Dumbass Muzzie Father Who Claimed Trump Should Read the Constitution Should Read it Himself

Source: None
Published: Jul 29, 2016
Author: constituion
Post Date: 2016-07-29 07:54:33 by no gnu taxes
Views: 3836

This dumbass who is being lauded as something special by the fawning sycophantic Hillary Media claimed that Trump wanting restrictions on immigrants is a violation of the Equal protection Clause. The clause would not apply to anyone who isn't in the country yet.

Go read it yourself, you Islamic scumbag.

Post Comment   Private Reply

#1: Stoner    To: no gnu taxes (#0)

" Dumbass Muzzie Father Who Claimed Trump Should Read the Constitution Should Read it Himself "

Only demoncraps are stupid enough to believe the shit that muzzie & shitlerly supporters are spewing.

Stoner posted on 2016-07-29 08:13:36   Reply   Private Reply


#2: Vicomte13    To: Stoner (#1)

Only demoncraps are stupid enough to believe the shit that muzzie & shitlerly supporters are spewing.

They're not at all stupid. They are stating what they want, and restating it, and restating it, again and again and again, until it becomes the majority opinion and is enacted into law.

They understand that law is nothing more than the opinion of the legislator, so they work on the level of opinion. And they almost always win.

So, it's not stupid - it's a tactic, a highly successful one.

Vicomte13 posted on 2016-07-29 08:43:31   Reply   Private Reply


#3: no gnu taxes    To: Vicomte13 (#2)

They are stating what they want, and restating it, and restating it, again and again and again

Maybe, but they are spewing nothing but platitudes, half-truths and outright lies.

Of course, the media swoons about how profound all it is.

MSNBC and CNN still think it is the middle of the DNC. They have had nothing but Hillary campaign operatives and hack supporters on all morning. Hell, MSNBC hasn't even left the DNC hall yet. They are still there with Hillary cheerleaders sitting behind them.

no gnu taxes posted on 2016-07-29 09:01:51   Reply   Private Reply


#4: Vicomte13    To: no gnu taxes (#3)

Yep, that's politics.

Vicomte13 posted on 2016-07-29 10:37:55   Reply   Private Reply


#5: Stoner    To: Vicomte13 (#2)

" They're not at all stupid. "

Oh realllllllly ?

I know a guy that he & his family have been demoncraps since the party started. Their philosophy " demoncrats are for the working man ". They are also staunch union. This guy works in a steel mill. As far as he is concerned, ANYTHING the demoncrap party does is good. I asked what he would think if obamarama ding dong, or Shitlery were to shut down his steel mill, he said it would be for the best if they did it. His theory is demoncraps = good, any body else = bad. This guy is just one of many.

That would be like Jews being loyal to the Nazi's that marched them into gas chambers.

Now, don't tell me they are not stupid! THEY ARE!!

Stoner posted on 2016-07-29 12:37:39   Reply   Private Reply


#6: no gnu taxes    To: Stoner (#5)

That would be like Jews being loyal to the Nazi's that marched them into gas chambers.

The Jews are mostly loyal to the Democrats even though the Democrats believe Israel doesn't have the right to exist.

no gnu taxes posted on 2016-07-29 13:01:55   Reply   Private Reply


#7: Stoner    To: no gnu taxes (#6)

" The Jews are mostly loyal to the Democrats even though the Democrats believe Israel doesn't have the right to exist. "

True enough. Those Jews are stupid supreme.

I was talking about a different bunch of Jews.

Regardless, I still contend that most party loyal demoncraps are supremely stupid!

Stoner posted on 2016-07-29 13:34:11   Reply   Private Reply


#8: nolu chan    To: no gnu taxes (#0)

http://law.justia.com/codes/us/2013/title-8/chapter-12/subchapter-ii/part-ii/section-1182/

2013 US Code
Title 8 - Aliens and Nationality
Chapter 12 - IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY (§§ 1101 - 1537)
Subchapter II - IMMIGRATION (§§ 1151 - 1381)
Part II - Admission Qualifications for Aliens; Travel Control of Citizens and Aliens (§§ 1181 - 1189)
Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Inadmissible aliens - 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (2013)

8 U.S.C. § 1182, PDF DOWNLOAD (GPO, entire section) [1182(f) at text p. 134, pdf p. 13]

8 U.S.C. § 1182(f) (2013)

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.

http://www.bu.edu/lawlibrary/PDFs/research/portals/66stat163.pdf

Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952, Section 212(e), 66 Stat. 163, 188 (1952), P.L. 414

Suspension of entry by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/149/698/

Fong Yue Ting v United States, 149 US 698 (1893)

Syllabus

The right to exclude or to expel aliens, or any class of aliens, absolutely or upon certain conditions, in war or in peace, is an inherent and inalienable right of every sovereign nation.

