As the insane circus act that is the 2016 election cycle comes to a head, Americans are playing right into the establishments plan of divide so that they can be conquered. 2016 is proving to be the year that America has lost its collective mind.
On November 8th, Americans will go to the polls and decide to cast their vote for a megalomaniacal flip-flopping establishment cozying crony or a murderous war criminal controlled by Soros and Rothschild.
Having failed to effectively support a third party candidate, America, once again, will be forced to choose between the lesser of two evils.
While peaceful militias are certainly healthy for protecting the citizens from the violence of a rogue state, a report out of Reuters shows that militias are now preparing to act if their statist doesnt win.
As Reuters reports, camouflaged members of the Three Percent Security Force have mobilized for rifle practice, hand-to-hand combat training and an impromptu campaign rally for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
A well-regulated militia is supposed to protect people from the state not fight for a political candidate.
This is the last chance to save America from ruin, Chris Hill, a paralegal who goes by the code name Bloodagent, told Reuters. Im surprised I was able to survive or suffer through eight years of Obama without literally going insane, but Hillary is going to be more of the same.
While the latter part of that statement is correct, Hill is missing the target widely if he thinks Trump will change anything. As Ron Paul said when Alex Jones attempted to trick him into supporting Trump, Donald Trump would be the champion of the executive order.
How many people are voting for Trump? Ooh-rah! asks Hill.
Ooh-rah! shouts back a dozen militia members.
As the most divisive presidential election in recent memory nears its conclusion, some armed militia groups are preparing for the possibility of a stolen election on Nov. 8 and civil unrest in the days following a victory by Democrat Hillary Clinton, reports Reuters.
Hillary Clinton would likely attempt to disarm Americans if she is elected. But Donald Trump is certainly no champion of the second Amendment either as he and Clinton both agree on the illegal and due process-removing notion of banning people on the terror watch list from buying guns.
No one is advocating that terrorists should have guns, but using an arbitrary list that people have no way of disputing to strip them of their rights is not only inefficient, but it is against the constitution. Where are the constitutionalists on this call by Trump?
I will be there to render assistance to my fellow countrymen, and prevent them from being disarmed, and I will fight and I will kill and I may die in the process, said Hill, as he conveniently ignores Trumps anti-second amendment stance.
Protecting his fellow countrymen from a government who wishes to disarm them is most certainly an honorable stance. However, this stance should be universally applied and uncompromised even if it means not supporting Donald Trump.
If Trump loses, Im grabbing my musket, former Illinois Representative Joe Walsh wrote on Twitter last week. But, if Trump wins, Walsh could be stripped of his second amendment with no due process when he gets put on a terror watch list.
.@KevinBuist If a person is a suspected terrorist, then charge him and present evidence. "Potential" is punished only in dystopian novels.
Justin Amash (@justinamash) June 16, 2016
Weve been building up for this, just like the Marines, said Hill. We are going to really train harder and try to increase our operational capabilities in the event that this is the day that we hoped would never come.
Unfortunately, as long as people are willing to compromise on their principles to fight for the lesser of two evils, that day will most certainly come and Trump will do nothing to stop it.
The good news is the three percenters seem to have the interests of the people in mind and Hill vowed to protect those who want to exercise their first Amendment by marching on Washington to protest in the event of a rigged election.
As weve already pointed out, Clintons only chance of winning is doing exactly that rigging the election.
Beginning in Iowa and eventually getting blown wide open in Arizona, the fraud and suppression of votes have already let Americans know that their rulers are selected not elected.
Examples of this fraud were captured on video, documented on paper, and even broadcast live on television.
A rigged election is almost a certainty and should most definitely be resisted. However, as long as Americans continue to buy into the political shitshow, that is the two-party paradigm, it will only continue to get worse no matter the puppets in white marble buildings.



#25: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#21)
I see that you are still pimping for gay politicians.
Oh, well ...
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 21:46:01 Reply Private Reply
#26: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#12)
Oh?
Just what is the age requirement to be a member of the militia you allege that you and I are in?
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 21:52:56 Reply Private Reply
#27: Gatlin To: Deckard, Hondo68 (#15)
According to the Militia Act of 1903, there is an age requirement to be a member of the unorganized militia.
What is that age?
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 22:10:51 Reply Private Reply
#28: Deckard To: Gatlin, hondo68, buckeroo (#24)
Yep - that pretty much tells me all I need to know about your brand of "conservatism".
