If conservatives who care about border security and true immigration reform are looking for a reason to vote for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, they just found it
Donald Trump may have just won the White House.
In a powerful, effective, and brilliant speech on the issue of illegal immigration delivered last night in Arizona, Trump laid out a view of true immigration reform that will secure our borders, protect our national security, protect American families in their own neighborhoods and communities, and above all, protect Americas cultural values.
Trumps plan is gloriously simple: lets enforce the immigration laws we already have. This involves rapid deportation of anyone who is found to be in this country illegally, whether that person is apprehended by federal authorities or local authorities. Deporting criminal illegal aliens will be given the highest possible priority under Trumps plan, to end the utterly foolish and dangerous policy of releasing aliens who are criminals twice over: once after they have been apprehended illegally trespassing on sovereign American soil, and a second time after they have committed an act of violence against someone who has the right to be here.
Trump has pledged, starting on day one, to build an impenetrable physical wall along our southern border. European countries such as Hungary have proven that border fences properly patrolled work. Even Norway is in the process of building a wall to secure its northeastern border with Russia against illegal incursions. Fences work, and Trump is determined to prove it. To paraphrase Kevin Costner, if we build it, they illegal aliens wont come.
Although Trump did not address this mechanism specifically in his speech, there is a simple way to fund the building of this wall: taxing remittances, which represent money shipped to Mexico by Mexicans working in the United States. Remittances are the second largest component of the Mexican economy, after oil. A four-percent tax on the $25 billion a year thats sent south of the border would raise $10 billion over the next ten years, more than enough to build the wall. Mexico has all the incentive one could ask for to keep this spigot running wide open. We can even offer to lift the tax once the wall is built.
Trump pointed out that, according to The Boston Globe, under Hillary Clintons watch 13,000 criminal illegals were allowed to stay in the United States because their country of origin refused to take them back. Trumps solution is brilliantly simple and devastatingly effective: no more visas for you. If you wont take your criminals back, nobody from your country will be allowed to so much as set his foot down in America. That will fix that problem on day one.
To fix the problem of illegals working in America and taking American jobs, Trump poses ramped up enforcement of E-Verify. If illegals cannot find jobs in America because their legal status cannot be verified, they will self-repatriate. They wont have to be deported since theyll take care of that themselves.
(There are, by the way, no jobs Americans wont do. Ive worked most of the jobs the so-called experts tell us are beneath the dignity of the American worker. I worked in the fields doing stoop labor, I worked in a meatpacking plant, I worked as a car wash attendant, I worked as a janitor, and I slung hash to work my way through college.)
Trump also proposes shutting off immigration from any country including Syria in which it is impossible to properly vet prospective immigrants. He also proposes a perfectly constitutional ideological test to determine if a wanna-be immigrant is bringing values that will enable him to assimilate seamlessly into American culture or whether he wants to bring fundamentally un-American ideals into our society.
In addition, Trump pledges to keep immigration levels, measured by population share, within historical norms. This will ensure stability and consistency, and is similar to immigration policies adopted 100 years ago to ensure population balance and assimilation.
Under Trumps plan, no one will ever be able to obtain legal residency or citizenship by entering this country illegally. They will have to leave, return home, and go through proper channels. The days of unconstitutional executive amnesty will be over.
Trump is exactly right. If his recipe is followed,
[P]eace and law and justice and prosperity will prevail. Crime will go down, border crossings will plummet, gangs will disappear, and welfare use will decrease. We will have a peace dividend to spend on rebuilding America, beginning with our inner cities.
Trump is also correct when he says, But to fix our immigration system, we must change our leadership in Washington. There is no other way. And hes also correct that this election may be our last chance to make the change thats required. We are getting close to the point where it will be too late if something dramatic isnt done.
Bottom line: if conservatives who care about border security and true immigration reform are looking for a reason to vote for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, they just found it.
Poster Comment:
Trump will bring back some honor and respect to the office of president. After the disgusting Clinton years, then Bush II it's long past time to show the world that America is truly a First Class Nation. At this time I, along with many others, find this evil administration and those before it with the exception of the Reagan years, beyond contempt. And, it's the damned Democrat party and NEVER the Democratic party.....there's nothing democratic about this collection of perverts and baby killers.
#1: Hondo68 To: HomerBohn, make America Atzlan again, *Border Invasion* (#0)
Reagan was the most successful Reconquista Republican, who signed amnesty into law.
He also presided over the US change from a productive business economy, to one based on the government providing most of the jobs. Just after the end of Reagan's second term, manufacturing had decreased and government had grown to such an extent that, there were more gov workers than manufacturing ones. It's been that way ever since. More government worker leaches, than productive manufacturing employees.
Government Workers Now Outnumber Manufacturing Workers by 9,932,000
The BLS has published seasonally-adjusted month-by-month employment data for both government and manufacturing going back to 1939. For half a centuryfrom January 1939 through July 1989manufacturing employment always exceeded government employment in the United States, according to these numbers.
