has a strong desire to receive truthful verbal abuse
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 17:20:05 Reply Private Reply
#66: Deckard To: Vinny (#58)
Please post a link to where the Chief was found to have ANY alcohol in his system along with any toxicology reports and arrest history.
What - you mean you are just making shit up because you have a man-crush on cops?
You certainly do have a vivid - one could almost say "delusional" imagination!
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 17:21:07 Reply Private Reply
#67: Gatlin To: Deckard, Vinny (#49)
What other cops have we been discussing were fighting fires?
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 17:22:39 Reply Private Reply
#68: Roscoe To: Gatlin (#67)
It may have been in one the discussions he was having with the voices in his head.
Roscoe posted on 2016-12-31 17:25:15 Reply Private Reply
#69: Gatlin To: Roscoe (#54)
At least he hasnt posted a multitude of different links for deflection .since he is getting his ass kicked so rightly with facts.
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 17:25:47 Reply Private Reply
#70: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#35)
I don't "claim".... I am a retired 20 year LEO.
During an active fire, the fire chief has control of the scene.
GrandIsland posted on 2016-12-31 17:42:29 Reply Private Reply
#71: Gatlin To: Deckard (#56)
First, Zukeschwerdt said : their leader being pulled out of here while he was fighting a fire.
Then a couple line down, Zukeschwerdt said: They pulled the fire chief out, Zukeschwerdt said, while the fire was still smoldering.
Then a link stated as the handcuffed volunteer fire chief departed, he said to his crew: Check to make sure there are no hot spots. [meaning of course, that the fire was out].
Now, please tell me .which link should I probably have checked?
There is no quotation marks encompassing that statement.Stop making up shit and trying to slip it in .that is so typical yellow journalism and easily spotted.
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 17:45:43 Reply Private Reply
#72: Gatlin To: Roscoe, Deckard (#59)
It did not!
I hit him on this also.
He likes to add shit in and make it look like someone reported that.
It is becaue of his actions, that I have a hard time trusting libertarians.
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 17:51:08 Reply Private Reply
#73: Gatlin To: Deckard, Roscoe, Vinny (#66)
Deckard to Vinny:
pot, kettle....black!
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 17:54:58 Reply Private Reply
#74: Vinny To: Roscoe (#61)
Total rummy. Red faced, cop fighters usually are.
Vinny posted on 2016-12-31 18:12:23 Reply Private Reply
#75: Deckard To: GrandIsland (#70)
Thank you.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 18:22:07 Reply Private Reply
#76: Deckard To: Vinny (#74)
Still waiting for you to post documented evidence showing the Chief was intoxicated.
...cop fighters usually are.
The cop in this instance should have obeyed the person who has authority at a fire -the Chief.
He would have served a useful purpose by keeping civilians away and fetching donuts and coffee for the real public servants.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 18:31:43 Reply Private Reply
#77: Hondo68 To: Gatlin (#73)
Police firefighting skilz.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-12-31 18:45:04 Reply Private Reply
#78: GrandIsland To: Gatlin (#40)
lol.... was wondering that myself.
GrandIsland posted on 2016-12-31 19:01:15 Reply Private Reply
#79: Deckard To: GrandIsland, Gatlin (#78)
It's kinda like Gatlin "claiming" to be a major when he distances himself from and trashes the very Constitution that he supposedly took an oath to protect and defend.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 19:27:16 Reply Private Reply
#80: Deckard To: hondo68 (#77)
Now they're gonna have to jack up some other citizen to make up for their incompetence.
Deckard posted on 2016-12-31 19:30:17 Reply Private Reply
#81: Vinny To: Deckard (#76)
KooK, the officers arrested the stewball after he struck an officer at the scene of an emergency where they heroically saved citizens.
So actually they were in charge.
See how this stuff works?
Vinny posted on 2016-12-31 20:12:23 Reply Private Reply
#82: Gatlin To: Deckard, GrandIsland (#79)
Well you can .but if you do so, then you will get your dumb hotheaded ass arrested and charged with: Battery Against a Public Safety Official, Level 6 Felony.
