It didnt take long for President-elect Donald Trump to make his mark on legislation in Congress.Republican leaders announced Thursday they would punt major spending decisions into 2017 in accordance with the incoming administrations wishes. That means Congress plans to pass only a stopgap bill that will fund the federal government through March rather than an omnibus appropriations bill that would set spending priorities for the first eight months of Trumps term.
I think the new incoming government would like to have say-so on how money is going to be spent going into 2017, House Speaker Paul Ryan told reporters at a press conference. Weve got a lot of funding priorities that we would like to have changed relative to the Obama funding priorities. Its as simple as that. Had Hillary Clinton won the presidency, Congress in all likelihood would have pushed harder to strike a big spending agreement in its lame-duck session, a move that would have cleared the way for her to focus on other legislative priorities during her first weeks in office. But Republicans know they will get a better deal with Trump than under President Obama, so they will keep spending levels as they are for another few months by passing a continuing resolution in the next few weeks.
The decision was made after Vice President-elect Mike Pence met with House Republicans on Thursday morning and conveyed the Trump transition teams preference. Its also a victory for conservatives who have fought against passing any major legislation in a lame-duck session, arguing that lawmaking are less accountable to voters when they act after the election but before the new Congress is seated. They were angry last year when Congress passed a $1.1 trillion spending bill just before Christmas with little time for debate. For Ryan, the move additionally serves as political protection against a revolt that could threaten his reelection as speaker. While Republicans unanimously nominated him as their leader on Tuesday, a number of conservative members of the House Freedom Caucus warned that if Ryan either tried to pass an omnibus spending bill or approve the Trans-Pacific Partnership in the lame-duck session, they would vote against him during the formal House vote for speaker in early January. Both of those measures are now dead for the year.
The drawback for Trump is that he will now have to spend time and political capital on a debate over federal spending during his first months in office, at a time when he will be trying to get other items on his agenda through Congress. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi warned Republicans they might come to regret that decision. I think theyre making a big mistake for themselves, she said at her own press conference. Theyre going to have a kettle of fish in March that they cant even imagine.
Yet Republicans might have another reason for kicking the spending fight in 2017: It could allow them to roll back more regulations enacted by the Obama administration. Under the Congressional Review Act, the House and Senate can nullify major regulations with a simple majority vote if they act within 60 legislative days of the rules enactment. Simply passing a stopgap spending bill now would likely lead the GOP to adjourn Congress a few weeks earlier than planned. And that would stop the legislative clock and allow the House and Senate in January to repeal regulations that went into effect earlier in 2016. (Because Congress was out of session so often this year, the window of 60 legislative days already stretches back to May.) According to an analysis by the conservative American Action Forum, Republicans would already be able to nullify 48 major regulations in January if Congress does not adjourn early, including rules expanding overtime pay, restricting personal drone use, curtailing drilling in the Arctic Shelf, and mandating significant changes to regulations on food labeling.
The GOPs decision on Thursday, in other words, could have ramifications far beyond congressional spending.
I was wondering how 0bama is handling all this stuff?
#16: Gatlin To: Deckard (#11)
Specifically, by doing what?
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-18 23:05:06 Reply Private Reply
#17: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#12)
Nah, I suspect they will be laughing their ass off at your unfounded reason for being more nervous about this nation's future than ever before.
I know that I will
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-18 23:11:47 Reply Private Reply
#18: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#14)
I am starting to worry about you, tater. I am starting to wring my hands, in a cold sweat anymore and in tremendous tension because of, "Trump phenomena." Trump rambleness is included within the discussion, too. And, I guess it may not be all Trump's fault either. I think you caused the phenomena.
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-18 23:11:58 Reply Private Reply
#19: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#18)
Put your worry aside for just a moment and: List some of the specific rambles that cause you to be more nervous about this nation's future than ever before.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-18 23:14:58 Reply Private Reply
#20: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#18)
Visceral Fear -
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-18 23:20:00 Reply Private Reply
#21: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#19)
Because you wear, "TRUMPER_ETTE" across your sweater while riding a battery powered scooter with three wheels in an old foggie's home? BTW, you have to lower your skirt lines or yukon will search for you, again.
