She has to produce something about a civil war battle. Isn't everybody going to do Gettysburg? A few may do Shiloh or Antietam, or something like that.
I'm thinking of using the last battle that was in Texas a month after Lee surrendered. I'll have to look up the details, but the Union got its ass kicked in this one.
#1: nolu chan To: no gnu taxes (#0)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Palmito_Ranch
The Battle of Palmito Ranch
nolu chan posted on 2016-12-06 15:27:06 Reply Private Reply
#2: Gatlin To: no gnu taxes (#0)
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-06 15:42:05 Reply Private Reply
#3: no gnu taxes To: Gatlin (#2)
no gnu taxes posted on 2016-12-06 15:46:24 Reply Private Reply
#4: nolu chan To: no gnu taxes (#0)
https://www.nps.gov/abpp/battles/tx005.htm
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (NPS)
nolu chan posted on 2016-12-06 15:47:26 Reply Private Reply
#5: no gnu taxes To: nolu chan (#1)
no gnu taxes posted on 2016-12-06 15:50:36 Reply Private Reply
#6: misterwhite To: no gnu taxes (#0)
Probably. But have her do a subset of that battle -- the Battle of Little Round Top.
It's part of the movie Gettysburg and stars Jeff Daniels as Col. Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain.
misterwhite posted on 2016-12-06 15:55:20 Reply Private Reply
#7: nolu chan To: no gnu taxes (#0)
http://www.historynet.com/battle-of-palmetto-ranch-american-civil-wars-final-battle.htm
nolu chan posted on 2016-12-06 16:01:44 Reply Private Reply
#8: nolu chan To: no gnu taxes (#0)
https://www.amazon.com/Last-Battle-Civil-War-Palmetto/dp/0292734611/
The Last Battle of the Civil War: Palmetto Ranch (Clifton and Shirley Caldwell Texas Heritage Series, No. 4) Paperback August 15, 2002
by Jeffrey W. Hunt (Author)
Arrives before Christmas
More than two months after Robert E. Lee surrendered the Army of Northern Virginia on April 9, 1865, the New York Times reported a most surprising piece of news. On May 12-13, the last battle of the Civil War had been fought at the southernmost tip of Texasresulting in a Confederate victory. Although Palmetto Ranch did nothing to change the war's outcome, it added the final irony to a conflict replete with ironies, unexpected successes, and lost opportunities. For these reasons, it has become both one of the most forgotten and most mythologized battles of the Civil War.
In this book, Jeffrey Hunt draws on previously unstudied letters and court martial records to offer a full and accurate account of the battle of Palmetto Ranch. As he recreates the events of the fighting that pitted the United States' 62nd Colored Troops and the 34th Indiana Veteran Volunteer Infantry against Texas cavalry and artillery battalions commanded by Colonel John S. "Rip" Ford, Hunt lays to rest many misconceptions about the battle. In particular, he reveals that the Texans were fully aware of events in the Eastand still willing to fight for Southern independence. He also demonstrates that, far from fleeing the battle in a panic as some have asserted, the African American troops played a vital role in preventing the Union defeat from becoming a rout.
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Jeffrey Wm Hunt is the Director of the Texas Military Forces Museum at Camp Mabry in Austin, Texas.
Start reading The Last Battle of the Civil War on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
New York Times best sellers
Browse the New York Times best sellers in popular categories like Fiction, Nonfiction, Picture Books and more. See more
Product Details
Series: Clifton and Shirley Caldwell Texas Heritage (Book 4)
Paperback: 233 pages
Publisher: University of Texas Press; 1 edition (August 15, 2002)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0292734611
ISBN-13: 978-0292734616
Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,611,576 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
nolu chan posted on 2016-12-06 16:13:44 Reply Private Reply
#9: no gnu taxes To: nolu chan (#8)
no gnu taxes posted on 2016-12-06 16:21:28 Reply Private Reply
#10: nolu chan To: no gnu taxes (#0)
nolu chan posted on 2016-12-06 16:27:29 Reply Private Reply
#11: Vicomte13 To: no gnu taxes (#0)
USS Monitor v. Merrimack (CSS Virginia), after the Virginia tore apart a line of regular US Navy ships - the Battle of Hampton Roads - is an exciting battle that marked the changing of the world.
Also, the Hunley's destruction of the USS Housatonic was the first time in history that a submarine sank an enemy vessel - another world-changing battle.
CSS David's attack on USS New Ironsides, 1863, was the first successful use of a torpedo boat in war.
Battle of Cherbourg - USS Kearsarge sinks CSS Alabama, an infamous commerce raider, after a running fight.
The American Civil War saw the development of a series of naval inventions that changed the way the whole world fought at sea. Ships of the Line, the "wooden ships and iron men" of the British age of sail were no match for the Union or Confederate ironclads.
Consider the problem the French or British would have had had they actually entered the war against the South and brought their proud wooden sailing ships across the Atlantic and tried to force their way into a Confederate port defended by several ironclad Union monitors. The Merrimack (CSS Virginia) sank two Union ships and seriously damaged and drove off a third - and they could do nothing to the ironclad. With time, the CSS Virginia, all by herself, could have send Nelson's whole fleet to the bottom at Trafalgar - the old style ships could not penetrate the armor, and could not outrun the steamship.
Torpedoes and submarines - the South was outnumbered and outgunned, but Southern naval ingenuity cost the Union dearly, and taught the world many things.
So maybe consider a naval battle instead of a land battle.
If you live in a state on the Mississippi, then perhaps a battle such as Island No. 10 - a great river battle - or the Battle of Vicksburg (which had both a land and a naval component) would be interesting.
The naval component of the war: the Anaconda Plan - is what really brought the South to its knees. Had the Union not effectively blockaded the South, the South had the money and cotton to be able to buy as much ammunition and weapons as they needed to arm the whole region, and probably would have not been beatable within any politically acceptable time range.
It was the Navy, really, that cut off the Confederacy from Britain and France, and thereby starved it. The Confederate inventions to try to break the blockade showed a great deal of "'Yankee' Ingenuity" and changed naval warfare forever.
So tell her to stand out by doing some naval battle instead.
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-12-06 16:39:02 Reply Private Reply
#12: Gatlin To: no gnu taxes (#3)
http://www.archives.alabama.gov/referenc/alamilor/6thinf.html .
Gatlin posted on 2016-12-06 16:39:31 Reply Private Reply
#13: goldilucky To: no gnu taxes (#0)
goldilucky posted on 2016-12-06 17:12:30 Reply Private Reply
#14: no gnu taxes To: All (#0)
no gnu taxes posted on 2016-12-06 17:46:45 Reply Private Reply