quite frankly, anyone can send shit into Julian Assange's server making shit up.

I shut you up before with the following. Have you collected the bitcoin yet? or is your blather, typically saying nothing, just expressing your desperation there is another week and the best wikileaks have yet to come?

http://blog.erratasec.com/2016/10/politifact-yes-we-can-fact-check-kaines.htm

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Politifact: Yes we can fact check Kaine's email

[...]

by Robert Graham

I am an ultraconservative.

You are an ultrainfantile.

You have no idea if the BS you read from Assange is true. There is no AUTHENTICATION of the BS.

I have a very good idea that it is true. It rings true. It matches that which we would expect of these people.

I have a very good idea that it is true. It rings true. It matches that which we would expect of these people.

A fair share of the email is now prefaced by:

"Secondary verification by google.com DKIM key"

Example

Correct the Record

You do seem the type to love David Brock and the Clinton Campaign funded propaganda mill and online hit squad. Otherwise, you would present persuasive evidence and argument.

LF has slowly turned back into a GREAT place where the discussion are once again about politics and other matters.

No, it has become an echo chamber for deluded Trump supporters.

Libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.

Wow - so conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending? I thought I had heard otherwise ...

(Removed by Moderator X)

Yet you allow Gatlin's (and GrandIsland's) profanity to remain.

I thought I had heard otherwise ...

TooConsevative, it is no surprise that you often hear only what you wish to believe.

Libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.

"Wow - so conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending? I thought I had heard otherwise ..."

it is no surprise that you often hear only what you wish to believe.

So I heard wrong - conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending?

it has become an echo chamber for deluded Trump supporters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rn6w255CGkk.

Libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.

"Wow - so conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending? I thought I had heard otherwise ..."

it is no surprise that you often hear only what you wish to believe.

So I heard wrong - conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending?

Did I say that “conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending?”

No, I did not.

I said that “libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.”

[…]

It is clear that the modern libertarian movement has its roots in radicalism rather than any sort of conservatism. However, since its initial beginnings within the context of the radical Left, much of the libertarian movement has turned sharply rightward, though in varying and often conflicting ways. This essay will argue that this rightward shift within the libertarian movement is severely misguided, as libertarianism and conservatism are not only historically antagonistic to one another but are indeed diametrical opposites.

[…]

https://attackthesystem.com/beyond- conservatism-reclaiming-the-radical-roots-of-libertarianism/.

I said that “libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.”

Still trying to sell that lie, eh?

“If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals — if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories.

The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.” - Ronald Reagan

8 ways Ronald Reagan was a libertarian

Reagan also said this: “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government, and I’m here to help.’”

Ronald Reagan was a libertarian

Still trying to sell that lie, eh?

Did I say that “conservatism doesn't support lower taxes and lower spending?”

No, I did not.

I said that “libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.”

How can they be "polar opposites" if they agree on lower taxes and lower spending?

... Ronald Reagan was a libertarian

Reagan also said this ,,,

Your old asshole buddy, Ron Paul, did a lot more than just “say” something about Reagan not being a libertarian. Ron Paul actually RESIGNED from the Republican Party over his disagreement on the way Reagan handled the federal budget “because Reagan was no libertarian.”

Another asshole libertarian said:

I don't get why Libertarians hate Barack Obama, yet LOVE Ronald Reagan. If you were a true libertarian you would hate Reagan just as much. Reagan EXPANDED gov't, created socialism FOR THE WEALTHY, DESTROYED the free market by throwing TONS of subsidies at major corporations so the middle class would get docked and docked UNTIL THIS DAY. As far as I'm concerned they're basically the same guy except differences in pigmentation.

Furthermore, Gene Healy writing for the Cato Institute profoundly proclaimed: Ronald Reagan Was No Libertarian.

[…]

Reagan was no libertarian. Instead of wrapping ourselves in his mantle, those of us who support deep reductions in government’s size and power should take a clear-eyed look at the Reagan record.

The Cato Institute did just that in “Assessing the Reagan Years,” which showed that under Reagan, federal spending actually increased from 23 percent to 24 percent of gross national product, while payroll tax increases resulted in a net tax increase for most Americans.

Not only did Reagan renege on his promise to abolish President Carter’s new Cabinet departments, Education and Energy, he appointed secretaries dedicated to their preservation.

[And so on …]

My goodness, sport….you have no idea about something you are attempting to promote. You simply did as you always do. You read a headline that you like and want to agree with….then you copy and past a link to the bogus article.

How can [conservatives and libertarians] be "polar opposites" if they agree on lower taxes ...

The standard libertarian position on income taxes is there should be no income tax at all while on the other hand, conservatives advocate for the continuation of the income tax and the IRS. I classify that as “polar opposite.”