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 21:28:22 Reply Private Reply
#83: Gatlin To: GrandIsland (#78)
He cant arrange his words and phrases properly to create well-formed sentences that make sense.
That is no doubt caused by his total inability to understand the complexity and truthfulness of the situation he is trying to discuss.
The poor lad is always so lost in the world of reality
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-31 21:36:47 Reply Private Reply
#84: Deckard To: Vinny (#81)
HUH? So you are trying to say that it was the cops who acted heroically?
Not according to the homeowner and witnesses on the scene.
Chris Zukeschwerdt, the man who owns the house that was burning, was horrified by the encounter that he witnessed.
I was in shock. When I saw the faces of those firefighters to see their leader being pulled out of here while he was fighting a fire was just unreal, Zukeschwerdt said.
Zukeschwerdt said that he heard the chief yell to the other firefighters to stay and make sure the fire was put out, as he was dragged away in handcuffs. However, he says that next the police officers took over the scene and ordered the firefighters to leave.
Were in charge of this scene now, Zukeschwerdt says he heard an officer say. Zukeschwerdt said at that point, a lot of the fire department guys started saying lets grab out gear and go.
Gee, what happened next you say?
The house caught fire again, and torched the rest of the house.
And still you ignorantly claim that the cops were "heroes" that day?
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 00:13:32 Reply Private Reply
#85: Gatlin To: Deckard, Vinny (#84)
There you go again spouting of about what Chris Zukeschwerdt said.
Chris Zukeschwerdts account is inconsistent and in contradiction to other sources.
Now, please, you cannot possible tell which version of all this is factually correct.Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 00:46:38 Reply Private Reply
#86: rlk To: Deckard (#84)
The weren't there for law enforcement. They were there for ego enforcement. A small minded man looking for a chance to show his authority and prowess.
rlk posted on 2017-01-01 00:50:06 Reply Private Reply
#87: Gatlin To: Deckard, Vinny, Roscoe (#84)
Why do you constantly point to and rely so heavily on eyewitness reports when using eyewitness reports is one of the worse things you can do since science has for a long time proven their inaccuracy.
Dont believe that .then check these out:
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 02:45:30 Reply Private Reply
#88: Deckard To: Gatlin (#85)
Oh - you mean the HOMEOWNER who was at the scene of the fire the entire time?
Chris Zukeschwerdt, the man who owns the house that was burning, was horrified by the encounter that he witnessed.
I was in shock. When I saw the faces of those firefighters to see their leader being pulled out of here while he was fighting a fire was just unreal, Zukeschwerdt said.
Zukeschwerdt said that he heard the chief yell to the other firefighters to stay and make sure the fire was put out, as he was dragged away in handcuffs. However, he says that next the police officers took over the scene and ordered the firefighters to leave.
Were in charge of this scene now, Zukeschwerdt says he heard an officer say.
Oh yeah - he must be lying, right?
Your whining is growing tiresome.
All charges against the Chief will be dropped. The town can't afford to have the cops and firefighters become enemies. At the very most, this was two guys getting into an argument over who's boss.
It is nowhere near a Level 6 Felony, unless of course you believe that a heroic public servant pushing a badged "hero" rises to that level of criminality.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 02:47:54 Reply Private Reply
#89: Deckard To: buckeroo (#28)
He's moved on from yukon to FireIsland in that department.
You are a queer, just like him
I wonder if Gatlin likes sushi and MMA fighting as much as our resident Village People cop does.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 03:06:10 Reply Private Reply
#90: Deckard To: Gatlin, Roscoe, Vinny, GrandIsland, rlk, hjondo68 A K A Stone, buckeroo, Stoner (#86)
Cop Handcuffs Firefighter For Trying to Protect Crash Victims, Caught on Tape
Firefighter Was in the Middle of Helping a Woman During Medical Call When He Suddenly Found Himself in Handcuffs
Cop Arrests Fireman Giving Aid - Jury Awards $18k
Juror Betsy Vennemann said after the verdict, "We wanted to make a statement that this kind of behavior will not be tolerated."
