Armed Militias Prepping for Violence if Clinton Wins in “Stolen Election”

Source: Free Thought Project
Published: Nov 3, 2016
Author: Matt Agorist
Post Date: 2016-11-04 07:25:59 by Deckard
Views: 33633

As the insane circus act that is the 2016 election cycle comes to a head, Americans are playing right into the establishment’s plan of divide so that they can be conquered. 2016 is proving to be the year that America has lost its collective mind.

On November 8th, Americans will go to the polls and decide to cast their vote for a megalomaniacal flip-flopping establishment cozying crony or a murderous war criminal controlled by Soros and Rothschild.

Having failed to effectively support a third party candidate, America, once again, will be forced to choose between the lesser of two evils.

While peaceful militias are certainly healthy for protecting the citizens from the violence of a rogue state, a report out of Reuters shows that militias are now preparing to act if their statist doesn’t win.

militia-2_0

As Reuters reports, “camouflaged members of the Three Percent Security Force have mobilized for rifle practice, hand-to-hand combat training – and an impromptu campaign rally for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.”

A well-regulated militia is supposed to protect people from the state — not fight for a political candidate.

“This is the last chance to save America from ruin,” Chris Hill, a paralegal who goes by the code name “Bloodagent,” told Reuters. “I’m surprised I was able to survive or suffer through eight years of Obama without literally going insane, but Hillary is going to be more of the same.”

While the latter part of that statement is correct, Hill is missing the target widely if he thinks Trump will change anything. As Ron Paul said when Alex Jones attempted to trick him into supporting Trump, “Donald Trump would be the champion of the executive order.”

“How many people are voting for Trump? Ooh-rah!” asks Hill.

“Ooh-rah!” shouts back a dozen militia members.

militia

As the most divisive presidential election in recent memory nears its conclusion, some armed militia groups are preparing for the possibility of a stolen election on Nov. 8 and civil unrest in the days following a victory by Democrat Hillary Clinton, reports Reuters.

Hillary Clinton would likely attempt to disarm Americans if she is elected. But Donald Trump is certainly no champion of the second Amendment either as he and Clinton both agree on the illegal and due process-removing notion of banning people on the terror watch list from buying guns.

No one is advocating that terrorists should have guns, but using an arbitrary list that people have no way of disputing to strip them of their rights is not only inefficient, but it is against the constitution. Where are the constitutionalists on this call by Trump?

“I will be there to render assistance to my fellow countrymen, and prevent them from being disarmed, and I will fight and I will kill and I may die in the process,” said Hill, as he conveniently ignores Trump’s anti-second amendment stance.

Protecting his fellow countrymen from a government who wishes to disarm them is most certainly an honorable stance. However, this stance should be universally applied and uncompromised — even if it means not supporting Donald Trump.

“If Trump loses, I’m grabbing my musket,” former Illinois Representative Joe Walsh wrote on Twitter last week. But, if Trump wins, Walsh could be stripped of his second amendment with no due process when he gets put on a terror watch list.

“We’ve been building up for this, just like the Marines,” said Hill. “We are going to really train harder and try to increase our operational capabilities in the event that this is the day that we hoped would never come.”

militia

Unfortunately, as long as people are willing to compromise on their principles to fight for the lesser of two evils, that day will most certainly come and Trump will do nothing to stop it.

The good news is the three percenters seem to have the interests of the people in mind and Hill vowed to protect those who want to exercise their first Amendment by marching on Washington to protest in the event of a rigged election.

As we’ve already pointed out, Clinton’s only chance of winning is doing exactly that — rigging the election.

Beginning in Iowa and eventually getting blown wide open in Arizona, the fraud and suppression of votes have already let Americans know that their rulers are selected not elected.

Examples of this fraud were captured on video, documented on paper, and even broadcast live on television.

A rigged election is almost a certainty and should most definitely be resisted. However, as long as Americans continue to buy into the political shitshow, that is the two-party paradigm, it will only continue to get worse — no matter the puppets in white marble buildings.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: U don't know me    To: Deckard (#0)

A rigged election is almost a certainty and should most definitely be resisted.

How?

U don't know me posted on 2016-11-04 08:11:01   Reply   Private Reply


#2: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#0)

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 08:13:50   Reply   Private Reply


#3: TrappedInMd    To: Deckard (#0)

While peaceful militias are certainly healthy for protecting the citizens from the violence of a rogue state, a report out of Reuters shows that militias are now preparing to act if their statist doesn’t win.

