WATCH – Black Welfare Mom With 15 Kids Issues SICK Welfare Demands to Americans

Source: Tea Party
Published: Dec 11, 2016
Author: Staff
Post Date: 2016-12-14 09:22:59 by IbJensen
Views: 13656

Angry Patriot Movement) – As long as welfare has existed, people have abused the privilege. One form of abuse is when low-income families have more children than they can afford and hand the bill to the rest of their community.

A new video shows Angel Adams, a Tampa mother of 15 children, 12 of which are living with her, arguing that she cannot afford her kids so “someone needs to be held accountable and they need to pay.”

The mom’s financial situation worsened when the baby daddy of ten of her children was arrested, leaving her to fend for herself. Adams blames the system for not giving her the help she needs.

The video shows reporters entering a motel room where Adams was staying with her 12 kids– after she was evicted from her previous home. The children had no food available, no shoes, and had not had a change of clothes in more than three days.

VIDEO AT LINK

http://www.teaparty.org/watch-black-welfare-mom-15-kids-issues-sick-welfare-demands-americans-206187/

Some of their clothes were laid out on the curb after she was evicted. The landlord claims that they and several other agencies tried to help her with her rent and utilities but she says it is simply not enough.

“I don’t have any clothes. People been donating food just around here, just helping me out with food, and I don’t have anything,” Adams said. She claims that her situation is due to the involvement of social services. “They done been in my life six months and I’m homeless,” she said.

The Department of Children and Families says a company called Hillsborough Kids Incorporated has been helping Adams out with rent and giving her furniture. DCF Director Nick Cox got involved in the matter personally to get her out of the motel where she was living.

This woman has the common attitude of a welfare state parent who believes she can have as many kids as she wants and the government will pick up the bill. These people do not understand that it is the taxpayers who have to be fund this woman’s irresponsibility.

It is no wonder this woman has lost custody of her children. They currently in the process of being placed with family members, under the supervision of the government. This is all being handled at the taxpayer’s expense. I personally do not want to pay for someone else to have kids. I want my money to pay for my own children!

Adams is like many other welfare recipients. She believes that she has an entitlement and that she doesn’t need to take personal responsibility. The government will simply pick up the bill. It is no wonder this country is in so much debt!

Then when politicians threaten to take away certain privileges, many who are entitled vote for the Democrat Party, who is willing to hand out entitlements to anyone.

This woman has been perpetually pregnant for her entire adult life. She put her own self in this situation. Now she is suffering the consequences of her actions by losing custody of her children.


Poster Comment:

Angel(????) cannot lay in bed day and night MAKING babies and milking the system. She is lazy and primitive and utterly useless. She belongs in prison doing hard 'labor'.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: misterwhite    To: IbJensen (#0)

"arguing that she cannot afford her kids so “someone needs to be held accountable and they need to pay.”

Say what?? Uh, that "someone" bees you!

Where did she get the idea that someone else should be held responsible for her decisions?

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 09:39:37   Reply   Private Reply


#2: jeremiad    To: misterwhite (#1)

There should be NO social safety net funded by taxpayers. It is an abomination in a country meant to be governed by the citizens. Churches and private organizations can handle it. Let those that need or just want help, go "hat in hand begging" for a piece of what they say is their "social justice".

jeremiad posted on 2016-12-14 11:29:06   Reply   Private Reply


#3: GrandIsland    To: jeremiad (#2)

There should be NO social safety net funded by taxpayers.

I agree.

be self reliant or STARVE.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-12-14 11:31:41   Reply   Private Reply


#4: Willie Green    To: IbJensen (#0)

Well if you dumbshits won't provide birth control or abortion services, then she's just going to continue to breed more just like her...

Willie Green posted on 2016-12-14 12:08:45   Reply   Private Reply


#5: A K A Stone    To: Willie Green (#4)

Well if you dumbshits won't provide birth control or abortion services,

How many abortions have you performed sicko?

Do you think old people like you should have bags put over their heads and smothered at the end of life when you become useless to society.

Because that is more just then murdering children.

Anyone for abortion should be put on trial. Then once convicted executed for attempted murder.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 12:14:52   Reply   Private Reply


#6: Willie Green    To: A K A Stone (#5)

It's your "choice"... If you won't permit birth control or abortions, then helping to support, raise, shelter, feed, medicate & educate these welfare babies are YOUR responsibility...

Willie Green posted on 2016-12-14 12:26:48   Reply   Private Reply


#7: A K A Stone    To: Willie Green (#6)

No it is the cunt who pulled down her panties and stuck a willie in it. It is her responsibility and the owner of the willie.