Capt. David Wilson won $7,500 in compensatory damages and $10,000 in punitive damages. Jurors, including a nun, said they went easy on the defendant, Officer Todd Greeves, because he has a family and they weren't sure who would pay the bill.
Wilson testified that the Robertson Fire Protection District truck was parked in a way to protect rescuers working to free a victim from wreckage along Interstate 270 at McDonnell Boulevard.
Greeves ordered that the truck be moved to accommodate passing traffic and arrested Wilson for ignoring him. Wilson was released after 23 minutes and never charged. He sued, claiming civil rights violations that opened him to anxiety and humiliation.
Greeves told the court the truck was creating a hazard and not adding to safety at the scene.
Jurors interviewed after the verdict said their feeling about Greeves was reinforced during the punitive phase of the trial, when they heard there had been other complaints about him. An internal affairs investigation determined that Greeves used excessive force in a 2002 arrest, court documents show, and was the subject of several other complaints.
Before Wednesday's deliberations, U.S. Magistrate Judge Mary Ann Medler had already ruled that Greeves had no probable cause to arrest Wilson, who she said had state law on his side. She also dismissed the city of Hazelwood as a defendant.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 03:24:08 Reply Private Reply
#91: Roscoe To: Deckard (#90)
Roscoe posted on 2017-01-01 04:09:52 Reply Private Reply
#92: Deckard To: Roscoe (#91)
Uh, no - I haven't lost the debate and I'm not changing my story.
I merely pointed out that this was not an isolated incident. Cops have interfered with firefighters doing their jobs before and they will do it again.
Why? Because they just don't learn.
Maybe more lawsuits like the one I posted above would be the answer.
At any rate, the felony charges against the Chief will be dropped, unless the badged "heroes" want to make an example out of him.
By doing so however they will only increase the tension between firefighters and cops - nobody wants to see that.
Pursuing criminal charges against Fire Chief Christopher Herzog will ultimately put lives and property in danger.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 04:25:59 Reply Private Reply
#93: Roscoe To: Deckard (#92)
Roscoe posted on 2017-01-01 05:15:01 Reply Private Reply
#94: Fred Mertz To: Roscoe (#93)
Fred Mertz posted on 2017-01-01 05:31:40 Reply Private Reply
#95: Roscoe To: Fred Mertz (#94)
This is more like swatting flies.
Roscoe posted on 2017-01-01 05:54:20 Reply Private Reply
#96: Gatlin To: Deckard (#88)
I do mean the homeowner who cannot keep his story straight each time he tells it.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 07:42:49 Reply Private Reply
#97: Gatlin To: Deckard (#90)
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 07:50:39 Reply Private Reply
#98: Gatlin To: Deckard, Roscoe (#92)
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 07:58:05 Reply Private Reply
#99: Gatlin To: Deckard (#88)
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 08:04:31 Reply Private Reply
#100: Gatlin To: Deckard (#88)
Eyewitness reports are notoriously unreliable.
Dont believe that then check these links out.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 08:13:34 Reply Private Reply
#101: Gatlin To: Roscoe (#95)
In the case with Deckard...like swatting a pesky gnat.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 09:33:25 Reply Private Reply
#102: Hondo68 To: Gatlin (#100)
You've convinced me that the eyewitness cops are clueless.
Matt Agorist from the Free Thought Project takes a more balanced view, collects observations from a number of eyewitnesses, as well as newscrews covering the event.
Plus, he's not a CT freak like you! Your attempts to parse the homeowners comments are ridiculous. There are no contradictions, k0oK!
Hondo68 posted on 2017-01-01 11:18:51 Reply Private Reply
#103: Deckard To: Gatlin (#96)
Seriously? That's all you got?
There is NO discrepancy in those two statements.
A smoldering fire IS STILL a fire.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 11:21:51 Reply Private Reply
#104: Deckard To: Gatlin (#97)
I merely pointed out that this kind of behavior has been displayed in the past by cops who stopped firemen from doing their jobs.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 11:23:31 Reply Private Reply
#105: Deckard To: Gatlin (#99)
Do you believe that the charges should be dropped?