Act? Like go on twitter and complain about it?

TrappedInMd posted on 2016-11-04 09:14:22   Reply   Private Reply


#4: Gatlin    To: TrappedInMd, Deckard (#3)

Act?

Militia is a misnomer that should never be used to categorize these nefarious groups.

They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”

Just like the Paultard libertarian assholes who attempt to occupy limited space on LF, all these hoodlums do is “huff” while they never have any “puff.” They both just make noisy empty statements with no empirical support.

They think that expressing themselves in a loud, aggressive, and indignant way will have some some effect….but in the end, bluster is all they have.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 11:51:23   Reply   Private Reply


#5: nolu chan    To: TrappedInMd (#3)

Act? Like go on twitter and complain about it?

Go out in the woods, drink, smoke, belch, fart, and shoot some trees.

nolu chan posted on 2016-11-04 12:06:33   Reply   Private Reply


#6: goldilucky    To: Gatlin (#4)

They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”

That is not true.

Title 10 Section 311 Part (b)(2) fits the above which is not only a legal organization but fits within the confines of the constitution of the USA.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/311

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are— (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and

(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14; Pub. L. 85–861, § 1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, § 524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656.)

goldilucky posted on 2016-11-04 13:45:19   Reply   Private Reply


#7: TrappedInMd    To: Gatlin (#4)

They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”

They think that expressing themselves in a loud, aggressive, and indignant way will have some some effect….but in the end, bluster is all they have.

Seems so. They give MSNBC types something else to complain about.

TrappedInMd posted on 2016-11-04 15:00:51   Reply   Private Reply


#8: goldilucky    To: TrappedInMd (#7)

Well, if MSNBC has that to complain about our militia let's send those news crew overseas and show them what a real battle is all about. Then perhaps they will understand why every citizen is gearing up for battle at home because we cannot trust our own government to protect us at all except their own ilk and to hell with us.

The Second Amendment was implemented because when our armies had to defend ourselves against the Benedict Arnolds betraying our country, it became the duty of every able-bodied citizen to defend their home (not homeland) from a professional standing army; an army that does not represent them at all but serves at the pleasure of a modern day Benedict Arnold who would deliver them unto their enemies.

Now try and explain that to a journalist.

goldilucky posted on 2016-11-04 16:26:24   Reply   Private Reply


#9: Gatlin    To: goldilucky (#6)

They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”

That is not true.

[...]

I am referring to those who have hijacked the noble and patriotic “militia” name and consist mainly of armed paramilitary groups with an anti-government conspiracy-oriented ideology….groups who call themselves “militia” that began to form shortly after the deadly Waco standoff and have now spread to every state.

The “militia” movement along with the sovereign citizen movement and the tax protest movement have seared themselves into the American consciousness. Many members of “militia” groups have been arrested, usually on weapons, explosives and conspiracy charges thereby causing a number of problems for law enforcement and the communities in which "militia" groups are active

Prominent “militia” arrests: Multiple members of the following groups have been arrested and convicted, usually on weapons, explosives, or conspiracy charges: Oklahoma Constitutional Militia, Georgia Republic Militia, Arizona Viper Militia, Washington State Militia, West Virginia Mountaineer Militia, Twin Cities Free Militia, North American Militia, San Joaquin County Militia.

I agree in principle with the factual definition of “militia” in your post. In light of day reality, I will continue to stand by my statement:

Militia is a misnomer that should never be used to categorize these nefarious groups.

They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”

Just like the Paultard libertarian assholes who attempt to occupy limited space on LF, all these hoodlums do is “huff” while they never have any “puff.” They both just make noisy empty statements with no empirical support. They think that expressing themselves in a loud, aggressive, and indignant way will have some some effect….but in the end, bluster is all they have.

From the article:
A well-regulated militia is supposed to protect people from the state…
Are these resent day groups who call themselves militias “well-regulated” and are they “protecting people from the state?”

I fear not since their extreme anti-government ideology combined with their elaborate conspiracy theories and obsessive fascination with weapons and paramilitary organization has lead many members of the “militias” to act out in ways that justify deep concerns.