But who cares what you think. Trump won and you and your faggots lost.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 12:29:30   Reply   Private Reply


#8: Willie Green    To: A K A Stone (#7)

And Trump will only succeed in turning America into a festering Third World slum...

Willie Green posted on 2016-12-14 12:32:18   Reply   Private Reply


#9: A K A Stone    To: Willie Green (#8)

You are a would be baby murderer. Who gives a shit what a useless eater like you thinks.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 12:44:04   Reply   Private Reply


#10: misterwhite    To: A K A Stone (#7)

"It is her responsibility and the owner of the willie."

So the 15th kid was "a bridge too far"? Had she stopped at 14 kids, everything would have been all right?

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 12:48:08   Reply   Private Reply


#11: A K A Stone    To: misterwhite (#10)

She and the willie(s) are responsible for all of the kids.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 12:53:14   Reply   Private Reply


#12: misterwhite    To: A K A Stone (#11)

"She and the willie(s) are responsible for all of the kids."

Had they been, they might have stopped at one or two. Now we have 15 future criminals* to look forward to.

*85% of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 12:59:44   Reply   Private Reply


#13: A K A Stone    To: misterwhite (#12)

Yes fatherless children are more likely to turn out bad.

But that doesn't mean that they will all turn out to be criminals.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 13:01:50   Reply   Private Reply


#14: A K A Stone    To: misterwhite (#12)

Perhaps she should lose custody and they should bring orphanages back

By grandmother lived in an orphanage.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 13:03:46   Reply   Private Reply


#15: misterwhite    To: A K A Stone (#13)

"But that doesn't mean that they will all turn out to be criminals."

“The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.”

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 13:07:50   Reply   Private Reply


#16: misterwhite    To: A K A Stone (#14)

"Perhaps she should lose custody and they should bring orphanages back"

My philosophy is this: Everyone makes mistakes. Meaning, society will help her with the first child. It's the humane thing to do.

Any additional children, she's on her own.

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 13:10:45   Reply   Private Reply


#17: A K A Stone    To: misterwhite, vicomte13 (#16)

Any additional children, she's on her own.

I kind of feel the same way.

But would you make her responsible to the point of the kids starving to death?

I don't you would.

Hence my comment about orphanages. Newt had a similar opinion in the 90's.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 13:13:12   Reply   Private Reply


#18: misterwhite    To: A K A Stone (#17)

"But would you make her responsible to the point of the kids starving to death?"

What did this country do before welfare, WIC, public housing, free healthcare, and and and food stamps?

How about family, friends, neighbors, community and church stepping up?

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 13:30:37   Reply   Private Reply


#19: Willie Green    To: A K A Stone (#17)

Hence my comment about orphanages. Newt had a similar opinion in the 90's.

And who would pay for the orphanages? YOU??? Newt? Paul Ryan? Scott Walker? The Taxpayers???

Baloney... when it comes down to it, you all would just condemn the kids to starve & fester in third world slums... only now the slums will be in suburbia USA... and you can thank Trump for that...

Willie Green posted on 2016-12-14 13:37:20   Reply   Private Reply


#20: A K A Stone    To: Willie Green (#19)

And who would pay for the orphanages? YOU??? Newt? Paul Ryan? Scott Walker? The Taxpayers???

The taxpayers obviously. Along with charitable individuals. The way it was funded in the past is a clue.

There is plenty of waste in government spending that would offset it. Like funding for planned murder for example.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 13:48:02   Reply   Private Reply


#21: A K A Stone    To: misterwhite (#18)

How about family, friends, neighbors, community and church stepping up?

Ok, fair enough.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 13:48:34   Reply   Private Reply


#22: Willie Green    To: misterwhite (#18)

What did this country do before welfare, WIC, public housing, free healthcare, and and and food stamps?

Willie Green posted on 2016-12-14 13:51:31   Reply   Private Reply


#23: Willie Green    To: A K A Stone (#20)

The way it was funded in the past is a clue.

So you mean underfunded warehouses where they'd be "out of sight, out of mind"

Willie Green posted on 2016-12-14 13:58:13   Reply   Private Reply


#24: misterwhite    To: Willie Green (#22)

The orphan trains operated between 1854 and 1929.

When I asked, "What did this country do before welfare, WIC, public housing, free healthcare, and food stamps?", I was referring to the 1950's and 1960's.

