Even before the FBI identified new cyber attacks on two separate state election boards, the Department of Homeland Security began considering declaring the election a "critical infrastructure," giving it the same control over security it has over Wall Street and and the electric power grid.
The latest admissions of attacks could speed up that effort possibly including the upcoming presidential election, according to officials.
"We should carefully consider whether our election system, our election process, is critical infrastructure like the financial sector, like the power grid," Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said.
"There's a vital national interest in our election process, so I do think we need to consider whether it should be considered by my department and others critical infrastructure," he said at media conference earlier this month hosted by the Christian Science Monitor.
Stay abreast of the latest developments from nation's capital and beyond with curated News Alerts from the Washington Examiner news desk and delivered to your inbox.
DHS has a vital security role in 16 areas of critical infrastructure and they provide a model for what the department and Johnson could have in mind for the election.
DHS describes it this way on their website: "There are 16 critical infrastructure sectors whose assets, systems, and networks, whether physical or virtual, are considered so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination thereof."
A White House policy directive adds, "The federal government also has a responsibility to strengthen the security and resilience of its own critical infrastructure, for the continuity of national essential functions, and to organize itself to partner effectively with and add value to the security and resilience efforts of critical infrastructure owners and operators."
At the time, Johnson did not mention specific security issues, but the FBI has since cited one hack and another attempt.
Johnson also said that the big issue at hand is that there isn't a central election system since the states run elections. "There's no one federal election system. There are some 9,000 jurisdictions involved in the election process," Johnson said.
"There's a national election for president, there are some 9,000 jurisdictions that participate, contribute to collecting votes, tallying votes and reporting votes," he said.
Gee, isn't this nice. I guess they want to do what is best for all US citizens.
#1: rlk To: Stoner (#0)
Question: Who is going to watch homeland security, a corrupt organization serving politicians, that arised from nowhere a few years ago and now outranks the FBI?
rlk posted on 2016-08-31 12:31:07 Reply Private Reply
#2: Stoner To: rlk (#1)
Stoner posted on 2016-08-31 13:16:01 Reply Private Reply
#3: nolu chan To: rlk, Stoner (#1)
It arose as the Office of Homeland Security directly from G.W. Bush/Cheney in response to, and less than 30 days after 9/11 on 8 Oct 2001. It became a full Department on November 25, 2002.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Homeland_Security
nolu chan posted on 2016-08-31 16:11:47 Reply Private Reply
#4: rlk To: nolu chan (#3)
You left out the part about exgovernor Napolitano taking it over for the Obama administration.
rlk posted on 2016-09-01 11:30:37 Reply Private Reply
#5: nolu chan To: rlk (#4)
Napolitano was not a founder of Homeland Security. It was established as an Office in late 2001 and the Department (DHS) in late 2002. She became Secretary in 2009.
As for DHS taking charge of elections, that appears directly contrary to the Constitution at Article II, Section 2:
It is strictly a State function. No popular vote need be permitted, and in the early days, no popular vote occurred. Article II does not contain any "critical infrastructure" exception. Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but the Constitution is not superseded by an Obama policy directive. Perhaps the DHS should be declared a clear and present danger and abolished.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/presidential-policy-directive-critical-infrastructure-security-and-resil
nolu chan posted on 2016-09-03 19:13:24 Reply Private Reply