Three members of a Kansas militia group were charged Friday with plotting to bomb an apartment complex that’s home to Somali immigrants in the western Kansas meatpacking town of Garden City, a thwarted attack prosecutors say was planned for the day after the November election. 1

A ranking member of the Louisiana Tactical Militia was arrested this week on drug and gun charges by the FBI’s domestic terror team in New Orleans. James Moore, 46, of Talisheek, Louisiana, was allegedly involved in trafficking large quantities of meth and claimed to have access to more than 80 firearms, the Justice Department said. 2

Thirty-six members of 3% of Idaho, many in leadership positions, announced their resignations Tuesday evening after they said $2,901 in donations earmarked for four Idaho men accused in the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff in Nevada were improperly spent. 3 [They even lie, cheat and steal among themselves].

Twelve members of an anti-government group called the "Viper Militia" have been arrested in Phoenix Arizona. Their arrest was the culmination of a six-month investigation that allegedly uncovered a plot to blow up several government buildings in the Phoenix area. 4

An anti-government militia with ties to Fort Stewart is accused of killing two people and plotting to kill President Barack Obama. 5

Three members of a border militia group are behind bars, charged with conspiracy to sell cocaine. They were caught in an FBI sting operation, involving an undercover agent, a plot to steal drugs and money from cartel smugglers, an offer of murder for hire and a high speed chase through the streets of Phoenix. 6

You may, with all due respect, continue to refer to these groups of people as “militias”….I however prefer to refer to them as criminal “vigilantes.”

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 17:04:33   Reply   Private Reply


#10: goldilucky    To: Gatlin (#9)

When I read your response here the first thing that came to my mind was the standoff incident at Ruby Ridge with Randy Weaver and the federal agents who shot and killed his wife and child in the face. What the government did to him and his family was anti-government, extreme, and classifies the agents who did this as vigilantes.

Just know this, Gatlin. Before Barbara Olson died on Sept 11, 2001, she had just finished her book, Hell to Pay in reference to Hillary Clinton. It is not the militias of this country that your ilk should be concerned about for they care about where this country is going. It is those that you protect (such as Hillary Clinton) who will deliver this country over to our enemies. Remember that she did this to US Ambassador Christoper Stevens.

goldilucky posted on 2016-11-04 17:17:36   Reply   Private Reply


#11: Gatlin    To: goldilucky (#10)

Randy Weaver ...

we are discussing “militia.” In order for me to respond to your post, you will need to please inform me which “militia” was Randy Weaver a member of.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 18:14:00   Reply   Private Reply


#12: Hondo68    To: Gatlin, unorganized militia (#11)

please inform me which “militia” was Randy Weaver a member of

The unorganized militia. The same one that you and I are in.

Hondo68 posted on 2016-11-04 18:27:52   Reply   Private Reply


#13: Gatlin    To: goldilucky (#10)

…federal agents who shot and killed his [Randy Weaver’s] wife and child in the face.
Just as you cannot accept my describing some militias as criminal vigilantes, I cannot accept you describing Randy Weaver’s son, Sammy, as a “child.” The “child” was 14-year-old boy who shot Bill Degan in retaliation for the shooting of the Weaver’s dog and then a running Sammy was shot in the back by a dying Bill Degan and/or other federal agents.

I remember you stated in a previous post you always want the truth and that is important to you. Just to be technically truthful….Randy’s wife was not shot in the face. An HRT sniper fired at an armed Kevin Harris, a family friend staying with the Weavers, as he ran for cover….but hit Weaver's wife, Vicki, in the head. She was also running and may have entered into the line of fire.

It has been a long time, if this information is not correct….I certainly stand to be corrected.

I will comment some more as we exchange posts.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 18:50:20   Reply   Private Reply


#14: Gatlin    To: hondo68 (#12)

please inform me which “militia” was Randy Weaver a member of

The unorganized militia. The same one that you and I are in.

Oh?

Just what is the age requirement to be a member of the militia you allege that you and I are in?

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 18:58:48   Reply   Private Reply


#15: Deckard    To: hondo68 (#12)

The same one that you and I are in.

You and I are in the "unorganized militia".

As far as Gatlin - the SPLC has told him "militias bad".

You've seen his numerous hit pieces on militias and pro-freedom groups like Oathkeepers.

Gatlin no doubt thinks Weaver's wife "got what she deserved".

