This is not the first time the GOP presidential nominee has been accused of doing drugs.
Carrie Fisher says she knows why Donald Trump was sniffing so much during the second presidential debate — he does cocaine.
Fisher was asked through social media during the debate Sunday night if Trump was a "coke head" because of his audible, reoccurring sniffing.
"I'm an expert & ABSOLUTELY," the Star Wars actress responded on her verified Twitter account.
Fisher has been open about her prior drug use.
This is not the first time the GOP presidential nominee has been accused of doing drugs.
Howard Dean suggested during the first presidential debate that Trump perhaps used cocaine because he was sniffing so much then, too. Dean later apologized for the "innuendo."
Poster Comment:
#1: Hondo68 To: Willie Green (#0)
But, does he do less than Hillary?
I'm pretty sure Trump does less than Howard Dean did during his presidential run, or even while watching this debate.
Dang, these D&R Party space cadets make Gary Johnson look like an Eagle Scout by comparison!
Hondo68 posted on 2016-10-10 18:03:36 Reply Private Reply
#2: misterwhite To: Willie Green (#0)
Trump: "The three things I've always told my children to live by: No alcohol, no drugs, and no smoking".
To say Trump did drugs, in front of his children and 100 million Americans in a Presidential debate, is ludicrous and ignorant.
misterwhite posted on 2016-10-10 19:09:20 Reply Private Reply
#3: Justified To: misterwhite (#2)
Justified posted on 2016-10-10 20:29:21 Reply Private Reply
#4: Titorite2 To: Willie Green (#0)
Titorite2 posted on 2016-10-10 22:27:12 Reply Private Reply
#5: goldilucky To: Justified (#3)
And Trump, if he has any honor in himself, should also do the same against his accuser making such a claim. We don't need another cokehead and drug dealer like Bill Clinton in the White House.
goldilucky posted on 2016-10-10 23:10:55 Reply Private Reply
#6: nolu chan To: goldilucky (#5)
Incomplete link. Correct below:
http://www.centrictv.com/entertainment/celebrity-news/articles/2016/05/06/arsenio-hall-files-lawsuit-over-accusation-he-was-princes-drug-dealer.html
nolu chan posted on 2016-10-11 01:28:46 Reply Private Reply
#7: misterwhite To: nolu chan (#6)
In 2011, Scalia rightfully argued that the change in the law (denying public figures protection) should have been done by the people, not the courts. Trump wants to go back to the way it was.
misterwhite posted on 2016-10-11 10:59:23 Reply Private Reply
#8: HomerBohn To: hondo68 (#1)
Apparently she wants another ten minutes of fame by spreading specious rumors.
HomerBohn posted on 2016-10-11 11:12:30 Reply Private Reply
#9: nolu chan To: misterwhite (#7)
It is not a complete removal of protection, but the public figure must prove actual malice, i.e. he must prove the defamation was made knowing it was false, or in reckless disregard for the truth.
nolu chan posted on 2016-10-11 18:40:14 Reply Private Reply
#10: GrandIsland To: Willie Green (#0)
GrandIsland posted on 2016-10-11 18:45:24 Reply Private Reply
#11: misterwhite To: nolu chan (#9)
Scalia's (and Trump's) point was that there are two standards and there shouldn't be. If the people want public figures to be treated differently, then the people should vote on it, not have it shoved down their throats by the court.
The current system isn't working, as evidenced by the dearth of libel cases settled in favor of the plaintiff. Plus, I think it would bring more accountibility to the press.
misterwhite posted on 2016-10-11 19:10:44 Reply Private Reply
#12: goldilucky To: nolu chan (#6)
goldilucky posted on 2016-10-13 00:39:50 Reply Private Reply