Deckard posted on 2016-11-04 22:45:32 Reply Private Reply
#29: Gatlin To: Deckard (#28)
Yep - But it does not tell you about the brand of "liberalism" his Democratic opponent represents.
Just like I voted for Donald Trump to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House....I voted for John McCain to keep liberal Ann Kirkpatrick out of the Senate.
You should be most grateful for my efforts for partly keeping the Senate from going to the extreme far left. But then, I realize that you don't have sense enough to appreciate anything except anarchy and cop-haters.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 23:03:25 Reply Private Reply
#30: Deckard To: Gatlin (#29)
Oh man - you can't get any more left than McCain.
Good grief!
Deckard posted on 2016-11-04 23:05:49 Reply Private Reply
#31: Gatlin To: Deckard (#30)
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you even know who Ann Kirkpatrick is?
The more you post....the dumber you get.
Geezze ...
Edit: Besides, Ann would support Hillary's SCOTUS nominations if they both win.
Think ahead....at least sometime. Oh, I just remembered, you can't.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 23:09:53 Reply Private Reply
#32: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#31)
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-04 23:14:39 Reply Private Reply
#33: buckeroo To: Gatlintater (#32)
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-04 23:21:40 Reply Private Reply
#34: Gatlin To: Deckard (#15)
According to the Militia Act of 1903, there is an age requirement to be a member of the unorganized militia.
What is that age?
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 23:22:41 Reply Private Reply
#35: buckeroo To: Gatlin (#34)
buckeroo posted on 2016-11-04 23:25:02 Reply Private Reply
#36: goldilucky To: Gatlin (#16)
And since you mention that the government did admit they made a grievous mistake, did they ever compensate the Weaver family?
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 00:27:41 Reply Private Reply
#37: goldilucky To: Gatlin (#34)
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25119439?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 00:30:48 Reply Private Reply
#38: goldilucky To: Gatlin (#13)
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 00:33:23 Reply Private Reply
#39: goldilucky To: hondo68 (#21)
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 00:36:25 Reply Private Reply
#40: Deckard To: goldilucky (#37)
During the Revolution of 1776, Militiamen were adult white males from small towns throughout North America; since the end of the French and Indian War in 1763, all adult males between fifteen and 60 had to enroll in their local militia company.
If the Mel Gibson movie "The Patriot" is accurate, there were kids younger than that.
War in The American Revolution
Deckard posted on 2016-11-05 00:50:54 Reply Private Reply
#41: goldilucky To: Deckard (#40)
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 00:55:31 Reply Private Reply
#42: Gatlin To: goldilucky (#36)
But since you asked .Yes, they were compensated to the tune of $3.1 million taxpayers dollars.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 05:49:40 Reply Private Reply
#43: Roscoe To: goldilucky (#39)
Either maliciously or stupidly. Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that it was merely stupidity on John's part.
What a frigging pigeon! All ISIS had to do get our taxpayers' funding was briefly pretend that they were more moderate than the other terrorist groups. I can imagine the ISIS start-up planning session.
"Seriously, I'm not kidding. All we gotta do to get free military weapons and millions in cash, that we can use to buy sex slaves and child brides, is to smile and not behead anyone during during the visit." --Mohammed (no, I don't know which one)
Roscoe posted on 2016-11-05 05:54:45 Reply Private Reply
#44: Gatlin To: goldilucky (#37)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 06:24:52 Reply Private Reply
#45: Gatlin To: goldilucky (#38)
Your memory is either faulty or your source was wrong. Vicki Weaver was shot in the head while holding the baby. The baby was not shot.Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 06:31:14 Reply Private Reply
#46: Gatlin To: Deckard, goldilucky (#40)
Washington wrote: I am wearied to death all day with a variety of perplexing circumstances, disturbed at the conduct of the militia, whose behavior and want of discipline has done great injury to the other troops, who never had officers, except in a few instances, worth the bread they eat. I never was in such an unhappy, divided state since I was born. [Boldness Added].