Deckard posted on 2016-11-04 19:51:59   Reply   Private Reply


#16: Gatlin    To: goldilucky (#10)

The US Marshalls screwed up at Ruby Ridge. A Justice Department review later found the shot that killed Vicki Weaver and Kevin Harris was unconstitutional and the lack of a request to surrender was inexcusable, since Harris and the two Weavers were running for cover and could not pose an imminent threat. The task force also specifically blamed Horiuchi, the sniper, for firing.
It is those that you protect …
Whom am I “protecting?”

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 19:52:45   Reply   Private Reply


#17: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#15)

Gatlin no doubt thinks Weaver's wife "got what she deserved".

You don’t have any idea what I think?

I agree that the US Marshals screwed up at Ruby Ridge.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 19:55:01   Reply   Private Reply


#18: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#15)

As far as Gatlin - the SPLC has told him "militias bad".
It was not the SPLC who told me these nine militia members were bad:
Nine militia members arrested in cop killing conspiracy in Midwest United States.
It was the UPI.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 20:01:25   Reply   Private Reply


#19: Deckard    To: Gatlin (#13)

The “child” was 14-year-old boy who shot Bill Degan in retaliation for the shooting of the Weaver’s dog and then a running Sammy was shot in the back by a dying Bill Degan and/or other federal agents.

Randy’s wife was not shot in the face. An HRT sniper fired at an armed Kevin Harris, a family friend staying with the Weavers, as he ran for cover….but hit Weaver's wife, Vicki, in the head.

You are seriously misinformed.

Vicki was murdered by an FBI sniper named Lon Horiuchi. It was no "accident" as you seem to claim, in fact Horiuchi testified in court that he could hit within a quarter inch of a target at a distance of 200 yards.

Horiuchi was charged with manslaughter for the death of Vicki Weaver

Ruby Ridge: FBI Sniper Slays Mother Holding her Baby

On Aug. 21, 1992, six heavily armed, camouflaged U.S. marshals sneaked onto Mr. Weaver’s property. Three agents threw rocks to get the attention of Mr. Weaver’s dogs. As Mr. Weaver’s 14-year-old son, Sammy, and Kevin Harris, a 25- year-old family friend living in the cabin, ran to see what the dogs were barking at, U.S. marshals killed one of the dogs.

Sammy Weaver fired his gun in the direction the shots had come from. Randy Weaver came out and hollered for his son to come back to the cabin. Sammy yelled, “I’m coming, Dad,” and was running back to the cabin when a federal marshal shot him in the back and killed him.

Kevin Harris responded to Sammy’s shooting by fatally shooting a U.S. marshal. Federal agents falsely testified in court that the U.S. marshal had been killed by the first shot of the exchange; evidence later showed that the marshal had fired seven shots before he was shot himself. (Self-defense)

After the death of the U.S. marshal, the commander of the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team was called in, and ordered federal agents to shoot any armed adult outside the Weaver cabin, regardless of whether that person was doing anything to threaten or menace federal agents. (Thanks to the surveillance, federal officials knew that the Weavers always carried guns when outside their cabin.)

With the massive federal firepower surrounding the cabin — the automatic weapons, the sniper rifles, the night vision scopes — this was practically an order to assassinate the alleged wrongdoers. Four hundred government agents quickly swarmed in the mountains around the cabin. Most important, the federal agents at that time made no effort to contact Mr. Weaver to negotiate his surrender.

The next day, Aug. 22, Randy Weaver walked to the little shack where his son’s body lay. As he was lifting the latch on the shack’s door, he was shot from behind by FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. As he struggled back to the cabin, his wife, Vicki, stood in the doorway, holding a 10-month-old baby in her arms and calling for her husband to hurry. The FBI sniper fired again and hit Vicki Weaver in the temple, killing her instantly.

Deckard posted on 2016-11-04 20:05:24   Reply   Private Reply


#20: Deckard    To: Gatlin (#17)

You don’t have any idea what I think?

I know from your numerous posts on the topic that you believe it's justified for a law enforcement officer of any agency to murder with impunity.

Deckard posted on 2016-11-04 20:09:32   Reply   Private Reply


#21: Hondo68    To: Gatlin, McCains ISIS Militia, Deckard, *Arab Spring Jihad* (#16)

Whom am I “protecting?”

Your Senator John McCain, and his ISIS militia. Do you deny that you're voting for Jihad Johnny?