Prosecuting a heroic firefighter doing his job controlling the scene and pushing a cop out of the way does not do anyone any good.
Lives and property will be at risk due to the animosity between the cops and firefighters which will be exacerbated by a felony conviction against the Chief.
I'm sure we can all admit that this situation could have been avoided if the cop would have checked his ego at the door and allowed the firefighters to do their jobs.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 11:30:22 Reply Private Reply
#106: Deckard To: Fred Mertz (#94)
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 11:32:41 Reply Private Reply
#107: Fred Mertz To: Deckard (#106)
I saw it once on live TV and never again - not that I did a thorough search for it or anything.
Fred Mertz posted on 2017-01-01 11:43:28 Reply Private Reply
#108: Vinny To: Deckard (#106)
Vinny posted on 2017-01-01 11:45:34 Reply Private Reply
#109: Deckard To: Vinny (#108)
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 12:47:48 Reply Private Reply
#110: Gatlin To: Deckard (#104)
Which was a complete waste, since it had no relationship to the volunteer fire chief blowing up and losing his tempter to physically attack a law enforcement officer and then be arrested for a Class 6 Felony.
Please try to stay on topic .I realize it must be hard for you to do so.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 13:01:46 Reply Private Reply
#111: Deckard To: Gatlin (#110)
Prosecuting a heroic firefighter doing his job controlling the scene and pushing a cop out of the way does not do anyone any good.
Lives and property will be at risk due to the animosity between the cops and firefighters which will be exacerbated by a felony conviction against the Chief.
I'm sure we can all admit that this situation could have been avoided if the cop would have checked his ego at the door and allowed the firefighters to do their jobs.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 13:10:38 Reply Private Reply
#112: Gatlin To: Deckard (#105)
The nincompoop publically displayed that he is a high tempered hot head who acts irrationally and irresponsibly which makes him mentally incapable to continue acting in his capacity as volunteer fire chief.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 13:10:50 Reply Private Reply
#113: Deckard To: Gatlin (#112)
The heroic Fire Chief was doing his job saving lives and property when an ego-centric police officer decided to flex his authoritah and proclaim that HE was now the boss at the scene.
A simple fact that even you should be able to grasp.
As far as apologies, both sides should apologize and end the ongoing animosity that will threaten the lives and property of the town's citizens.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 13:16:50 Reply Private Reply
#114: Gatlin To: Deckard (#113)
It was not his job to lose his temper and attack the policeman.
The policeman has nothing to apologize for.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 13:26:20 Reply Private Reply
#115: Roscoe To: Deckard (#113)
Nope
Roscoe posted on 2017-01-01 13:26:24 Reply Private Reply
#116: Gatlin To: Deckard (#103)
Nope!
This is a house fire:
This is a house that was on fire and is now smoldering:
There is a BIG difference.
The point that being made by Zukeschwerdt was the relativity .the active burning had finished.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 13:28:39 Reply Private Reply
#117: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#90)
I've done it. That's what happens when they drive to the scene intoxicated.
GrandIsland posted on 2017-01-01 13:29:23 Reply Private Reply
#118: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#116)
buckeroo posted on 2017-01-01 13:30:57 Reply Private Reply
#119: Gatlin To: GrandIsland, Deckard, Vinny, Roscoe (#117)
That was a strikingly amusing remark .quite a beautiful ZINGER.
Gatlin posted on 2017-01-01 13:32:55 Reply Private Reply
#120: Deckard To: GrandIsland (#117)
Driving while intoxicated is NOT within the parameters of "doing his job", and there is no evidence here to indicate that Chief Herzog was intoxicated.
I can see that happening with volunteer fire departments - guy is in a bar or at home having a couple of beers, gets the call and rushes to the scene.
In that situation, maybe you cut the guy a break and drive him to the fire, depending on his level of intoxication, the severity of the fire and whether his presence was vital to the firefighting effort.
You can always haul him in afterwards.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 13:40:38 Reply Private Reply
#121: Deckard To: Gatlin (#116)
Okey dokey.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 13:53:13 Reply Private Reply
#122: Deckard To: buckeroo (#118)
Sometimes the simplest concepts are the most difficult for him to understand.