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-18 23:20:18 Reply Private Reply
#22: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#21)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-18 23:22:56 Reply Private Reply
#23: Gatlin To: Buckeroo (#20)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-18 23:26:20 Reply Private Reply
#24: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#23)
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-18 23:27:37 Reply Private Reply
#25: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#24)
"I'll Make America Great Again."
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-18 23:43:04 Reply Private Reply
#26: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#24)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-18 23:44:54 Reply Private Reply
#27: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#26)
He is full of "hot-aire." You are almost up to his nausiating crap level, too.
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-18 23:47:18 Reply Private Reply
#28: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#27)
Really?
You are saying that a person who boasts about actual achievements makes you more nervous about this nation's future than ever before.
Seriously?
Okay, then exactly which of his actual achievements that he brags about makes you more nervous about this nation's future than ever before?
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 04:47:05 Reply Private Reply
#29: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#21)
Your adolescent sophomoric ill-humored comment did nothing to show a list of the specific rambles that cause you to be more nervous about this nation's future than ever before.
Why cant you do that?
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 06:24:39 Reply Private Reply
#30: GrandIsland To: Gatlin (#15)
No need to be afraid if you are LEGAL RESIDENT, you WORK, you aren't a drug user, criminal, anarchist or a Timmy McViegh wanna-be.... then you should love TRUMP.
GrandIsland posted on 2016-11-19 10:12:22 Reply Private Reply
#31: buckeroo To: GrandIsland (#30)
Are you insane? That is no reason to love Trump.
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-19 10:14:12 Reply Private Reply
#32: Gatlin To: buckeroo, GrandIsland (#31)
Hey, asshole....there are many reasons to love Trump.
The biggest of which, is we will not be seeing this for the next 4 years:
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 10:27:47 Reply Private Reply
#33: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#32)
You don't know that. Trump could change his mind and hire Clinton for Secretary of State because she is so experienced.
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-19 10:32:31 Reply Private Reply
#34: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#11)
Muslims are by definition evil. They should leave the country or be prosecuted by Trump. Just for being a muslim.
A K A Stone posted on 2016-11-19 10:38:03 Reply Private Reply
#35: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#29)
There are lots of folks who fear Obama because of his policies and some even hate him because of his race, but all were able to explain their reasons, yet you cannot even basically explain why you are literally afraid of Trump on a visceral level as if a monster is already in house and you dont know where it is hiding.
You have such a high level visceral fear of Trump and yet I feel no fear of Trump .not even one iota. Trump has always looked like the safest candidate in this election cycle, although I dont share his politics on a few topics. So I have to continually ask myself: Why do I have zero fear of Trump while you are operating in full panic mode?
Should I be more afraid too? I have my reasons to believe my reaction to Trump is more accurate yours and if you would only explain your reaction .then maybe I can understand you. Im not generally immune to fear when it is real so this is a bit of a puzzle to me. Lets see if we can discuss it a bit.
For a starter, do you fear Trumps position on social programs? Trump hasnt made much noise about cutting social programs. So, is this your problem .is your fear coming from that? It would be odd if it were because most people think Trump would be a great choice for the economy and a strong economy keeps the social programs intact. So, is it that you see Trumps position on social programs to be a problem and the basis for the fear that makes you more nervous about this nation's future than ever before?
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 10:43:54 Reply Private Reply
#36: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#33)
That is just an absolutely utterly insane statement .here, check to see if this fits:
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 10:53:04 Reply Private Reply
#37: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#29)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 10:57:03 Reply Private Reply
#38: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#37)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 11:07:16 Reply Private Reply
#39: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#38)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 11:12:45 Reply Private Reply
#40: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#39)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 11:26:51 Reply Private Reply
#41: Deckard To: buckeroo (#24)
Exactly his meeting with Obama was to tell Trump he is not to prosecute Clinton - he made a deal.
Kind of like what Bill Hicks said about becoming President.
I have this feeling man, 'cause you know, it's just a handful of people who run everything, you know that's true, it's provable. It's not I'm not a fucking conspiracy nut, it's provable.