Gatlin's dream Militia group, ISIS

Hondo68 posted on 2016-11-04 20:17:48   Reply   Private Reply


#22: buckeroo    To: hondo68, tater (#21)

tater's Senator of choice lives around the corner fom tater's favorite "Ike's liquor store."

buckeroo posted on 2016-11-04 20:52:02   Reply   Private Reply


#23: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#20)

I know from your numerous posts on the topic that you believe it's justified for a law enforcement officer of any agency to murder with impunity.

Nah....you do NOT know that.

That is only something you make yourself believe because I do not buy into your yellow journalism articles and consistently expose their incongruities.

No LEO from any agency should ever murder with impunity.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 21:31:48   Reply   Private Reply


#24: Gatlin    To: buckeroo (#22)

tater's Senator of choice lives around the corner fom tater's favorite "Ike's liquor store."

Nope!

Normally he is not my Senator of choice. I did not vote for him last time in the primary or general election. However, after carefully considering the opposing candidates in the primary and general election….I could not wait to vote for him this time.

Furthermore, I know exactly where he lives while he is in Phoenix and where he lives when he is at his ranch. There are no liquor stores within miles of either location.

By the way, I see you are still at your same old address. One would have thought that you had bleed enough money from the lucrative government contracts you work on sucking the government’s money teat to upgrade just a little bit.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 21:43:38   Reply   Private Reply


#25: Gatlin    To: hondo68 (#21)

I did not vote for the local Hillary clone to be my Senator.

I see that you are still pimping for gay politicians.

Oh, well ...

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 21:46:01   Reply   Private Reply


#26: Gatlin    To: hondo68 (#12)

please inform me which “militia” was Randy Weaver a member of

The unorganized militia. The same one that you and I are in.

Oh?

Just what is the age requirement to be a member of the militia you allege that you and I are in?

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 21:52:56   Reply   Private Reply


#27: Gatlin    To: Deckard, Hondo68 (#15)

You [Hondo] and I are in the "unorganized militia".

According to the Militia Act of 1903, there is an age requirement to be a member of the unorganized militia.

What is that age?

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 22:10:51   Reply   Private Reply


#28: Deckard    To: Gatlin, hondo68, buckeroo (#24)

I could not wait to vote for him (McStain)this time.

Yep - that pretty much tells me all I need to know about your brand of "conservatism".

Deckard posted on 2016-11-04 22:45:32   Reply   Private Reply


#29: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#28)

I could not wait to vote for him (McStain)this time. Yep - that pretty much tells me all I need to know about your brand of "conservatism".

Yep - But it does not tell you about the brand of "liberalism" his Democratic opponent represents.

Just like I voted for Donald Trump to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House....I voted for John McCain to keep liberal Ann Kirkpatrick out of the Senate.

You should be most grateful for my efforts for partly keeping the Senate from going to the extreme far left. But then, I realize that you don't have sense enough to appreciate anything except anarchy and cop-haters.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 23:03:25   Reply   Private Reply


#30: Deckard    To: Gatlin (#29)

You should be most grateful for my efforts for partly keeping the Senate from going to the extreme far left.

Oh man - you can't get any more left than McCain.

Good grief!

Deckard posted on 2016-11-04 23:05:49   Reply   Private Reply


#31: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#30)

Oh man - you can't get any more left than McCain.

Good grief!

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Do you even know who Ann Kirkpatrick is?

The more you post....the dumber you get.

Geezze ...

Edit: Besides, Ann would support Hillary's SCOTUS nominations if they both win.

Think ahead....at least sometime. Oh, I just remembered, you can't.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 23:09:53   Reply   Private Reply


#32: buckeroo    To: Gatlin (#31)

Beyond skinning the localized folkyorabout tater: tater husks in what have you really acconplished as a Republican beyond voting for yukon or Mittens? just asking.

buckeroo posted on 2016-11-04 23:14:39   Reply   Private Reply


#33: buckeroo    To: Gatlintater (#32)

Just asking.

buckeroo posted on 2016-11-04 23:21:40   Reply   Private Reply


#34: Gatlin    To: Deckard (#15)

You [Hondo] and I are in the "unorganized militia".

According to the Militia Act of 1903, there is an age requirement to be a member of the unorganized militia.

What is that age?

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-04 23:22:41   Reply   Private Reply


#35: buckeroo    To: Gatlin (#34)

Younger than your 85 year old approvel yukon.

buckeroo posted on 2016-11-04 23:25:02   Reply   Private Reply


#36: goldilucky    To: Gatlin (#16)

You protect public officers and officials and diplomats such as the following: city council members, governors, the President of the United States, the Pope and other public figures.