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-14 13:59:13   Reply   Private Reply


#25: A K A Stone    To: Willie Green (#23)

So you mean underfunded warehouses where they'd be "out of sight, out of mind"

I don't know how they did it in the past. But the way you described it wouldn't be my objective if I had any say in it.

I care about people. About poor people. About people hurting. About the disadvantaged.

I also care about people who have their money stolen via taxes to be wasted.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 13:59:54   Reply   Private Reply


#26: A K A Stone    To: Willie Green (#22)

I'm sure your video is sad. I watched a tiny portion of it.

Today democrats just kill them so they are out of sight out of mind. Democrats are such sicko's that they think murder is moral. A sick lot you run with. Repent Willie.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 14:02:11   Reply   Private Reply


#27: A K A Stone    To: Willie Green (#23)

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 14:03:57   Reply   Private Reply


#28: Willie Green    To: A K A Stone (#20)

The taxpayers obviously. Along with charitable individuals.

Charitable individuals like Donald Trump???

Good grief... Trump & his Goldman Sachs cronies would rather kick the orphans into the gutter...

Willie Green posted on 2016-12-14 14:13:40   Reply   Private Reply


#29: A K A Stone    To: Willie Green (#28)

Charitable individuals like Donald Trump???

Good grief... Trump & his Goldman Sachs cronies would rather kick the orphans into the gutter...

People who would murder babies (you) have no credability. Murders are also liars.

Why do you make up lies Willie?

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 14:30:01   Reply   Private Reply


#30: Willie Green    To: A K A Stone (#29)

Trump is a global real estate developer...
So tell me how many orphanages has he built?

And how many orphanages were paid for by Goldman Sachs?

Willie Green posted on 2016-12-14 17:16:01   Reply   Private Reply


#31: paraclete    To: Willie Green (#30)

None it isn't about orphanages because that assumes the baby factories can just go on pumping them out, freedom gone mad. There is a sure form of birth control and don't tell me she can't afford it, but there is an even surer form and that is to limit the number of children and it could start by stiff fines for the parents and jail if needed

paraclete posted on 2016-12-14 17:34:08   Reply   Private Reply


#32: A K A Stone    To: Willie Green (#30)

Trump is a global real estate developer... So tell me how many orphanages has he built?

And how many orphanages were paid for by Goldman Sachs?

It isn't his job. They don't build them anywhere. Maybe the should maybe the shouldn't. Just an idea.

How many people did you vote for that murder these children that you pretend to care for. You don't care. You vote to chop up kids into bloody little pieces. Repent Willie.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-14 17:39:44   Reply   Private Reply


#33: BorisY    To: Willie Green (#30)

When
I
was
in
LA

San
Bernadino
Riverside

25
years
ago

pre
post
Rodney
king
riots

I
was
at
a
private
high
school
graduation

watching
the
future
successful
starting
out
on
their
lives

the
school
principal
was
an
African
American

at
the
previous
time
the
news
media
was
wrattling
on
about
the
cream
of
the
crop
was
getting
killed
off
by
gang
bangers

just
after
that

I
was
at
another
service
in
Hawaii

Where
Dr
Ben
Carson
did
his
life
testimony

Here's
a
quote

by
Vince
Lombardi

The
only
place
success
comes
before
work

is
in
the
dictionary

you
could
say
in
govt
affirmative
action
welfare
too

love
boris

hopefully
these
children
can
be
salvaged

ps

from
liberalism
hate
bigotry
dnc
slavery
too

BorisY posted on 2016-12-14 17:49:28   Reply   Private Reply


#34: Stoner    To: BorisY (#33)

If you ... don't use proper sentence / paragraph format, --- you should't be typeing !!

Stoner posted on 2016-12-14 19:24:09   Reply   Private Reply


#35: paraclete    To: BorisY (#33)

Boris for what ever reason you do this; it is annoying, boring and I, for one, don't read your posts because it is hard to sort out what you are saying

paraclete posted on 2016-12-14 19:27:17   Reply   Private Reply


#36: paraclete    To: A K A Stone, misterwhite (#21)

How about family, friends, neighbors, community and church stepping up?

Tell me, who made it their responsibility? All of those people can help out in an emergency but this is an ongoing problem and not confined to one family so there has to be change and it has to start with the person with their hand out.

The kids will now be taken, should have happened long ago, this women needs to understand that true birth control is keeping your legs shut, by now pregnancy can't be an ideal experience

paraclete posted on 2016-12-14 19:33:37   Reply   Private Reply


#37: rlk    To: Stoner (#34)

BorisY (#33)

If you ... don't use proper sentence / paragraph format, --- you should't be typeing !!

