In August, Dr. Kevin Dutton of Oxford University ranked US president-elect Donald Trump as "above Adolf Hitler" on a standard scale used to measure potential psychopathy in adults, according to the science news site Phys.org (Hillary Clinton scored pretty highly, too).
That sounds like a cheap shot.
But Trump does display some of the symptoms clinicians look for when trying to diagnose psychopaths and sociopaths. (Many psychiatrists and criminologists use the terms interchangeably, but experts disagree on whether the two are meaningfully different.) In fact, most people display some symptoms of psychopathy superficiality, glibness, promiscuous sexual behaviour, etc. and that does not make you a psychopath.
In a political leader, a few psychopathic traits may not be a bad thing: Many of the traits we seek in leaders, such as fearlessness, dominant Behaviour, and immunity to stress, are found in psychopaths. Indeed, psychopaths are found in greater proportions among CEOs. Between 3% and 21% of CEOs are probably psychopaths, according to a study by Bond University psychologist Nathan Brooks. The background rate of psychopathy in the normal population is about 1%.
The standard screening test for potential psychopaths is the Hare Psychopathy Checklist. In the test, a clinician interviews a potential sociopath and scores them on 20 criteria, such as "promiscuous sexual Behavior" or "impulsivity." On each criterion, the subject is ranked on a 3-point scale: (0 = item does not apply, 1 = item applies somewhat, 2 = item definitely applies). The scores are summed to create a rank of zero to 40. Anyone who scores 30 and above is probably a psycho.
The test is supposed to be done by a professional psychologist but if you really want to take it yourself or make a layperson's guess at Trump's psychological makeup Click here to continue!
Poster Comment:
#1: buckeroo To: Willie Green (#0)
What was your score?
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-25 12:00:36 Reply Private Reply
#2: misterwhite To: Willie Green (#0)
"An individual's score may have important consequences for his or her future, and because the potential for harm if the test is used or administered incorrectly is considerable, Hare argues that the test should be considered valid only if administered by a suitably qualified and experienced clinician under scientifically controlled and licensed, standardized conditions."
misterwhite posted on 2016-11-25 13:23:19 Reply Private Reply
#3: Vicomte13 To: Willie Green (#0)
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-11-25 16:25:01 Reply Private Reply
#4: Willie Green To: Vicomte13 (#3)
These are the actual scoring instruction, if you want to be more accurate:
On each criterion, the subject is ranked on a 3-point scale: (0 = item does not apply, 1 = item applies somewhat, 2 = item definitely applies).
Willie Green posted on 2016-11-25 20:41:11 Reply Private Reply
#5: Vicomte13 To: Willie Green (#4)
Vicomte13 posted on 2016-11-25 21:50:19 Reply Private Reply