And since you mention that the government did admit they made a grievous mistake, did they ever compensate the Weaver family?

goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 00:27:41   Reply   Private Reply


#37: goldilucky    To: Gatlin (#34)

I do not know what the age requirement is but it may be 18 (the same as those required to sign up for selective service) However from what you mention, it appears that this very act only applied to the professional standing armies.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/25119439?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 00:30:48   Reply   Private Reply


#38: goldilucky    To: Gatlin (#13)

I remember reading on the account that the wife and baby were shot. The wife was unarmed.

goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 00:33:23   Reply   Private Reply


#39: goldilucky    To: hondo68 (#21)

Thank you for posting that image. We need to be reminded that the United States government created ISIS. You can thank John McCain for that one. Such a nice guy he is.

goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 00:36:25   Reply   Private Reply


#40: Deckard    To: goldilucky (#37)

I do not know what the age requirement is but it may be 18 (the same as those required to sign up for selective service)

During the Revolution of 1776, Militiamen were adult white males from small towns throughout North America; since the end of the French and Indian War in 1763, all adult males between fifteen and 60 had to enroll in their local militia company.

If the Mel Gibson movie "The Patriot" is accurate, there were kids younger than that.

War in The American Revolution

Deckard posted on 2016-11-05 00:50:54   Reply   Private Reply


#41: goldilucky    To: Deckard (#40)

Well able-bodied means just that and I don't see an issue with age requirement considering that the Israeli children are taught as young as 5 y.o.

goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 00:55:31   Reply   Private Reply


#42: Gatlin    To: goldilucky (#36)

You protect public officers and officials and diplomats such as the following: city council members, governors, the President of the United States, the Pope and other public figures.
That is an blanket coverall assumptive statement….you therefore need to show where I have “protected” those individuals.
And since you mention that the government did admit they made a grievous mistake, did they ever compensate the Weaver family?
And since it was you who first quoted the Randy Weaver situation and seemed to know so much about it….you should already know the answer to your question.

But since you asked….Yes, they were compensated to the tune of $3.1 million taxpayers dollars.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 05:49:40   Reply   Private Reply


#43: Roscoe    To: goldilucky (#39)

We need to be reminded that the United States government created ISIS.

Either maliciously or stupidly. Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that it was merely stupidity on John's part.

What a frigging pigeon! All ISIS had to do get our taxpayers' funding was briefly pretend that they were more moderate than the other terrorist groups. I can imagine the ISIS start-up planning session.

"Seriously, I'm not kidding. All we gotta do to get free military weapons and millions in cash, that we can use to buy sex slaves and child brides, is to smile and not behead anyone during during the visit." --Mohammed (no, I don't know which one)

Roscoe posted on 2016-11-05 05:54:45   Reply   Private Reply


#44: Gatlin    To: goldilucky (#37)

I do not know what the age requirement is but it may be 18 (the same as those required to sign up for selective service)
That is correct….you obviously do not know. And no, it is not your “may be” age.
However from what you mention, it appears that this very act only applied to the professional standing armies.
There was a definite reason the law was named the Militia Act of 1903. If the “act only applied to the professional standing armies” as you suggest, then it would have been titled the Profession Standing Armies Act of 1903….don’t you think?

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 06:24:52   Reply   Private Reply


#45: Gatlin    To: goldilucky (#38)

I remember reading on the account that the wife and baby were shot. The wife was unarmed.
Your memory is either faulty or your source was wrong. Vicki Weaver was shot in the head while holding the baby. The baby was not shot.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 06:31:14   Reply   Private Reply


#46: Gatlin    To: Deckard, goldilucky (#40)

During the Revolution of 1776, Militiamen were adult white males from small towns throughout North America …
George Washington was displeased with “the undisciplined conduct and poor battlefield performance of the militia.” He even blamed “the Patriot reliance on the militia as the chief root of his problems in the devastating loss of Long Island and Manhattan to the British.”

Washington wrote: “I am wearied to death all day with a variety of perplexing circumstances, disturbed at the conduct of the militia, whose behavior and want of discipline has done great injury to the other troops, who never had officers, except in a few instances, worth the bread they eat. I never was in such an unhappy, divided state since I was born.” [Boldness Added].