Then, in August 1989, the seasonally-adjusted employment numbers for government exceeded the employment numbers for manufacturing for the first time. That month, manufacturing employed 17,964,000 and government employed 17,989,000.
Hondo68 posted on 2016-09-03 12:05:21 Reply Private Reply
#2: packrat1145 To: HomerBohn (#0)
Overall, a good article. But, the author should have stuck with what Trump DID address; because, once he builds the wall and sends the illegals back home,there will be no $25 billion a year to tax. Or, am I missing something...
packrat1145 posted on 2016-09-03 12:19:54 Reply Private Reply
#3: rlk To: HomerBohn (#0)
I sure hope so!
rlk posted on 2016-09-03 13:35:59 Reply Private Reply
#4: buckeroo To: HomerBohn (#0)
What, exactly, did Reagan do to warrant an exclusion to your list? He promoted illegal immigration along with all others after him and ensured that social security funds could be raided by the US government.
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-03 13:52:12 Reply Private Reply
#5: ConservingFreedom To: HomerBohn (#0)
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-03 19:20:03 Reply Private Reply
#6: misterwhite To: ConservingFreedom (#5)
He doesn't say he won't.
If illegals can't get a job and if they can't get government services, how many will hang around?
misterwhite posted on 2016-09-03 20:14:41 Reply Private Reply
#7: ConservingFreedom To: misterwhite (#6)
He used to say he would.
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-03 20:19:12 Reply Private Reply
#8: misterwhite To: ConservingFreedom (#7)
In the primary. And he caught shit for that, didn't he? Right away the MSM painted his entire immigration plan as "tearing apart families in the middle of the night -- hard-working families that did nothing more than desire the American dream".
You know the score -- run hard right in the primary, move to the center in the general. Oh, you never heard this? Huh. Here I thought you were somewhat familiar with politics.
misterwhite posted on 2016-09-04 09:37:24 Reply Private Reply
#9: HomerBohn To: buckeroo (#4)
HomerBohn posted on 2016-09-04 14:05:46 Reply Private Reply
#10: buckeroo To: HomerBohn (#9)
All Reagan performed was stoke fear; further fear from an aggressor, world class nation ... the USA.
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-04 14:11:59 Reply Private Reply
#11: ConservingFreedom To: misterwhite (#8)
Ah, so Trump is just another politician after all, suckering the conservative base the way they've so often been suckered. Got it.
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-04 15:23:28 Reply Private Reply
#12: ConservingFreedom To: buckeroo (#10)
They'd been crumbling for 70 years. You want to call it a coincidence that those 70 years came to an end on Reagan's watch, more fool you.
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-04 15:34:13 Reply Private Reply
#13: misterwhite To: ConservingFreedom (#11)
Nah, but he plays one. Pretty well, I'd say.
misterwhite posted on 2016-09-04 17:55:48 Reply Private Reply
#14: HomerBohn To: buckeroo (#10)
What a handle for a Hillary fan.
HomerBohn posted on 2016-09-04 18:18:56 Reply Private Reply
#15: HomerBohn To: ConservingFreedom (#11)
HomerBohn posted on 2016-09-04 18:20:27 Reply Private Reply
#16: ConservingFreedom To: misterwhite (#13)
When it comes to suckering the base, very well.
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-04 18:36:30 Reply Private Reply
#17: ConservingFreedom To: HomerBohn (#15)
Overrepresented where?
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-04 18:43:15 Reply Private Reply
#18: HomerBohn To: ConservingFreedom (#17)
HomerBohn posted on 2016-09-05 07:55:43 Reply Private Reply
#19: buckeroo To: ConservingFreedom (#12)
No. The USSR was already crumbling. Ronnie just stumbled along at the right tyme from a historical perspective.
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-05 08:12:05 Reply Private Reply
#20: ConservingFreedom To: buckeroo (#19)
That is calling it a coincidence. Cling to your illusions.
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-05 08:46:00 Reply Private Reply
#21: ConservingFreedom To: HomerBohn (#15)
The only "sexually confused" posters here are the ones who are constantly accusing others of homosexual inclinations or acts - projecting their own desires. I don't think the few leftists contribute anything of value, but if A K A Stone wants to allow them, it's his forum.
Why do you ask?
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-05 08:49:58 Reply Private Reply
#22: A Pole To: hondo68 (#1)
Reagan was serving Job Creators who wanted plenty of cheap labor and cannon fodder.
A Pole posted on 2016-09-05 09:02:27 Reply Private Reply
#23: buckeroo To: ConservingFreedom (#20)
The truth is: Ronnie didn't do anything other than arm the so-called "Freedom Fighters" otherwise known as the Mujahideen via the US_CIA. Once the USSR left Afghanistan, Ronnie left Afghanistan as his proxie war with USSR was considered a VICTORY in the USA and left his "Freedom Fighters" completely abandoned. Angered by US policies, the Mujahideen later morphed into the Taliban and other radical Muslim groups, such as Al-Qaeda and spawning ISIS.