In the United States, the power to exclude or to expel aliens is vested in the political departments of the National Government, and is to be regulated by treaty or by act of Congress, and to be executed by the executive authority according to the regulations so established, except so far as the Judicial Department is authorized by treaty or by statute, or is required by the Constitution, to intervene.

The power of Congress to expel, like the power to exclude, aliens, or any specified class of aliens, from the country, may be exercised entirely through executive officers; or Congress may call in the aid of the Judiciary to ascertain any contested facts on which an alien's right to remain in the country has been made by Congress to depend.

Congress has the right to provide a system of registration and identification of any class of aliens within the country, and to take all proper means to carry out that system.

The provisions of an act of Congress, passed in the exercise of its constitutional authority, must, if clear and explicit, be upheld by the courts, even in contravention of stipulations in an earlier treaty.

Section 6 of the act of May 5, 1892, c. 60, requiring all Chinese laborers

149 U. S. 699

within the United States at the time of its passage, "and who are entitled to remain in the United States," to apply within a year to a collector of internal revenue for a certificate of residence, and providing that anyone who does not do so, or is afterwards found in the United States without such a certificate, "shall be deemed and adjudged to be unlawfully in the United States," and may be arrested by any officer of the customs, or collector of internal revenue, or marshal, or deputy of either, and taken before a United States judge, who shall order him to be deported from the United States to his own country unless he shall clearly establish to the satisfaction of the judge that, by reason of accident, sickness, or other unavoidable cause, he was unable to procure his certificate, and "by at least one credible white witness" that he was a resident of the United States at the time of the passage of the act, is constitutional and valid.

OPINION of the Court at 705:

MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the facts, delivered the opinion of the Court.

The general principles of public law which lie at the foundation of these cases are clearly established by previous judgments

149 U. S. 705

of this Court, and by the authorities therein referred to.

In the recent case of Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U. S. 651, 142 U. S. 659, the Court, in sustaining the action of the Executive Department, putting in force an act of Congress for the exclusion of aliens, said:

"It is an accepted maxim of international law that every sovereign nation has the power, as inherent in sovereignty, and essential to self-preservation, to forbid the entrance of foreigners within its dominions, or to admit them only in such cases and upon such conditions as it may see fit to prescribe. In the United States, this power is vested in the National Government, to which the Constitution has committed the entire control of international relations, in peace as well as in war. It belongs to the political department of the Government, and may be exercised either through treaties made by the President and Senate or through statutes enacted by Congress."

The same views were more fully expounded in the earlier case of Chae Chan Ping v. United States, 130 U. S. 581, in which the validity of a former act of Congress, excluding Chinese laborers from the United States, under the circumstances therein stated, was affirmed.

In the elaborate opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Field in behalf of the Court, it was said:

"Those laborers are not citizens of the United States; they are aliens. That the Government of the United States, through the action of the Legislative Department, can exclude aliens from its territory, is a proposition which we do not think open to controversy. Jurisdiction over its own territory to that extent is an incident of every independent nation. It is a part of its independence. If it could not exclude aliens, it would be, to that extent, subject to the control of another power. . . . The United States, in their relation to foreign countries and their subjects or citizens, are one nation, invested with powers which belong to independent nations, the exercise of which can be invoked for the maintenance of its absolute independence and security throughout its entire territory."

130 U.S. 603, 130 U. S. 604.

It was also said, repeating the language of Mr. Justice

149 U. S. 706

Bradley in Knox v. Lee, 12 Wall. 457, 79 U. S. 555:

"The United States is not only a Government, but it is a National Government, and the only Government in this country that has the character of nationality. It is invested with power over all the foreign relations of the country, war, peace, and negotiations and intercourse with other nations; all of which are forbidden to the state governments."