Deckard posted on 2017-01-01 13:55:44 Reply Private Reply
#123: rlk To: Gatlin (#114)
It God damned well was if the cop, to show his ass, was trying to prevent him from doing his job of putting out the fire. The cop, along with those making excuses for him, should have been sentenced to replace the owner's home.
rlk posted on 2017-01-01 18:39:33 Reply Private Reply
#124: A K A Stone To: Roscoe (#33)
It is in the video on this site with the article.
Here it is again since you are to dumb to find it on your own.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-01 23:38:10 Reply Private Reply
#125: Roscoe To: A K A Stone (#124)
You're pathetic.
ar·ti·cle
noun
a piece of writing included with others in a newspaper, magazine, or other publication.
Roscoe posted on 2017-01-02 09:20:55 Reply Private Reply
#126: A K A Stone To: Roscoe (#125)
Like I said reading comprehension problems.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-02 09:30:30 Reply Private Reply
#127: Roscoe To: A K A Stone (#126)
Moving the goalpost. Again. Craven.
Roscoe posted on 2017-01-02 09:34:48 Reply Private Reply
#128: A K A Stone To: Roscoe (#127)
Shut up already. Man up and admit you wasn't paying attention.
The video is part of the article. It was always there.
I just mentioned "you obviously didn't watch the video. Which is part of the article."
Have a nice new year.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-02 09:40:14 Reply Private Reply
#129: Roscoe To: A K A Stone (#128)
You lied. You got busted. Dry your craven tears.
Roscoe posted on 2017-01-02 09:45:57 Reply Private Reply
#130: Stoner To: Deckard (#122)
Stoner posted on 2017-01-02 10:04:57 Reply Private Reply
#131: Stoner To: rlk (#123)
Robert, I suspect the property owners insurance company's lawyers, and a jury, will have the final say in this matter.
Stoner posted on 2017-01-02 10:10:54 Reply Private Reply
#132: A K A Stone To: Roscoe (#129)
The video was there all along.
You are really boring me and wasting my time.
Maybe it is time to flush you down the toilet.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-02 10:46:12 Reply Private Reply
#133: Roscoe To: A K A Stone (#132)
Craven bitch.
Roscoe posted on 2017-01-02 10:55:51 Reply Private Reply
#134: A K A Stone To: Roscoe (#133)
Got ya.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-02 11:01:03 Reply Private Reply
#135: Roscoe To: A K A Stone (#134)
Proverbs 26:11 As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly.
I hope you enjoyed your beating.
Roscoe posted on 2017-01-02 11:08:46 Reply Private Reply
#136: A K A Stone To: Roscoe (#135)
You're just playing semantics.
Point is you didn't watch the video which was included with the article, and being included with it is part of the article.
So you were wrong when you said there was no mention of police looking for people to help.
I'm done talking to you about this. Have a nice new year.
A K A Stone posted on 2017-01-02 11:29:19 Reply Private Reply
#137: Fred Mertz To: A K A Stone (#132)
And make this place go from dead to deader.
Fred Mertz posted on 2017-01-02 11:45:17 Reply Private Reply
#138: GrandIsland To: Fred Mertz (#137)
You drug addict loving agenda posters make the site only pleasant for you... because all you liberal assholes always gotta act like Ferguson zoo animals when you don't get your way or your liberal hero (or whore) isn't elected.
The intolerance and anarchist behavior stems from the AGENDA posters.... you assholes stunk up FR, then you shit all over LP... and now you have this fucking place only enjoyable if you love drug addicts, faggots... and you hate cops and the rich.
You filthy assholes have always been one great big smelly hippie OCCUPY type cult. All fucking 6% of you.
It ain't Stones fault.
GrandIsland posted on 2017-01-05 08:33:17 Reply Private Reply
#139: Deckard To: GrandIsland (#138)
Deckard posted on 2017-01-05 09:05:52 Reply Private Reply
#140: GrandIsland To: Deckard (#139)
GrandIsland posted on 2017-01-05 17:48:13 Reply Private Reply