I'm loving these police robots!!!!


| Source: | http://cdn.defenseone.com/defenseone/interstitial.html?v=2.1.1&rf=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defenseone.com%2Ftechnology%2F2016%2F07%2Fmilitary-robotics-makers-see-future-armed-police-robots%2F129769%2F |
| Published: | Jul 11, 2016 |
| Author: | Drudge |
| Post Date: | 2016-07-11 10:12:06 by Vinny |
| Views: | 8013 |
I'm loving these police robots!!!!


#1: Roscoe To: Vinny (#0)
Roscoe posted on 2016-07-11 10:30:07 Reply Private Reply
#2: Pinguinite To: Vinny (#0)
It's probably the first time in the US that a bomb was used by law enforcement to kill someone. If this will become a common way to kill suspects, then it's not a good legal precedent.
My concern should not be construed as defending the party that did these shootings and killed & wounded so many police. I of course don't condone that at all. Quite the opposite.
Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-11 11:06:57 Reply Private Reply
#3: Don To: Pinguinite (#2)
Don posted on 2016-07-11 13:58:34 Reply Private Reply
#4: Justified To: Pinguinite (#2)
Standard equipment on for the robot
Justified posted on 2016-07-11 14:28:06 Reply Private Reply
#5: Pinguinite To: Don (#3)
By that standard, we no longer operate by the rule of law, but rather, the rule of war. In which case, they stop being cops, and start being soldiers.
I'm not so concerned about the fate of the shooter. I am concerned about the fate of everyone else. Precedents always spread & expand into areas we wouldn't have expected. I.e. who would have thought that equal rights for transgenders would have resulted in the president of the United States telling schools they have to let everyone use the bathroom of their choice?
Using deadly bombs to end any and every standoff with police is not the way to go. In the Dallas case, why not tear gas? Snipers could have been stationed around as needed. Give a warning to disarm, dispense tear gas, and if he comes out with his hands up, then fine, shoot him. I can certainly understand the emotional sentiments of the police wanting to kill the guy, but that doesn't make it appropriate police work if they have other options (which, granted, they say they didn't really have).
Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-11 14:47:09 Reply Private Reply
#6: Don To: Pinguinite (#5)
Don posted on 2016-07-11 15:26:51 Reply Private Reply
#7: Pinguinite To: Don (#6)
Both the left and the right have the errors of their ways.
Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-11 17:18:53 Reply Private Reply
#8: Don To: Pinguinite (#7)
Don posted on 2016-07-11 20:54:40 Reply Private Reply
#9: GrandIsland To: Pinguinite (#2)
It was a pretty good legal precedent for the Dallas cops that didn't get dead a few nights ago.
GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-11 21:37:19 Reply Private Reply
#10: Pinguinite To: Don (#8)
Are you talking about Bush 2 in Iraq?
Pinguinite posted on 2016-07-11 22:58:23 Reply Private Reply
#11: Deckard To: Vinny (#0)
Deckard posted on 2016-07-12 05:41:15 Reply Private Reply
#12: Don To: Pinguinite (#10)
Don posted on 2016-07-12 19:10:54 Reply Private Reply
#13: Don To: GrandIsland (#9)
Don posted on 2016-07-12 19:13:48 Reply Private Reply
#14: Vinny To: Deckard (#11)
LOVE IT!!!!
I WANT POLICE ROBOTS TO KEEP SCUM LIKE YOU IN LINE.
Vinny posted on 2016-07-12 19:24:24 Reply Private Reply
#15: GrandIsland To: Don (#13)
GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-12 19:57:28 Reply Private Reply
#16: GrandIsland To: Vinny (#14)
lol
I like the way you think.
GrandIsland posted on 2016-07-12 20:21:20 Reply Private Reply
#17: Titorite2 To: Vinny (#0)
Fuck robocops.
Titorite2 posted on 2016-07-12 23:52:04 Reply Private Reply
#18: nolu chan To: Titorite2, Vinny (#17)
If you are close enough to cover it in silly string, it is close enough to blow you up.
nolu chan posted on 2016-07-13 01:34:52 Reply Private Reply
#19: Vinny To: Titorite2 (#17)
Yes!...I can see the future....murdering assassins will be sure to tote paint & silly string to crime scenes in order to defeat police robots loaded up with C-4...
How long have you been a Kook?
Vinny posted on 2016-07-13 09:02:39 Reply Private Reply
#20: Titorite2 To: Vinny (#19)
Titorite2 posted on 2016-07-16 13:27:48 Reply Private Reply
#21: Vinny To: Titorite2 (#20)
Can't wait!
Vinny posted on 2016-07-16 13:48:56 Reply Private Reply