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 06:57:06 Reply Private Reply
#47: Gatlin To: goldilucky (#41)
Yes, able-bodied does mean just that and that is not the issue. Neither is the issue what the Israeli children are taught, the question is the age requirement to be a member of the American unauthorized militia.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 07:03:27 Reply Private Reply
#48: Gatlin To: goldilucky (#6)
Book Definition:
The New York Times (5/10/95) states:
The laws clearly distinguish paramilitary groups from Boy Scouts and hunting clubs organized for lawful purposes. They have been used to stop the KKK and other white supremacist organizations in the early 80's, and against the Texas Emergency Reserve in 1982. States without anti-militia OR anti-paramilitary laws are: Hawaii, Alaska, Utah, S.Dakota, Wisconsin, Ohio, Vermont, Delaware. [This list is not definitive - check your own state law]The state laws fall into a number of categories. Some states have no laws regarding unauthorized military groups. Some, such as Connecticut, require the groups to register with the state and annually file a membership list. Others ban unauthorized military organizations regardless of the purpose of the organization. Some states only ban these organizations if the purpose of the group is meant to or likely to produce civil disorder. Many of these same states prohibit parading by unauthorized armed groups through towns or cities.
Here is a listing of the statutory sources for each state law.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 08:20:19 Reply Private Reply
#49: Gatlin To: goldilucky, hondo68, nolu chan, A K A Stone (#39)
Had you searched for the truth, you would have found this:
The photo was taken in May 2013, while Mccain was on a trip to northern Syria, where he met with members of the Free Syrian Army (FSA). The picture shows McCain posing with members of the FSA .not ISIS. Hondo is of the Hillary Clinton School of Hide and Deceive as he works through the back door to get her elected. Hondo believes he can post a photo of McCain with a members of the FSA and call them ISIS terrorists. Hondo posted just another of his MANY lies.
McCain went to northern Syria to meet with the FSA in an attempt to secure help for the FSA, an opposition group founded in 2011 during the Syrian Civil War with the intent of bringing down the government of Syrian president Bashar Hafez al-Assad. (This is what you should thank McCain for). Reports after McCains visit indicated that elements of the FSA were both battling ISIS militants and some were defecting to ISIS. That prompted liberal propagandizing idiots (hondo included) to begin the online circulation of the photograph from McCain's Syrian visit along with rumors that the McCain had posed for photographs "with ISIS militants." In particular, the photograph posted by Hondo is alleged to show McCain posing with Abu Bakr al- Baghdadi, the 1st Emir (and later the leader) of ISIS .the individual circled in red.
Those in the know would quickly realize that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was extremely unlikely to have been hanging around an FSA stronghold posing for photographs with an American politician in May 2013, and the person seen in the background of the above-displayed photograph (identified with a red circle) bears only a passing resemblance to al-Baghdadi, who in recent years has always sported a full beard. The individual circled in red has no full beard.
Moreover, as the New York Times reported, the "ISIS leader" seen in the photograph with Senator McCain was actually the commander of another Syrian rebel group allied with the FSA, not al-Baghdadi.
You can now either believe Hondo, believe me, check out sources to form your own objective conclusion .or just say: Screw It!
McCain can be blamed for a number of political positions that may be disagreeable, but no one should be allowed to irresponsibly post false and misleading information lies to promote their self-serving warped agenda.Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 14:15:19 Reply Private Reply
#50: goldilucky To: Gatlin (#49)
You are correct, Gatlin. I have found the truth and I am free from all the lies. And its right out of McCain's home state.
https://public.isishq.com/public/about/default.aspx
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 14:52:49 Reply Private Reply
#51: nolu chan To: Gatlin, goldilucky (#48)
FEDERAL LAW
http://law.justia.com/codes/us/2012/title-10/subtitle-a/part-i/chapter-13/section-311/
http://law.justia.com/codes/us/2012/title-10/subtitle-a/part-i/chapter-13/section-312/
nolu chan posted on 2016-11-05 15:01:13 Reply Private Reply
#52: goldilucky To: Gatlin (#42)
This is not the America I was taught. That White House, before it had that fence, was open to the public and people could freely correspond with their representatives and president. Not anymore. I've even noticed since the early nineties, that after the Ruby Ridge standoff, that our police force was turned into a professional standing army. This is EXACTLY why Title 10 Sec 311 (b)(2) applies because it was installed to protect the common folk from professional standing armies used by a corrupt government to attack on its own citizenry and constituents.
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 15:03:03 Reply Private Reply
#53: goldilucky To: nolu chan (#51)
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 15:05:08 Reply Private Reply
#54: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, tater, cat ladies, Hillarys Harpies, Lying Canaries, *Arab Spring Jihad* (#49)
Snopes = Cat Lady who finds progressive propaganda lies, through Google searches.
