Police officer unleashes dog to attack naked unarmed man.

Source: None
Published: Dec 14, 2016
Author: Stupid cops own dashcam
Post Date: 2016-12-14 11:21:35 by A K A Stone
Views: 5462

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: GrandIsland    To: A K A Stone (#0)

He should have been tased.... then cuffed. I agree. Excessive use of force.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-12-14 11:37:03   Reply   Private Reply

#2: Pinguinite    To: A K A Stone (#0)

It's horrible.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-12-14 11:38:01   Reply   Private Reply

#3: Pinguinite    To: A K A Stone (#0)

A much better title, Stone.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-12-14 11:55:35   Reply   Private Reply

#4: misterwhite    To: GrandIsland (#1)

"He should have been tased.... then cuffed."

No. He should have cooperated.

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 12:10:56   Reply   Private Reply

#5: A K A Stone    To: misterwhite (#4)

No. He should have cooperated.

Yes he should have cooperated. But that doesn't give the police a license to punish him by unleashing an attack dog on him.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 12:16:09   Reply   Private Reply

#6: A K A Stone    To: misterwhite (#4)

Maybe they should have just shot him in the head huh?

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 12:17:33   Reply   Private Reply

#7: Pinguinite    To: A K A Stone (#6)

Maybe they should have just shot him in the head huh?

misterwhite seems to have no concept of excessive force, so yes, I'm sure he would not see any problem with the police shooting him, cutting him up with a chainsaw, or running him over with a steamroller. Or all three.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-12-14 12:25:55   Reply   Private Reply

#8: misterwhite    To: A K A Stone (#5)

"Yes he should have cooperated. But that doesn't give the police a a a a license to punish him by unleashing an attack dog on him."

Did the dirtbag think the cop was simply taking the dog for a walk? Of course he should have cooperated. Even without the dog.

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 12:39:45   Reply   Private Reply

#9: misterwhite    To: A K A Stone (#6)

"Maybe they should have just shot him in the head huh?"

Really?

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 12:41:32   Reply   Private Reply

#10: A K A Stone    To: misterwhite (#9)

No I was just seeing how far you go in support of police brutality.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 12:45:10   Reply   Private Reply

#11: misterwhite    To: A K A Stone (#10)

"No I was just seeing how far you go in support of police brutality."

Police brutality? What's the police dog for? Petting?

The highly trained police dog was used as non-lethal force to subdue the uncooperative douchebag. A taser could have missed, been ineffective, or even killed the subject.

(Ooooh. That would have given you something to post about. Why did they taser him? Why not use the police dog? At least he'd be alive today.)

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 12:55:21   Reply   Private Reply

#12: A K A Stone    To: misterwhite (#11)

Police brutality? What's the police dog for? Petting?

To catch fleeing suspects. Not to attack unarmed people who are not a threat.

What are the guns for? To shoot them in the head? You kind of dodged that one.

So again should the police have been allowed to just shoot him in the head. I mean they have guns and the guns aren't for playing cops and robbers. They ar for shooting.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 12:56:56   Reply   Private Reply

#13: misterwhite    To: A K A Stone (#12)

"What are the guns for? To shoot them in the head?

Yes. Under the use of force continuum.

Turns out the dog was sufficient. No one died.

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 13:04:41   Reply   Private Reply

#14: GrandIsland    To: misterwhite (#13)

LE, under the use of force continuum, should use just enough force to gain control. IMHO, there was no need for the K9 officer to allow the dog to keep nawing on the arrestee, when there was a sufficient amount of officers present to get him cuffed without injury to officers.

Better yet, they should have tased his naked ass... make the idiot ride the lightening bolt. The route they took will cause CIVIL LIABILITY PAYOUT by taxpayers.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-12-14 20:43:11   Reply   Private Reply

#15: jeremiad    To: Pinguinite (#2)

A friend of mine broke into a junk yard at night to smoke some and drink a six pack he and a friend had pilfered from dads fridge. The neighbor called the cops, and they turned the police dogs loose in the junk yard. The friend ended up with 12 stitches on his face, and a frightening experience. He was 13, and he must have deserved that. sarcasm off now....

jeremiad posted on 2016-12-14 22:42:38   Reply   Private Reply

#16: GrandIsland    To: jeremiad (#15)

You hang out with 13 year old trespassing potheads?

GrandIsland posted on 2016-12-15 08:08:48   Reply   Private Reply

#17: Stoner    To: GrandIsland (#14)

" LE, under the use of force continuum, should use just enough force to gain control. IMHO, there was no need for the K9 officer to allow the dog to keep nawing on the arrestee, when there was a sufficient amount of officers present to get him cuffed without injury to officers.

Better yet, they should have tased his naked ass... make the idiot ride the lightening bolt. The route they took will cause CIVIL LIABILITY PAYOUT by taxpayers. "

Very logical assessment.

Stoner posted on 2016-12-15 08:57:45   Reply   Private Reply