He shouldn't even be here. The stupid attempt at humor and attention-getting is characteristic of a two year old and wears thin after five minutes. This place should be reserved for adults.

rlk posted on 2016-12-14 20:30:51   Reply   Private Reply


#38: rlk    To: misterwhite (#18)

How about family, friends, neighbors, community and church stepping up?

Ten broads like this one would break any church or local community organization in half financially in a week.

rlk posted on 2016-12-14 22:14:21   Reply   Private Reply


#39: BorisY    To: buckeroo, willie chaingang gangrene choo choo (#33)

the
cream
of
the
crop
was
getting
killed
off

oops

the
cream
of
the
crop
* that *
was
getting
killed
off

fixed
it

love
boris

BorisY posted on 2016-12-14 23:26:12   Reply   Private Reply


#40: Fred Mertz    To: BorisY (#39)

Put away the bong, you freak.

Fred Mertz posted on 2016-12-14 23:28:54   Reply   Private Reply


#41: BorisY    To: Fred Mertz (#40)

fred

red

hey

yay

I
get
it

love
boris

BorisY posted on 2016-12-14 23:47:05   Reply   Private Reply


#42: A K A Stone    To: paraclete (#36)

Tell me, who made it their responsibility?

Here is what it amounts to. Man is in a fallen state. We don't have answers for everything. If we all lived as God commanded we wouldn't be talking about this problem.

So maybe there is no solution that is just.

I like when things are just and right.

A K A Stone posted on 2016-12-15 00:19:31   Reply   Private Reply


#43: paraclete    To: A K A Stone (#42)

Here is what it amounts to. Man is in a fallen state

yes and some have made a business out of it. There is no solution that is just for all parties. We have governments because some things are too hard for individuals but noone has an answer for stupid!

paraclete posted on 2016-12-15 01:42:05   Reply   Private Reply


#44: Willie Green    To: Fred Mertz, BorisY (#40)

Put away the bong, you freak.

Willie Green posted on 2016-12-15 09:33:23   Reply   Private Reply


#45: misterwhite    To: rlk (#38)

"Ten broads like this one would break any church or local community organization in half financially in a week."

True. But a church or local community organization would not let it get to that point. Which is the benefit of local vs. federal aid.

Imagine the reaction of the church or local community organization when she walks in and announces pregnancy #2 by an unknown male. Much less pregnancy #15.

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-15 10:48:28   Reply   Private Reply


#46: misterwhite    To: paraclete (#36)

"All of those people can help out in an emergency ..."

And that's all I'm suggesting. People make mistakes and sometimes need help.

But I draw the line after one mistake. Additional pregnancies? You're on your own.

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-15 10:54:38   Reply   Private Reply


#47: Vicomte13    To: A K A Stone (#17)

It's a messy situation. How do you stop a woman from spitting out babies, without just starving the kids?

Orphanages probably are the answer. Run tight, you can get model citizens out of orphanages. Run like the public schools, though, and you end up with a mess.

When our social services start to see the children piling up, it is time to intervene...with benefits based on wearing Norplant, at least.

Vicomte13 posted on 2016-12-15 13:34:33   Reply   Private Reply


#48: Vicomte13    To: A K A Stone (#42)

Here is what it amounts to. Man is in a fallen state. We don't have answers for everything. If we all lived as God commanded we wouldn't be talking about this problem.

So maybe there is no solution that is just.

I like when things are just and right.

You sound like me today.

Vicomte13 posted on 2016-12-15 13:35:34   Reply   Private Reply


#49: rlk    To: misterwhite (#46)

"All of those people can help out in an emergency ..."

And that's all I'm suggesting. People make mistakes and sometimes need help.

The only kind of help that would have worked for her is a good kick in the ass and a trip to a vetrenarian to get spayed many years ago.

rlk posted on 2016-12-15 23:52:49   Reply   Private Reply


#50: misterwhite    To: rlk (#49)

"The only kind of help that would have worked for her is a good kick in the ass and a trip to a vetrenarian to get spayed many years ago."

The one thing these parasitic moochers understand is money. That always seems to get their attention. Let them know the new policy is one mistake only.

Who came up with the existing policy of more money for more kids? That if the mother gets married the funds are cut off? That if the mother gets a job the funds are reduced? That the benefits under welfare are so great that she'd have to gross $60,000 a year just to break even?

misterwhite posted on 2016-12-16 09:54:39   Reply   Private Reply