The same method used by the neonazi left wing-nut Gatlin! SPLC, ADL, SubvertedNation, and now Snopes!
John McCain Caught Again! Senator Photographed With ISIS Chief
John McCain has been caught red handed yet again, this time with ISIS terrorist leaders in Syria.
Senator McCain has courted controversy previously after a laptop belonging to one of his staffers was hacked, and a staged ISIS beheading was found in it.
This time photos have surfaced (which were previously broadcast worldwide) in which the Senator is hanging out with the same individuals who are allegedly causing trouble in Iraq and Syria.
Its pretty bad when Al Arabiya, a Muslim Middle East news paper, makes fun of your statement that you can identify the good guys in Syria. It is another to get caught in the middle of funding, being filmed, and photographed with a terrorist organization. It seems John McCain either is a traitor, as his fellow Veterans from Vietnam call him, or he cant tell a moderate rebel from the ISIS leader, who was also filmed with McCain despite the multi-million dollar contract on his head.
Lets take a look at who he was photographed with shall we?
ISIS Terrorist Muahmmad Noor
According to Al Arabiya, a man identified as Muahmmad Noor can be seen a member of the militant brigade. It gets even better with the next series.
Senator John McCain with ISIS Chief Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi (circled left) and terrorist Muahmmad Noor (circled right).
John McCain speaking with ISIS chief Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi (aka Elliot Shimon) circled in red!
The last photo is courtesy of our own CNN, who photographed the man talking to John McCain face to face. If anyone is having trouble recognizing this man, Ill give you a big hint. When they let him out of an Iraq prison in 2009, he said, Ill see you in New York.
Simon Elliot (Elliot Shimon) aka Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi is a Mossad agent.
John McCain, Conductor of the "Arab Spring" and the Caliph
Hondo68 posted on 2016-11-05 15:33:51 Reply Private Reply
#55: Deckard To: hondo68, Gatlin (#54)
Unethical Website Of The Month: Bye-Bye Snopes Youre Dead To Me Now [UPDATED 10/12/2016]
Deckard posted on 2016-11-05 15:55:46 Reply Private Reply
#56: nolu chan To: goldilucky (#53)
The original age requirement was 18 to less than 45. Originally, only white citizens were included.
The Militia Act of 1792 did not exist when the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791, and said Militia Act was repealed and replaced in 1795.
At the time of the Framing and ratification of the Bill of Rights, the militia was viewed as a force for the people to defend against potential future usurpations of the federal government.
Madison, Federalist 46, re the Militia
The Militia Act of May 8, 1792
(repealed and replaced 1795).nolu chan posted on 2016-11-05 16:05:17 Reply Private Reply
#57: Gatlin To: nolu chan, Goldilucky, hondo68, Deckard (#51)
Thanks, I have seen the age requirement to be a member of the unauthorized militia a number of times, including here on this thread: Post #6 - goldilucky posted on 2016-11-04 13:45:19 ET.
I couldnt understand why Goldilucky did not know the age requirement since she had clearly posted that information. Oh well
Anyway, I was primarily poking fun at hondo68 and Deckard because the information was already posted on this thread and yet in displaying their stupidity while failing to keep up on a discussion they are partaking in, they insisted they are members of the unauthorized militia and even tried to erroneously include me in it. I knew that I was not eligible to be a member.
While I was not eligible to be a member of the unauthorized militia after passing age 45 .as a retired Air Force officer, I was however eligible to be recalled to active duty under the provisions of 10 U.S. Code § 688 until I attained the age of 60.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 16:17:05 Reply Private Reply
#58: nolu chan To: Gatlin, Goldilucky, hondo68, Deckard (#57)
Technicality - should be unorganized militia. It is very authorized.
nolu chan posted on 2016-11-05 16:26:25 Reply Private Reply
#59: goldilucky To: Gatlin, hondo68, Deckard, nolu chan (#57)
I was unsure what the age requirement was but thanks to nolu chan that has been answered.
However, I disagree that after age 45 one is not eligible as it does says in in the Second Amendment, "able-bodied" citizens. Deckard and hondo68 are correct when they include you. We are all members of the militia. However, the other class is recognized as (yourself) the professional army which is under control of the state governors as directed by the President of the U.S.