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 06:57:06   Reply   Private Reply


#47: Gatlin    To: goldilucky (#41)

Well able-bodied means just that and I don't see an issue with age requirement considering that the Israeli children are taught as young as 5 y.o.

Yes, able-bodied does mean just that and that is not the issue. Neither is the issue what the Israeli children are taught, the question is the age requirement to be a member of the American “unauthorized militia.”

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 07:03:27   Reply   Private Reply


#48: Gatlin    To: goldilucky (#6)

Gatlin: They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a [vigilante] group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”

Goldilucky: That is not true.

Au contraire, Madam….it is true.

Book Definition:

A vigilante group is an armed private group that has taken the law into its own hands or that has the announced potential of doing so. There are quite a number of such organizations in the contemporary United States, and many have members who are said to be anti-government, racist, or both.

The New York Times (5/10/95) states:

"… 41 states bar or regulate armed paramilitary groups...Twenty-four states have laws banning private military organizations or militias and 24, including 7 with anti-militia laws, have laws banning private paramilitary training that is meant to or likely to produce civil disorder ...There is a long legal history to militia issues, dating back to 1886 when the Supreme Court ruled in Presser v. Illinois that an Illinois law was constitutional."
The laws clearly distinguish paramilitary groups from Boy Scouts and hunting clubs organized for lawful purposes. They have been used to stop the KKK and other white supremacist organizations in the early 80's, and against the Texas Emergency Reserve in 1982. States without anti-militia OR anti-paramilitary laws are: Hawaii, Alaska, Utah, S.Dakota, Wisconsin, Ohio, Vermont, Delaware. [This list is not definitive - check your own state law]

The state laws fall into a number of categories. Some states have no laws regarding unauthorized military groups. Some, such as Connecticut, require the groups to register with the state and annually file a membership list. Others ban unauthorized military organizations regardless of the purpose of the organization. Some states only ban these organizations if the purpose of the group is meant to or likely to produce civil disorder. Many of these same states prohibit parading by unauthorized armed groups through towns or cities.

Here is a listing of the statutory sources for each state law.

States with Both Anti-Militia and Anti-Paramilitary Training Laws (7)

-Florida. FLA. STAT. ANN. ch. 870.06, 790.29.
-Georgia. GA. CODE ANN. ss 38-2-277, 16-11-150 to -152.
-Idaho. IDAHO CODE ss 46-802, 18-8101 to -8105.
-Illinois. ILL. REV. STAT. ch. 1805, para. 94-95.
-New York. N.Y. MIL. LAW s 240.
-North Carolina. N.C. GEN. STAT. ss 127A-151, 14-288.20.
-Rhode Island. R.I. GEN. LAWS ss 30-12-7, 11-55-1 to -3.

States with Anti-Militia Laws Only (17)

-Alabama. ALA. CODE s 31-2-125.
-Arizona. ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. s 26-123.
-Iowa. IOWA CODE s 29A.31.
-Kansas. KAN. STAT. ANN. s 48-203.
-Kentucky. KY. REV. STAT. ANN. s 38.440.
-Maine. ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 37-B, s 342.2.
-Maryland. MD. CODE ANN. art. 65, s 35.
-Massachusetts. MASS. GEN. L. ch. 33, s 129-132.
-Minnesota. MINN. STAT. s 624.61.
-Mississippi. MISS. CODE ANN. $ 33-1-31.
-Nevada. NEV. REV. STAT. s 203-080.
-New Hampshire. N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. s 111:15.
-North Dakota. N.D. CENT. CODE s 37-01-21.
-Texas. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. s 431.010.
-Washington. WASH. REV. CODE s 38.40.120.
-West Virginia. W. VA. CODE s 15-1F-7.
-Wyoming. WYO. STAT. s 19-1-106.