A handful, a very small elite, run and own these corporations, which include the mainstream media. I have this feeling that whoever is elected president, like Clinton was, no matter what you promise on the campaign trail blah, blah, blah when you win, you go into this smoke-filled room with the twelve industrialist capitalist scum-fucks who got you in there.
And you're in this smoky room, and this little film screen comes down and a big guy with a cigar goes, "Roll the film." And it's a shot of the Kennedy assassination from an angle you've never seen before that looks suspiciously like it's from the grassy knoll.
And then the screen goes up and the lights come up, and they go to the new president, "Any questions?"
"Er, just what my agenda is."
"First we bomb Baghdad."
"You got it "
Deckard posted on 2016-11-19 11:53:30 Reply Private Reply
#42: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#41)
You're making stuff up and talking out your ass. Druggies aren't honest.
A K A Stone posted on 2016-11-19 12:00:31 Reply Private Reply
#43: Deckard To: A K A Stone (#42)
Come on man, get serious - Trump will NEVER prosecute Clinton, that isn't how politics works in D.C.
Deckard posted on 2016-11-19 12:03:13 Reply Private Reply
#44: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#43)
A K A Stone posted on 2016-11-19 12:04:32 Reply Private Reply
#45: Deckard To: A K A Stone (#44)
How old are you anyways, 12?
Deckard posted on 2016-11-19 12:08:02 Reply Private Reply
#46: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#40)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 12:18:14 Reply Private Reply
#47: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#46)
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-19 12:28:41 Reply Private Reply
#48: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#47)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 12:50:21 Reply Private Reply
#49: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#47)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 13:18:09 Reply Private Reply
#50: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#47)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 13:29:14 Reply Private Reply
#51: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#50)
God Bless America .and Long Live President-Elect Donald Trump!
Lets stand and join with Lee Greenwood now in singing God Bless the U.S.A. .
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 13:38:13 Reply Private Reply
#52: Fred Mertz To: Deckard (#45)
More likely 10.
Fred Mertz posted on 2016-11-19 13:51:30 Reply Private Reply
#53: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#51)
Because of Trump?
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-19 14:02:29 Reply Private Reply
#54: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, shoveling the bull, golden spoon (#50)
Trump steer manure, BS!
Hondo68 posted on 2016-11-19 14:14:54 Reply Private Reply
#55: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#53)
No because it is Saturday and I want you to do the one-leg standardized field sobriety test to see if you fall flat on you face.
You have said that you get shit-faced on Saturday and over the weekend
Did you pass .oh well, its still early in the day!
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 14:22:05 Reply Private Reply
#56: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#54)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 14:24:10 Reply Private Reply
#57: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#55)
Here is your earlier post:
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-19 14:25:56 Reply Private Reply
#58: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#57)
I am never worried about you....I only want to laugh at you.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 14:45:18 Reply Private Reply
#59: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#57)
My Post #55 is unedited .it is exactly the same as this one you say: Here is your earlier post:
WTF are you talking about, shit for brains .try doing the one-leg-stand using the other leg and see if that works better for you.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 14:52:57 Reply Private Reply
#60: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#59)
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-19 15:03:23 Reply Private Reply
#61: Gatlin To: buckeroo (#60)
WTF are you talking about, shit for brains .
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 15:17:56 Reply Private Reply
#62: calcon To: Gatlin (#61)
that quote says it all
calcon posted on 2016-11-19 15:46:16 Reply Private Reply
#63: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, inner Mohammad triggered, McCain Republicans, *Arab Spring Jihad* (#56)
LOL
Don't hold back, tell us how you really feel Mohammad.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-11-19 16:35:55 Reply Private Reply
#64: Gatlin To: calcon (#62)
Yes, it does....says it all.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-19 17:09:40 Reply Private Reply
#65: A K A Stone To: Deckard (#45)
Why would Trump have to make a deal? Do you think he has to ask Obama for permission for something? Do you think Obama has something to offer?
Tell me what Obama could Obama possibly offer Trump for any kind of deal on any subject in the universe.
You really showed yourself not only to make stuff up but to have a very active imagination. Were you tripping on shrooms?
A K A Stone posted on 2016-11-19 20:42:46 Reply Private Reply