130 U. S. 605. And it was added:

"For local interests, the several States of the Union exist; but for international purposes, embracing our relations with foreign nations, we are but one people, one nation, one power."

130 U. S. 606.

The Court then went on to say:

"To preserve its independence, and give security against foreign aggression and encroachment, is the highest duty of every nation; and to attain these ends nearly all other considerations are to be subordinated. It matters not in what form such aggression and encroachment come, whether from the foreign nation acting in its national character, or from vast hordes of its people crowding in upon us. The Government, possessing the powers which are to be exercised for protection and security, is clothed with authority to determine the occasion on which the powers shall be called forth; and its determination, so far as the subjects affected are concerned, is necessarily conclusive upon all its departments and officers. If, therefore, the Government of the United States, through its Legislative Department, considers the presence of foreigners of a different race in this country, who will not assimilate with us, to be dangerous to its peace and security, their exclusion is not to be stayed because at the time there are no actual hostilities with the nation of which the foreigners are subjects. The existence of war would render the necessity of the proceeding only more obvious and pressing. The same necessity, in a less pressing degree, may arise when war does not exist, and the same authority which adjudges the necessity in one case must also determine it in the other. In both cases, its determination is conclusive upon the Judiciary. If the Government of the country of which the foreigners excluded are subjects is dissatisfied with this action, it can make complaint to the

149 U. S. 707

executive head of our Government, or resort to any other measure which, in its judgment, its interests or dignity may demand, and there lies its only remedy. The power of the Government to exclude foreigners from the country whenever, in its judgment, the public interests require such exclusion has been asserted in repeated instances, and never denied by the Executive or Legislative Departments."

130 U.S. 130 U. S. 606-607. This statement was supported by many citations from the diplomatic correspondence of successive Secretaries of State, collected in Whart. Int. Law Dig. § 206.

nolu chan posted on 2016-07-29 14:52:04   Reply   Private Reply


#9: no gnu taxes    To: Stoner (#7)

To be fair the Jews who believe Israel has a right to exist are the "fake Jews" to the Paultards and Democrats.

Those who dont think Israel has a right to exist are the "good Jews" or "real Jews" to the same groups.

no gnu taxes posted on 2016-07-29 16:05:07   Reply   Private Reply


#10: BorisY    To: no gnu taxes (#0)

... open
borders

our
... overlords

their
... hoax
chains *

Make
America
America
again

love
boris

* equal
protection
chasm

BorisY posted on 2016-07-29 16:41:15   Reply   Private Reply


#11: buckeroo    To: no gnu taxes (#9)

Which Jews are you talking about? There are piles of different Jewish cults; most if not all, are liberal.

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-29 17:23:43   Reply   Private Reply


#12: Stoner    To: no gnu taxes (#9)

Those who don't think Israel has a right to exist are the "good Jews" or "real Jews" to the same groups. "

" To be fair the Jews who believe Israel has a right to exist are the "fake Jews". Well, I do not consider them to be "fake Jews". I will take that bunch over the others - Those who dont think Israel has a right to exist are the "good Jews" or "real Jews" to the same groups.

Stoner posted on 2016-07-29 17:29:10   Reply   Private Reply


#13: rlk    To: Stoner (#5)

To: Vicomte13 (#2)

" They're not at all stupid. "

Oh realllllllly ? I know a guy that he & his family have been demoncraps since the party started. Their philosophy " demoncrats are for the working man ". They are also staunch union. This guy works in a steel mill. As far as he is concerned, ANYTHING the demoncrap party does is good. I asked what he would think if obamarama ding dong, or Shitlery were to shut down his steel mill, he said it would be for the best if they did it. His theory is demoncraps = good, any body else = bad. This guy is just one of many.

Fifty percent of people in this country have IQs below 100. As far as I'm concered that places them in a category of intellectual sentience somewhere below the common household dog. The Democrats, and politicians in general, have become exclusively oriented toward appealing to them.

rlk posted on 2016-07-29 19:28:17   Reply   Private Reply


#14: GrandIsland    To: Vicomte13 (#2)

They are stating what they want

I don't give a shit what non Americans want, exspecially a smelly diaperhead.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-29 20:07:59   Reply   Private Reply


#15: buckeroo    To: GrandIsland (#14)

Do you tell your doughnut shop owners the same thing to their faces?