States with Anti-Paramilitary Training Laws Only (17)

-Arkansas. ARK. CODE s 5-71-301 to -303.
-California. CAL. PENAL CODE s 11460.
-Colorado. COLO. REV. STAT. s 18-9-120.
-Connecticut. CONN. GEN. STAT. s 53-206b.
-Louisiana. LA. REV. STAT. ANN. s 117.1.
-Michigan. MICH. COMP. LAWS s 750.528a.
-Missouri. MO. REV. STAT. s 574.070.
-Montana. MONT. CODE ANN. s 45-8-109.
-Nebraska. NEB. REV. STAT. s 28-1480 to -1482.
-New Jersey. N.J. REV. STAT. s 2C:39-14.
-New Mexico. N.M. STAT. ANN. s 30-20A-1 to -4.
-Oklahoma. OKLA. STAT. ANN. tit. 21, s 1321.10.
-Oregon. OR. REV. STAT. s 166.660.
-Pennsylvania. 18 PA. CONS. STAT. s 5515.
-South Carolina. S.C. CODE ANN. s 16-8-10 to -30.
-Tennessee. TENN. CODE ANN. s 39-17-314.
-Virginia. VA. CODE ANN. s 18.2-433.1 to -433.3.

http://archive.adl.org/mwd/faq5.html.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 08:20:19   Reply   Private Reply


#49: Gatlin    To: goldilucky, hondo68, nolu chan, A K A Stone (#39)

Hondo: Your Senator John McCain, and his ISIS militia.
Goldilucky: Thank you [hondo] for posting that image.
You should never thank someone for posting a lie….hondo knew this was a lie when he posted it.
Goldilucky: You can thank John McCain for that one.
What exactly can you “thank John McCain for?” I will tell you later.
We need to be reminded that the United States government created ISIS.
You, Goldilucky, need to be reminded of something you and I discussed and agreed on before. That is to always search for the “TRUTH!”

Had you searched for the truth, you would have found this:

The photo was taken in May 2013, while Mccain was on a trip to northern Syria, where he met with members of the Free Syrian Army (FSA). The picture shows McCain posing with members of the FSA….not ISIS. Hondo is of the Hillary Clinton School of Hide and Deceive as he works through the back door to get her elected. Hondo believes he can post a photo of McCain with a members of the FSA and call them ISIS terrorists. Hondo posted just another of his MANY lies.

McCain went to northern Syria to meet with the FSA in an attempt to secure help for the FSA, an opposition group founded in 2011 during the Syrian Civil War with the intent of bringing down the government of Syrian president Bashar Hafez al-Assad. (This is what you should thank McCain for). Reports after McCain’s visit indicated that elements of the FSA were both battling ISIS militants and some were defecting to ISIS. That prompted liberal propagandizing idiots (hondo included) to begin the online circulation of the photograph from McCain's Syrian visit along with rumors that the McCain had posed for photographs "with ISIS militants." In particular, the photograph posted by Hondo is alleged to show McCain posing with Abu Bakr al- Baghdadi, the 1st Emir (and later the leader) of ISIS….the individual circled in red.

Those in the know would quickly realize that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was extremely unlikely to have been hanging around an FSA stronghold posing for photographs with an American politician in May 2013, and the person seen in the background of the above-displayed photograph (identified with a red circle) bears only a passing resemblance to al-Baghdadi, who in recent years has always sported a full beard. The individual circled in red has no full beard.

Moreover, as the New York Times reported, the "ISIS leader" seen in the photograph with Senator McCain was actually the commander of another Syrian rebel group allied with the FSA, not al-Baghdadi.

You can now either believe Hondo, believe me, check out sources to form your own “objective” conclusion….or just say: “Screw It!”

Sources:
Mahmood, Mona. "US Air Strikes in Syria Driving Anti-Assad Groups to Support ISIS."
      The Guardian. 23 November 2014.
DeYoung, Karen. "Kerry Says U.S. Will Expedite New Aid to Syrian Opposition."
      The Washington Post. 21 Aprli 2013.
Londoño, Ernesto and Greg Miller. "CIA Begins Weapons Delivery to Syrian Rebels."
      The Washington Post. 11 September 2013.
Gladstone, Rick. "Try as He May, John McCain Can’t Shake Falsehoods About Ties to ISIS."
      The New York Times. 11 September 2014.
McCain can be blamed for a number of political positions that may be disagreeable, but no one should be allowed to irresponsibly post false and misleading information – lies – to promote their self-serving warped agenda.

Gatlin posted on 2016-11-05 14:15:19   Reply   Private Reply


#50: goldilucky    To: Gatlin (#49)

You, Goldilucky, need to be reminded of something you and I discussed and agreed on before. That is to always search for the “TRUTH!”

Had you searched for the truth, you would have found this:

You are correct, Gatlin. I have found the truth and I am free from all the lies. And its right out of McCain's home state.

https://public.isishq.com/public/about/default.aspx

goldilucky posted on 2016-11-05 14:52:49   Reply   Private Reply