New FBI files contain allegations of 'quid pro quo' in Clinton's emails
By Catherine Herridge, Pamela K. Browne
FoxNews.com
Published October 16, 2016
FBI interview summaries and notes, provided late Friday to the House Government Oversight and Intelligence Committees, contain allegations of a "quid pro quo" between a senior State Department executive and FBI agents during the Hillary Clinton email investigation, two congressional sources told Fox News.
"This is a flashing red light of potential criminality," Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah, who has been briefed on the FBI interviews, told Fox News.
He said "there was an alleged quid pro quo” involving Undersecretary for Management Patrick Kennedy and the FBI “over at least one classified email.”
“In return for altering the classification, the possibility of additional slots for the FBI at missions overseas was discussed,” Chaffetz said.
As Fox News previously reported, interviews released earlier this month, known as 302s, reveal the serious allegation that Kennedy applied pressure to subordinates to change classified email codes so they would be shielded from Congress and the public. Fox News was told as far back as August 2015 that Kennedy was running interference on Capitol Hill. But Kennedy, in his FBI interview on Dec. 21, 2015, “categorically rejected” allegations of classified code tampering.
[snip]
- - - - - - - - - -
Poster note: The title appears in error or misleading when citing "in Clinton's emails." The cited information is allegedly revealed by FBI documents, not Clinton email. The FBI information refers to Clinton emails.
#1: redleghunter To: nolu chan (#0)
I know...digging these stories and linking source data did not take you, a layman journalist very long. Yet the state run media can't get one of these headline stories even on page 2.
redleghunter posted on 2016-10-16 02:46:09 Reply Private Reply
#2: Hank Rearden To: nolu chan (#0)
Silence is complicity and normal citizens should never cooperate with these government clowns again if they remain silent about the crimes they've discovered.
Hank Rearden posted on 2016-10-16 12:40:40 Reply Private Reply
#3: nolu chan To: redleghunter (#1)
Yeah, and many online sources give a snippet and little information to readily enable the inexperienced user to readily search for, obtain, and read the email at Wikileaks.
nolu chan posted on 2016-10-16 17:40:25 Reply Private Reply
#4: nolu chan To: Hank Rearden (#2)
They don't. Job security comes first.
nolu chan posted on 2016-10-16 17:41:20 Reply Private Reply