Then I will use the old communication strategy of answering a question with some questions.

How can they not be “polar opposites” when libertarians advocate and support abortion as a “woman’s choice?”

How can they not be “polar opposites” when libertarians believe that “sex with underage teens could be okay under certain conditions?”

How can they not be “polar opposites” when libertariana call for “the legalization of prostitution and all drugs?”

How can they not be “polar opposites” when libertarians call for “open borders as their immigration position?”

In no way can I ever support the 1 percent’s loathsome libertarian scheme.

conservatives advocate for the continuation of the income tax and the IRS.

Source?

Is it your position that this is the "polar opposite" of conservatism?

You were this close!

I am the demographic you are trying to reach out to: disenfranchised with the Republican Party presidential nominee; a lover of liberty not of political parties; someone searching for a new place to call home that represents the ideas I hold dear to my heart.

I was optimistically hopeful. I spent my entire day tuned into the Libertarian Party convention hoping to see the legitimacy that I was yearning for.

Would this be my new place to put my trust? Behind lovers of liberty like myself who wanted to make legitimate change, wanted to be taken seriously, and wanted to defend life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?

Nope. I didn’t find that while watching the Libertarian Party convention. How can we make legitimate change and be taken seriously with the buffoonery I witnessed during the convention?

People like presidential candidate Darryl Perry losing his poise, screaming and pounding the podium, not only during the Saturday night debate but also during his concession speech.

How about the poor Libertarian Party chair, Nicholas Sarwark, who I legitimately felt sorry for throughout the whole event? He struggled to maintain order during the chaotic convention.

How can the Libertarian Party say they defend life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness when their presidential candidate doesn't represent those values?

There is no pro-life candidate in the 2016 election. The Libertarian Party should have represented that. There is no pro-2nd amendment candidate ticket in the 2016 election. Again, the Libertarian Party should have represented that. And if the Libertarian Party candidate doesn’t support religious freedom, then how can they support me pursuing my own happiness?

This is disappointing. I was gleefully optimistic about potentially becoming a member of the Libertarian Party. I spent a lot of time mulling it over and planned to use the convention to seal the deal for me.

Well... they definitely solidified my decision, it just isn't the same one I initially had coming into the convention. The Libertarian Party gave a platform to several foolish people that took away from the potential influx of weary ex-GOP voters, like myself.

The passionate candidates for liberty, some who were truly inspirational, were over shadowed by chaos. This was the Libertarian Party's shot at winning over the average American who feels that neither the GOP nor the Democrats represent them. And for conservatives like me, you just blew it.

http://www.thelibertyconservative.com/libertarian-party-blew- converts/.

Behind lovers

Libertarianism is not some variant of conservatism. It is its polar opposite.

Define all your terms, tater. You think "Libertarianism" is a political party called, "Libertarian" just as much as you think "conservatism" is the Republican Party.

Man, you suck to high heaven.

ROTFL! Quit your whining.

ROTFLMAO! Your whole thread is a whine.

the best wikileaks have yet to come

You worry me, chan. Do you also believe in the Tooth Faerie?

No, it has become an echo chamber for deluded Trump supporters.

A pile of trumperettes is how I see this chit-chat forum.

Define all your terms, tater.

Sure thing...be happy to do so

Libertarianism: A suck-ass philosophy that makes people act stupidly.

There!!!

A pile of trumperettes is how I see this chit-chat forum.

Understandable.

Seeing things only through your asshole makes everything look like "a pile" to you.

ROTFL! Quit your whining.

ROTFLMAO! Your whole thread is a whine.

ROTFLAMO also. His whole life is nothing buy a series of whines.

A pile of trumperettes

My precious....

Underdog Chicago Cubs win the WS tonight in game 7 elimination. 10 innings after a end of 9th rain delay. The tooth fairy is real. :-)

I am...a lover of liberty

I'm sure in your deluded mind you think that - your posts here display that you are just the opposite.

Alpha, MAGA, cuck-cuck-cuck!!!
Alpha, MAGA, cuck-cuck-cuck!!!
Alpha, MAGA, cuck-cuck-cuck!!!

(... come on, everbody, join on in ...)

Alpha, MAGA, cuck-cuck-cuck!!!
Alpha, MAGA, cuck-cuck-cuck!!!
Alpha, MAGA, cuck-cuck-cuck!!!

NOT WHAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS HAD IN MIND

LOCK HER UP!!!
LOCK HER UP!!!
LOCK HER UP!!!
(... come on, everbody, join on in ...)
LOCK HER UP!!!
LOCK HER UP!!!
LOCK HER UP!!!

LOCK HER UP!!!

You just want her locked upped with you, you ol' wind bag.

That really did make me laugh out loud ...