Why I Endorse Gary Johnson (this week)
I don’t know how to write this post without unintentionally disrespecting the real victims of abuse in any form. I apologize in advance if it comes off that way. But it’s part of the national conversation now, and unavoidable. The best I can do is focus on how voters perceive the situation. I don’t have an opinion about who did what to whom because I wasn’t in the room any of those times. That said…
We fine citizens of the United States find ourselves playing some sort of sex abuse poker in which we have to assign value to various alleged sex crimes to see which alleged rapist/groper/enabler combination we want to inhabit the White House and represent our national brand. Let’s call that situation “not ideal.”
My view is that if either Clinton or Trump can be judged by the weight of the allegations against them, both are 100% unfit for the office. I think Trump supporters think it’s worth the hit to our national brand just to get some specific improvements in the country.
Clinton supporters have been telling me for a few days that any visible support for Trump makes you a supporter of sex abuse. From a persuasion standpoint, that actually makes sense. If people see it that way, that’s the reality you have to deal with. I choose to not be part of that reality so I moved my endorsement to Gary Johnson.
I encourage all Clinton supporters to do the same, and for the same reason. I don’t know if any of the allegations against the Clinton’s are true, but since we are judging each other on associations, you don’t want to be seen as supporting sex abuse by putting an alleged duo of abusers (the perp and the clean-up crew) into office. I think you will agree that it doesn’t matter if any of the allegations are true, because the stink from a mountain of allegations – many that seem credible to observers – is bad for the national brand too. To even consider putting the Clinton’s back in the White House is an insult to women and every survivor of abuse.
To be fair, Gary Johnson is a pot head who didn’t know what Allepo was. I call that relatable. A President Johnson administration might bring with it some operational risks, and policy risks, but at least he won’t slime you by association and turn you into some sort of cheerleader for sex abuse in the way you would if you voted for the Clintons or Trump.
If you take allegations of sex abuse seriously – and you should – vote Johnson. To vote for Clinton or Trump is to be seen by others as an enabler for sexual abuse. I don’t think that’s what anyone had in mind by breaking the glass ceiling. Don’t let it happen to you.
—
You might enjoy my book because you’re not sure if I’m really endorsing Gary Johnson or just saying so to protect my brand.
Poster Comment:
This guy must have written at least 100 articles about how wonderful The Donald is.
Then, he realized he was FOS.
#1: ConservingFreedom To: hondo68 (#0)
Doesn't look that way to me: blog.dilbert.com/tagged/Trump
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-10-09 17:39:17 Reply Private Reply
#2: Justified To: hondo68 (#0)
In the end he will get Clinton. He will kick himself until the day he dies wishing he would have voted for Trump! ;)
Thats funny a story about Trump acting like a 20 year old towards women makes him change his vote but he is okay with allow a serial rapist back into the White Hut? People are too easily moved by stupid shit!
Everyone in politics including Gay Johnson has said the same thing in private.
Justified posted on 2016-10-09 17:42:21 Reply Private Reply
#3: Justified To: ConservingFreedom (#1)
Thanks that makes more sense to me. I still can not go open border. Its pure suicide.
Justified posted on 2016-10-09 17:47:26 Reply Private Reply
#4: ConservingFreedom To: Justified (#3)
Agree 100%. The only time I voted Libertarian is when they dropped their looniest planks to get Bob Barr on the ticket.
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-10-09 17:59:03 Reply Private Reply
#5: Hondo68 To: Justified, ConservingFreedom (#3)
Above is a list of some of the Trump stuff written by Scott Adams. This stretches back to over a year ago. Google, Trump Scott Adams, and you'll find more.
He has written a lot of pro-Trump stuff.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-10-09 18:04:34 Reply Private Reply
#6: ConservingFreedom To: hondo68 (#5)
Posted September 18th, 2016 @ 4:23pm in #Trump #Clinton
For over a year now I have been blogging about Trump’s talent for persuasion, and that gives people the impression that I prefer him as my president. That is not the case. [...]
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-10-09 18:10:32 Reply Private Reply
#7: Hondo68 To: ConservingFreedom (#6)
Yeah, right.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-10-09 18:20:21 Reply Private Reply
#8: misterwhite To: hondo68 (#0)
misterwhite posted on 2016-10-09 18:52:28 Reply Private Reply
#9: Hondo68 To: misterwhite (#8)
Hondo68 posted on 2016-10-09 19:32:24 Reply Private Reply
#10: rlk To: hondo68 (#0)
You are easily persuaded by the wrong people in the wrong direction.
rlk posted on 2016-10-09 19:43:19 Reply Private Reply
#11: misterwhite To: hondo68 (#9)
misterwhite posted on 2016-10-10 09:15:28 Reply Private Reply
#12: calcon To: hondo68 (#0)
calcon posted on 2016-10-10 13:19:31 Reply Private Reply
#13: Hondo68 To: calcon, *Politics and Politicians* (#12)
1% could be a BFD if it throws a pile of electoral votes. Many States are winner take all.
It really only takes ONE vote to change the election result.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-10-10 13:30:07 Reply Private Reply
#14: calcon To: hondo68 (#13)
calcon posted on 2016-10-10 14:47:48 Reply Private Reply