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 16:30:00 Reply Private Reply
#60: goldilucky To: nolu chan (#58)
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 16:32:57 Reply Private Reply
#61: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#54)
You are trying to tell everyone that we am suppose to believe it when some bloggers claim that two of the rebel leaders seen in the photos with McCain look very much like leaders of the Islamic State: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and Muahmmad Noor."
It has been claimed by a number of people that I look like Gregory Peck.
Wait, let me post a picture like your bloggers did.
Whatta you think?
You and Deckard need to stay off of whatever it is that causes you to hallucinate and think irrationally.
Believe a claim from some bloggers?
ROTFLAMO
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 17:02:10 Reply Private Reply
#62: nolu chan To: goldilucky, Gatlin, hondo68, Deckard (#59)
No, this is just wrong, and Gatlin is correct.
Federal law defines who is a member of the militia.
We are not all members of the militia.
It is not like we join. By Federal law, the militia is composed of able-bodied males at least 17 years old and less than 45 years old and female members of the National Guard.
I am not in the militia, and not eligible for recall to active duty. After 20 years active duty, and 10 years in the Fleet Reserve (inactive reserve), I transferred to the retired rolls. I believe Gatlin is similarly situated and is not in the militia. If one cannot legally be conscripted to active duty, one is not in the militia.
It is not like joining a club. It is basically a legal definition of who is eligible for the draft.
nolu chan posted on 2016-11-05 17:07:49 Reply Private Reply
#63: Gatlin To: nolu chan (#58)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 17:19:02 Reply Private Reply
#64: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, tater tot, *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars* (#63)
Pull yourself up by the bootstraps son, you're in the Unorganized Militia!
The correct term for you is, Maggot.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-11-05 18:07:13 Reply Private Reply
#65: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#54)
Its not like the same smell test that you and Deckard would die to perform on Hillary.
I am talking about a REAL political smell test.
The Democratic Party is pumping MEGA BUCKS into advertising for John McCains Democratic opponent here in Arizona. There have been some atrociously negative ads by Ann Kirkpatrick against McCain. But at NO time has she ONCE ever mentioned in any way his alleged meeting with ISIS leaders in northern Syria.
If there had been one iota of evidence that such a meeting had occurred, I can assure that Ann Kirkpatrick and the Dim Party would have plastered those pictures on statewide TV channels all day long every day .and they would have been effective. There has NOT been ONE time it has ever been mentioned .EVER.
So, since Ann Kirkpatrick will not show those pictures or even mention the alleged meeting happening and thereby giving absolutely no credence to your conspiracy theory .just how in the Hell do you ever expect anyone, except your fellow CTers and anti-government haters, to believe for one minute it happened? You CANT
You may or course continue to nurture the conspiracy blogposts, social media and photo-altering tricks while trying to promote the false rumors of McCains relationship with ISIS .in the meantime, I am moving on.
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 18:07:22 Reply Private Reply
#66: Gatlin To: goldilucky (#52)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 18:20:48 Reply Private Reply
#67: Gatlin To: goldilucky (#52)
Will you please explain the meaning of this to me if you understand it?
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 18:26:24 Reply Private Reply
#68: Gatlin To: hondo68 (#64)
Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 18:36:41 Reply Private Reply
#69: Deckard To: nolu chan (#62)
When the SHTF, your federal "definitions" won't mean squat.
When "Federal Law defines" that no firearm is allowed for civilian use, I'm sure you be a good little slave and turn in your neighbors who own guns.
What a stooge!
Deckard posted on 2016-11-05 19:54:36 Reply Private Reply
#70: Deckard To: hondo68 (#54)
Deckard posted on 2016-11-05 19:59:57 Reply Private Reply
#71: Hondo68 To: Gatlin, verified by Snopes (#68)
Hondo68 posted on 2016-11-05 20:28:40 Reply Private Reply
#72: nolu chan To: Deckard (#69)
When shit becomes brains, I am sure you will become a towering genius.
Your bullshit will never mean squat.
I am not the blithering idiot who professes belief in this nonsense:
nolu chan posted on 2016-11-06 00:35:36 Reply Private Reply
#73: nolu chan To: hondo68, Gatlin (#71)
nolu chan posted on 2016-11-06 00:36:54 Reply Private Reply
#74: goldilucky To: Gatlin (#66)
The commoners are on their own. www.firearmsandliberty.com/kasler-protection.html
goldilucky posted on 2016-11-06 01:06:44 Reply Private Reply