BOMBSHELL: Chelsea Privately Declared War On Clinton Foundation in 2011

Source: Daily Caller
Published: Oct 11, 2016
Author: Richard Pollock
Post Date: 2016-10-12 16:24:40 by nolu chan
Views: 1966

BOMBSHELL: Chelsea Privately Declared War On Clinton Foundation in 2011

Richard Pollock
Reporter
Daily Caller
4:50 PM 10/11/2016

Chelsea Clinton’s bold decision in 2011 to launch an “internal investigation” into the finances of the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative was the equivalent of a declaration of war by the first daughter and a bombshell about the financial mess she discovered at the foundation.

The latest revelation came out Tuesday in a new batch of WikiLeaks emails sent to and from Clinton confidant John Podesta, who now is Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman.

Two emails — one dated Nov. 12, 2011 and another dated Jan. 4, 2012 — show Chelsea was aggressively looking into the foundation’s money flows and talking to others about it.

Her actions worried President Bill Clinton’s long-time handler Doug Band, who complained to Podesta about Chelsea’s intervention into the internal operations of the foundation.

The disclosure suggests that Chelsea was shocked by what she found inside her parent’s organization that secured millions of dollars from despots, Eastern European tycoons, Arab Sheiks and foreign billionaires — all of whom also were seeking favors from her mom and dad.

[snip]

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: nolu chan    To: All (#0)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2874

Re: Draft of Doug's Teneo et al memo

From: john.podesta@gmail.com
To: doug@presidentclinton.com
Date: 2011-11-13 12:21
Subject: Re: Draft of Doug's Teneo et al memo

A few suggestions:

1) I'd take one more pass through this and strip the defensive stuff out ( we may have not been perfect stuff, etc.) just make it factual.

2) I'd move the sections on what Teneo does and what you do up to the top and then go through the details and how they have helped WJC; in this draft what the actual activities are sort of come in at the end.

3) If I were you I'd take Lasry out of this. You'll get into a deep debate about who's right and who's not with CC on this. The list is really strong without it, so why get into that.

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Doug Band wrote:

Need get this asap to them although I'm sure cvc won't believe it to be true bc she doesn't want to.

Even though the facts speak for themselves.
John, I would appreciate your feedback and any suggestions

I'm also starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed. Dk and I built a business. 65 people work for us who have wives and husbands and kids, they all depend on us. Our business has almost nothing to do with the clintons, the foundation or cgi in any way. The chairman of ubs could care a less about cgi. Our fund clients who we do restructuring and m and a advising the same just as bhp nor tivo do. These are real companies who we provide real advice to through very serious people. Comm head for goldman, dep press secretary to bloomberg, former head of banking, and his team, from morgan stanley for asia and latin am.

I realize it is difficult to confront and reason with her but this could go to far and then we all will have a real serious set of other problems. I don't deserve this from her and deserve a tad more respect or at least a direct dialogue for me to explain these things. She is acting like a spoiled brat kid who has nothing else to do but create issues to justify what she's doing because she, as she has said, hasn't found her way and has a lack of focus in her life. I realize she will be off of this soon but if it doesn't come soon enough....

From: Cheryl Mills [mailto:cheryl.mills@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 04:51 PM
To: john.podesta@gmail.com Cc: Doug Band
Subject: Draft of Doug's Teneo et al memo

John

Attached is doug's memo with edits I have included so typos are likely mine. He's going to fill in the blanks.

Send any suggested thoughts, edits and additions.

I am working on the next memo on options now.

cdm

nolu chan posted on 2016-10-12 16:29:01   Reply   Private Reply


#2: Pinguinite    To: nolu chan (#0)

Could Chelsea actually be a decent woman?

Pinguinite posted on 2016-10-12 20:50:13   Reply   Private Reply


#3: buckeroo    To: Pinguinite (#2)

Could Chelsea actually be a decent woman?

No. She is the "spot on" target of and about the trickle-down nasty DNA theory from Hubbell's illicit affair with Clinton. No decency is possible from their inter-locked loins.

buckeroo posted on 2016-10-12 20:57:08   Reply   Private Reply


#4: GrandIsland    To: nolu chan (#0)

Chelsea Clinton’s bold decision in 2011 to launch an “internal investigation” into the finances of the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative was...

A ploy to get turds like all of you drug addict lovers to buy her snake oil... The socialist party already have plans to get her in the Whitehouse like they did her cunt mother... start her off as senator... the (D) party feels qualifications are derived from marriage and genes. I'll suggest marriage and genes will get you an ugly daughter with a socialist mindset and a golden spoon in your mouth job.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-10-12 21:33:56   Reply   Private Reply


#5: Hondo68    To: GrandIsland, Chelsea Drumpf (#4)

age and genes will get you an ugly daughter

Hondo68 posted on 2016-10-12 22:21:53   Reply   Private Reply


#6: GrandIsland    To: hondo68 (#5)

The Grabber

Made by the photoshopper

Fuck off, Gay Johnson lover.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-10-12 22:37:56   Reply   Private Reply


#7: nolu chan    To: GrandIsland (#4)

The socialist party already have plans to get her in the Whitehouse like they did her cunt mother...

If Hillary loses, that would not be good for Chelsea's career. But if Hillary wins, Chelsea could be burdened with a greater handicap than Jeb! Bush.

the (D) party feels qualifications are derived from marriage and genes.

The only qualifications are the ability play dirty, get elected, and get rich.

nolu chan posted on 2016-10-12 22:59:53   Reply   Private Reply