Yeah, some illusion. The ME has turned into a nightmare because folks like YOU do not understand the responsibility the USA has played in creating international turbulence through silly meddling policies.
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-05 09:05:47 Reply Private Reply
#24: A Pole To: HomerBohn (#9)
Economy collapsed there AFTER imposing free market reforms and predatory privatisation during Yeltsin misrule.
A Pole posted on 2016-09-05 09:11:36 Reply Private Reply
#25: buckeroo To: HomerBohn (#14)
Left side of what? Even your Rush Limbaugh is left of me.
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-05 09:16:08 Reply Private Reply
#26: A Pole To: ConservingFreedom (#12)
Berlin Wall was removed during the early Clinton as a result of Gorbachev pressure on East German government.
And Soviet Union fell apart because of Yeltsin later
A Pole posted on 2016-09-05 09:19:35 Reply Private Reply
#27: ConservingFreedom To: buckeroo (#23)
Which has squat to do with what/who caused the USSR to fall. But don't let me stop you from changing the subject.
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-05 09:25:47 Reply Private Reply
#28: buckeroo To: ConservingFreedom (#27)
Ronnie's effort was minor in regards to toppling the USSR. His effort was major creating a ME crisis that persists to this day.
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-05 09:31:32 Reply Private Reply
#29: ConservingFreedom To: A Pole (#26)
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-05 09:32:20 Reply Private Reply
#30: ConservingFreedom To: buckeroo (#28)
* NSDD-32 declared that the United States would seek to "neutralize" Soviet control over Eastern and Central Europe and authorized the use of covert action and other means to support anti-Soviet groups in the region, especially in Poland.
* NSDD-66 stated that it would be U.S. policy to disrupt the Soviet economy by attacking a "strategic triad" of critical resources--financial credits, high technology, and natural gas. The directive was tantamount to a "secret declaration of economic war on the Soviet Union."
* NSDD-75 stated that the U.S. would no longer coexist with the Soviet system but would seek to change it fundamentally. America intended to roll back Soviet influence at every opportunity.
A subset of the Reagan strategy was U.S. support of pro-freedom forces in Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Angola, and Cambodia. A key decision was to supply Stinger ground-to-air missiles to the mujahideen in Afghanistan, who used them to shoot down the Soviet helicopters that had kept them on the defensive for years.
[...] The same month, the President announced that development and deployment of a comprehensive anti-ballistic missile system would be his top defense priority. The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) was called "Star Wars" by liberal detractors, but Soviet leader Yuri Andropov took SDI very seriously, calling it a "strike weapon" and a preparation for a U.S. nuclear attack.
Moscow's intense opposition to SDI showed that Soviet scientists regarded the initiative not as a pipe dream but as a technological feat they could not match. A decade later, the general who headed the department of strategic analysis in the Soviet Ministry of Defense revealed what he had told the Politburo in 1983: "Not only could we not defeat SDI, SDI defeated all our possible countermeasures."
- www.heritage.org/research...d-reagan-and-the-fall-of- communism
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-05 09:40:34 Reply Private Reply
#31: buckeroo To: ConservingFreedom (#30)
Another failed Reagan program. Keep up the BS, pal ... because you are full of it.
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-05 09:43:36 Reply Private Reply
#32: buckeroo To: ConservingFreedom (#30)
This was the CIA "CONTRA" BS instilled by Ronnie. Another failed program.
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-05 09:47:39 Reply Private Reply
#33: buckeroo To: ConservingFreedom (#30)
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-05 09:49:26 Reply Private Reply
#34: buckeroo To: ConservingFreedom (#30)
Another failed Ronnie program which lead to USA intervention in Vietnam because of the so-called "domino effect." Total BS to this day.
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-05 09:53:18 Reply Private Reply
#35: ConservingFreedom To: buckeroo (#32)
Another red herring - freedom fighters didn't need to oust Communist governments, nor did SDI need to become fully operational, to destabilize the Soviet empire.
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-05 09:56:56 Reply Private Reply
#36: buckeroo To: ConservingFreedom (#35)
It is total BS that you subscribe to that Reagan was some sort of GREAT President. He was lead by the nose into meaningless intervention around the globe.
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-05 10:03:59 Reply Private Reply
#37: ConservingFreedom To: buckeroo (#36)
Which has squat to do with what/who caused the USSR to fall. But don't let me stop you from changing the subject.
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-05 10:53:00 Reply Private Reply
#38: buckeroo To: ConservingFreedom (#37)
buckeroo posted on 2016-09-05 10:55:52 Reply Private Reply
#39: ConservingFreedom To: buckeroo (#38)
ConservingFreedom posted on 2016-09-05 10:59:19 Reply Private Reply
#40: HomerBohn To: ConservingFreedom (#21)
Just wanted your opinion.
Got it.
HomerBohn posted on 2016-09-05 17:57:47 Reply Private Reply