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-29 20:32:41   Reply   Private Reply


#16: GrandIsland    To: buckeroo (#15)

Do I come across like a person who wouldn't call a diaperhead smelly... or a paronoid paultard a kook? You think I watched my mouth when I dealt with filthy weak welfare scumbags? I'm allowed my opinion, in or out of my uniform and I've never given two F'in shits if anyone is offended. Tax payer or not.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-29 20:52:20   Reply   Private Reply


#17: buckeroo    To: GrandIsland (#16)

You do seem like you are one of those kind of PIGs that get in one's faces. I wonder how many tymes you were punched in the face because of your brazen ignorance.

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-30 07:57:09   Reply   Private Reply


#18: GrandIsland    To: buckeroo (#17)

Many have taken a swipe at me... none have won. One swipe at me will get you at least one punch to your face and then a face plant into the hood of a patrol car. Camera or not. Your "punch thrown" gives me the legal authorization to cave your forehead in.

You'd only try it once. Asshole.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-30 09:08:28   Reply   Private Reply


#19: buckeroo    To: GrandIsland (#18)

If you initiated force by disrespectful and challenging remarcks to people you have no idea about other than some disingenuinous remarck, you deserve to be knocked out by a defensive punch.

You have been lucky so far, pal.

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-30 09:30:28   Reply   Private Reply


#20: Stoner    To: buckeroo, GrandIsland (#19)

" remarcks to people you have no idea about other than some disingenuinous remarck " ? ?

Just a suggestion, you might want to try using a spell checker.

It would improve at least the illusion / appearance of intellect. LOL

Stoner posted on 2016-07-30 11:03:10   Reply   Private Reply


#21: buckeroo    To: Stoner (#20)

Everyhing I perform with respect to my comments are designed to elicit or otherwise appeal to a post by some dimwit, even if they want to suggest using a spielenchecker.

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-30 11:19:32   Reply   Private Reply


#22: GrandIsland    To: buckeroo (#19)

you deserve to be knocked out by a defensive punch.

Like Clint Eastwood once said in the movie Unforgiven.... "Deserves got noting to do with it."

Like I said, you'd only punch me once. Once you did, you'd wish you shot me.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-30 11:54:30   Reply   Private Reply


#23: GrandIsland    To: Stoner (#20)

lol

GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-30 11:55:10   Reply   Private Reply


#24: buckeroo    To: GrandIsland (#22)

You are a total basketcase, pal. You deserve no respect even as a elementary school cross walk guard. And you try to convince the chit-chat forum that you are a cop! ROTFL.

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-30 11:57:14   Reply   Private Reply


#25: GrandIsland    To: buckeroo (#24)

I don't need to convince anyone of anything, numb nuts. The people I care about enough to "convince" knows where I've been, what I've done... and what I've achieved. They'd also be much smarter than you and refrain from saying half the shit you spew, to me.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-30 13:04:34   Reply   Private Reply


#26: buckeroo    To: GrandIsland (#25)

So why do you literally advertise your jobs, both past and present? There must be a reason why a government paid goon, such as yourself, would place their unsubstantiated resume on the Internet.

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-30 13:31:31   Reply   Private Reply


#27: GrandIsland    To: buckeroo (#26)

why do you literally advertise your jobs, both past and present?

Don't be an ignorant fuck, Buck. You have no clue what department I retired from of where I work now. Shut your Stinky Peter Puff polisher.

GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-30 14:18:15   Reply   Private Reply


#28: Deckard    To: buckeroo (#24)

You are a total basketcase, pal. You deserve no respect even as a elementary school cross walk guard.

Cops like GI are the reason so many hate the police.

Deckard posted on 2016-07-30 14:25:57   Reply   Private Reply


#29: buckeroo    To: GrandIsland, sneakypete (#27)

I see you can't get sneakypete out of your head. Why is that?

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-30 14:31:41   Reply   Private Reply


#30: buckeroo    To: Deckard (#28)

He is a wannabe cop. The clear signal is he is un-trained and not qualified to be a constable on patrol; he thinks he can operate under the "colour of law" as though his imaginary badge gives him authority.

buckeroo posted on 2016-07-30 14:41:20   Reply   Private Reply